After heated London talks, where do China-US trade relations stand?
After two days of closely watched trade talks between the United States and China in London, US President Donald Trump has declared the negotiations have led to a
wide-ranging deal to maintain the fragile truce laid out after earlier talks in Geneva.
Advertisement
The agreement, Trump said, would cover numerous points of contention, including shipments of rare earth minerals, student visas and tariffs.
China, meanwhile, has been reticent to comment on the talks' outcome, with representatives only saying they would submit a report for President Xi Jinping's approval.
Here, we summarise the latest developments in the ever-changing trade relationship between the world's two largest economies.
What did Trump say – and not say？
Trump took to his Truth Social platform on Wednesday to share initial details from the intensive discussions in London, stating a US-China accord was 'done'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
A US judge on Thursday temporarily barred US President Donald Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, finding that the Guard was unlawfully mobilised by Trump. San Francisco-based US District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on Friday. Breyer said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion'. Trump justified the deployment of troops by qualifying the protests as a rebellion. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong stocks fall slightly on rising geopolitical tensions
Hong Kong stocks dropped on Friday as rising geopolitical tensions dimmed investors' appetite for risk assets. The Hang Seng Index fell 0.4 per cent to 23,950.45 at 10.10am local time, though it was still heading for a small weekly gain following a temporary de-escalation of US-China trade tensions. The Hang Seng Tech Index fell 1.3 per cent. On the mainland, the CSI 300 Index dropped 0.6 per cent and the Shanghai Composite Index retreated 0.5 per cent. Sino Biopharm led losses as its shares fell 5.1 per cent to HK$5.40. Electric-vehicle maker BYD lost 3.3 per cent to HK$130 and peer Geely Auto fell 2.4 per cent to HK$16.34. Tech stocks also slumped: Xiaomi dropped 2 per cent to HK$51.15 and Alibaba Group Holding, owner of the Post, retreated 1.6 per cent to HK$112.80. Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group jumped 9 per cent to HK$13.38 after it reported better-than-expected net income for its financial year ended in March. Property stocks traded higher: China Resources Land rose 3.6 per cent to HK$27.55, while Link Reit and Hang Lung Properties both gained 1.1 per cent to HK$42.45 and HK$6.66, respectively. State-owned China National Offshore Oil Corporation gained 2.1 per cent to HK$18.70 and PetroChina rose 1.4 per cent to HK$7.37 on rising oil prices. Gold producer Zijin Mining advanced 2.5 per cent to HK$20.50.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
As Trump hits out at critics, damage to America may go far deeper
Four months into his second term, US President Donald Trump has launched a high-stakes campaign against three pillars of American society: mainstream media, elite universities and the nation's most influential law firms. Through lawsuits, executive orders and threats to funding, he has exerted unprecedented pressure on many institutions, sparking debate about whether his actions signify genuine reform or personal vendettas Advertisement Critics argue that these confrontations reflect a desire to settle old scores rather than drive meaningful change. Regardless, it raises urgent questions about the future role of these institutions in upholding democracy. To gauge public sentiment, American broadcaster Michael Smerconish recently polled his audience on which sector – major law firms, academia or the media – is most vital to the nation's interests. The poll suggests the public recognises all three as essential pillars of society, with law firms rated slightly higher. The close division also suggests that, despite acknowledging the flaws in each sector, Americans perceive all of them as vital checks on government power and crucial safeguards for the rule of law. The challenges facing each sector have become increasingly pronounced. The American media, long regarded as a government watchdog, faces a wave of lawsuits and executive actions. These conflicts involve financial and psychological costs, potentially prompting media organisations to exercise greater caution in or even desist from reporting on matters of public interest. Advertisement Elite universities have also come under scrutiny. The administration has threatened to freeze federal grants and is restricting international student enrolment, citing issues such as campus antisemitism. While it is important to address campus challenges, critics warn these actions risk politicising higher education and may be more about exerting leverage than genuine reform.
