Miami Beach again pushes for no spring breakers and pushes new campaign to end the party
Officials in Miami Beach, Florida are implementing strict security measures to crack down on spring breakers traveling to the waterfront city next month.
City officials are ordering heightened police presence, parking garage closures, DUI checkpoints and even potential curfews throughout March as spring breakers flock to the region, according to the Miami Beach website.
The new 'Reality Check' program will also include the implementation of license plate readers and other surveillance technology throughout the month.
'Consistent with last year's spring break, Miami Beach will once again impose tough measures in March to reinforce the message that the city is not interested in being a spring break party destination,' the city's website reads.
The city will also have 'Goodwill Ambassadors' roaming the Entertainment District, wearing pink 'Take Care of Our City' shirts and offering tips on how to 'enjoy the city responsibly.'
This follows the 'Breaking Up with Spring Break' campaign the city launched last year, which aimed to promote peace and safety during spring break after three straight years of violence during the season.
'We set a new standard for spring break in Miami Beach last year,' Mayor Steven Meiner said in a statement this week. 'This year, we're building on that success, ensuring Miami Beach remains a welcoming destination where people can enjoy our world-class beaches, restaurants, and community in a safe family-friendly atmosphere.'
However, the program wasn't popular with everyone. Some business owners were worried about losing money, while others argued the program was an overreaction to Black crowds, the Associated Press reports.
'Everybody loves this idea that they are free from their government intruding on them,' attorney Stephen Hunter Johnson said at the time. 'But amazingly, if the government intrudes on Black people, everyone's fine with it.'
However, Meiner rejected this criticism: 'I have a moral obligation to keep people safe, and right now, it is not safe.'
City officials said fewer arrests were made in 2024 during the 'Breaking Up with Spring Break' program compared to previous years, local outlet WSVN7 reports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Mamdani's Black voter gap
Presented by With help from Cris Seda Chabrier Zohran Mamdani's democratic socialist policies are a hit with affluent white voters. But the surging mayoral candidate trails Andrew Cuomo among New Yorkers he says his plans will help the most. The upstart candidate is lagging the former governor with Black and Latino voters in all the polls. With the Democratic primary a week away, political leaders from those core constituencies are dialing up their support of Cuomo as Mamdani's core base — younger, farther to the left, whiter — flock to early voting booths to crown the 33-year-old lawmaker the next executive. The dynamic is a microcosm of a nationwide divide in the Democratic Party. In 2024, younger lefty voters expressed open hostility toward Kamala Harris over her stance on the Israel-Hamas war. And in the two previous election cycles, voters of that ilk broke for Bernie Sanders while those over 45 — most crucially Black voters in the South — went strongly for Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. For Mamdani, the obstacles facing him played out in absentia over the weekend in Manhattan. Friday night in Harlem, Cuomo rallied alongside Rep. Adriano Espaillat. The next day, he appeared with Rep. Gregory Meeks and Al Sharpton. Sharpton praised Cuomo and criticized Mamdani for cross-endorsing City Comptroller Brad Lander and not City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who is Black. 'They say that Mamdani and Lander endorsed each other, so against the Black woman,' Sharpton said. 'Something about that politics ain't progressive to me.' (As POLITICO reported, Mamdani's team has in fact sought a cross-endorsement with Adams.) That political split exemplifies the pitfalls awaiting Mamdani as he has climbs in the polls and activates the excited left wing of his party: Older Black and Latino voters — particularly middle-class Black homeowners — have long been key to any winning coalition in a New York City Democratic primary. And they tend not to be card-carrying members of the Democratic Socialists of America, of which Mamdani is a member. 