logo
‘A slap on the face': Orlando Marine vet among thousands to lose jobs in federal employee purge

‘A slap on the face': Orlando Marine vet among thousands to lose jobs in federal employee purge

Yahoo02-03-2025

Doug Jackson liked working for the federal government.
A U.S. Marine veteran who served in the Iraq War, he worked for a stretch at NASA and then in January took a job in the Internal Revenue Service's Orlando office. The federal government — which encouraged veterans to apply — offered a stable, familiar workplace and one that counted his four years of military service toward retirement benefits.
Not any more. Jackson, 40, of Orlando, this week found himself among the estimated 30,000 federal employees to suddenly lose their jobs amid the Trump administration's mass firings across swaths of federal agencies.
'It has pulled the carpet out from underneath a lot of people,' Jackson said.
Now Jackson, a married homeowner, is unexpectedly worried about his finances and wondering why his work history, which also included a stint as an veterans' advocate lobbying for legislation to benefit military retirees, has been suddenly devalued.
'This is a slap on the face when I've spent my life serving in government or working for the public interest,' he said.
Billionaire Elon Musk and the ad hoc group 'DOGE' have been targeting new, probationary hires like Jackson for termination across the board since President Donald Trump returned to office last month.
When Jackson learned a fellow recent hire, a disabled Army veteran, had been fired via email, he was still working at the IRS but figured his survival may have just been an oversight. He was right.
''Hey, who's Doug Jackson?'' his supervisor was asked by her superiors, he said. 'I was just so new, I wasn't on some sort of roster that they used to compile all the probationary hires.'
His work at the agency 'is no longer in the public interest,' a letter he received this week stated.
'It's completely impersonal,' said Jackson. 'It's not based off of merit or someone's credentials or even a performance report. It's just, 'Oh, you're probationary, or you're a new hire. Okay, you're gone.''
The layoffs will leave federal agencies weaker, Jackson said. 'It will certainly make their recruitment efforts more difficult, retention efforts more difficult, and just overall create instability,' he said. 'Which, I think, is all by design.'
The Trump administration — claiming it was seeking to end waste and fraud — has terminated employees in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Federal Aviation Administration, the National Park Service, and the Weather Service, among many others. In addition, another 75,000 federal employees took what have been described as 'buyouts,' the legal status of which remains unclear.
A Thursday court injunction put a temporary restraining order on the Office and Management and Budget, finding its firing of probationary employees illegal, but the action does not affect Jackson and IRS employees, he said.
The mass layoffs appear to be just beginning. Russell Vought, the OMB director, told agencies to prepare for an additional 'large-scale reduction in force' by March 13. Vought has called federal employees 'villains' who should be 'in trauma.'
But the American public does not share those views. More than half said that Musk was cutting 'useful programs' and only 38% approved of the job he was doing, according to a YouGov poll released this week. DOGE was also the most disliked federal office in the survey, with 37% of Americans saying they wanted the group reduced or eliminated, up from 34% last week.
'They're playing with fire now,' said Aubrey Jewett, a professor of political science at the University of Central Florida. 'I don't think most Americans who voted for Trump were expecting large, indiscriminate cuts to people's jobs as part of the bargain for voting for him.'
'Venal depravity': Florida Dems spotlight people at risk in GOP budget cuts
Such mass firings, Jewett added, seem 'really disrespectful' and could also hurt the economy.
The number of Americans applying for jobless benefits last week jumped to 242,000, the highest in three months.
'That is all a potential problem for the president,' Jewett added.
Florida ranks fifth among the 50 states for the largest number of civilian federal employees, according to the Congressional Research Service, with more than 94,000 as of March 2024. More than 26,000 of those employees live in and around Orlando.
The districts with the largest number of those employees are largely represented by Republicans in Congress. That includes more than 12,000 in Districts 7 and 11, held by Republican representatives Cory Mills and Dan Webster.
Veterans make up nearly 30% of all civilian federal employees. Mills, who served in the 82nd Army Airborne in Iraq and Afghanistan, did not return a request for comment about the layoffs left with his office.
Jackson said the firings are creating a 'disproportionate' impact among his fellow former servicemembers.
An Alabama native, Jackson said much of the country seems unaware of how federal government operations impact their lives.
'I've spoken to friends and even family who don't quite understand the work that I've been doing for the last several years,' he said. 'They're looking from the outside and just agreeing. 'Okay, yep, the budget is bloated. Government has gotten too big. We need to make some bold moves'.'
Continuing to gut the federal workforce, he said, will have a 'negligible, almost immeasurable effect' on the overall budget, as salaries make up only about 4% of the total.
After leaving the military, Jackson pursued a master's degree at Rollins College. As a part of the Pathways program, which allows the government to recruit talent among those still pursuing degrees, Jackson worked in communications for NASA.
With no permanent position available once he graduated, he worked as a government contractor for two years before beginning the months-long process of getting hired at the IRS.
He was assigned to the downtown Orlando office, though his internal communications team mostly worked remotely. His team's duties included speechwriting for executives and writing guidance to employees.
'The IRS already struggles with public favor,' he said. 'When it's being gutted, it's hard to imagine that their capabilities won't be impacted.'
Now he is anxious to find a new job quickly. 'I'm not really looking at the federal government,' Jackson said. 'That would be my preference, but I'm looking towards the private sector.'
He also plans to write about his experiences and share that work publicly, hoping to educate others.
'I'm trying to think of ways that I can contribute, in a small way, to explain to people who don't understand that there are specific consequences to what's happening,' he said. 'Despite people's eagerness to see a more efficient federal government, this isn't the way to do it. And it's hurting people.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider
After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider

The Hill

time7 hours ago

  • The Hill

After the Trump-Musk dustup, NASA has much to consider

The social media-driven feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk may have simmered down a bit, with the rhetoric cooling and Musk even deleting some of his ill-considered posts about Trump from X and then apologizing for them. But the shockwaves generated by the tit-for-tat insults and threats still reverberate through NASA and the commercial space sector. When Trump threatened to pull all of SpaceX's government contracts and Musk responded by threatening to decommission the Dragon spacecraft, an apocalyptic scenario that would have cripped NASA loomed. Fortunately, both men have since backed off. Even so, according to the Washington Post, NASA and the Defense Department are quietly urging commercial space companies to hurry the development of hardware that can compete with what SpaceX has to offer. Encouraging competition with SpaceX is sound policy regardless of the relationship between Trump and Musk. However, that competition is months, if not years, in the future. The next flight of the Boeing Starliner, which failed so spectacularly in 2024, will be early next year at the earliest. The Blue Origin New Glenn, an answer to the SpaceX Falcon family of rockets, may launch once more this year and is a long way from achieving Falcon-level launch cadence. It is in Trump's and Musk's interests, and that of the American space effort, that both men repair their relationship and move on. One of the issues that drove Trump and Musk apart was Trump's abrupt and inexplicable withdrawal of the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and private space traveler, for NASA administrator. Musk had championed Isaacman, who is well regarded in the aerospace community, and took it to heart when Trump changed his mind about his own nominee. The resulting leadership vacuum at NASA is being filled by Congress. The Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), has offered its own ideas for a NASA budget. The Senate Commerce document is at odds with the White House proposal in one important aspect. Whereas the Trump budget eliminates the Space Launch System after Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway, Senate Commerce would retain the massive, expensive rocket at least through Artemis V and would build the Gateway to support future Artemis missions. A NASA administrator such as Isaacman would be able to argue for the White House's approach. As for Isaacman, some people in the MAGA world, no doubt stung by the near-universal outrage sparked by his treatment at the hands of the White House, have started to trash the former nominee in the media. A recent Daily Caller story quoted unnamed White House officials accusing Isaacman of not only giving money to Democrats but of supporting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives at his companies and in his private spaceflights. But both of these facts were known when Isaacman was nominated. According to the story, the officials said, 'Isaacman would have been a black spot on an administration otherwise filled with Republican Trump supporters or, at least, individuals like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who backed the president prior to the election.' To hear these unnamed sources talk, Isaacman is no better than left-wing House members Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and their Squad. It should be noted that even if Isaacman wanted to impose DEI policies at NASA, he couldn't because of Trump's executive order prohibiting it across the federal government. Isaacman posted to X in his own defense: 'I am a moderate and donated to both parties for different reasons … my largest contribution was to President Trump — because I support many of his policies. I definitely did not like the direction this country was going over the last 4 years.' He went on to state, 'I have never spoken against the President. I have never voted against him.' It sounds like Isaacman is very loyal to Trump, remarkable under the circumstances. The suggestion of disloyalty is spurious and against the White House's interests. Isaacman's situation could provide the basis of a rapprochement between Trump and Musk. Musk has already apologized to the president for some of his posts on X, particularly the one suggesting that Trump is named in the Department of Justice's files on Jeffrey Epstein. But the president should admit fault as well. He was deceived by some of his staff about Isaacman's character. If it is not too late, he should reverse himself a second time and send his fellow billionaire's name back into nomination. NASA, the U.S., and the Trump-Musk partnership would gain as a result. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled 'Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon?' as well as 'The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently, 'Why is America Going Back to the Moon?' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.

