Tesla's Semi trucks to roll out from Nevada gigafactory by end of 2025
Tesla, in an update on Semi, said that the first units of the electric trucks would be on the production line by the end of 2025 at its Nevada gigafactory campus.
Advertisement
Dan Priestley, who leads the Semi programme at Tesla, said in a video posted to YouTube on Monday, that the factory had an annual capacity of 50,000 units, adding that the company would prepare for high volume production over the next few quarters.
'First units are set to be on the line by the end of this year, and we'll be ramping the factory throughout 2026,' Priestley said.
Tesla, which has been looking to build a truck-making business for years, had said it would have the Semi in production by 2019. In October 2022, CEO Elon Musk told investors that his goal was to make 50,000 Semis in 2024.
A sign marks the entrance to the Tesla Gigafactory in Nevada. Photo: AP
Tesla's plans to ship components from China for the Cybercab and the Semi in the US were suspended after President Donald Trump raised tariffs on Chinese goods amid a trade war, Reuters exclusively reported earlier this month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
Beijing says it's US that has violated tariffs deal
Beijing says it's US that has violated tariffs deal The revocation of visas for Chinese students is cited by Beijing as a discriminatory restrictive measure. File photo: AFP The United States has seriously undermined the consensus reached during the China-US economic and trade talks in Geneva by successively introducing multiple discriminatory restrictive measures against China, the Ministry of Commerce said on Monday. These measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and announcing the revocation of visas for Chinese students, according to a spokesperson for the ministry. These actions severely violated the consensus reached during a phone call between the two heads of state on January 17 and gravely harmed China's legitimate rights and interests, said the spokesperson. The United States has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations, according to the spokesperson. "Instead of reflecting on its own actions, the United States has groundlessly accused China of violating the consensus, a claim that grossly distorts the facts," the spokesperson said. "China firmly rejects these unjustified accusations." Noting that China has canceled or suspended relevant tariff and non-tariff measures adopted against the US "reciprocal tariffs," the spokesperson said China has acted in a responsible manner, taking the consensus reached in the Geneva talks seriously, implementing it rigorously, and upholding it actively. "China is firm in safeguarding its rights and interests, and sincere in implementing the consensus," the spokesperson said. Calling the outcomes of the Geneva talks "hard-won," the spokesperson urged the United States to work with China in the same direction, immediately correct its wrong practices, jointly uphold the consensus of the talks, and promote the healthy, stable and sustainable development of China-US economic and trade relations. If the US side insists on going the wrong way and continues to harm China's interests, China will resolutely take forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests, according to the spokesperson. (Xinhua)
RTHK
4 hours ago
- RTHK
Beijing says it's US that has violated tariffs deal
Beijing says it's US that has violated tariffs deal The revocation of visas for Chinese students is cited by Beijing as a discriminatory restrictive measure. File photo: AFP The United States has seriously undermined the consensus reached during the China-US economic and trade talks in Geneva by successively introducing multiple discriminatory restrictive measures against China, the Ministry of Commerce said on Monday. These measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and announcing the revocation of visas for Chinese students, according to a spokesperson for the ministry. These actions severely violated the consensus reached during a phone call between the two heads of state on January 17 and gravely harmed China's legitimate rights and interests, said the spokesperson. The United States has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations, according to the spokesperson. "Instead of reflecting on its own actions, the United States has groundlessly accused China of violating the consensus, a claim that grossly distorts the facts," the spokesperson said. "China firmly rejects these unjustified accusations." Noting that China has canceled or suspended relevant tariff and non-tariff measures adopted against the US "reciprocal tariffs," the spokesperson said China has acted in a responsible manner, taking the consensus reached in the Geneva talks seriously, implementing it rigorously, and upholding it actively. "China is firm in safeguarding its rights and interests, and sincere in implementing the consensus," the spokesperson said. Calling the outcomes of the Geneva talks "hard-won," the spokesperson urged the United States to work with China in the same direction, immediately correct its wrong practices, jointly uphold the consensus of the talks, and promote the healthy, stable and sustainable development of China-US economic and trade relations. If the US side insists on going the wrong way and continues to harm China's interests, China will resolutely take forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests, according to the spokesperson. (Xinhua)
Asia Times
20 hours ago
- Asia Times
A US cavalier talks 'imminent' war in Singapore
In his recent speech in Singapore, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pledged to defend the region against Chinese aggression and encroachment. This should have reassured the audience presumed to be concerned about China's assertiveness. Yet, possibly, the room listening to him wasn't quite ready to believe what they were hearing. The past few months have been full of surprises for Asia. Technically, Japan is still at war with Russia, just as South Korea is with North Korea. And yet, both Russia and North Korea are fighting in Ukraine— a country that has been left hanging by the US because Washington is (was?) seeking to turn Russia (and maybe also North Korea?) against China. This situation is spreading anxiety in Asia. China may suddenly look more straightforward, reliable and easier to talk to. Plus, Chinese jet fighters look more formidable than French fighters because the French aircraft (adopted by the Indian Air Force) performed poorly compared to the Chinese ones (adopted by Pakistan) in the recent bilateral clash. Furthermore, everyone in the region— starting with the US's closest allies— is scrambling to understand what kind of trade deal they can make with America. It is all creating huge uncertainty in the region. So far, no one feels they have a clear picture, and no one has a deal. Then, America doesn't address these issues, but comes and lambasts China. Maybe Japanese, or Thai or South Korean, could say: 'Sure, China is my biggest concern in the long term. But geography doesn't change, and what if America doesn't have my back in one or two years? It dropped me about Russia and North Korea, it bugs me about my trade surplus, but it wants me to push harder on China. Sure, I'll do it, but I'll need to hedge my bets— at the very least.' These contradictory statements and actions are causing massive unease in Asia. Many (maybe all) American regional allies are getting cold feet about the US. Their feet are getting even colder because, despite many warnings, America doesn't seem to realize the gravity of the situation and that Asia can't be separated from what is happening in Europe. In the 1950s and 1960s, the Korean and Vietnam Wars had a massive impact on Europe. To cap it all, the Chinese—and thus true believers in conspiracy theories—could see this erratic US behavior as evidence that the US administration is caught in a loop of irrationality or is penetrated by Russia. Moscow could likely fuel those suspicions. And still, the pragmatic Chinese would be puzzled: if the Russians are so good at plotting in Washington, why didn't they get a peace deal in Ukraine already? Thus, short of certainty, Beijing would not sensibly talk to Washington without a clear picture of what was happening. It would realistically wait to see the developments with the US and the world. This also impacts Europe, now closely following Asian developments, and Russia. Moscow has fewer incentives to seek peace in Ukraine when the whole American fabric seems to be unraveling. America can decide to be cavalier about all of this, and the problems will certainly fester and rot transpacific and transatlantic trust, weakening US clout in the regions and the world. Or it can decide to address these concerns, which need profound rethinking. This article first appeared on Appia Institute and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here.
