Trouble is brewing for local beer companies as Trump slaps tariffs on aluminum
He says his business, Right Proper Brewing, has to sell more than $6,000 of beer just to cover the taxes on his brewery. He's hesitant to raise prices because his competitors, most notably the big breweries, might not. And so having to pay more for the aluminum cans that ship his brews is a scary proposition.
President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum took effect Wednesday, and one of the places Americans touch aluminum most directly is in canned drinks. This increase in the price of canning material could dramatically hit the bottom line of many businesses, such as craft breweries.
'We can't raise our prices just because our costs have gone up,' Cheston said. 'We may be on the shelf next to breweries that are much larger than us, that may be in a better position to absorb those costs, whereas we are not.'
Cheston, like many small-business owners across the U.S., faces the prospects of rising costs in crucial pieces of the operations due to the escalating trade war that Trump has started with many of the U.S.' biggest trading partners.
'It could be massive,' Cheston, who co-founded Right Proper Brewing in 2013 as a neighborhood brewpub in Washington, D.C., said. The company has two locations and plans to open a third.
While bottles are still an option, craft brewers have been shifting to cans for many years. For Cheston, the tariffs could mean the difference between being able to hire an additional employee or being able to buy necessary equipment.
Cheston said that even 50 cents makes a difference when customers are choosing a beer off a grocery shelf.
'Roughly, if we were to incur a 25% increase in that cost, it would be over $40,000 for us, which is the cost of an employee,' he said of the tariffs. Right Proper's packaging is provided by a third party that sources their aluminum in Canada.
'What we pay per piece is subject to the aluminum index, and so if that goes up, we pay more,' he told NBC News. 'We have a few months of cans and inventory right now, but beyond that, there's nothing we can do.'
Cheston is competing for shelf space with other small craft breweries as well as larger companies, such as Molson Coors and Anheuser-Busch. Molson Coors has the ability to source its cans domestically and would not be affected by the tariffs.
'While we continue to evaluate the implications of possible tariffs, with respect to aluminum, we source our cans from a number of domestic suppliers, so our exposure to any tariffs on imported aluminum to the U.S. would be minimal,' a company spokesperson told NBC News.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
Serena Williams to promote weight-loss drugs with telehealth firm Ro
Aug 21 (Reuters) - Telehealth company Ro has tapped tennis star Serena Williams as a celebrity patient ambassador for its weight-loss treatments, the company said Thursday. The 23-time Grand Slam champion, who retired from professional tennis in 2022, will headline a multi-year national marketing campaign for GLP-1 drugs, a company spokesperson said. "I don't take shortcuts," Williams said in an NBC News interview, adding that her efforts to lose weight before turning to GLP-1 treatments included professional tennis training. "I was doing everything right ... but my body wasn't responding the way it used to," she said. Williams said in an advertisement that after struggling to lose post-baby weight, the treatments helped her lose 31 pounds (14 kg) - her first time speaking out about using them, Ro said. "Serena knows people may be surprised to learn that she would use a GLP-1, and that's exactly why we think she is the perfect person to share her story," said a Ro spokesperson. Ro said Williams' husband Alexis Ohanian, the co-founder of social media site Reddit, is an investor in the company and serves on its board. GLP-1 drugs promote weight loss by reducing appetite and causing the stomach to empty more slowly. Novo Nordisk's ( opens new tab Wegovy and Eli Lilly's (LLY.N), opens new tab Zepbound have been shown to reduce weight by around 20%. Ro, which sells both drugs through its weight-loss program, said Williams was on a branded GLP-1 but declined to say which one. Paul Cerro, a former Ro strategy analyst and founder of Cedar Grove Capital Management, said the deal will boost Ro's visibility and credibility in a crowded weight-loss drug market as companies push deeper into women's health. "Well known people are willing to put their name with a company that they believe is doing the right thing in the right way," said Cerro. Ro offers cash-pay access to Zepbound and Wegovy through Novo and Lilly's direct pharmacies, although eligible patients can use insurance. It sells compounded Wegovy in varying doses for patients whose clinicians deem it medically necessary.
