logo
Joanna Cherry could be called in Moira Salmond legal case

Joanna Cherry could be called in Moira Salmond legal case

The former First Minister raised a compensation claim of £3million against SNP ministers almost two years ago over a flawed sexual misconduct investigation by the Scottish Government.
A Holyrood committee investigated the mishandling of the complaints and also found that there were serious shortcomings.
The legal case concerns possible "misfeasance" - a civil law term meaning the wrongful exercise of lawful authority - by officials while Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister and was paused following Mr Salmond's sudden death in October last year.
READ MORE:
On Sunday, it emerged that Mrs Salmond's resolve to proceed with the case was strengthened by attacks on her late husband in Ms Sturgeon's memoirs, Frankly, published last week.
Writing on X, Ms Cherry, who was a close ally of Mr Salmond and is a prominent critic of Ms Sturgeon, welcomed the report that the case is to resume.
"It's important that this action continues," wrote the former SNP MP on X.
"Misfeasance in public office is a very serious matter. The Scottish Parliament inquiry was hamstrung and partisan politicians had the wool pulled over their eyes. A court of law will be very different."
Ms Cherry revealed last week that she is writing a book about her time in frontline politics when Ms Sturgeon was First Minister. The manuscript is due to be completed this autumn with the book due to be published next year.
Referring to Ms Sturgeon's government's policies on gender self-declaration, which she opposed, she wrote: "I have a lot more to say about this in the book I'm currently writing although my take is slightly different."
She later continued: "In her political afterlife as in her political life Nicola evades scrutiny. For those hoping to understand better what was really going on behind the scenes during her leadership, this memoir will disappoint. It will be left to others to spill the beans."
A family friend told the Sunday Mail that Mrs Salmond was "upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book" with "ridiculous and inaccurate" allegations.
"It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure the full truth comes out and Alex's name is cleared," they told the paper.
Now executor of Mr Salmond's estate, his widow has assembled a legal team including a KC and two junior counsel and has raised money to fund the case.
The friend added: "Her case against the government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that.
"Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him."
Ms Sturgeon's book includes strongly disputed claims Mr Salmond opposed gay marriage, failed to read the 650-page independence white paper and that he or an aide acting on his behalf may have been responsible for the leak to the Daily Record about the Scottish Government investigation into complaints against him.
She also denied there had been any "conspiracy" to ruin Mr Salmond's reputation - a claim the former Alba Party leader maintained until his death at the age of 69.
Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor "would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him". She also claimed he "impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy - government, police, Crown Office", adding: "He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all."
Ms Sturgeon and Mr Salmond fell out dramatically in 2018 after it emerged her government had investigated misconduct complaints made against him by two female civil servants. Mr Salmond had the probe struck down at the Court of Session as unfair, unlawful and "tainted by apparent bias", and was awarded £512,000 in legal costs.
He was later cleared of 13 sexual assault charges at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020.
He launched the Alba Party as a rival to the SNP a year later.
The former First Minister, who admitted he could have behaved better towards women on occasions, had always denied any criminality.
He sued the Scottish Government in November 2023 alleging there had been misfeasance by various civil servants under Ms Sturgeon and sought damages of around £3million.
Promising a "day of reckoning", he said at the time: "Not one person has been held accountable. With this court action that evasion of responsibility ends."
In a Court of Session hearing last August, Mr Salmond's lawyer said the police were probing whether one senior civil servant "gave a false statement under oath" to a Holyrood inquiry that was probing how the sexual harassment claims were handled.
The civil action was frozen when Mr Salmond suffered a fatal heart attack in North Macedonia. But Mrs Salmond's legal team is now reactivating proceedings.
A spokesman for the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service told The Herald that the case had been "sisted" until 19 September.
He added: "Following this date the parties would advise the court, if they are ready to proceed or if they are requesting a further sist to the case."
The Scottish Government has previously vowed to defend itself "robustly" in court.
Last night a Scottish Government spokeswoman said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.'
The SNP was approached for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Zealand will spend $1.6B on military aircraft in a plan to double the defense budget
New Zealand will spend $1.6B on military aircraft in a plan to double the defense budget

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

New Zealand will spend $1.6B on military aircraft in a plan to double the defense budget

