Sean 'Diddy' Combs used violence to traffic women, prosecutor says as trial closes
Sean \"Diddy\" Combs waves to supporters as he arrives with his defense lawyers during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
Sean \"Diddy\" Combs waves to supporters as he arrives with his defense lawyers during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
Sean \"Diddy\" Combs watches as prosecutor Emily Johnson announces the government has rested their case during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 24, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
Sean \"Diddy\" Combs attends a charge conference with his defense lawyer Xavier R. Donaldson during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 25, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
Sean \"Diddy\" Combs attends a charge conference with his defense lawyer Xavier R. Donaldson during Combs' sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., June 25, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
NEW YORK - Sean "Diddy" Combs used "violence and fear" to lead a criminal enterprise that helped him subject two of his former girlfriends to sex trafficking, a U.S. prosecutor said on Thursday in her closing argument at the music mogul's trial.
Combs, a former billionaire known for elevating hip-hop in American culture, has pleaded not guilty to racketeering conspiracy and two counts each of sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted on all counts, the Bad Boy Records founder faces a minimum 15-year prison term and could be sentenced to life behind bars.
Over more than six weeks of testimony in Manhattan federal court, jurors heard two of Combs' former girlfriends testify that they took part in days-long, drug-fueled sex parties sometimes called "Freak Offs" with male sex workers while Combs watched, masturbated, and sometimes filmed.
The jury saw hotel surveillance footage of Combs beating one of the women in a hallway, and heard Combs' employees describe setting up hotel rooms and buying drugs for the performances.
"The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted," prosecutor Christy Slavik told jurors in her address. "He thought that his fame, wealth and power put him above the law."
The jury is expected to start deliberations either late on Friday or on Monday. Combs, a rapper and entrepreneur known for turning artists like Notorious B.I.G. and Usher into stars, has been held in federal lockup in Brooklyn since his September 2024 arrest.
Both alleged victims - the rhythm and blues singer Casandra "Cassie" Ventura and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane - testified Combs also threatened to cut off financial support or leak sex tapes when they complained about their treatment.
Combs' defense lawyers acknowledge that Combs was occasionally violent in domestic relationships, but have argued that his conduct did not amount to sex trafficking because the sex acts described by prosecutors were consensual. They are expected to deliver their closing argument on Friday.
Ventura and Jane both testified that they at times took part in the performances because they loved Combs and wanted to make him happy, and defense lawyers have argued he had no way of knowing that they were not participating willingly.
During her closing argument, Slavik brought jurors' attention to text messages they had seen in which Jane told Combs she felt obligated to take part in the performances out of concern Combs would stop paying her rent.
Slavik told jurors that to convict Combs, they only needed to find that one of the dozens of "Freak Offs" was the result of Combs' coercion, and that he knew or should have known that Ventura or Jane participated unwillingly.
"It doesn't require them to say no, it doesn't require them to try to run away," Slavik said.
DUELING NARRATIVES
Combs did not testify. Defendants in U.S. criminal cases are not required to present evidence, and judges instruct juries not to hold a refusal to testify against defendants. To win a guilty verdict, prosecutors must prove their cases beyond a reasonable doubt.
Legal experts said the jury would need to consider the prosecution's evidence of Combs' abuse against the defense's evidence that the women consented to the performances in at least some instances. The 12-member jury must be unanimous to convict Combs on any of the counts.
"The question is which narrative is going to hold more weight," said Heather Cucolo, a professor at New York Law School.
Slavik argued that Combs is guilty of racketeering conspiracy because his employees enabled and concealed his behavior.
Combs' lawyers have argued there was no conspiracy in part because his employees were not aware of anything improper about the sexual performances, and that any drugs they procured for their boss were for his personal use. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump administration plans second deportation of Abrego, but not to El Salvador
FILE PHOTO: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who lived in the U.S. legally with a work permit and was erroneously deported to El Salvador, is seen wearing a Chicago Bulls hat, in this handout image obtained by Reuters on April 9, 2025. Abrego Garcia Family/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo Trump administration plans second deportation of Abrego, but not to El Salvador WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump's administration is planning to deport migrant Kilmar Abrego for a second time, but does not plan to send him back to El Salvador, where he was wrongly deported in March, a lawyer for the administration told a judge on Thursday. It is not clear when the deportation might occur or whether it would happen before the criminal case accusing him of smuggling migrants into the United States is complete. Justice Department lawyer Jonathan Guynn said during a hearing in federal court in Maryland that the United States does not have "imminent plans" to remove Abrego from the United States. If deported, Abrego would be sent to a third country and not El Salvador, Guynn said. He did not name the country. Abrego, a Salvadoran national, was deported and imprisoned in El Salvador in March despite a 2019 judicial decision barring him from being sent there because of a risk of persecution. The Trump administration brought Abrego back to the United States this month to face federal criminal charges accusing him of transporting migrants living illegally in the United States. He has pleaded not guilty. The case of Abrego, 29, who had been living in Maryland with his U.S. citizen wife and their young son, has become a flashpoint over Trump's hardline immigration agenda. The federal judge overseeing Abrego's criminal case has ordered him released ahead of trial as early as Friday, but the Trump administration has said it plans to immediately take him into immigration custody. His fate would then be unclear. Abrego's lawyers have asked that Abrego be kept in Maryland and that the Justice Department, which is prosecuting the criminal case, and the Department of Homeland Security, which handles immigration proceedings, ensure he is not deported while the criminal case remains pending. Federal judges in Maryland, where Abrego is suing over the March deportation, and Tennessee, where criminal charges were filed, are both yet to rule on Abrego's requests. Robert McGuire, the top federal prosecutor in Nashville, Tennessee, told U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes at a hearing in the criminal case on Wednesday that he would coordinate with the Department of Homeland Security as best as he could but ultimately could not control their decisions about where to house Abrego and whether to deport him. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