'African-American voters have historically been more moderate to conservative than a lot of people really account for,' said Basil Smikle Jr., who once led the New York State Democratic Party. 'It's a vote tied to more mainstream politics and politicians, and you will see a higher turnout among those voters compared to younger ones.' Read more from POLITICO's Joe Anuta on voter demographics — and how Mamdani's trying to reach voters of color and expand the electorate. IT'S TUESDAY: Got news? Send it our way: Jeff Coltin, Emily Ngo and Nick Reisman. WHERE'S KATHY? Delivers Remarks at a ribbon cutting for a GrowNYC regional food hub in the Bronx and announcing health care investments in Central Brooklyn at SUNY Downstate. WHERE'S ERIC? Public schedule unavailable as of 10 p.m. Monday. QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'Only socialists and Brooklyn hipsters would believe such nonsense.' — Assemblymember Michael Fitzpatrick of Suffolk County on climate change, speaking on the Assembly floor, via the Times Union's Dan Clark. ABOVE THE FOLD RELITIGATING 'DEFUND': The 2020 defund movement is reappearing in the under-the-radar race for New York City comptroller. The leading candidates, each in the City Council at the time the national push was peaking, technically voted to defund the police in 2020. And one of them — Mark Levine, now the Manhattan borough president — even called for deeper cuts to the NYPD than the $1 billion the council imposed at the time, and has distanced himself from that choice in a recent round of debates. At the time, Levine posted on X that the council's cuts 'were not as deep as I — and many of you — had hoped.' And at the first candidate debate last month, he avoided mentioning that call entirely, instead saying that he didn't think the demands for 'far steeper cuts' to policing were 'prudent.' Some activists at the time — amid national protests following the death of George Floyd — wanted to slash the NYPD budget by about $3 billion. Mayor Bill de Blasio had said that year's budget cut $1 billion from the NYPD, though the cuts never totaled that much on paper and some reductions were never enacted. Comptroller candidate Justin Brannan confronted Levine over this issue during the second debate on June 10, asking why his opponent didn't own up to his past rhetoric. 'You also voted the same way I did, in favor of the budget,' Levine added. Brannan wasn't happy, appealing to the moderators that Levine didn't answer, but the debate moved on. Sentiments have changed, and the 2020 defund movement is now a political liability in a citywide race. Levine is appealing to more moderate Democrats in the comptroller primary, while Brannan is running to his left with the support of the Working Families Party, so the debate challenge was meant to hurt Levine's standing with his base. The battle in the council in 2020 centered around whether to vote against the budget in an effort to extract deeper cuts or approve it, Levine said. 'I voted in favor of the budget because it was a moment of crisis. We needed to keep the city going,' during the second debate. While Levine was arguing the cuts didn't go far enough in 2020, Brannan was telling activists that they actually did total $1 billion. 'I made a commitment to the $1B cut and to follow the lead of my BIPOC colleagues in the Black, Latino & Asian Caucus and I don't break my promises,' he said in a text message posted to X. — Jeff Coltin CITY HALL: THE LATEST HEY, BIG SPENDER: City Council Member Keith Powers' girlfriend is one of his biggest financial supporters. Layla Amjadi donated $25,000 to a super PAC that's boosting Powers' candidacy for Manhattan borough president. Amjadi also gave the legal maximum $1,600 donation to Power's BP campaign. Super PACs have no contribution limits, but cannot coordinate with campaigns and candidates they support. One of the factors New York City Campaign Finance Board regulators consider when determining whether there is coordination is if the super PAC has been 'financed, maintained or controlled' by the candidate's spouse, domestic partner or family members. Another factor is whether the campaign and the super PAC have both been in communication with the same third party. A board spokesperson declined to comment. Regulators have approved of similar situations with far more money on the line. Mayoral candidate Shaun Donovan's father donated $6.8 million to a super PAC backing his son's 2021 mayoral run, and the board didn't find evidence of coordination. Amjadi, a senior director of product at Google, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. John Collins, chair of the pro-Powers super PAC Safe New York City, declined to comment. The super PAC has reported raising $75,000 and spending $63,000 on mailers boosting Powers in his campaign against state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal for the open seat. 