
Visitors warned not to feed bears at national parks amid increase in incidents: "Bears learn quickly"
"Feeding bears is not only illegal; it can be extremely dangerous for bears and visitors," the Great Smoky Mountains National Park wrote in the warning.
The park reported an increase in incidents where tourists intentional fed bears, including three separate occurrences in just one week. In one case, a visitor fed a mother bear and her two cubs and was issued a citation.
Intentionally feeding wildlife in the park is a federal offense and can result in fines of up to $5,000 or imprisonment for up to six months, park officials said. Any park visitor who sees someone intentionally feeding a bear should inform park authorities, the NPS said.
"Bears learn quickly" and are endangered by intentional feeding, the park said. If a bear is fed by a person even once, that can lead to the animal becoming "conditioned to human food," the park said. This can result in the bear seeking out people and exhibiting more aggressive behavior while losing its natural fear of humans, putting both park visitors and bears at risk. Bears seeking out human food are also more likely to be hit by a car, the park said.
"In some cases, feeding a bear can result in the euthanasia of the animal," the park said. Officials in Yellowstone National Park had to trap and kill an 11-year-old male grizzly bear in May after the animal became conditioned to human food. The bear began overturning bear-resistant dumpsters and trash cans to access human food, the park said.
The Great Smoky Mountains National Park is home to about 1,900 American black bears, according to the NPS. Bear activity is high in the area between May and August because the animal's breeding season is putting a stress on natural food sources. Eighteen-month-old yearlings are also being left by their mothers and learning how to navigate on their own for the first time. These younger bears are more likely to wander into areas where humans are, the park said.
About 339 "negative human-bear encounters" are reported annually in the park, the NPS said. Many more incidents go unreported. While black bears are not normally aggressive, they will defend food and cubs. They may fight back if cornered, and may attack dogs, the NPS said. Dogs are involved in the majority of physical encounters between people and bears, the agency said.
Visitors to national parks should never feed or approach bears. Coming within 150 feet of the animals can result in fines and arrest, the park said. All food and trash should be stored securely and disposed of in bear-resistant containers. Visitors should also stay alert while in the park, and report unusual bear behavior to park authorities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why you're probably better off just avoiding Rashee Rice in your fantasy football drafts this season
The 'will he, won't he' nature of Rashee Rice's potential and inevitable suspension saga took another turn Thursday morning. ESPN's Adam Schefter reported that Rice's disciplinary hearing with the NFL will take place on Tuesday, Sept 30 in New York, which means his suspension would only begin sometime after that date. When Rice entered into a plea bargain stemming from the 2024 multi-car crash in Dallas back in July, fantasy gamers assumed the NFL's disciplinary process would begin soon and Rice would serve his suspension — estimated anywhere from four to eight games — at the start of the season. That's now completely out the window, as he'll be eligible to play in the first four games of the 2025 NFL season. Those matchups include a Week 1 Brazil game with the Chargers, a Super Bowl rematch with the Eagles in Kansas City, a trip to New York vs. the Giants and a home game against the Ravens. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Beyond the fact that this has been a super laborious and drawn-out disciplinary process for someone who deserves immense scrutiny for what he did, this is straight-up bad for fantasy drafters considering Rice. I firmly believe fantasy content creators have gotten too over-focused on 'the weeks that matter' toward the end of the season rather than hammering how important it is to win in September, as I outline in my Draft Day Blueprint mega-article. However, it's objectively true that the easiest time to fill in the gap around a suspended or injured player is earlier in the season. There are no bye weeks to consider, you haven't sustained injuries yet and the most appealing waiver-wire heroes are often made apparent in the first few weeks of the year. Essentially, you have your whole lineup at your disposal to fill in the gaps. That will no longer be the case if Rice serves his four-to-eight-game suspension anywhere between Weeks 5 and 18. Not that the Chiefs have a Week 10 bye that can't count toward a suspension and there's no guarantee the league hands out punishment right after the September 30 hearing before their Week 5 kickoff against the Jaguars on October 6. We've seen this before. Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott was suspended six games during the 2017 NFL season over accusations of domestic violence. Elliott was originally suspended for the first six weeks of the season but after appeals and court litigation pushed it off, he ended up serving the suspension from Weeks 10 to 15. The process for both situations is an apples-to-apples comparison but the point is the same: You're in the Wild West of projecting when the player will miss time. Yahoo drafters were taking Rashee Rice at an ADP of 61st overall. That seemed more than fair enough of a risk/reward proposition for a player who has been ultra-productive in a terrific offensive ecosystem. Since he entered the league in 2023, Rice has been targeted on 27.4% of his routes, sixth-most among wide receivers who have run 300-plus routes, and ranks seventh in first downs per route run. I do have my concerns about Rice holding up to that level of production long-term, given that he doesn't have the complete WR1 skill set as a man-coverage-beating or downfield receiver that every other name in the top 10 of those two metrics brings to the table. The YAC-based zone-beaters who struggle to beat man coverage can be susceptible to environmental changes more than traditional WR1s. Just look back to JuJu Smith-Schuster's rise and fall for an example of this; I think they're incredibly similar players. However, that's more of a dynasty concern. If Rice is on the field for this Chiefs offense, he's likely ticketed for another year of heavy volume of layup targets as the team's power slot receiver, unless Xavier Worthy takes a massive leap forward. Before Thursday's update, I had Rice ranked 52nd overall and was willing to take the plunge in Round 5 even if he was set to miss the start of the season. Now that the suspension is a complete unknown from a timing perspective, the calculation has to change. I've hammered this over and over again this offseason but the Rounds 5-8 wide receiver draft board is just so appealing. There are even appealing picks all the way into the 110-to-120-overall range. None of those bets are flawless but at least I'm not walking into the season carrying a massive burden of unknown and locking myself into multiple missed games during crucial bye weeks. I won't sink Rice past that 120 overall range or anything like that, but a big dip into the 90s and outside the top-40 wide receivers feels appropriate. There's likely a way to take Rice, start him in the first four weeks and insulate your wide receiver corps with the deep pool of WRs this year to make up for his absent weeks. However, I question if the reward of such a pursuit is as great as the fantasy community may imagine. That's because there is another significant risk factor to Rice's profile that we haven't touched on here yet — and is way too often ignored in the fantasy circles. Rashee Rice is coming off a major injury that ended his 2024 season after less than four games. One of the (slightly galaxy brain) takes in some circles of the fantasy community over the last month — when Rice pled guilty in July — was that missing the first few games of the season may actually be good for Rice. This would allow him to get healthier coming off the significant injury and you wouldn't have to start him in the games he may be working back into form. Instead, you'd just plug him into the lineup when he's close to fully operational after four, six or however many games he missed. I'm not sure if that ever made sense but either way, that's out the window now. You're now getting Rice for those first four games when he may indeed be working back from that injury. And just because he's been practicing, you've seen some nice-looking clips of him and the team is saying he looks good, does not mean you are guaranteed anything close to 100% Rice when the real games begin. Drafters made this exact same mistake with Tank Dell last season for all the same reasons listed. Despite participating fully in the offseason, Dell was not productive to start the year, averaging 32.3 yards per game, 9.7 yards per catch and scoring just once in the first seven weeks of last season. It took no time at all when turning on the film in September to see that, while there was a wide receiver out there wearing No. 3 for the Houston Texans playing a normal snap count, that guy didn't play anything like the Tank Dell we saw cut through secondaries as a rookie before going on IR with a lower body injury. Dell eventually returned closer to form as the year wound down, but this still provides a cautionary tale when discussing Rice's projections early in 2025. We act like these guys are names on a spreadsheet, or players in Madden. They're not. Just because they're out there on the field doesn't mean they are capable of performing at their normal level when working back from something significant. Sometimes, it's the year after the year following the injury. Rice's 'ramp up back to normal in-game performance' phase could be in the first four weeks when he's eligible to play and is then whisked away from your lineup the moment he's turning the corner. That's not to mention how coming back from an injury like this may, at best, temporarily sap some of his explosiveness early in the season, which is troubling for a wideout who doesn't win down the field with nuance or separation, but rather as a hammerhead with speed and power in the open field. Maybe all of that worry is for naught and he's fantastic in the first four weeks of the season. That's within the range of outcomes. However, the risk is present and I don't see any of that discussed in the analysis of him from a fantasy standpoint, nor is it at all baked into either his current ADP or even where he was going in best-ball drafts prior to the July plea bargain. Rashee Rice is one of the riskiest propositions on the board in fantasy football drafts this year. It would be one thing if it were a simple four-game suspension to start the year. It's not. It's an unknown length of absence that will come in the middle of the season for a player working back from a significant injury, a player who inhabits a somewhat fragile role as a YAC-based zone-beater for an offense that desperately needs to find a downfield dimension. What if Xavier Worthy takes off in Year 2 as a vertical threat at the start of the season and only cements himself further while Rice is suspended? Are we absolutely confident that Rice returns to the type of outrageous volume he was getting in Weeks 1 to 3 last year? You have to be certain to wade into the incredibly clouded waters that now define his 2025 season. With how strong the wide receiver board is after Round 5, with a litany of appealing bets — some early in their career and others undervalued veterans — there are just too many ways the Rice selection can go wrong. He's a pretty easy avoid for me inside the top 90 selections and there are too many analysts focused on that per route efficiency for me to imagine he falls farther than that.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Mayor Of Chicago Fired Back At Donald Trump Calling Him "Incompetent," And His Response Is Going Viral For Being The "Bar Of The Year"
The Mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, is going viral for his "brilliant" takedown of a reporter and Donald Trump, which people are calling the "bar of the year." Chicago — like other major cities across the nation — is preparing for a potential "federal takeover of policing" following Donald Trump's issuing of National Guard troops on the streets of Washington, D.C. in the name of fighting crime. Recent videos of FBI and DEA agents patrolling the streets of Georgetown — a D.C. neighborhood — wearing tactical gear have gone viral online. FNTV / Twitter: @ScooterCasterNY Related: "If we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster," Trump said in a recent press conference. "We have a mayor there that's totally incompetent. He's an incompetent man." It's important to note that, according to FBI statistics, violent crime in Chicago is down. Well, the mayor of Chicago was repeatedly asked by a reporter to respond to Trump calling him "incompetent," and his response is going super-viral. "What do you say to Donald Trump? How did you feel when Donald Trump called you 'incompetent?' Please answer that question if you will," a reporter asked from the crowd. Related: "OK. Fine. Since you are begging," Johnson replied to the reporter. The reporter then tried to interrupt, but Johnson continued. "So let me just answer that. I do appreciate you begging," he repeated. "So, I will just say it like this, that the President has always been intimidated by the intellectual prowess of Black men." Related: "And so, of course, he would speak in those petite and puerile terms, because he's small." The clip of the interaction has received over 1.5 million views on TikTok and thousands of comments. People are absolutely obsessed with Johnson's quick-witted response, with many applauding the way he addressed the eager reporter. ...Others called Johnson's comments on the President the "bar of the year." Related: "Using vocabulary that he won't even understand is damn poetic," one person wrote. "*MAGA furiously googles petite and puerile,*" another person joked. And this person praised Black politicians who have clapped back at Trump. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:


Gizmodo
5 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Infowars Is Back on the Market
The Onion could finally get its hands on Alex Jones' far-right media empire Infowars. On Wednesday, a Texas state judge ordered Infowars' parent company's, Free Speech System, assets be handed over to a court-appointed receiver, who will oversee their sale. The proceeds will be used to pay Jones' massive debt to the families of the children killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. The families won a $1.3 billion defamation case in 2022 against Jones, who spent years peddling false claims that the massacre was staged and that the grieving parents were crisis actors. His followers harassed the families for years. Judge Maya Guerra Gamble granted the receiver broad authority over Free Speech Systems' assets including the power to change locks on their properties, access storage units and safe-deposit boxes, and take control of their websites. 'Today's order brings us a critically important step closer to achieving the goal that the Connecticut families have spent years fighting for: holding Alex Jones accountable for years of harm,' said Chris Mattei, an attorney for the Connecticut families, in an emailed statement to Gizmodo. 'The receiver is now authorized to liquidate his business assets, and we look forward to the corrupt media empire that Jones built finally being dismantled.' Mark Bankston, an attorney for the families based in Texas, told NPR, 'The families are relieved that the court has placed Infowars' parent company into receivership, a step that will finally hold Alex Jones accountable for his monstrously cruel harassment.'' Infowars did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Gizmodo. Last December, a federal bankruptcy court judge in Texas blocked the proposed sale of Infowars to The Onion. He ruled that the bankruptcy auction process was flawed and that the satirical media company's bid was too low. The Onion's parent company, Global Tetrahedron, had offered $1.75 million in cash for the site, a bid supported by the families of the Sandy Hook victims. Bidding against them was First United American Companies, a group affiliated with Jones that helps manage his dietary supplements business, which submitted a $3.5 million offer. The Onion's original plan was to relaunch Infowars this year as a parody of itself. 'The Onion's goal with the acquisition is to end Infowars' relentless stream of disinformation used to sell supplements and replace it with The Onion's own relentless stream of humor for good,' the company said in a press release before the sale was blocked. With the state court's latest ruling, The Onion's chance to snatch up Infowars is back on the table. The company didn't immediately respond to Gizmodo's request for comment.