
Landowner tipped over ESB tractor with driver inside to stop tree trimming
Tom O'Shea, Stellrose, Wheelam, Milltown, Newbridge, Co Kildare, had previously, in 2009, interfered with efforts to trim trees on land he owns and ultimately was brought before the High Court for breaching undertakings not to do so.
Advertisement
On May 6th last, the ESB attended lands he owns, over which the Cushaling-Newbridge 110kv overhead lines run, to start work on cut back growth under a statutory power it has to access lands with such lines and after notifying Mr O'Shea.
In a sworn statement for court, Stephen Mortimer, high voltage and cables central region project leader, said Mr O'Shea arrived later that morning and told them to leave. He said if they were not out in an hour, "I will pull down the line", Mr Mortimer said.
He headed back in the direction of his farmyard, returned and then got into his own tracked digger and used it to tip over the tractor with the saw on its side with the driver inside, he said.
Attempts to disable his digger failed when he fought back, and two injured parties backed off, Mr Mortimer said. Mr O'Shea then locked his digger and walked back towards his home.
Advertisement
Gardaí were called and they later arrested him with the Garda Armed Support Unit seizing his licensed firearm. The two injured parties were taken to hospital.
Two further attempts were made to access the land, and on the last one, on June 18th, Mr O'Shea had locked a gate into the field, and everywhere was blocked.
Mr Mortimer said an injunction was now required due to the defendant's persistent and continued refusal to allow access. The works are required to ensure the health and safety of anybody on the lands and to ensure critical maintenance planned for this season can be carried out, he said.
Ireland
Heir of Barne Estate 'shocked' by €50K brown envel...
Read More
There are four lines on the land, and there is a serious risk that the interference will lead to disruption of continuity of supply to an extensive volume of customers, he said.
Advertisement
Two 110kV lines serve the greater eastern and midland region, and another 38kV line which serves around 18,000 customers. There is a potential that these customers could be left without power, and there could be a severe impact on the national grid, he said.
On Wednesday, Mr Justice Brian Cregan granted permission to serve proceedings on Mr O'Shea following a one side only represented application by Stephen Dodd SC, for the ESB.
The judge said that, given the urgency of the matter, it could come back before the court on Friday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why three concert-goers are suing Royal Albert Hall for £500,000
Three long-standing Royal Albert Hall seat holders have launched a High Court lawsuit against the venue's corporation, seeking over £500,000 in damages. Arthur George and William and Alexander Stockler allege the Royal Albert Hall has "unlawfully" deprived them of their rights to their seats by excluding them from more performances than its rules permit. Their legal representatives are asking a judge to declare the exclusion practice unlawful, grant an injunction, and award an interim payment of £500,000. The Royal Albert Hall corporation opposes the application, arguing the case should proceed to trial. The corporation also suggests the claimants' complaints are linked to "various financial matters" and that they consented to or acquiesced in the granting of additional exclusive lets.


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Off-duty officers in Pride event told not to wear items linking them to police
Off-duty Northumbria Police officers who choose to take part in a Pride event this weekend have been told they must not wear clothing linking them to the force. The decision by Northumbria Police comes after a court ruled that the force acted unlawfully by allowing its officers to take part in a Pride event last year. High Court judge Mr Justice Linden said his ruling on Wednesday related only to the 2024 event and that it was up to the force to decide how it approaches Saturday's parade. Northumbria Police has now confirmed uniformed officers will not be permitted to take part and said any of those who are off-duty and do participate must not visibly identify themselves as being officers or members of the force through clothing, flags, or accessories. In an update on Friday, the force also said any participating off-duty officers must not 'express support for political aims (e.g. changes to law or policy) or opposition to other lawful views'. On-duty attendance 'is only permitted where it forms part of the official policing response', the force said. In a statement it said the approach was 'designed to maintain public confidence in our impartiality, while also respecting our employees' individual rights under the European Convention on Human Rights'. It added: 'This guidance is not about limiting personal expression, but about ensuring that when our people represent Northumbria Police, they do so in a way that is fair, balanced, and impartial to all communities.' Lindsey Smith, who describes herself as a 'gender critical' lesbian, took legal action against Northumbria Police over its decision to allow officers to participate in the Newcastle Pride in the City event last July, in which she also participated. Lawyers for Ms Smith told the High Court that the officers' involvement breached impartiality rules, and that the decision to allow them to take part was unlawful, although barristers for the force opposed the challenge, claiming the decision, made by Chief Constable Vanessa Jardine, was within her 'discretion'. In his judgment, Mr Justice Linden said Ms Smith is opposed to 'gender ideology', which she believes is 'wrong and dangerous' but has been 'embraced' by the organisers of the event, Northern Pride. While Ms Smith agreed that the event should be policed, she objected to officers 'associating themselves with the views of supporters of gender ideology and transgender activists by actively participating', the judge said. Last year's event saw uniformed officers march with some carrying flags which included Pride colours alongside police insignia, and others wearing uniforms with the word 'Police' in Pride colours. There was also a 'static display' staffed by uniformed officers, which displayed a Progressive Pride flag, which includes representation of transgender and non-binary people, people of marginalised ethnicities and those living with Aids, the judge said. A police van with the colours of the transgender Pride flag painted on its sides was also present, the court was told. Northumbria Police said it will have a community engagement display at Northern Pride this weekend, adding that it believed a complete withdrawal of police engagement from such events 'would be a retrograde step and damage trust and confidence amongst members of LGBTQ+ community'. The force added: 'We want to ensure everyone knows that we are absolutely here for them when they need us.' The LGB Alliance charity called on the rest of the UK's police forces to follow suit on the withdrawal of uniformed officers from such events and to put in place measures around the participation of off-duty officers. The charity's chief executive Kate Barker said: 'Since our founding, LGB Alliance has been working with police and crime commissioners to raise our supporters' concerns about partisan policing that favours gender activists over LGB people. 'We will continue this work until the UK's remaining 42 forces follow the lead of their colleagues in Northumbria, and stop endorsing a movement they do not understand.'


BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kilkenny: Speeding fines quashed due to camera location error
Hundreds of drivers in the Republic of Ireland have escaped fines and penalty points due to a mistake in processing a speed camera's Garda Síochána (Irish police) said a total of 914 speeding fines issued to drivers for offences on the N25 road in County Kilkenny are being were detected by a static speed safety camera between 30 May and the end of June.A gardaí spokesperson said the fines have been overturned because of "human error when inputting the offence location onto the processing system". Some drivers had paid the fine and been issued with penalty points before gardaí became aware of the error on 30 said they are now in the process of writing to those drivers."This error is very much regretted," Ch Supt David Harrington added: "An Garda Síochána is very conscious of our statutory responsibility for road safety and is committed to delivering a professional policing service to enforcement of speeding via a variety of speed safety cameras." Earlier this year almost 2,000 Irish motorists had fines and penalty points quashed after their speeding was detected by an uncertified speed 1,871 drivers who were caught speeding on the N17 in County Mayo late last year had fixed charge notices overturned.