IRS: Avoid ‘falling behind' by making second-quarter estimated tax payment by June 16
IRS: Avoid ‘falling behind' by making second-quarter estimated tax payment by June 16

CNBC

time11 hours ago

  • CNBC

IRS: Avoid ‘falling behind' by making second-quarter estimated tax payment by June 16

The second-quarter estimated tax deadline is June 16 — and on-time payments can help you avoid "falling behind" on your balance, according to the IRS. Typically, quarterly payments apply to income without tax withholdings, such as earnings from self-employment, freelancing or gig economy work. You may also owe payments for interest, dividends, capital gains or rental income. The U.S. tax system is "pay-as-you-go," meaning the IRS expects you to pay taxes as you earn income. If your taxes are not withheld from earnings, you must pay the IRS directly. Here's a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business. The quarterly tax deadlines for 2025 are April 15, June 16, Sept. 15 and Jan. 15, 2026. These dates don't line up with calendar quarters and so can easily be missed, experts said. The second-quarter deadline in particular "often sneaks up on people," especially higher earners or business owners with irregular income, said certified financial planner Nathan Sebesta, owner of Access Wealth Strategies in Artesia, New Mexico. "I often see clients forget capital gains, side income, or large distributions that were not subject to withholding," Sebesta said. Quarterly payments are due for individuals, sole proprietors, partners and S corporation shareholders who expect to owe at least $1,000 for the current tax year, according to the IRS. The threshold is $500 for corporations. If you skip the June 16 deadline, you could see an interest-based penalty based on the current interest rate and how much you should have paid. That penalty compounds daily. On-time quarterly payments can help avoid "possible underpayment penalties," the IRS said in an early June news release. Employer withholdings are considered evenly paid throughout the year. By comparison, quarterly payments have set time frames and deadlines, said CFP Laurette Dearden, director of wealth management for Dearden Financial Services in Laurel, Maryland. "This is why a penalty often occurs," said Dearden, who is also a certified public accountant. You can avoid an underpayment penalty by following the safe harbor guidelines, according to Dearden. To satisfy the rule, you must pay at least 90% of your 2025 tax liability or 100% of your 2024 taxes, whichever is smaller. That threshold increases to 110% if your 2024 adjusted gross income was $150,000 or more, which you can find on line 11 of Form 1040 from your 2024 tax return. However, the safe harbor protects you only from underpayment penalties. If you don't pay enough, you could still owe taxes for 2025, experts say.

DOGE gets failing grade
DOGE gets failing grade

Boston Globe

time13 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

DOGE gets failing grade

1: The DOGE numbers don't add up. Calculating how much DOGE has saved is difficult, but it's not at all hard to see that it didn't deliver what was promised. After Musk revised down his own early projection of DOGE savings from $2 trillion to $1 trillion, the department's website now estimates it has found more than $170 billion in taxpayer savings — Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But even that figure should be taken with a grain of salt, given that past examinations of DOGE's ' Advertisement DOGE moved to correct the error, as well as change the website to make such errors harder to find. But a Advertisement And though it may seem counterintuitive, cutting jobs doesn't actually translate to savings if it results in less productivity — if fewer IRS workers means less tax revenue is collected, for instance. An And even some Republican lawmakers have expressed unease with backing many DOGE-recommended cuts in a $9.4 billion legislative 'rescissions' package to claw back previously approved funding. House lawmakers 2: DOGE has roiled the job market. According to the latest jobs numbers, DOGE cuts contributed to a 50 percent spike in layoffs in May over the same period last year, Exacerbating the damage the firings alone have created is the chaotic way in which they were implemented. Federal agencies like the State Department, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Food and Drug Administration, National Weather Service, and the IRS are among those rushing to rehire terminated employees. That's because many of the estimated 135,000 DOGE-axed positions are for critical functions, like approving drugs and forecasting weather disasters. The layoffs' often-disorganized manner has confused dismissed workers and overtaxed remaining ones, many of whom have been asked to work overtime, volunteer to take on additional roles, or be pushed into new positions, Advertisement One former FDA worker That's not to mention the blow to communities in states where the largest percentages of federal workers are located, as well as government contractors that face secondhand profit and job losses due to the cuts. Outside of the greater Washington, D.C. region, which includes Virginia and Maryland, the hardest-hit states when it comes to canceled government contracts based on anti-DEI initiatives alone include Texas, California, North Carolina, Georgia, and Colorado — affecting politically red communities as well as blue. DOGE's harms know no partisanship. 3: The incalculable costs. On Monday a 'This was a breach of law and of trust,' wrote Judge Denise Cote in issuing the temporary injunction. 'Tens of millions of Americans depend on the Government to safeguard records that reveal their most private and sensitive affairs.' Whether some or all of DOGE's efforts to gain access to Americans' most sensitive information through agency databases will be declared unlawful is still uncertain. Challenges are still being litigated, and in a lawsuit involving DOGE access to Social Security data, the Advertisement According to Some DOGE staff have been granted temporary 'edit-access' to data, which means the information can be altered or deleted entirely within the federal system. That says nothing of the broader global impact, particularly through the dismantling of agencies like the United States Agency for International Development, which once provided critical life-saving humanitarian aid across the world. DOGE has The government claims that shuttering the agency saved Americans nearly $60 billion, or less than 1 percent of the federal budget. According to Advertisement Musk is already back to playing with his cars and rocket ships as the federal government picks up the pieces from his DOGE tantrum. But the global ripple effect is a reminder that some of the damage can't be undone. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store