New Zealand 's government announced new military spending Thursday of 2.7 billion New Zealand dollars ($1.6 billion) to replace aging aircraft, with senior officials who unveiled the package citing rapidly growing global tensions and a deteriorating security environment. The purchase of military planes and helicopters was the first procurement announced in a government plan, disclosed April, to double defense spending from 1% to 2% of GDP in the next decade. New Zealand's military spending has trailed that of its larger partners in the Five Eyes intelligence sharing group of countries — which includes the United States, Britain, Canada and Australia — and the bolstered budget reflects a shift in how the remote island nation is responding to strategic competition between major powers in the Pacific Ocean. The procurement includes five MH-60R Seahawk helicopters to replace the existing maritime fleet and two Airbus A321XLR aircraft, allowing the retirement of Boeing 757s that are more than 30 years old and were already secondhand when purchased. The helicopters accounted for more than NZ $2 billion of the spending, officials said. Defense Minister Judith Collins said her government would 'move at pace' to procure the helicopters directly through the United States' foreign military sales program instead of going to a wider tender. Cabinet ministers were expected to consider the final business case in 2026, she told reporters in Wellington on Thursday. It would take 'a few years' to acquire the helicopters, Collins added, because buying new meant New Zealand would need to 'wait in line.' She denied the choice to buy from the United States was an attempt to rectify the trade imbalance that has seen New Zealand goods targeted for an adjusted 15% levy when arriving in the U.S. under the Trump administration's global tariffs plan. The aging Boeing aircraft have frequently broken down while transporting New Zealand prime ministers abroad in recent years and now can only be flown short distances. The episodes are among an awkward string of incidents that have highlighted the rundown state of the country's military hardware and persistent difficulties in maintaining it due to recruitment shortfalls.

Revealed: The STAGGERING amount of money Aussie taxpayers will have to fork out to pay for the Brisbane Olympics
Revealed: The STAGGERING amount of money Aussie taxpayers will have to fork out to pay for the Brisbane Olympics

Daily Mail​

time35 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Revealed: The STAGGERING amount of money Aussie taxpayers will have to fork out to pay for the Brisbane Olympics

Many Aussie taxpayers can't wait for the Brisbane Olympics to begin in 2032 - but they won't be happy to hear they'll be forking out more than $7billion to host the Games. Under a deal struck with the Queensland government, the Commonwealth has agreed to contribute just under half the cost of building when it comes to Games venues and other infrastructure. The federal government will provide $3.43billion for 17 new and upgraded venues for the Games - with the whole bill forecast to cost $7.1billion. Given the long track history of Olympics being subject to huge cost overruns, the eventual total could be far in excess of that. A large proportion of federal government's contribution will be spent on the new 63,000-seat stadium at Victoria Park as well as a 25,000-seat National Aquatic Centre in Spring Hill. In total, 37 venues across 11 Queensland cities will be used to host the 28 Olympic and 22 Paralympic sports. But given some sports won't be determined until an International Olympic Committee (IOC) meeting is staged next year, Games organisers will be forced to create a venue plan while not knowing what sports they are hosting. At the LA Olympics in 2028, there will be six additional sports: cricket, baseball, flag football, lacrosse, squash and softball. In March, Premier David Crisafulli apologised to Queenslanders for breaking a major election promise after announcing the construction of a new stadium as part of Brisbane's $7billion plan for the 2032 Olympics. Crisafulli repeatedly pledged not to build any new stadiums on the campaign trail in the lead-up to last year's state elections. 'It became a choice between the embarrassment of hosting the games at [the run-down Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre] or a new stadium at Victoria Park,' he said earlier this year. 'In the end, the choice was clear. The Games must be held at a new stadium at Victoria Park.' Crisafulli was asked how he planned to respond to claims he had back-flipped on his earlier promises. 'By being honest and copping that on the chin,' he conceded. 'I have to own that, and I will, and I am sorry. (But) it is my decision.' Following the Olympic and Paralympic Games, the new stadium will host home games for the Brisbane Lions and Cricket Australia matches. Brisbane won the rights to host the 2032 Games four years ago when the International Olympic Committee stated the city was its 'preferred candidate' based on its previous successes in hosting international sporting events.

Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area

Powys County Times

timean hour ago

  • Powys County Times

Majority of public back housing and developments in their area

A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store