Economist
8 hours ago
- Economist
Pakistan is critical in the fight against Islamic State terrorism
For most of the past 25 years, 'phenomenal' was not a word many Americans used to describe Pakistan's co-operation on counter-terrorism. Yet that is how General Michael Kurilla, then head of America's Central Command, characterised it in June. His praise was striking not just because American officials have long accused Pakistan of covertly backing the Afghan Taliban and sheltering Osama bin Laden, who was killed by American special forces in a Pakistani garrison town in 2011. The remark also came seven weeks after India blamed a terrorist attack in Kashmir on Pakistan, which has a long history of sponsoring similar assaults on Indian soil.
Spectator
18 hours ago
- Spectator
My plan for a wealth tax
Reading Careless People, an exposé of life within Facebook written by a Kiwi, it occurred to me that one potential advantage that the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have over the US is we do not unthinkingly idolise the very rich. Americans sometimes find this confusing: it always irked transplanted American bankers in London that local employees were eager to make a few million quid, but lost interest beyond a certain threshold. Once they had a rectory in the Cotswolds, an Aga, two labradors and a Range Rover it was game over, you win. This is because the US is more of a money/power economy, whereas the Commonwealth countries are to a greater extent prestige economies. We shouldn't bemoan this, but turn it to our advantage instead. Here's how. It's a wealth tax. But wait. Traditionally the proponents of a wealth tax have implicitly attacked the wealthy. I think a better line of attack is to highlight people who should be really wealthy but aren't. At the moment, I think it unlikely that Sir Tim Berners-Lee is cruising round the Med on a 600ft megayacht crammed with bikini-clad supermodels. Nor is Sir Stanley Whittingham (co-inventor of the lithium-ion battery) sunning himself on an inflatable flamingo in an infinity pool overlooking Hvar. We don't even know who invented chicken tikka masala. All three have made many billions, perhaps trillions, of pounds – unfortunately, for other people. I once met the daughter of one of the four British and Australian men instrumental in the discovery and creation of penicillin. As I remember, she did live in the Cotswolds. I didn't see any evidence of a Range Rover, though. In a truly just world, she'd have a brand-new V8 Overfinch conversion, with light-up wheels. In short, any debate about wealth is meaningless unless we acknowledge that it is perfectly possible to create wealth without extracting it and that, correspondingly, it is also possible to extract wealth without creating it. Economists don't get this. So we have shovelled billions of dollars into the maw of Facebook without any evidence that the company is capable of enacting a single new idea. It's mostly extractive. Mark Zuckerberg is a big digital Duke of Westminster, without the redeeming charm or style. By contrast, I know Elon Musk's politics are a bit dicey, but he does keep trying new things. To be honest, if he invaded Poland I'd probably move there. But here's the thing. For every great idea you can monetise yourself, there are 20 that you can't – and it is these ideas which create wealth. So what's the plan? Well, if rich people are so brilliantly inventive (and some of them are), call them out at their own game. Instigate a wealth tax but hypothecate 25 per cent of the proceeds to an innovation fund. With 5 per cent, you retroactively reward unrecognised wealth creators: it would be nice to give Sir Stanley a Bentley, say, or an all-female bodyguard unit like Colonel Gaddafi (he may not actually want these things, admittedly: what you got there is a disturbing glimpse inside my imagination). With the remaining 20 per cent you instigate a prize fund worth billions to reward people for ideas which are impossible to monetise – the Harrison 'Longitude' Prize for the 21st century. If they are so clever, the rich can then earn their money back. I myself have an idea which would reduce needless GP visits by 50 per cent while costing nothing. If you can get a Rolls-Royce Spectre past NHS Procurement, it's yours. Out there somewhere is someone who knows a far better way of fixing potholes, solving the house-building crisis or reducing innumeracy. This is what we need to grow the economy, rather than a magical brainfart from Rachel Reeves.
