Alabama House passes bill prohibiting use of foreign national IDs to vote
The Alabama House of Representatives passed a bill Tuesday that prohibits people from using a foreign national drivers license or ID to vote in Alabama elections.
Sponsor of HB 480, Rep. Alan Treadaway, R-Morris, said he has heard of people using one of these IDs to vote in Alabama elections. Treadaway did not say where or how many.
'My understanding is there's been some confusion at the polling places,' he said.
People from foreign countries with legal status in the country may apply for driver's licenses or IDs from the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency but are not authorized to vote.
House Democrats criticized the legislation saying it is unnecessary. Rep. Mary Moore, D-Birmingham, prodded Treadaway for proof that this has happened.
'I would like to know where it happens and how frequently it happens before we jump into this,' Moore said.
Rep. Laura Hall, D-Mobile, questioned the need for a law if the ID is not on the list of approved photo-IDs to vote.
'If it's not one of them, why do we need a bill? It's already not one of the ones you can use to vote,' Hall said.
Treadaway said the IDs have caused confusion at polling locations and the bill would clarify that one could not be used in order to vote.
'If they have, or haven't been used, this bill simply says they cannot be used unless they get their U.S. citizenship,' he said.
The bill passed 76-5, with 21 abstentions. It goes to the Senate.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Texas GOP nears vote on new maps as Democrats stage protest in state House
Texas Republicans are moving closer to approving new congressional maps amid a Democratic show of protest over the GOP House speaker's order that members who fled the state weeks earlier be placed under law enforcement watch. The state House is set to reconvene Wednesday as Republicans push ahead with their Trump-backed redistricting plan, which would create five more GOP-leaning House districts in time for next year's midterm elections. The House could vote Wednesday and the Senate as early as Thursday. It's not yet clear exactly when the House will vote, however, and a lengthy floor debate could delay the process. Relegated to the minority, Democrats have no viable way to stop passage of the maps, but have continued to protest GOP tactics to prevent them from leaving the state again. House Speaker Dustin Burrows required that the quorum-breaking Democrats be placed under the around-the-clock supervision of the Department of Public Safety to be allowed to leave the House floor. However, state Rep. Nicole Collier has refused to do so and has been confined to the House chamber. Other Democrats on Tuesday evening ripped up the written agreements that allowed them to leave the chamber and vowed to spend Tuesday night on the House floor. 'This is a civil discussion and disagreement, and in order to win, the other side is willing to use force — to use the arms of a state to get what they want. Good guys don't do that,' Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic leader, told CNN's Pamela Brown on 'The Lead.' In California, Democrats moved forward with their own redistricting countermeasure. Two committees advanced a trio of bills that ask voters to amend the state constitution and approve new maps that create five additional Democratic leaning seats. Now that Democrats have returned to the state, the House is all but guaranteed to have the two-thirds quorum it needs to conduct business when Burrows gavels the chamber into session Wednesday. The only item on the day's agenda is House Bill 4 — the measure that would redraw the state's congressional map to add five more Republican-leaning seats. That bill cleared a committee on a party-line vote Monday. What's not clear is how long debate will last before votes place. It could drag well into Austin's evening hours. The state Senate, where the redistricting plan's passage is all but certain, is scheduled to return Thursday night. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott said Monday on Fox News that the new congressional maps 'will become law probably by the end of this week.' Burrows imposed an unusual requirement on the Democrats who ended their 15-day boycott and returned to the Capitol on Monday: They'd be released from the House floor into the custody of a Department of Public Safety officer who would ensure their return Wednesday. The move came after the civil arrest warrants Burrows signed shortly after Democrats fled the state proved unenforceable outside of Texas. Most Democrats complied with the law enforcement escort, showing reporters what they called 'permission slips' they received to leave the House floor and pointing to the officers escorting them around the Capitol. But some Democrats protested. Collier refused to leave the House floor, sleeping there Monday night and planning to do so again Tuesday. Wu and Rep. Vince Perez, who signed the 'permission slips' to leave with a police escort, stayed with Collier through Monday night. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' Collier said. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts. My community is majority-minority, and they expect me to stand up for their representation. When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' Other Democrats joined Collier and Wu on Tuesday night. State Rep. Penny Morales Shaw said after returning to the Houston area under police escort, she realized it was a mistake to enter into the agreement, arguing she is now 'correcting course.' 'Yesterday, I left in custody and I came back in custody, because I stand with Nicole Collier and Gene Wu,' she said. 'This is illegitimate, this is a wrongful use of power, and I will not condone it, and I don't want to be a part of setting a very bad and low precedent for future legislators.' The state's Senate and Assembly elections committees both advanced Democrats' redistricting countermeasure Tuesday, despite opposition from Republicans on the panels. 'When other states decide to do something else, we shouldn't react to them,' Republican state Assemblymember David Tangipa said Tuesday. 'We should prove by example that we can do this better.' Democrats have framed their push to redraw the maps as a check on Texas Republicans. 'Let's not dance around the issue here: If California Democrats had our way, the midterms would continue as they are, with a map drawn by the state's independent California citizens redistricting commission,' Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, the Assembly's Democratic majority leader, said during the chamber's elections committee meeting. 