
This iPhone feature is the only reason I haven't switched back to a Pixel phone
I often find myself shuffling between phones — sometimes as frequently as switching handsets every week. And I make sure to replicate my home screen layout on each Android phone so that I don't feel unfamiliar when switching and my muscle memory doesn't act up either.
But every single one of those Android phones teases my inner urge to have everything look visually organized. When you have a bunch of widgets — all different shapes and sizes — plastered across multiple home pages, it ends up looking haphazard, no matter how much you try.
I flinch every time I glance at my home screen on Android, and that's one big reason I dread going back to a Pixel as my primary phone.
The iPhone is known to be very controlling about how things appear on the screen, even for third-party apps and widgets. And in this case, I honestly think it's a good thing. My home screen on the iPhone looks far more organized and pleasing to the eye just because of one feature: stacked widgets. With them, I can do a lot more on the same screen size instead of filling up ten home pages to house all my widgets.
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
Yes, I am a widget freak. But more than that, I'm someone who's a sucker for clean aesthetics — and I flinch every time I glance at my home screen on Android. It's something you stare at all day long, and that's one big reason I dread going back to a Pixel as my primary phone — even though Android 16 has me seriously tempted.
Do you want to see stacked widgets on Pixels?
1 votes
Yes
0 %
No
100 %
Android vs iOS: Stacked widgets edition
Stacked widgets are an ingenious way of saving space — and saving me from having to swipe through endless pages. I check traffic using the Google Maps widget twice a day and run my robot vacuum once in the morning. I do need those shortcuts, but they don't have to be in my face all the time, right?
On my Pixel, each widget occupies a permanent spot, whether I need it at the moment or not. And the inconsistency is just jarring, with different shapes, sizes, and corner radii that turn the whole screen into visual clutter. My LG AC widget awkwardly sits in a 1×1 slot while another smart home control eats up a 2×2 grid — both doing the same thing. It's insufferably chaotic, at least to my nit-picking eyes.
iPhone
iPhone
Pixel
OnePlus
In comparison, my home screen setup on the iPhone 16 Pro Max looks cleaner and calming to my nerves. All my smart home products are stacked into a single widget — whether it's an LG device or a no-name smart plug. I just scroll through the stack to find the one I'm looking for. The same goes for my search stack. I use multiple search and AI tools — Google, Perplexity, and ChatGPT — and I can cycle through them to start an instant search without each one separately hogging screen space.
More importantly, I can turn these into smart stacks — something iPhones have handled well even before AI became a cool buzzword. My phone now surfaces the world clock widget at the same time each day before I call my loved ones halfway across the world, while the stock market widget quietly disappears after the evening frenzy checks during a market crash.
That's not to say Apple's implementation is flawless. For instance, I wish Apple would offer a smaller size (say a 2×1 grid, vertically or horizontally), especially for widgets that only need a single tap. But still, there's so much value in stacked widgets that I didn't fully grasp until I had them — and now I just want Google to bring its own version to Pixels.
What would Pixels need to do?
Stacked widgets may look simple, but on Android, they'd be a pain to implement, mostly because of fragmentation. Google would need to take up the herculean task of aligning its millions of developers to make widgets in standardized sizes. But even that won't solve everything, because Android lets you customize grid sizes on your home screen, which complicates things further.
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
Frankly, if Google hasn't been able to get app developers to adopt themed app icons — with many still stubbornly clinging to their colorful logos — I'm not too confident it can pull off universal widget sizing, at least soon enough.
But there's still hope. Third-party developers have found workarounds, which makes me believe I'm not the only one frustrated by this gap.
Your current options
When it comes to Android, I am married to Pixel phones for their clean (read: superior) experience and day-one OS updates. So I want stacked widgets on my Pixel by default, without resorting to launchers or UI hacks.
But if you aren't as stubborn as I am, you've got plenty of options. Samsung added native support for stacked widgets a few One UI versions ago — so technically, Android has had this feature for a while now. It's just the Pixel that's missing in action.
Andy Walker / Android Authority
And others aren't entirely out of luck either. You can install third-party launchers like Action, Smart Launcher, or Niagara to get a stacked widget experience that I have been craving on Pixels. Just know that most of these solutions only let you stack similarly sized widgets — or stretch them awkwardly to fit, resulting in zoomed-in content or excessive padding. So these solutions are far from perfect, but they are still better than nothing.
There's so much value in stacked widgets that I didn't fully grasp until I had them — and now I just want Google to bring its own version to Pixels.
The only real fix is Google stepping in. It recently did something similar with Live Updates — bringing features together from Samsung, OnePlus, and other OEMs into a unified experience. So yeah, it could do the same for widgets if it really tried.
