Stealth frigates Udaygiri, Himgiri to be commissioned in Vizag on Aug 26
, two advanced frontline frigates — Udaygiri (F35) and Himgiri (F34) — would be simultaneously commissioned at the Eastern Naval Command in Visakhapatnam on Aug 26.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The two surface combatants have been entirely built and developed in the country. While Udaygiri, the second ship in the Project 17A stealth frigates, has been built by Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited in Mumbai, Himgiri, which is the first of P17A ships, was developed by Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers in Kolkata. In another milestone for Indian Navy, Udaygiri is the 100th ship designed by the Navy's inhouse warship design bureau.
Stealthy, versatile, and indigenous, Udaygiri and Himgiri represent a generational leap over earlier designs. Displacing about 6,700 tons, the P17A frigates are roughly five percent larger than their predecessor Shivalik-class frigates and yet incorporate a sleeker form, with a reduced radar cross section. They are powered by combined diesel or gas (CODOG) propulsion plants using diesel engines and gas turbines that drive controllable-pitch propellers and are managed through an integrated platform management system.
The weapon suite includes supersonic surface-to-surface missiles, medium range surface-to-air missiles, 76mm MR gun, a combination of 30mm and 12.7mm close-in weapon systems, besides anti-submarine underwater weapon systems.
Both ships are the result of an industrial ecosystem spanning over 200 MSMEs, supporting approximately 4,000 direct and over 10,000 indirect jobs. The commissioning of Udaygiri and Himgiri underscores the Navy's commitment to self-reliance in ship design and construction and follows the commissioning of other indigenous platforms, including destroyer INS Surat, frigate INS Nilgiri, submarine INS Vaghsheer, ASW shallow watercraft INS Arnala, and diving support vessel INS Nistar — all in 2025 alone.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Rigorous sea trials have validated the frigates' hull, machinery, firefighting, damage control, navigation and communication systems, ensuring they are ready for operational deployment.
The joint commissioning ceremony of the two frigates at ENC Visakhapatnam will be more than a naval ritual; it will be a celebration of India's journey towards a robust and self-sufficient maritime defence ecosystem. As the nation watches the two grey hulls take their place in the fleet, the message will be clear: India's oceans are guarded by ships built in India, designed by Indians, and staffed by Indians — a true embodiment of the Make in India initiative and a beacon of the country's rising maritime power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Cow's milk, as well as Russian oil, fuels the US-India trade war
Donald Trump has beef with India for buying oil from Russia. But the American president's tariffs totalling 50% on many Indian exports—set to come into force later this month—are not just about geopolitics. Agriculture and dairy have been the most contentious issues in India's talks with America, which broke down this month. And it is over farming that India's equally combative prime minister, Narendra Modi, has chosen to fight back. 'India will never compromise on the wellbeing of its farmers, dairy and fishermen," he thundered in Delhi on August 7th, a day after Mr Trump's announcement. For Hindu-nationalist politicians like Mr Modi, the dairy industry has particular importance (the cow is sacred in Hinduism). But it is also a source of national pride, seen as a poverty-alleviating triumph of enlightened policymaking, technological advance and international co-operation. India is a milk superpower. For nearly three decades it has been the world's biggest producer and is now the source of about a quarter of the global total. Yet, from the point of view of India's trading partners, notably America, the industry seems to sum up all that is wrong with India. It is grossly inefficient, subsidised, polluting (all that methane) and heavily protected by high tariff barriers and a perplexing lattice of arcane non-tariff ones. Can these diametrically opposed views be reconciled? The answer matters a lot to India's trade diplomacy. It is not just America that complains about access to the Indian market. It is a sticking-point in negotiations with the European Union, too, and was one of the thorniest issues in the negotiations leading to a free-trade agreement with Britain signed last month. It may also have been the main reason why India pulled out of a big regional trade deal in 2019. Indian dairy still basks in the glow of a 'white revolution" launched in 1970. At the time Indians already had more cattle than any other country, but they consumed an average of about 100 millilitres of milk a day, far below recommended nutritional standards. Some of that had to be imported. By the turn of the century India had virtually doubled the availability of milk per person. Dairy practices had been modernised and the cross-breeding of cattle had boosted yields. A network of tens of thousands of co-operatives had been established, improving distribution and logistics, financed by the sale of skimmed milk powder and butter donated by the European Economic Community, the EU's forebear. Yields have continued to improve this century, but the structure of the industry remains unchanged. 'White Revolution 2.0", launched by the government last year, aims not to reform but expand it, with co-operatives increasing milk procurement by 50% over five years. Production will still depend on tens of millions of smallholders—families with a cow that grazes on their plot, produces dung and urine to be used as fertiliser, and provides milk for the family, sometimes with a surplus to sell. Himanshu (who goes by one name), a professor of economics at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi, points out that Mr Modi and Mr Trump are both very 'pro-farmer". But their farmers, including dairy farmers, could hardly be more different. India has about 200m cattle, of which the United States Department of Agriculture estimates 62m are dairy cows. Yet the average 'herd" consists of fewer than four, and the average landholding of just one hectare. A number widely used is that 80m families have one or more cows or buffaloes. America has just 24,000 dairy farms, with an average herd size of about 390. Co-operatives guarantee Indian farmers a buyer for their milk, and pay them bonuses when prices rise. A handful have become big national organisations—notably Amul, from Gujarat, home state of Mr Modi and his powerful cabinet minister, Amit Shah. So vaunted is the success of the agricultural co-operative system that