'If the Hoylman-Sigal campaign wants to spend the final week of the race engaging in baseless attacks, that's their choice,' Powers spokesperson JT Ennis said when asked about Amjadi's contribution. 'Our campaign remains laser focused on the issues that actually matter to voters: public safety and affordable housing.' — Jeff Coltin More from the city: — Cuomo has been hit with an ethics complaint for failing to disclose his more than $2.6 million worth of stock options in an nuclear technology company. (New York Post) — Brannan bragged that he was endorsed by more than 70 faith leaders last week — but a bunch of his supposed supporters said they never even heard of him. (New York Post) — Former Interim Police Commissioner Thomas Donlon was pushed out of his post as an assistant deputy mayor last month. (Daily News) NEW FROM PLANET ALBANY WHAT'S IN A NAME: State lawmakers today will propose naming an Albany-area bridge after World War I hero Henry Johnson, a Black soldier who was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor by President Barack Obama in 2015. In normal political times, the proposal would probably be uncontroversial. In the Trump 2.0 era, the measure is fraught with politics. A commission in 2023 re-named Fort Polk in Louisiana for Johnson, but the Trump administration moved this year to reverse the name to Fort Polk. The southern fort's initial name change two years ago belonged to a broader effort to replace the names of Confederate soldiers at military installations. Fort Polk was originally named for Leonidas Polk, a Confederate general. When President Donald Trump announced this month Johnson's name would be removed for World War II Gen. James Polk, Albany Democrats eager to fight the Republican president leapt to respond. 'It's just another gut punch from this administration,' said state Sen. Pat Fahy, one of the sponsors of the bridge-naming bill. Democrats nationally and in New York have struggled to counteract Trump through legislation. During his first term, state lawmakers moved to provide Congressional Democrats access to his state tax returns. Resistance-style legislation in response to Trump during the second administration has been rarer in Albany. The bill to name the bridge after Johnson will be unveiled this week, but won't be considered until next January when state lawmakers start a new legislative session. 'This will show that while the president may not value his heroic contributions, the Capital Region does,' Fahy said. — Nick Reisman More from Albany: — State lawmakers won't act on a bill to create sweeping sanctuary protections for undocumented immigrants. (City & State) — Measures to regulate artificial intelligence in New York may run afoul of federal efforts to block state action. (Gothamist) — A bill to slow the expansion of natural gas hookups is heading to Hochul's desk. (POLITICO Pro) KEEPING UP WITH THE DELEGATION TALKING CORRUPTION: Rep. Dan Goldman is burnishing his reputation as an anti-corruption crusader with a speech this morning at New York Law School billed as 'Democracy on the Brink: Corruption and the Public Trust.' 