logo
Is Los Angeles a sanctuary city? Here's what we know about the city's right to protect undocumented immigrants

Is Los Angeles a sanctuary city? Here's what we know about the city's right to protect undocumented immigrants

Hindustan Times5 hours ago

Amid the anti-ICE riots taking over the streets of Los Angeles, many are wondering whether LA is a sanctuary city, which in general limits or denies cooperation when asked to help the national government enforce immigration laws. Notably, in November 2024, the Los Angeles City Council unanimously passed a "sanctuary city" ordinance to protect immigrants who live in the city. The policy is meant to stop the use of city resources and personnel to carry out federal immigration enforcement.
The move last year followed Donald Trump's promise to carry out mass deportations of immigrants. Before the vote, pro-immigrant protesters were seen speaking on the steps of Los Angeles City Hall, as reported by Reuters. They held up signs saying, "Los Angeles Sanctuary City Now!" They also chanted in Spanish, "What do we want? Sanctuary. When do we want it? Now."
Nithya Raman, an immigrant who came to the US when she was just six years old, called it a 'common sense policy.' The Los Angeles City Councilmember for the 4th District since 2020 is a member of the Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialists of America who defeated incumbent Councilmember David Ryu in 2020. She said in a newsletter last year, 'LA's new Sanctuary City Ordinance permanently enshrines sanctuary policies into municipal law and prohibits the use of City resources, including property and personnel, from being utilized for immigration enforcement or to cooperate with federal immigration agents engaged in immigration enforcement. The Ordinance also goes beyond our existing Sanctuary City Executive Directive in an important way: it prohibits the direct and indirect sharing of data with federal immigration authorities, an important gap to close in our city's protections for immigrants.'
According to Britannica, 'A sanctuary city is an American municipality that limits local enforcement of federal immigration laws to protect undocumented immigrants. Such policies are established at a city, state, or county level and may be formally enforced or a de facto practice. Although there is no official definition of a sanctuary city, such cities typically enact one or more immigration-inclusive policies.'
After the raids in Los Angeles, Andres Kwon, attorney and senior policy counsel at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, issued a statement weighing in on the city's sanctuary status. 'Angelenos know that immigrants make up the fabric of this beautiful and diverse city. It is because of their strength and courage that our city leaders recently designated Los Angeles a sanctuary—promising to keep families together and defy the Trump administration's cruel and inhumane actions,' Kwon said.
'Today, city leaders broke their promise. LAPD officers assisted federal agents in terrorizing L.A. neighborhoods—impeding people from going to work, making their immigration court appearances, or attending their children's graduations,' the statement added, urging elected officials to to take 'all action necessary to grind this oppressive and vile paramilitary operation to a halt and keep our city safe and whole.'
On Sunday morning, June 8, the first members of the National Guard arrived in Los Angeles following Trump's order to deploy 2,000 troops in the city. The US President has hailed the National Guard, and slammed LA Mayor Karen Bass and California Gavin Newsom for being 'unable to handle the tasks' of calming the city, according to the New York Post.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greta Thunberg, activists pushed back from Gaza; Israel shares video of Madleen boat
Greta Thunberg, activists pushed back from Gaza; Israel shares video of Madleen boat

First Post

time28 minutes ago

  • First Post

Greta Thunberg, activists pushed back from Gaza; Israel shares video of Madleen boat

Israel shared a video of the prominent activists who were onboard the Gaza aid ship, which will now head towards Ashdod Port. Defence Minister Israel Katz said that the passengers will be shown videos from October 7. read more Israel's Foreign Ministry shared a video showing the detained activists who were bound to an aid boat heading to Gaza. The Israeli authorities shared the video after seizing control of the vessel named 'Madleen', which was carrying prominent activists, including Climate Activist Greta Thunberg. The Israeli Foreign Ministry shared the video of the activists on board being given food and water. The Israeli authorities have been calling it a 'selfie yacht,' negating the importance of the mission. 'All the passengers of the 'selfie yacht' are safe and unharmed. They were provided with sandwiches and water. The show is over,' the ministry wrote in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Earlier, the ministry noted that the boat was being towed to Israeli shores, and the activists would be deported soon after they arrive in Israel. The Israeli authorities noted that the 'tiny amount of aid' it was carrying would be sent to Gaza. All the passengers of the 'selfie yacht' are safe and unharmed. They were provided with sandwiches and water. The show is over. — Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) June 9, 2025 Where is the boat now heading According to The Times of Israel, the Madleen and its passengers will be taken to the Israeli port of Ashdod. The Israeli news outlet reported that the naval unit, Shayetet 13, was responsible for the interception at around 3 am local time. Meanwhile, Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz, issued a statement congratulating the Israeli army on the 'quick and safe takeover' of the Madleen, the Gaza-bound aid vessel. Katz said that activists would show the video of the October 7 attacks. 'I congratulate the IDF for the quick and safe takeover of the 'Madlan' flotilla to prevent them from breaking the blockade and reaching the shores of Gaza. I instructed the IDF to show the flotilla passengers the video of the horrors of the October 7 massacre when they arrive at the port of Ashdod,' the Israeli defence minister said in the post. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Israeli Navy is currently communicating with the 'selfie yacht'. Using an international civilian communication system, the Israeli Navy has instructed the 'selfie yacht' to change its course due to its approach toward a restricted area. — Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) June 8, 2025 'It is appropriate that the anti-Semitic Greta and her fellow Hamas supporters see exactly who the Hamas terrorist organisation they came to support and for whom they work is, what atrocities they committed against women, the elderly, and children, and against whom Israel is fighting to defend itself,' he added. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the interception of the vessel and called for the protection of the crew onboard. The MFA based in the West Bank said that it 'appreciates their efforts and the extreme hardships and dangers they endured at sea in pursuit of this noble humanitarian goal of standing by our people in the Gaza Strip.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Ministry calls on the international community and all countries to heed the call of international activists and their humanitarian message,' the ministry further reads.

Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement

New Indian Express

time28 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect Monday amid rising tension over the president's escalating campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed last week, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. While many of the listed countries send few people to the United States, Haiti, Cuba and Venezuela had been major sources of immigration in recent years.

How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s
How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s

NDTV

time31 minutes ago

  • NDTV

How China Has Been Blocking India's UNSC Actions Since The 2000s

In the India-Pakistan strategic dynamic, China has emerged as an inextricable third actor, turning a bilateral rivalry into a triangular matter. While military escalation in the subcontinent does not align with Beijing's strategic interests, its pro-Pakistan leanings often manifest on international platforms. Most recently, China blocked the designation of The Resistance Front (TRF), an alleged offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), following the 2025 Pahalgam attack. This move reflects a longstanding pattern: China has consistently complicated New Delhi's diplomatic efforts to isolate Pakistan-based groups in global forums. As India seeks broader consensus on counterterrorism designations, particularly at the UN Security Council (UNSC), China has frequently intervened by blocking or delaying the listing of individuals affiliated with anti-India groups such as LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). A 'technical hold' in the UNSC sanctions process allows a member state to indefinitely delay designation without a formal veto. For decades, China has exploited this to delay, if not deny, sanctions on Pakistan-linked terror architecture without triggering a diplomatic confrontation. The symbolic framing of China-Pakistan relations, famously described by former Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani as 'higher than mountains, deeper than oceans, stronger than steel, and sweeter than honey", for now has translated into sustained strategic cover for Pakistan on the international stage. Chinese media's description of terrorism in India, such as the Pahalgam attack, as a case of 'shooting' by local gunmen against civilians, further supports the Pakistani narrative of the conflict. 'Technical Holds' China's pattern of using 'technical holds' in the UNSC 1267 Sanctions Committee can be traced to the early 2000s. After the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, India began pushing for international sanctions against Pakistan-based outfits. While China supported the designation of groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, it remained reluctant to target individuals associated with these anti-India groups, most notably JeM chief Masood Azhar, who was finally listed in 2019. India's first formal request to enlist Azhar came in 2009, following the Mumbai attacks and was followed up in 2016, 2017, and 2019. While international pressure eventually influenced this reversal after two decades, the exclusion of any reference to the Pulwama attack in the final listing allowed China to maintain that Azhar's designation was based on his long-standing links to terrorism rather than a specific attack on India. Over time, the Pathankot attack of 2016 and the Pulwama suicide bombing in 2019 resulted in intensified Indian diplomatic efforts targeting Pakistan-based terrorist leaders and groups. All efforts were impeded by China's technical holds, despite co-sponsorship by France, the UK, and the US. At large, this trend continues. In 2023, Beijing blocked a joint India-US proposal to list Abdul Rauf Asghar and other anti-India terrorists. Double Standards This stands in contradiction to China's own counterterrorism posture against separatist and Islamist groups that threaten Chinese nationals and investments in Pakistan, including in major cities like Karachi. In 2021, a suicide bomber affiliated with the Baloch Liberation Army's (BLA) Majeed Brigade attacked a convoy carrying Chinese engineers and workers, killing three Chinese nationals near the Jinnah International Airport and the Chinese consulate area in Karachi. China has also raised similar concerns with the Taliban administration in Afghanistan regarding the alleged presence of Uyghur militant groups, such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). This antithetical approach serves dual purposes - mitigating pressure on Pakistan's influential military establishment while keeping India preoccupied with cross-border security challenges. The SCO Factor China's selective counter-terror posture also plays out in other multilateral groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which remains a key arena for its regional influence. With India and Pakistan inducted as full members in 2017, China portrayed the bloc as a pan-Asia alternative to Western-led groupings. But India's strong stance against cross-border terrorism and leanings towards the QUAD bloc have complicated that narrative. India's limited participation in the SCO, especially since 2019, is increasingly shaped by the grouping's silence on cross-border terrorism allegations against Pakistan. India's decision to downgrade its summit participation to a virtual format in 2023 further challenges China's efforts to position the SCO as a counterweight to US influence in the region. For China, India's continued engagement in the SCO remains crucial for maintaining the bloc's diplomatic credibility. India could continue framing Chinese obstructionism as a significant concern for global counterterrorism efforts with the aim of raising the reputational and diplomatic costs of China's inaction, without relying solely on the UNSC system. India's widening engagement with QUAD, involving Australia, Japan, India, and the US, through military exercises and joint dialogues, will also keep China on edge by signalling a strengthened Indo-Pacific alliance countering the Chinese regional influence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store