Could Splash Planet be a playground over winter?
Photo:
Supplied
Using Splash Planet's attractions as a destination playground in the off-season is being considered as Hastings District Council looks to improve the water park's performance.
Last season, the park ran at a loss of $326,000 and closed a month early following a wet and cold summer.
The council is looking at two areas to improve efficiencies: reducing opening days and opening a destination playground in the off-season.
The opening days for the water park are currently set at 97.
Council officers found that a saving of about $75,000 was possible by reducing opening to weekends only for the first four weeks of the season.
It would then open for seven days over eight weeks (excluding Christmas Day) and then another four weeks of weekends, a total of 71 days.
The council is proposing to change the opening hours from 9.30am to 5.30pm to 10am-6pm, except for the first Monday to Friday of operations.
Council papers say that due to community feedback, it was also considering opening parts of the park outside the season as a playground.
The destination playground would include Wonderland Mini Golf, the Fantasy Land Express, the Jungle Jeeps, Tiny Town, Tree House Playground and the Coffee Bean Cafe.
It would be open on weekends from 9am to 4pm during Splash Planet's off-season.
The reduction of summer operating days and the introduction of the playground would mean Splash Planet would be open 160 days, 71 days of full operations during summer and 88 days of partial operations for the playground during cooler months.
Splash Planet is a water-themed amusement park with indoor and outdoor pools, waterslides, a lazy river, and dry play activity areas.
It was formerly known as Fantasyland, a dry ride theme park run by a trust until the 1990s.
The council will discuss options at its meeting on Thursday, 26 June.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
'Is this available': How to use online marketplaces and avoid the scams
Experts say there are a few things to keep in mind to mitigate the extra risks of private sales online. Photo: RNZ New Zealanders are buying and selling everything from cabins and wedding bands to nappy cakes and cars on Facebook marketplace, as well as online auction site Trade Me. It was estimated earlier in the year that this country's secondhand market could be worth about $5.5 billion a year. But when it comes to private secondhand sales, there are extra risks to watch out for - and not just the chance you'll get stuck in a never-ending loop of "is this available?" messages on Facebook. Experts say there are a few things to keep in mind to help make the process smoother. When you're selling an item as a private sale, the Fair Trading Act and Consumer Guarantees Act generally aren't a consideration. It is the law of caveat emptor, or buyer beware, that generally applies. You're buying (or selling) items "as seen", which includes any flaws or general wear and tear. Consumer Protection advises that it could be helpful for a buyer to ask the seller to point out damage, to avoid surprises. But if you buy (or sell) something that doesn't live up to your expectations, you can't go back to the seller for a refund. If a seller knowingly makes a misrepresentation about a product, the buyer may be able to cancel the contract or make a claim under the Contract and Commercial Law Act. While you can't go to the seller, you might be able to make your case to the manufacturer if something goes wrong. If an item is not very old and it is still reasonable to expect the original warranties to apply, you could make a claim under the Consumer Guarantees Act. It will help to have the original receipt from the person who sold you the item secondhand. If you're buying or selling something that needs to be posted or couriered, it needs to turn up in a reasonable amount of time, if you haven't agreed on a set time. If it doesn't, the buyer may have a case under the Contract and Commercial Law Act. Under the Electricity Act, electrical appliances must be safe even when sold second-hand by a private seller. It is a good idea to have them checked by a qualified person, if possible. If you know that something might not be safe, you can't sell it. If you think something might be suitable for parts, Consumer NZ advices you could cut the cord and apply a label saying the appliance cannot be used. Sellers may need to take extra precautions to stop themselves being targeted by thieves . Consumer NZ warns that people can create fake profiles to arrange vehicle viewings and find out more details about vehicles that are then stolen. This could apply to any item that you invite people around to your house to see. It advised that people should host viewings for things like cars away from their homes if they could. "Doing this means a potential criminal doesn't know where your car is usually located. Lots of people use false names online, so tell people when you arrange a viewing that you'll be taking a picture of their ID before they can view the car. This will act as a deterrent and could help recover your car if a person who views it subsequently steals it." Its spokesperson, Abby Damen, said she had her car stolen after listing it for sale on Facebook. "Whether or not the selling and the stealing is related is unclear. My experience is I put it on Facebook marketplace to sell it ... I thought if I use Trade Me I get charged more fees. A month later it was stolen. "I included in my listing that it had fresh new tyres. That was a selling point but also a selling point to thieves." She said her insurer asked her when she made a claim whether it had been listed for sale. If you're buying a vehicle , it's particularly important to check there is no security interest registered on it. This means it's been used as security for a loan. This needs to be cleared before you buy the item. Even if you've paid for it, the lender might be able to repossess it from you. If things go wrong, you will probably need to go to the Disputes Tribunal for resolution. But even that won't always give you what you want. In one case, a buyer went to the tribunal over the Trade Me purchase of a campervan for $17,900. The tribunal noted that a friend inspected it with her on Facetime before she bought it, and she had it mechanically checked. But when she went to pick it up, there was a problem with batteries and on the way home the water pump was leaking. She could not get the fridge to work and the one time the gas worked there was "loud explosive bang". The heater was also not working. She wanted $8126 to replace the heater, make the fridge compliant and fix other problems. The tribunal adjudicator explained that there was no remedy available unless the buyer could prove the seller had misrepresented the vehicle. The tribunal found that the condition of the fridge and heater had been misrepresented but said there were no claims made about its compliance with gas regulations. The amount she was awarded for the heater was also depreciated because it was already 13 years old and had an expected life of 20. No platform is completely scam-free. But Trade Me does have the additional option of its buyer protection policy when people use its Ping payment service. This means that people can be refunded up to $2500 if the time is not as described or does not show up. There are fees associated with this but Trade Me's rating function will also show you if someone has a history of selling goods that go wrong. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