Until that happens, I'll keep sighing every time I swipe past the visual mess on my Pixel while quietly enjoying the neat order on my iPhone.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Launches Globally Distributed Exadata Database on Exascale Infrastructure
With strong share price gains and significant hedge fund interest, Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) secures a spot on our list of the 11 Hot Software Stocks to Buy Now. Ken Wolter/ On August 8, 2025, Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) was recognized as a Leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for Strategic Cloud Platform Services for the third consecutive year. This highlights increasing global demand for the company's AI infrastructure and distributed cloud capabilities. On the previous day, Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) launched its Globally Distributed Exadata Database on Exascale Infrastructure. With this launch, the company enables mission-critical applications to operate seamlessly across OCI regions globally. It offers always-on availability, petabyte-scale AI processing, and flexible serverless scaling. Meanwhile, on August 6, 2025, Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL)'s Oracle Financial Services achieved top honors from Celent across six digital banking evaluations. The recognition includes 'Luminary' status in Corporate Digital Banking Reports and XCelent Awards for 'Breadth of Functionality' in retail and SMB banking platforms. Thus, Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) is strengthening its leadership across AI, cloud, data management, and financial services technology with these achievements. Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) offers integrated cloud applications and secure, autonomous infrastructure. It helps businesses run workloads efficiently. It is included in our list of the hot stocks to buy. While we acknowledge the potential of ORCL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best AI Stocks to Buy Under $3 and Bill Ackman Stock Portfolio: Top 10 Stock Picks. Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citi Raises Cummins' Price Target
Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) is among the 11 Best Hydrogen Stocks to Invest in Now. Citi reiterated its Buy recommendation on August 6 and increased its price objective for Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) from $380 to $425. Citi raised projections and highlighted the stock's present price as appealing to investors in response to the company's Q2 results, which preceded the increase. Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) reported a 2% drop in revenue during the second quarter but an excellent 18% increase in EBITDA. The company's data center solutions displayed exceptional success, which helped to overcome a worsening forecast for its core truck business. Tariff consequences appear to be minor for the time being. The firm has decades of experience and industry leadership in diesel engines, particularly for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. The business has expanded its skills in additional heavy vehicle components throughout time, including drivetrains, brakes, and emissions systems. Cummins Inc. (NYSE:CMI) produces engines and generators for a range of industries, and the quickly growing data center market is driving up demand for its products. It is among the Best Hydrogen Stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of CMI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 High-Growth EV Stocks to Invest In and 13 Best Car Stocks to Buy in 2025. Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ChatGPT's model picker is back, and it's complicated
When OpenAI launched GPT-5 last week, the company said the model would simplify the ChatGPT experience. OpenAI hoped GPT-5 would act as a sort of 'one size fits all' AI model with a router that would automatically decide how to best answer user questions. The company said this unified approach would eradicate the need for users to navigate its model picker — a long, complicated list of AI models that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said he hates — to pick a version of ChatGPT that offers the right kind of responses. But it looks like GPT-5 is not the unified AI model OpenAI hoped it would be. Altman said in a post on X Tuesday that the company introduced new 'Auto', 'Fast', and 'Thinking' settings for GPT-5 that all ChatGPT users can select from the model picker. The Auto setting seems to work like GPT-5's model router that OpenAI initially announced; however, the company is also giving users options to circumnavigate it, allowing them to access fast and slow responding AI models directly. Alongside GPT-5's new modes, Altman said that paid users can once again access several legacy AI models — including GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, and o3 — which were deprecated just last week. 'We are working on an update to GPT-5's personality which should feel warmer than the current personality but not as annoying (to most users) as GPT-4o,' Altman wrote in the post on X. 'However, one learning for us from the past few days is we really just need to get to a world with more per-user customization of model personality.' ChatGPT's model picker now seems to be as complicated as ever, suggesting that GPT-5's model router has not universally satisfied users as the company hoped. The expectations for GPT-5 were sky high, with many hoping that OpenAI would push the limits of AI models like it had with the launch of GPT-4. However, GPT-5's rollout has been rougher than expected. The deprecation of GPT-4o and other AI models in ChatGPT sparked a backlash among users who had grown attached to the AI models' responses and personalities in ways that OpenAI had not anticipated. In the future, Altman says the company will give users plenty of advance notice if it ever deprecates GPT-4o. GPT-5's model router also appeared to be largely broken on launch day. That caused some users to feel the AI model wasn't as performant as previous OpenAI models, and forced Altman to address the problem in an AMA session on Reddit. However, it seems that GPT-5's router may still not be satisfying for all users. 'We're not always going to get everything on try #1 but I am very proud of how quickly the team can iterate,' wrote OpenAI's VP of ChatGPT, Nick Turley, in a post on X Tuesday. Routing prompts to the right AI model is a difficult task that requires aligning an AI model to a user's preferences, as well as the specific question they're asking. The router then has to make a decision on which AI model to send the prompt to in just a split second — that way, if a prompt goes to a fast responding AI model, the response can still be fast. More broadly, some people exhibit preferences for AI models that go beyond fast or slow responses. Some users may like the verbosity of one AI model, while others might appreciate the contrarian answers of another. Human attachment to certain AI models is a relatively new concept that isn't well understood. For example, hundreds of people in San Francisco recently held a funeral for Anthropic's AI model, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, when it was taken offline. In other cases, AI chatbots seem to be contributing to mentally unstable people going down psychotic rabbit holes. It seems OpenAI has more work to do around aligning its AI models to individual user preferences. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data