'It's going to be a bipartisan indictment of the culture of corruption,' a spokesperson promised. But even though Goldman endorsed state Sen. Zellnor Myrie for mayor, he does not anticipate mentioning Cuomo — whose alleged corruption opponents have relentlessly attacked A former federal prosecutor, Goldman won election in 2022 running on his experience as lead counsel for House Democrats' first impeachment of President Donald Trump — and a helpful endorsement from The New York Times. — Jeff Coltin More from Congress: — New York Republicans blasted the U.S. Senate proposal to keep the $10,000 SALT cap. (Times Union) — U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand blasted the federal tax-and-spend package as a 'big beautiful betrayal.' (Buffalo News) — Congressional Democrats warn budget cuts will leave New York unprepared for another Sept. 11-style attack. (NY1) NEW YORK STATE OF MIND — The U.S. Supreme Court ordered New York to reconsider religious exemptions for abortion coverage. (Gothamist) — There may be a gap in New York's sex offender registry system. (Spectrum News) — Trump wants to expand ICE deportations in New York. (Bloomberg) SOCIAL DATA HAPPY BIRTHDAY: New Deal Strategies' Camile Rivera … former state Sen. John Sampson … Brian Fargnoli of NYC DOHMH … Matt Canter of Global Strategy Group … Matt Miller … CNBC's Christina Wilkie … Paul Steinhauser … Jessica Boulanger … Kerri Chyka … Rebecca Zisser … (WAS MONDAY): Alison Gopnik ... Daniel C. Kurtzer Missed Monday's New York Playbook PM? We forgive you. Read it here.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
IMPD's Randal Taylor ready to investigate retirement
Monday is IMPD Commander Randal Taylor's last day at work. The big picture: Taylor has protected and served the Circle City for more than three decades, including a recent stint leading the department through four of its most difficult and transformative years as chief. Flashback: Taylor took over as IMPD's top cop in 2020, just in time to navigate his officers through a global pandemic; the police shooting of Dreasjon Reed, a 21-year-old Black man whose death sparked a summer of protests; and a 2021 mass shooting at a FedEx facility that still weighs heavily. After stepping down as chief at the start of 2024, Taylor became commander of IMPD's Victims Assistance Unit. He's interested in continuing to help victims' families get the resources they need as a member of the department's professional staff. What's next: Taylor, 60, said even in retirement, he has no plans to stop trying to make Indianapolis a better place for everyone who calls it home. Ahead of his final shift, Taylor sat down with Axios to reflect on the ups and downs of his 38-year law enforcement career and share why he believes the future of the department is bright. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity. 🚔 Nearly 40 years of police work, 32 spent in Indianapolis. How are you feeling as you prepare to do something different? "I feel like it's time, and I'm feeling good about it. No regrets or anything right now. I still want to work in some capacity, but I have no problem with putting this law enforcement chapter to rest." 🤔 What time period as an Indianapolis police officer stands out the most? " When I got started [as chief] I came right into COVID, and that was difficult not just for this department, but obviously all across the country. But then we had the Dreasjon Reed case that was extremely tough. And of course, FedEx. "FedEx impacted me most personally, because I was out there with those families for such a long period of time," he said. "I had a hard time shaking that and had to really think about how those kinds of things impact you mentally during the long haul. I had not dealt with that before." 📈 From the creation of a use of force review board to the implementation of a departmentwide bodycam program, you made big changes to IMPD's operational structure. How are you feeling about the department's trajectory under the leadership of Chris Bailey? " Chris has been there by my side for a while, so I've seen him operate and had no issue when he took over the chief spot. Knew he would continue to progress. "And Chief Bailey has also done some great work on improving the mental health aspect for officers, which I think is certainly going in the right direction." 👮♂️ With an ongoing officer shortage, recruitment is a major priority. Do you have any words of wisdom to leave for the next generation of local law enforcement? "Don't be afraid to be a people person. You've got to ask questions and get to know people, and that's always been a plus. And there's no particular pattern for someone to follow to be a police officer." 🙏 What do you want Indianapolis residents to remember about you and your time with the department? "I just hope that they know that I care about them. I care about you. I care about our officers. Hopefully you thought I was fair. "It's been a great career. I don't regret any of it."