How switching banks could come at a cost
There has been a steady increase in switching this year partly driven by banks offering incentives to change banks. Photo: RNZ High levels of switching between home loan providers has the potential to create bills for the borrower - and their mortgage adviser, brokers are warning. There has been a steady increase in switching this year. Almost $2.5 billion of lending changed to an new provider in June, up from $1.4b last June and $1.2b the year before. Some of that has been driven by an increase in competition with "cash back" offers, which give up to about 0.8 percent of a home loan's value as an incentive to change to a new bank . But if the borrower does not then stick with the new lender for at least as few years, it could come with a cost for them. And if they had not been with the lender they switched from long, it could also cost their adviser, who might send them a bill. Most banks "claw back" some of what they paid a mortgage adviser if the borrower moves to a new bank or other lender within about two-and-a-half years. They also ask borrowers to repay some or all of the cash back they received as an incentive to move to the bank, for sometimes out to four years. The Commerce Commission recommended that home loan providers should claw back both the commission and cash back offers on a pro rated basis. But advisers say there are many different ways that it is calculated. One major bank has moved to a straight line claw back over 24 months, so that if someone switched banks after nine months, 15 months' worth of cash back or commission would be clawed back. But David Cunningham, chief executive at Squirrel, said other banks had rules such as 100 percent claw back in the first six months, 75 percent up to a year, 50 percent for 13 to 18 months and 25 percent claw back out to 24 months. Others clawed back 100 percent in the first 15 months and 50 percent out to 26 months. "Each bank is a little different," he said. Sometimes, when brokers have had their commission clawed back by a lender because a client had switched, they sought to recover it from the customer. But Glen McLeod, head of Link Advisory, said they were not usually able to claim the whole amount. "We're only allowed to charge a service fee at that particular time which is the maximum of 10 hours at $300 an hour. So, if I was clawed back a $5000 commission, I have to be able to show that I and my team have completed more than 10 hours work in order to be able to charge $3000 for the work we've done." He said it was reasonable for advisers to expect to be paid for the service they provided. "The situation now is that there's such an encouragement at refix time to refinance. That's not coming from advisers, that's fully led by cashbacks and people going 'well I've got a $2m mortgage, so that's $18,000 cashback' - it's hard to argue with $18,000 as an incentive to move... people are hurting out there, a $6000 cheque or even $4000 is a lot of money for people." He said his clients shifting generally did not incur a claw back because they had been with the lender long enough. "But I dare say there would be a few that are getting claw backs out there at the present time... and the clients too, if they've taken cash back before, you might get $6000 but if you've got to pay back $4000... You've got to talk about the facts and go through what are the financial benefits of your moving, what are the financial risks?" He said advisers would outline their fee structure and terms in the documentation they gave to clients. Some advisers also charged a fee if they helped a client with an approval and the client chose not to go ahead with it. "It might be a situation where the client has had a change of circumstances, maybe they've got an application in with us and we're all good to go then they lose a job. That's outside the client's control and so I'd be going I feel for you. Don't worry about it," McLeod said. Financial Services Complaints Ltd said it would receive about 12 to 15 complaints a year about mortgage advisers seeking to recover clawed back commission. "A few years ago, we developed a consumer guide to help explain what claw back fees or fees for service are, and why advisers may charge them in certain situations. We believe that this has helped improve understanding and contributed to a noticeable drop in complaints." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Police minister blames previous government for poor asset management
Police Minister Mark Mitchell. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Police Minister says the force's asset management has been of concern "for some time". RNZ reported on Thursday that Police admit over 170 back-office job cuts last year ate into its ability to manage costly assets. Mark Mitchell said the previous government failed to invest for six years in core operations. "This was allowed to deteriorate quickly," he said in a statement. The National-led government has since put about $240 million in to meet cost pressures, and more for vehicles and a boat, Mitchell said. He did not mention asset management systems, which a Treasury report showed were at least five years behind being fixed to work properly. Police said it has realigned leadership to manage assets better. Earlier this year, it was rated the worst out of 16 agencies Cabinet put on watch to do better in 2023. Yet in 2024, Police cut the back-office staff anyway, saying it would not hurt the front line. Eleven of the 16 agencies were on track to be up to Cabinet standards by this financial year, the report back to Treasury in February said. This included Health New Zealand (HNZ), though last year it had a raft of non-compliances - including one which HNZ said would take until 2028 to fix: Meshing finance, asset and investment management policies "to ensure assets are maintained to deliver the required level of service quality". Along with that hangover of poor asset management, Health NZ also justified its lack of a national health plan financially adept enough to persuade the Auditor-General as being because it was always going to take several more years to make it "mature" enough. It was not clear how this shortcoming fit with it complying with Cabinet's directive to improve asset management. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.