logo
How Trump 2.0 Protests Compare to His First Term

How Trump 2.0 Protests Compare to His First Term

Newsweek04-07-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
It's been nearly six months since the reelection of President Donald Trump, and so far during his second term, the headlines have been filled with news of protests across the country.
From "Not My President's Day" demonstrations in February and the coordinated "No Kings Day" protests in June, which coincided with the president's 79th birthday, to anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles last month, thousands of people have turned up at demonstrations across the country.
But how do these protests compare with those during Trump's first term? With sweeping "Free America" protests due over the July 4 weekend, Newsweek spoke to experts to find out more about activism under Trump 2.0.
How Have Protests Movements Changed Under Trump 2.0?
"The simplest thing is, a much larger number of protests," Sid Tarrow, an associate member of the law faculty and Maxwell M. Upson Professor Emeritus Government Department at Cornell Law School, told Newsweek in a phone call.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/AP/Canva
Dana Fisher, director of the Center for Environment, Community & Equity and a professor at America University, echoed this, telling Newsweek via email that although "Resistance 2.0 has taken longer to build momentum," there have been "more protests during the first six months of Trump 2."
These have also been widely attended. The American Civil Liberties Union estimated that over 5 million people attended "No Kings" protests, of which it was an organizer, on June 14. The ACLU also reported that there were 2,100 protest events on that day alone.
G. Elliot Morris, former editorial director of political polling website FiveThirtyEight, reported in a post on his Substack that there have been nearly triple the number of political protests at this point in Trump's second term than there were the first time around—15,395 in 2025 compared with 5,043 in 2017, according to data he cited from Crowd Counting Consortium.
A Trump balloon floats above a "No Kings" protest on June 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.
A Trump balloon floats above a "No Kings" protest on June 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.National data from the American National Election Studies survey points to a general increase in protest participation from 2016 to 2020. It looked at youth participation and found that 18 percent of people aged 18 to 34 had participated in a protest, with another 29 percent saying they would do so in the future.
Fisher told Newsweek that protests and resistance movements are often made up of people who are older and highly educated, with less of a change in this respect this time around.
"Resistance 1 was clearly made up of highly educated, middle aged white women (and men)," Fisher said, adding: "Resistance 2.0 continues to be peopled by the same demographic, but more so: the participants are less diverse and more highly educated than Trump's first term."
Meanwhile Asef Bayat, a professor of sociology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, highlighted a difference in the background to protest movements.
"What distinguishes his second term is an unprecedented repression that...the U.S. has seen in the recent decades. Americans cannot simply take for granted the kind of freedom of expression and protests they once had," Bayat told Newsweek.
The Trump administration has taken measures to crack down on protests during his second term, including deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles in June, without the consent of California Governor Gavin Newsom, as protests against immigration raids escalated.
The president has consistently defended these crackdowns and emphasized a need for law and order.
The Issues Driving The Action
"Young people's participation in protest movements is driven largely by a major dissatisfaction with the state of politics and democracy," Alberto Medina, communications team lead at the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), told Newsweek via email.
"Only 16 percent of youth (ages 18-29) think democracy is working well for them," Citing Medina said, citing research from CIRCLE, adding: "There is also major distrust in institutions—especially major national institutions like the presidency, Congress, and the major political parties."
"Young people are seeing a democracy that they don't believe is working and institutions that they don't trust to fix it, so they're taking to the streets to express their dissatisfaction, exert political pressure, and demand change."
"The topics of protests are much, much broader," Tarrow said of the drivers under Trump 2:0. "It was as if people were waiting for the policy shoe to drop in order to protest against it."
"The repertoire of contention has considerably broadened compared to Trump's first term."
In June, there were anti-war protests following the U.S. strike on Iran. March brought Stand Up for Science rallies in response to cuts on science research funding. In May, tens of thousands of people demonstrated against the Trump administration's labor and immigration policies.
People protest the involvement of the U.S. in Israel's war against Iran near the Wilshire Federal Building on June 22, 2025, in Los Angeles, California.
People protest the involvement of the U.S. in Israel's war against Iran near the Wilshire Federal Building on June 22, 2025, in Los Angeles, California."The widened range of the protest movements against Trump are direct response to the widened and the more rapid range of policy moves that the Trump administration has made," Tarrow said.
Whereas there was "a real focus on large centrally coordinated demonstrations" during Trump's first term, Fisher said.
However, this time around, "The focus has been on more distributed actions that connect local people who are embedded in their communities," Fisher said, adding that "this structure makes it harder to see how big the mobilizations" are, apart from when they are "huge, like during the No Kings day of action."
One thing that has remained consistent is the tactics of the protests, which—despite some instances of violence—"continue to be focused on peaceful activism," according to Fisher.
How Might Protest Movements Continue To Evolve Throughout Trump 2.0?
Tarrow said that while it's hard to predict events over a three-and-a-half year period, the key date to observe will be the 2026 midterm elections.
"Protests will become more and more institutionalized, more and more aimed at particular Republican politicians," he said.
However, he said: "The magnitude of the threat has been perceived and worried about by people who are generally not protesters," adding, "I think we need to understand better, the degree that there's a transfer of protest energy into electoral energy, which I think there will be in November 2026."
Bayat shared a different possibility. "If repression continues, we might even see the rise of some kind of 'hidden sphere' (as opposed to public sphere) where people might remain silent or pretend to comply in public, but act or express views the opposite in private."
"This would have serious implications for political process," he added.
Fisher, meanwhile, said that while "Resisters the first time around thought that electoral politics could fix everything and that Trump 1 was a just a blip in the system or a mistake," this time round "everyone realizes that Trump's success was the product of a political system" and society "does not grant equal access to everyone."
"Fewer people are speaking about how [an] election will solve the problem this time around. Instead, the focus is on the need for systemic changes that fix the system that is not working for the majority of Americans and has expanded inequality in our country," Fisher said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Fed governor Cook 'must resign' as pressure campaign on central bank continues
Trump says Fed governor Cook 'must resign' as pressure campaign on central bank continues

