
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3+4 review – a gnarly skating time capsule
In 2020, the first couple of Tony Hawk's games were polished up and re-released as the first wave of Y2K nostalgia hit. The two games were packaged up as one, with consistent controls and a new look that preserved the grungy feel of the originals, and the same is true for 3+4: levels, skaters and parks from both 2001's THPS3 and 2002's THPS4 rock up here alongside newer stars of the sport (including Riley Hawk, son of the eponymous skating celebrity – I found this oddly touching).
I remember these places so well – the factory, the college campus, the snow-dusted Canadian skate park, the time capsule of central London. Weirdly, the zoo level is now empty of animals (why?), but otherwise these compact arrangements of grindable, trickable urban obstacle courses are very much as they were. (The skater-punk soundtrack, unfortunately, is not as it was – there are a great many omissions, a disappointment only partly softened by a slew of new tracks.) Between grabs, spins, flips and manuals you can string together insane and risky combos across their entire geography, skidding across power lines, along walls and finding hidden half-pipes.
I do not remember all of this being so hard, however. My first few hours with these games were a humiliation, as I grappled with the controller and baled over and over again trying to meet even the minimum required scores in each two-minute run. Was I always this bad at these games? Whatever muscle memory I once had is gone, but I am slowly building up a respectable set of virtual-skating skills again. There are more complex moves and traversal tricks to keep in mind here than there were in Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 1+2, which is a more arcadey experience, and a better place to start if you weren't there for these games the first time round.
Like the real sport, it's about perseverance and repetition: when the combos started to flow again for me after a few hours, it felt so freeing. I still don't think there's a better skating game out there than old-school Tony Hawk's, even after all this time – and there's certainly no better time capsule of this pivotal moment in the history of the sport.
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3+4 is out July 11; £39.99

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
From Diana's 'rock' to Royal outcast: Inside Paul Burrell's betrayal of the Firm - as royal butler's upcoming tell-all book promises new bombshells
He's known to many for his high-profile trial where he was cleared after being accused of stealing and selling items belonging to Princess Diana 's estate - as well as for appearing as a contestant on I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here! Paul Burrell joined the household of Prince Charles and Diana at Highgrove House in 1987 after working as the Queen's footman, later becoming the Princess' butler and remaining in this role until her death. Burrell became a close confidante of the Princess - but the family's perception of him soured shortly after Diana's passing in 1997. William and Harry accused Burrell of a 'cold and overt betrayal' after he published his memoir A Royal Duty - which contained a raft of private revelations. According to Harry's witness statement in his High Court battle with Mirror Group Newspapers, the Prince took the view that his mother's former butler was an attention-seeking, self-interested 'two-faced sh**'. And now the man Diana once called her 'rock' is set to release a third 'intimate' memoir, promising to reveal stories he felt he couldn't share while the late Queen was still alive. His book The Royal Insider – with a picture of himself and Diana on the cover – is due out in September. The Princes are now bracing themselves for what he might reveal as he vows to 'speak candidly about the tensions that simmered' during his time at the Palace – 'including the breakdown of Charles and Diana's marriage and his own complex relationship with Princes William and Harry'. The publishers, Sphere, said: 'It is only in the wake of the Queen's passing Burrell feels he can finally tell his story in full.' Burrell's was woken in January 2001 by police officers who asked if he had any items from Kensington Palace in his home. He was arrested and his home was raided, revealing rooms filled with paintings, drawings, china and photographs that clearly belonged to Diana. Other items included signed photographs of the Princess, her daily personal notes to William at school and clothes belonging to her - including a blue-ribboned hat she'd worn during her visit with Prince Charles to South Korea in 1992. That year, Burrell was charged with theft of a total of 310 items, reportedly worth £5million, which were said to have been stolen from Kensington Palace, the Princess' former London