International Business Times
2 hours ago
- International Business Times
Linet Vartanians: Wife of Iranian Illegal Immigrant Threatened to Shoot ICE Agents When They Reached Her Home to Arrest Husband
The wife of an Iranian illegal immigrant allegedly threatened to shoot ICE agents in the head when they showed up at the couple's Arizona home to arrest her husband, Mehrzad Asadi Eidivand, who had been ignoring a deportation order for over ten years. Linet Vartanians, 37, is accused of threatening federal agents that she had a loaded weapon and would open fire on anyone who tried to enter the couple's Tempe home, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. She also allegedly made direct threats to shoot the ICE officers in the head as they stood outside the home on Saturday. Arrested for Threatening ICE Agents Both Linet Vartanians and illegal immigrant husband, Mehrzad Asadi Eidivand, 40, were federally indicted on Tuesday, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Eidivand has been under a deportation order since 2013 but has remained in the U.S. illegally. When ICE agents arrived at their home, they were met by Vartanians, who refused to let them in, demanded a warrant, and then contacted local police, the U.S. attorney said. A police dispatcher who spoke with Eidivand said that the undocumented immigrant admitted to having three firearms in the house. Federal agents came back the next day with a search warrant and found one loaded gun on the kitchen counter and another on a nightstand. The couple was arrested that same day. The Trump administration has intensified its efforts to arrest Iranian nationals as part of its broader mass deportation strategy, particularly in the aftermath of U.S. airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. Over the past week, ICE arrested 130 illegal Iranian immigrants across the U.S., including people suspected of terrorism, according to NewsNation. Big Suspects Arrested Among those arrested is an Iranian army sniper and a suspected terrorist linked to Hezbollah. Ribvar Karimi, who was an Iranian Army sniper from 2018 to 2021, was arrested in rural Alabama, where he had been living with his American wife. ICE agents tracked him on Sunday in the town of Locust Fork and found an identification card from the Islamic Republic of Iran Army in his possession, DHS claimed. Karimi legally arrived in the US in October during the Biden administration on a K-1 visa, which is issued to foreign nationals engaged to American citizens. Karimi married his fiancée, Morgan Gardener, in January of this year. However, he did not complete the necessary steps to adjust his immigration status, which rendered his stay in the U.S. illegal. Karimi's American wife maintains that he loves America and considers himself a proud immigrant. "This man loves America, the first purchase he made when he got here was an American Flag," Morgan Gardner told a local station. "If he was here on bad intentions, he wouldn't have done that, he wouldn't be willing to walk around with a flag, knowing he could get deported and sent back to a country where he could be killed for that." She is currently seven months pregnant with their first child and fears she may have to give birth without him by her side.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
India denies entry to UN aviation investigator in Air India crash probe, say sources
NEW DELHI - India would not allow a UN investigator to join a probe of a crashed Air India jet that some safety experts had criticised for delays in analysis of crucial black box data, two senior sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Earlier this week, the United Nations aviation agency took the unusual step of offering India one of its investigators to provide assistance following the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crash killing 260 people in Ahmedabad on June 12. Previously, the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) has deployed investigators to help with certain probes, such as the downing of a Malaysian plane in 2014 and a Ukrainian jetliner in 2020, but those times the agency had been asked for assistance. ICAO had asked for the investigator who was in India to be given observer status, but Indian authorities refused the offer, the sources said. The news was first reported on June 26 by the Indian news channel Times Now. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is leading the probe into the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade, did not return a request for comment. ICAO was not immediately available for comment. India's civil aviation ministry said on June 26 that investigators downloaded flight recorder data around two weeks after the crash. Previously, safety experts had questioned a lack of information about the probe, including the status of the combined black box unit recovered on June 13, along with a second set that was found on June 16. A police officer standing in front of the wreckage of the Air India aircraft that crashed during take-off from an airport in Ahmedabad, India on June 12. PHOTO: REUTERS Questions were also raised on whether the recorders would be read in India or in the US since the National Transportation Safety Board is participating in the investigation. The Indian government held only one press conference on the incident, and no questions were taken. Under international rules known throughout the industry by their legal name 'Annex 13', the decision of where to read flight recorders should be made immediately in case the evidence obtained could avert future tragedies. Earlier this week, an Indian aviation ministry official who declined to be named said the department has been 'following all the ICAO protocols.' The official added that media representatives have made updates on important events. Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, with a preliminary report expected about 30 days after the accident. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