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says Fed governor Cook 'must resign' as pressure campaign on central bank continues

President Trump on Wednesday called on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign as the public pressure on the central bank continues to build. "Cook must resign, now!!!" Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social Wednesday morning with a link to a Bloomberg report on a letter sent by Federal Housing Finance Agency head Bill Pulte urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Cook over a pair of mortgages. Pulte wrote in a letter dated Aug. 15 that Cook, 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud under the criminal statute.' The President's call for Cook to resign comes as public pressure on the Fed continues amid ongonig changes on the Fed's Board of Governors. Last week, Trump nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to the Fed board to fill a seat left empty by Adriana Kugler, who stepped down from the board on Aug. 8. Should Cook also step down, Trump would have the opportunity to nominate another Fed governor. The search for a replacement for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whose term leading the central bank ends in May 2026, also continues in the background with Trump last week saying the field of possible replacements for Powell was "down to 3 or 4" candidates. Trump has repeatedly called on Powell to cut rates more aggressively, coining the nickname "Too Late" for the Fed chair. Trump first appointed Powell to the role in 2017; President Biden renominated Powell as Fed chair in 2021. Powell is also a member of the Fed's Board of Governors, with his term set to expire in 2028; it isn't clear whether Powell will also vacate that post when his term as Fed chair ends next year. Reporting from CNBC, however, suggested up to 11 names are under consideration for Powell's role, including Jefferies chief market strategist David Zervos, who told CNBC Wednesday that the Fed has "never been independent." The mounting discussion around Fed independence and political pressure currently being levied at the central bank comes ahead of the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, which is set to feature Powell's key policy speech of the year on Friday morning. Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

'South Park' spoofs Trump's DC crackdown in new clip: Watch
'South Park' spoofs Trump's DC crackdown in new clip: Watch

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'South Park' spoofs Trump's DC crackdown in new clip: Watch

"South Park" is keeping its focus on President Donald Trump. The Comedy Central series has released a preview for its next episode, indicating the show will spoof Trump's law enforcement crackdown in Washington, D.C. The clip shows the recurring character Towelie, a talking towel who originated in a 2001 episode, arriving on a bus to the nation's capital, only to find it's swarming with troops and military tanks. "This seems like the perfect place for a towel," he says as a tank passes by the street outside of the White House. Earlier this month, Trump deployed hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in what he described as a crackdown on rampant crime. Mayor Muriel Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims, saying that the capital is "not experiencing a crime spike." The "South Park" episode, which is set to air on Wednesday, Aug. 20, is titled "Sickofancy," and the synopsis simply reads, "Towelie goes to Washington, D.C." The show has recently been nabbing strong ratings and drawing heat from the White House, with a season that has featured unusually pointed criticism of Trump and his administration. After uproar, 'South Park' pummels Trump again and hits at JD Vance, Kristi Noem It started in the Season 27 premiere, "Sermon on the 'Mount," which depicted Trump as a thin-skinned bully who is the lover of Satan. The episode also mocked Trump by showing a live-action version of him removing all of his clothes as part of a public service announcement. JD Vance reacts to brutal parody in latest 'South Park' episode White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers slammed "South Park" in a statement provided to USA TODAY on July 24, saying the show "hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention." But the show doubled down in the following episode, "Got a Nut," which featured more Trump jokes. The president was again shown as Satan's lover and, as part of a spoof of the ABC series "Fantasy Island," was depicted physically and verbally abusing Vice President JD Vance. Vance issued a succinct response to his depiction, writing on X, "Well, I've finally made it." The episode "Got a Nut" additionally spoofed Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, showing her repeatedly shooting dogs. It also mocked her appearance by having her face slide off and move around by itself like a horror film. Noem fired back on "The Glenn Beck Program" podcast on Aug. 7, saying that "it's so lazy to make fun of women for how they look." Contributing: Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Phillip M. Bailey and Anna Kaufman, USA TODAY

President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

Chicago Tribune

time11 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

SAN FRANCISCO — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store