'But that's not good enough for this president or the Republicans following his commands in Texas and DC.' Under the proposals, voters would have the opportunity to approve or reject a constitutional amendment allowing Democrats to override the state's independent redistricting commission and redraw congressional lines through the 2030 elections. The proposed lines could net Democrats an additional five favorable seats as well as shore up the districts of some vulnerable incumbents. The bills will be considered by the Assembly's appropriations committee Wednesday at 9 a.m. PT/12 p.m. ET before the full legislature votes on Thursday. Democrats, who have a supermajority, will need two-thirds support in both chambers. Many California Republicans have acknowledged that their best chance to block the new maps are by defeating them in November. But that hasn't stopped GOP lawmakers from attempting to stop the proposed constitutional amendment from making it onto the ballot. California Republicans filed a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court Tuesday requesting an emergency injunction to stop the redistricting effort on the grounds that the legislature didn't give voters enough notice. State Rep. Carl DeMaio, a San Diego Republican, also filed a proposed citizens' initiative that would retroactively ban lawmakers who approve the constitutional amendment from running in one of the new districts. The proposal mirrors a rule that bans members of the independent redistricting commission from running on maps they drew. It's also a dig at DeMaio's Democratic colleagues, including Mike McGuire, the senate president pro tempore. McGuire, who is term-limited, is seen as a likely candidate to run in a redrawn Northern California district under the new maps. If DeMaio and his allies gathered enough signatures, the measure would not appear before voters until 2026. Republicans have also grilled Democrats over the origin of the maps, leading to tense exchanges during the Assembly's elections committee meeting Tuesday. 'Who drew the maps? It's a very simple question,' state Assemblymember Alexandra Macedo, the committee's Republican vice chair, said during the panel's Tuesday meeting. 'The assembly did,' Aguiar-Curry said. 'I'm in the Assembly, and I did not draw these maps,' Macedo responded. The chair of the Assembly's elections committee, Gail Pellerin, also declined to say who drew the maps during a gaggle with reporters Tuesday. Pellerin said it was a 'collaboration' with several people. One reporter asked: 'When you consume something, don't you want to know who makes it?' 'When I go to a restaurant, I don't need to meet the chef,' Pellerin said. 'I just enjoy the food.'
27 minutes ago
Democratic lawmakers demand information about 'Alligator Alcatraz'
A group of Senate and House Democrats is pushing officials at the Department of Homeland Security for more information about the use of the immigration detention facility in the Florida Everglades known as " Alligator Alcatraz." In a letter sent late Tuesday to the heads of the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and FEMA, the lawmakers expressed concern that the Trump administration's decision to use what lawmakers called a "novel state-run immigration detention model" could violate federal law and make the federal government less accountable for the conditions at immigrant detention centers. The letter comes as the Trump administration has embraced the model of using state-run facilities -- as opposed to federal or private ones -- to detain noncitizens during immigration proceedings, including using a shuttered state prison as an additional site in Florida, dubbed "Deportation Depot," and expanding ICE detention space in an Indiana correctional facility dubbed the "Speedway Slammer" and in a Nebraska facility to be called "Cornhusker Clink." "Experts worry this novel state-run immigration detention model will allow Florida to create an 'independent, unaccountable detention system' that runs parallel to the federal detention system," the group of eight senators and 57 representatives wrote. The "Alligator Alcatraz" detention facility has been the subject of intense political and legal scrutiny since it was rapidly constructed on the site of a rarely used airstrip in the Florida Everglades in June. The temporary detention center -- which currently can house 3,000 migrants awaiting deportation -- was toured by President Donald Trump and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in early July. "They have a lot of bodyguards and a lot of cops that are in the form of alligators. You don't have to pay them so much." Trump said while touring the facility. "I wouldn't want to run through the Everglades for long." In the letter, spearheaded by Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley and Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the lawmakers asked the Department of Homeland Security to provide more information about the facility by Sept. 3. They asked the Trump administration to identify the legal authority that allows Florida to run the facility, confirm the facility meets federal standards for the treatment of detainees, and outline the criteria used by DHS to reimburse Florida for the facility. "Brushing aside concerns from human rights watchdogs, environmentalist groups, and Tribal nations, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has greenlit the construction of this expansive detention facility that may violate detained individuals' human rights, jeopardize public and environmental health, and violate federal law. We ask that DHS promptly provide critical information for the American public to better understand this detention plan," the Democratic lawmakers wrote. The lawmakers also requested additional information about legal access for detainees at the facility and the environmental impact of the site -- issues that have been at the center of two federal lawsuits challenging the facility. A federal judge has temporarily paused further construction at the site over environmental concerns, and a lawsuit over legal access was partially dismissed after the Trump administration established a nearby immigration court to handle issues stemming from Alligator Alcatraz. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has previously said the facility complies with federal detention standards. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has lauded "Alligator Alcatraz" as an efficient way for Florida to work with the Trump administration to carry out deportations, and has encouraged other states to do the same. "I know that the administration has called on other states to follow suit and expand this type of capacity, and I would just reiterate that call. I think it's important. I think it will make a difference," DeSantis said at a press conference at the site in July. "The whole purpose is to make this be a place that can facilitate increased frequency and numbers of deportations of illegal aliens." Since "Alligator Alcatraz" opened in July, immigration advocates have been pushing for more information about the facility, arguing that the custodial and operational details were initially kept murky to prevent oversight. According to documents released in an ongoing lawsuit challenging the facility, the Florida Division of Emergency Management and Florida State Guard -- along with private contractors -- are running the site under a 287(g) agreement with the federal government. "While the aliens are in the physical custody of the State, they are for certain legal purposes treated as in the custody of the federal government," an attorney with the Department of Justice wrote in a court filing earlier this month. According to H. Marissa Montes, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the model used by Alligator Alcatraz allows the federal government to outsource detention facilities to eager states and private contractors. While the federal government has long relied on county jails and for-profit prison companies to house detainees, facilities like "Alligator Alcatraz" expand the scale of individual states' involvement in federal immigration proceedings, Montes said. "Given that DHS is working directly with the Florida state government on a detention facility with alarming implications, DHS should ensure transparency and accountability surrounding the facility's financing operations," the lawmakers wrote in their letter. With Trump vowing to carry out the largest deportation in U.S. history, the use of facilities like "Alligator Alcatraz" contributes to a deterrent effect that encourages self-deportation, according to Montes, who runs Loyola's Immigrant Justice Clinic. "We've got an increased number of people who come in seeking to self-deport because they'd rather self-deport in a way that's dignified, right, than at the hands of the federal government," Montes said.
Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Georgia Moves Closer to Eliminating Income Tax
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lawmakers in Georgia have met to discuss the possibility of axing personal income tax. Supporters say eliminating the state's income tax could attract businesses and residents, continuing recent tax relief efforts. Critics warn it would force service cuts or higher sales taxes, hitting low- and middle-income households hardest. Why It Matters Georgia has been amending its personal income tax rates in recent years. Governor Brian Kemp this year signed into law income tax rebates of up to $500 and a rate cut to 5.19 percent starting in January for all income earned in 2025. The measure is part of a broader plan to lower the rate to 4.99 percent. The law also replaced Georgia's system of tax brackets with a flat income tax. According to the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, individual income taxes are expected to amount to around 47 percent of Georgia's state revenue for the current budget year, which started on July 1. Currently, only eight states don't tax individual income, according to the Tax Foundation. What To Know The effort to abolish the Peach State's individual income taxes is being led by Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones, a Republican, who argued in a Tuesday meeting that reducing income taxes to zero would help the state stay competitive, particularly among southern states like Florida and Tennessee which have no income tax, and Mississippi and North Carolina, both of which are working toward eliminating personal levies. Jones said lawmakers have already given back billions of dollars to taxpayers in recent years through tax cuts, rebates and other measures. Some $7.6 billion has been returned to Georgia taxpayers through property tax relief, motor fuel tax relief, and income tax rebates and cuts, according to Kemp. "But we must go further," Jones told the Senate Special Committee on Eliminating Georgia's Income Tax. "We must seize this opportunity to lead the South, not trail behind it." The Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta on December 30, 2024. The Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta on December 30, 2024. GETTY Danny Kanso, senior fiscal analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said that for most Georgia households, eliminating the income tax would effectively be a "massive" tax increase. To offset the deficit, he said, the state would need to triple the sales tax and apply it to new products, calling that "a very tall order to replace the state's largest source of revenue." "[It] doesn't really make sense when you hear we're going to lower taxes, eliminate sources of revenue, and somehow we're also going to raise more money," Kanso said. "That's not something we've really seen work in the past." The committee also heard from Democrats, who warned that eliminating the income tax could force Georgia to either cut services or raise sales taxes, measures they said would hit low- and middle-income residents the hardest. "The same people who favor lowering taxes want the ambulance to be there in four minutes when their loved one is having a health crisis," said State Senator Nan Orrock. "That requires an investment." The committee also heard from Grover Norquist, president of the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform. Norquist argued that states like Florida, which has no income tax, continue to generate revenue even after cutting personal levies. He said that when businesses see states moving to eliminate the tax, they begin investing there, and residents follow. What People Are Saying Georgia Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones said on Tuesday: "If we want to continue to stay competitive here in the state of Georgia, and continue to be the number one state to do business, we've got to be looking for ways to keep us competitive and make it where we have a competitive advantage over states that we are competing with all the time." Danny Kanso, senior fiscal analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said in Tuesday's meeting: "The proposal would have to increase taxes on far more Georgians than it would reduce taxes on, and so it's a little bit of a solution in search of a problem that would likely cause ripples all across the state and across the economy as well." What Happens Next The committee has set a goal of delivering a workable plan to eliminate income taxes ahead of next year's legislative session, which begins in January 2026.