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Maps show neighborhoods where environmental justice zoning ordinance would benefit residents most
As communities are urging their representatives to support an environmental ordinance introduced in April to the City Council, a neighborhood group released maps showing large swaths of land across the city are currently zoned for commercial warehouses and industrial manufacturing that don't require public notice or city approval to be developed. Wards with the most land where this kind of use is permitted include the 10th Ward on the city's Southeast Side, the 11th and 12th Wards on the South Side, the 25th Ward on the Lower West Side, and the 27th Ward on the Northwest Side. 'I was born and raised in the community, in Brighton Park, and we have a lot of manufacturing around our ward — and it was designed that way,' said Ald. Julia Ramirez, 12th. 'The Hazel Johnson ordinance also considers the compounded impact that the community has already gone through.' Named after the so-called mother of the environmental justice movement started over 40 years ago in Chicago, the ordinance would establish an advisory council to inform future environmental policy. Its main goal, however, would be to change zoning practices by requiring developers to study the possible cumulative impacts of a new project or an expansion, such as how it would affect public health in a community given already existing polluters, and meet with neighbors before applying for city approval. It's a tool, Ramirez said, to involve the community in decisions that will affect them. 'That's the part that's actually been missing from a lot of the discussions around development, up until now,' said Anthony Moser, board president of Neighbors for Environmental Justice or N4EJ, a grassroots nonprofit on the Southwest Side. 'It feels very commonsense to me.' The ordinance is the next step after the 2023 release of a cumulative impact assessment that analyzed how exposure to toxins, socioeconomic factors and health conditions vary throughout Chicago. That assessment was part of a voluntary compliance agreement negotiated with the federal government following a two-year federal investigation that found the city culpable of steering heavy industry away from white communities and into Black and Latino communities. Currently, intensive industrial manufacturing of asphalt, corrosive acid, chlorine and insecticides, as well as warehousing, wholesaling and freight movement, are permitted in certain zoning districts. Under the ordinance, such developments would require special-use approval in those districts. Moser said Chicagoans wanting to make relatively basic changes to their homes often need to obtain special zoning permissions. 'The idea that you don't need any kind of permission to start a project that's going to affect the whole neighborhood — I think, if ordinary people can deal with it, (developers) can too,' he said. 'It's not like this is suddenly going to prevent anything from being built here.' When introduced to the City Council in April, the legislation was referred to the Committee on Committees and Rules, which has stalled hearings and voting, and will likely delay a review process that already takes months. Even after the ordinance passes, the city's Departments of Public Health, Environment and Transportation still have to figure out what Moser called 'the nuts and bolts' of the cumulative impact studies. While 22 of the city's 50 aldermen have reportedly expressed support for the ordinance, advocates say they'll need at least four more votes to pass the bill. Strong proponents besides Ramirez include bill co-sponsor Ald. Daniel La Spata, 1st; Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez, 25th; Ald. Rossana Rodriguez-Sanchez, 33rd; and Ald. Maria Hadden, 49th, who is also chair of the Environment Committee. 'If I were them, I would be thinking about it as a measure to mitigate political risk,' Moser said. 'If a warehouse opens up down the street, people need to know about its cumulative impacts to know that they're mad about it. And if they didn't hear about (the project) first, they're going to assume that the alderperson did know — even if they didn't. … They're going to assume you're on the take.' Ramirez said the ordinance would benefit her ward, and Black and Latino communities — 'but really, all the city of Chicago.' According to Moser, while some aldermen have said they will vote in favor of the ordinance when the time comes, they aren't actively campaigning to pass it. Some aldermen might be worried about the ordinance creating a longer, drawn-out zoning process that ignores businesses and creates more obstacles, Ramirez said. 'My argument to that is: You should put in the work before signing off on something,' she said. 'Because, obviously, if there (are) legitimate concerns that we can make sure that we take care of, we should do that before allowing a permit.' She said the new zoning rules will mean everybody wins at the end of the day. 'When you garner a lot of community support,' she said, 'this at least allows us to get ahead of potential issues that may come up in the future, by addressing them earlier on.' When the ordinance was finally brought before the City Council, it was almost a year after its planned introduction. And the yearslong process has not been without tension and disagreements. After the initial assessment in 2023, some South and West side residents said the report was flawed because a map identifying census tracts most burdened by pollution did not consider their proximity to Chicago's 24 industrial corridors, where communities of color suffer from disproportionately prevalent chronic illnesses such as respiratory and cardiac disease. More recently, some community activists blasted city officials for not making the ordinance available to the public beforehand — a move they called alienating after a mostly collaborative partnership with Mayor Brandon Johnson's administration. At the time, a spokesperson for the mayor said that city ordinances are not made public before their introduction. Other groups, including N4EJ, have been more concerned with getting the ordinance passed first and working out the nitty-gritty of its implementation later. 'We're hopeful to see this moving forward,' Moser said. 'It's been a long time coming.'