home. He denied any impropriety and maintained the items were given to him by Diana. The case against him had proceeded on the basis that he had not told anyone that he had kept items belonging to the Princess. But the prosecution barrister said that it had emerged that Burrell had met with the Queen privately in December 1997 where he mentioned that he had taken some of the Princess's papers for safekeeping. In April of that year, the police outlined the possible charges and said that they were investigating whether Burrell had been selling some of the items. Later in September, a letter from Burrell's solicitor requested a meeting to discuss Burrell's life and service with the Royal Family, but this was declined as The Queen was not actively involved with the case. In the autumn of 2001, The Queen's private secretary was told informally that the police had told Charles that they had evidence that Burrell had been selling items from the Princess's estate. However, in the following year this was made clear during the trial that, contrary to their earlier advice, the police had no evidence that Burrell had been selling the items in question. On October 25, 2002, the Queen, Charles and Prince Philip had driven together to St Paul's for a memorial service for the victims of the Bali bombing. Driving past the Old Bailey, she asked why a crowd was standing outside. Charles answered that Burrell was on trial. The Queen was apparently unaware that he was being prosecuted. Then she mentioned that, some years before, Burrell had sought an audience with her to explain that he was caring for some of Diana's papers, and she had agreed that he should do so. Given the importance to the prosecution case of the question of whether or not Burrell had told anyone that he had taken items from Kensington Palace, the relevance of this information was realised and quickly drawn to the attention of the police. The front page of Daily Mail is pictured from September 11, 2006, featuring Rebecca English's report that Paul Burrell was accused of 'stooping to an unprecedented low' by claiming Princess Diana's sons had failed to defend her memory The prosecution barrister, William Boyce QC later told the Old Bailey: 'In all the circumstances, the prosecution has concluded that the current trial is no longer viable because it has proceeded on a false premise that Mr Burrell had never told anyone that he was holding anything for safekeeping. 'The prosecution consider that if the defence were to apply for the jury to be discharged, although it would be a matter for My Lady, the prosecution could not oppose that application'. After hearing submissions from the prosecution and defence, the judge dismissed the jury and told Burrell he was free to go on November 1, 2002. If the trial had continued, the former butler would have been called to give evidence and may have faced questioning about his time in the Queen's employment as well as Princess Diana's. Outside the court, Mr Burrell said: 'The Queen has come through for me. I'm thrilled, I'm so thrilled.' In his tell-all memoir Spare, Harry described how he learned of Burrell's book about Diana when he was working as an unpaid farmhand in Australia aged 19 in 2003. He wrote that he received a package from Buckingham Palace, which was full of memos from the Palace communications team about 'a delicate matter'. 'Mummy's former butler had penned a tell-all which actually told nothing,' he said. 'It was merely one man's self-justifying, self-centring version of events. 'My mother once called this butler a dear friend, trusted him implicitly. We did too. Now this. 'He was milking her disappearance for money. It made my blood boil.' Harry wrote that he wanted to fly home to 'confront' Burrell but Charles and William talked him out of it, saying all they could do was 'issue a united condemnation'. Burrell hit back at criticism from Harry in Spare, saying he doesn't recognise 'the young man I see today'. Appearing on Australian breakfast show Sunrise, Burrell said: 'I first met him in his mummy's tummy. I don't recognise the young man I see today. That's not the boy I knew. 'What I see now is an angry, petulant, privileged prince who is constantly blaming other people and not taking accountability on his part.' Before A Royal Duty was published, Princes William and Harry issued a joint statement calling the book 'a cold and overt betrayal.' While Harry and William rarely see eye-to-eye these days and a joint statement is unlikely, the upcoming publication will likely bring back unhappy memories of the period surrounding their mother's death for the two men.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The stars of the much-loved Wittering Whitehalls podcast on how a hearing check has changed their relationship