in July Mr Shah unveiled plans to extend it to other businesses such as tourism, taxis and green energy. Proud as Indians are of their cows and their dairy farmers, they have to admit that both are, by international standards, woefully unproductive. The average American cow produces about seven times as much milk as her Indian competitor. India protects its dairy farmers with import tariffs comparable to those Mr Trump is now imposing on Indian exporters: 40% on most butter and cheese and 60% on powdered milk. Without these protections, says Shashi Kumar, boss of Akshayakalpa, a privately owned organic-dairy business in southern India that works with 2,200 small farmers, 'smallholder farms will collapse". It is not just tariffs that Mr Trump's negotiators object to. India excludes imports of all genetically modified crops except cotton, and in dairy there is a ban on what has become known as 'non-veg milk"—with a requirement that imported dairy products be certified to come from cows that had not been fed animal products such as bonemeal. The ban is often decried as a non-tariff barrier dressed up in politically correct Hindu-nationalist clothes. Vijay Sardana, a lawyer and agri-economist, points out it was in fact introduced in 2003, when he drafted the law in response to the BSE (mad-cow disease) scare in Europe. Still, the perception that the Indian government will use any available tactic to protect its farmers is probably justified. Harish Damodaran, the agriculture editor of the Indian Express, a newspaper, points out that twice in four years India's farmers have fended off attempts at reform. In 2021 their prolonged, angry protests in Delhi forced Mr Modi to repeal three laws introducing sensible deregulatory reforms. Mr Trump's effort to impose change through diplomacy may prove equally fruitless.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
India not dead economy but fastest one moving ahead: Naidu
'US President said ours (India's) is a dead economy. No, it is the only economy moving ahead fast in the world. Nobody can compete with it,' Naidu said at a meeting in Vijayawada on the 'Har Ghar Tiranga' campaign. The TDP supremo asserted that the future will determine 'whose economies are dead economies', adding the South Asian giant has some advantages and underwent economic reforms at the right time in 1991. Vijayawada, Aug 11 (PTI) Countering US President Donald Trump's 'dead economy' jibe at India, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on Monday said the country was the 'fastest one in the world moving ahead with which nobody can compete'. Though India was treated as a 'poor country incapable of anything' at one time, today it is emerging as the 'most powerful nation', the chief minister said. 'Today, some people may cause some temporary difficulties. They may raise taxes or impose duties, thinking that India's history will be stopped by these. But it is just their imagination and nothing else,' he said. Naidu also observed that 'some people' are calling for denying jobs to Indians, but highlighted that there will come a day soon that without Indians, 'those countries will not develop'. According to the TDP supremo, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy was 'top notch', and added that India has friendly relations with all nations. 'India is good with everyone and has the intention to be happy in all ways,' he said. Referring to the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were gunned down, Naidu said India responded with missiles, and the whole world remembers it. 'We don't meddle in others' affairs, but if anyone meddles with us, we will not spare them,' the Andhra Pradesh chief minister said. Describing PM Modi as the 'right leader at the right time', Naidu said India rose from being the 11th economy to the fourth largest in the past 11 years. PTI STH OZ NSD NSD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
H-1B visa update: How mandatory in-person interviews will affect Silicon Valley workers
In a major update on the H-1B and other nonimmigrant visa rules, the US Department of State announced on July 25 that the in-person interview for applicants, which was previously scrapped, has been made mandatory again. Representational.(AFP) It means that starting September 2, 2025, all nonimmigrant visa holders will have to attend in-person interviews in their home countries to get their visas renewed. One of the sectors in the United States where this procedure change is going to create significant problems is the tech hub in California - the Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley companies have thousands of tech workers who are in the country on H-1B visas. Here's how they will be affected due to the recent rule change How Silicon Valley Will Be Affected By the H-1B Rule Change Located in California's Bay Area, Silicon Valley ranks second in the number of H-1B visa permit approvals issued between 2021 and 2024, according to the United States Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS). According to a report by the San Francisco Chronicle, around 1% of all workers in the Bay Area held newly approved H-1B visas. In 2024 alone, of the 78,000 workers approved for H-1B visas, more than 39,000 were from Silicon Valley. Of them, the majority were Indians. H-1B workers will now have to travel back to their country and take part in an in-person interview to get their visas renewed. H-1B visas and are typically issued for three years and are eligible for another three-year renewal. Audrea Golding, an immigrant law practitioner from San Jose, told NBC News that it would not only mean travel for the employees but also for their family. Also read: US scraps interview waiver program for H1-B and other visa holders; How it will impact you from September 2 "Now, the requirement will be that the person goes, typically, back to their home country, to apply for that visa," he said. He revealed that those below the age of 14 and above the age of 79 will also have to travel back to their country. Bill Hing, a professor of Law and Migration Studies at the University of San Francisco, explained to NBC Bay Area that it would result in additional expenses, cause delay, and may disrupt work in the companies. "This is going to entail a delay in their processing, it can be costly, because [visa holders] may be stuck, for example, in India or China, and they won't be able to get back to work," Hing said. "It's going to be a problem for the Bay Area, especially because Silicon Valley and other big businesses in San Francisco and the Bay Area rely very heavily on H-1Bs," Hind added. All major tech companies have a significant number of workers on H-1B visas. Google has approximately 5,367 H-1B employees, with Meta and Apple also employing in similar numbers.