Michael and Hilary Whitehall have been married for 39 years and – as anyone who has listened to their podcast, The Wittering Whitehalls, knows – they love to disagree. As the parents of stand-up comedian Jack Whitehall, the former talent agent (Michael) and actor (Hilary) have found new later-in-life careers as podcasters, loved both for their amusing insights and for their gentle bickering. Which is probably why they didn't notice at first that Michael's hearing was causing some frustrations. 'I genuinely do think that our arguing has got worse in recent years,' admits Hilary. 'And yes, I would argue that some of it is perhaps to do with hearing loss, because it's quite a tricky subject to navigate.' Mishaps and misunderstandings It wasn't until Michael, 85, went to Specsavers for a hearing check that he was told that he had good hearing for his age but was struggling with consonant sounds. 'We have misunderstandings on an hourly basis,' laughs Hilary. 'Just now I said: 'I'm going to brush my hair' and Michael said: 'Do you have time to wash your hair?'. 'We live in a house which has got six flights of stairs, so there is a lot of shouting up and down the stairs. 'And then there's lots of me losing my temper and stomping up the stairs... because he hasn't caught what I said!' Michael complained actors were mumbling through every film... then he realised maybe it wasn't the standard of modern acting that was the problem. It was the same at the theatre. 'I'd say: 'The trouble with that actor is they don't train them any more, he just mumbles and mumbles'. 'But I'm not going to say that any more of course!' Finding what's needed Those small issues with hearing caused their fair share of amusing anecdotes, as well as a few everyday irritations. 'What really annoys Michael about me is that I come into a room and immediately turn the sound on the television down,' says Hilary. 'And then he comes in and immediately turns it up, so we're constantly battling with each other over the remote control. 'And of course there is an element (we've been married almost 40 years) of 'Is it selective hearing?',' laughs Hilary. 'Is my voice just a noise or is he actually not hearing me?' How a hearing check helped Neither could believe how easy the hearing check was, and they were immediately put at ease by the hearing expert. 'She was so reassuring, the whole thing was painless,' says Hilary. 'The hearing expert at Specsavers said, actually your [Michael's] hearing is pretty good for your age, a little bit of upper range hearing loss, but what you're missing is the consonants. 'You're hearing an approximation of what is being said and it's very interesting to have that pointed out to you by an expert, because that made me more understanding.' For Michael, the solution was as straightforward as the hearing check. He got two hearing devices, one for each ear. They were small and discreet and even matched to his hair colour. Now, Michael can simply pop them in and use them when he feels the need. 'The last time I saw what was then known as a hearing aid was with my grandfather. He had a whole apparatus with wires and a crackling box on the front, which he kept hitting all the time while saying, 'Michael, speak up!'. 'I imagined there had been an improvement, but hadn't realised it had improved quite to the extent it has – where you can hardly see them.' Hilary adds: 'At a wedding we went to recently nobody knew that he had them in; they are beautifully designed and very discreet.' Spreading the word The couple are now working with Specsavers to help encourage others to take action. Hilary explains: 'Michael always says that we're all happy to go and have a dental check, a sight check, but the one thing we don't do is have a hearing check, because there is a stigma about hearing loss. 'But I would say to anybody: go for a hearing check: they're very quick, very efficient and very accurate.' Couples say 'What?' more often than 'I love you' In romantic relationships, research for Specsavers found saying 'What?' is more common than 'I love you' for couples aged 55+*. Almost half (46 per cent) of Britons had bickered with a partner due to not hearing properly; 36 per cent said it happened weekly. And 15 per cent were misunderstood by their partner at least once a day. Hearing loss can impact how we experience and enjoy life, and our relationships with loved ones. It's what Michael and Hilary found, with small misunderstandings and irritations as a result of Michael's hearing loss. But Specsavers makes it easy to keep track of your hearing health, with free hearing checks in store, expert advice and a wide range of hearing devices to suit individual needs and lifestyles. How to book your check Simply book online at and choose your local store, or call them direct. Your hearing expert will ask some easy health-related questions, use a small camera to examine the health of your ear and will then play sounds at different pitches through headphones to check your hearing. Based on your results, the Specsavers hearing experts can then make recommendations and they'll help you find the best solution for you. Symptoms to look out for Changes to hearing can happen gradually, so hearing experts recommend booking a check if you're struggling to listen to conversations or the television, if speaking on the phone is difficult, or if you feel like you have to ask people to repeat conversations in groups can be challenging, and concentrating on listening can leave you feeling stressed or tired. There is no need to be embarrassed. Earlier intervention can actually mean you have a better chance of managing and improving your hearing. And with today's hearing devices connected to phones and even linked to appliances at home, they can be easier and more discreet to manage than ever before.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Alex Jones reveals she was completely unaware about complaints made against her The One Show co-host Jermaine Jenas
Alex Jones has revealed she was completely unaware about complaints made against her The One Show co-host Jermaine Jenas. Jenas, 42, was taken off the show after being fired by the BBC for sending inappropriate messages to female employees during his time at the corporation. The sexting scandal also cost Jenas his 13-year marriage after his wife Ellie, the mother of three of his four children, announced the pair were divorcing earlier in March. Someone who was oblivious to the complaints was Welsh presenter Alex, who used to host The One Show alongside Jenas. Speaking to The Big Issue, she said: 'I very much take people on face value. But with JJ I didn't know what was going on. I thought he was taking extended leave. 'If that was my daughter and she felt uncomfortable with someone's behaviour, I hope that whatever company she was working for would deal with it swiftly as well.' Jenas, who also has a daughter from a previous relationship, was sacked by the BBC in August, which resulted in him losing his hosting gig on The One Show and punditry work on both Match of the Day and 5 Live. The BBC confirmed their decision while he was on air guest hosting talkSPORT's drive time show. His agency MC Saatchi also cut ties with him before he brought in a crisis PR team to handle the aftermath of the scandal. Jenas revealed he lied to wife Ellie during a family holiday in order to sneak off and take a Zoom call with BBC bosses after news of his X-rated messages was first revealed within the broadcaster. And he also told how she had kicked him out of their £1million home in Hertfordshire after he admitted sending inappropriate messages to two female colleagues. Speaking to the Filthy Rellas podcast last month, Jenas claimed historical problems within the relationship also contributed to the break up. He said: 'The reality is, me and my wife haven't split up because I sent some text messages to some people at work. 'We had issues for a period of time, it all comes to a head and you eventually make a decision to say, as adults, we will be better parents for our children if we just remain friends and that's it. 'We had 16 amazing years together, me and my wife, how many people last that long? Sixteen years. Ups and downs. She caught the wrong end of my [playing] career, bless her.' During an interview with The Sun shortly after he was sacked by the BBC, Jenas admitted his wife was 'raging' over the incident. He said: 'We've not really spoken properly since. She's absolutely raging.' Jenas continued: 'It's just about the children right now. It's the school holidays and they're trapped in the house because photographers are outside my house. 'They're like, 'What's going on, Daddy?'. It's tough.' He added: 'I've got to take responsibility and I've apologised to all of them. 'I don't know what to say about that, to be honest with you. It's just hard at home for the kids right now. My wife's a real one 'My wife is solid and she's amazing. She is kind. She just needs some time.' Jenas bombarded a woman working at the World Cup in Qatar two years ago with unwanted messages asking 'You want my boy now?' During the interview, Jenas insisted Ellie should not fear more women coming out of the woodwork with tales of further inappropriate behaviour. However, weeks after the scandal broke, MailOnline revealed Jenas bombarded a woman working at the World Cup in Qatar two years ago with unwanted messages asking 'You want my boy now?' before sending her a picture of his manhood, despite her making clear she was not interested in his advances. The following week, we also told how he repeatedly pestered a junior make-up artist for sex - and when she told him she had a boyfriend replied: 'Just come to my dressing room early and I'll [perform a sex act] on u… that's not cheating.' That incident took place when he was working for BT Sport in 2017, where he was a rising star as a football pundit.