logo
‘Destabilizing' Indiana casino relocation study could also recommend new license

‘Destabilizing' Indiana casino relocation study could also recommend new license

Yahoo26-03-2025
Lobbyist Jim Purucker testifies in committee on Tuesday, March 25, 2025. (Leslie Bonilla Muñiz/Indiana Capital Chronicle)
Indiana legislation to study relocation of a poor-performing casino's license could also lead to a rare license expansion — and regulators have already gotten started.
One witness at a Tuesday hearing called the study itself 'destabilizing' for the industry.
'The way that companies would look at this, is studying it would imply that there's an interest in moving it … or creating another one,' said Jim Purucker, a lobbyist representing Caesars Entertainment and its three Hoosier casinos.
He said it's 'very fair' for licensees 'to suggest that there's a move afoot.'
Senate Bill 43 previously required the Indiana Gaming Commission to contract out for a study to 'identify the top three regions in the state' for a license relocation.
After the committee accepted an amendment by consent Tuesday, that analysis would only take place 'subject to available funding.' It narrowed the study to two regions — but expanded it by striking relocation-specific language.
'I think if you just look at a map of casinos in the state, it's pretty clear the biggest hole in the market is northeast Indiana. … The other thing that has been floated multiple times over the years has been an Indianapolis casino,' Rep. Ethan Manning said.
He authored the amendment and chairs the committee.
'I think it leaves us a possibility of studying that. … I'm not even sure there would be an appropriate third region to study,' Manning, R-Logansport, continued. Still, he noted that the legislation doesn't dictate locations, and the contractor would choose.
Purucker said the study is 'tremendously destabilizing' for the industry and called it 'another factor' in capital expenditure decisions.
'It's just not how we treat any other industry,' Purucker said. 'We don't talk about, you know, how we want to put other competitors in place with other industries.'
Manning, however, said more information is preferable.
'It'd be good to … have professionals do the study rather than just (us) just deciding things without the data,' he told Purucker.
Rep. Kyle Miller, D-Fort Wayne, said it's also 'entirely possible' that researchers conclude a 14th license 'isn't valuable to the state.'
Senate Bill 43 began as an empty vehicle bill — and was only overhauled after the early death of a measure relocating a struggling casino operating near the Indiana-Kentucky border.
Full House Resorts hoped Senate Bill 293 would let it move the Rising Star Casino Resort 150 miles north to New Haven, in northeast Indiana. But a Senate committee's chair killed the proposal after listening to about 20 opponents, who feared gambling addictions and other risks to their community.
Rep. Justin Moed, D-Indianapolis, asked Sen. Andy Zay — who authored both bills — whether he'd support the study if its recommendations were to point outside northeast Indiana.
'Yeah. I mean, we're here to represent the whole state, and I think that's the genesis of this conversation,' Zay, R-Huntington, replied. 'We have a way under-performing license that really has brought this conversation on … I think it's incumbent upon us to look at our 13 licenses and mak(e) sure that those are being maximized, wherever that would be.'
The committee approved the amended bill on a unanimous, 11-0 vote.
Regulators would also now have to present their findings to the State Budget Committee by November, a month later than previously proposed.
The Indiana Gaming Commission has already made headway on the draft's mandates.
In a request for quotations — with submissions due March 14 — regulators wrote, 'This study is being sought in response to currently pending legislation,' and listed requirements copied from the bill 'as currently written.'
The commission re-emphasized the bill's pending nature while answering some of the questions asked by interested, in another document obtained by the Capital Chronicle.
'Greater clarity might be possible once the Bill is finalized,' regulators wrote.
Editor Niki Kelly contributed reporting.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'
Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'

Indianapolis Star

timea day ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'

Gov. Mike Braun says he will lean on the will of the legislature when it comes to President Donald Trump's push for mid-decade redistricting in Indiana. Already some of those legislators are making their ill feelings known. Vice President JD Vance made the pitch to Braun, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray in a closed-door meeting at the Statehouse last week. The latter two said nothing after the meeting, only releasing vague statements that didn't mention redistricting. Braun said the meeting went "pretty good." It would be up to Braun to call a special session in order to redraw the congressional maps. He said Aug. 12 that Huston and Bray are consulting with their caucuses, and he is waiting to see what the legislature wants to do. "I think it's going to be a methodical process, and I think each leader is going to take his time on getting to that point where they say what they want to do," he said. He acknowledged that even if he called a special session, the legislature, if they are at odds with the idea, could very well just gavel in and gavel right out. "I'm listening to the legislators," he said. The political conundrum is this: Indiana leaders are facing the ultimate loyalty test to Trump while balancing the reality that carving up their very few Democratic congressional districts could make some incumbent Republicans' races tighter. Plus, redistricting for an overtly partisan purpose of giving Trump a more favorable midterm election in 2026 isn't a very popular idea with voters, some lawmakers are saying. More: Top Indiana Republicans met with VP on redistricting. Only Democrats are talking about it There's also the risk of diluting votes if new maps are drawn based on five-year-old Census data that won't account for any more recent population shifts. This is one point new state Rep. Danny Lopez, R-Carmel, made in a post on X Aug. 12. "We should stand by that work," he wrote, while also saying he is a "hard no" on mid-decade redistricting. Another "hard no" comes from Republican Rep. Jim Lucas of Seymour, who on Facebook called the idea "highly unusual and politically optically horrible." He also said Republicans shouldn't "stoop to the level of Democrats on this issue," which could be a reference to the criticism that Illinois Democrats' map is gerrymandered. "If there are seats that need targeted, we should do it the old fashioned way and campaign harder in those districts," Lucas wrote. Mooresville Rep. Craig Haggard, a Republican running for the 4th Congressional District, could very well be drawn out of that district. He told the Indiana Capital Chronicle that he's not hearing any "appetite" for redistricting right now. Sen. Jim Tomes, R-Wadesville, has also said he doesn't think redistricting is needed, WEHT reported. Rep. Becky Cash, R-Zionsville, responded to a voter's question on her Facebook page about redistricting and said that she does not support nor "know of any reason why Indiana should redistrict." The prospect of mid-decade redistricting drew at least 100 protestors to the Statehouse and to the governor's mansion last week, with those gathered characterizing the concept as "cheating."

4 things casinos have seen during the Las Vegas tourism downturn
4 things casinos have seen during the Las Vegas tourism downturn

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

4 things casinos have seen during the Las Vegas tourism downturn

Video above: July 30, 2025, coverage of Las Vegas Strip casinos struggling as 'local' casinos report 49-year high earnings. LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Concerns about the Las Vegas economy — specifically, slow business on the Strip — have been simmering this year, and it seems no one has an answer to what is going on. Financial analysts are asking if it's tariffs, or the weather, or if there's something structurally shaky with how Las Vegas works. Caesars Entertainment CEO Tom Reeg, who has offered theories about consumer behavior in the past, doesn't have an answer this summer. 'It's tough to put your finger on that,' Reeg said last week. 'This is kind of normal seasonality that we haven't seen in a while.' Las Vegas has been on a hot streak coming out of the pandemic. The state saw casinos win record amounts from gamblers three years in a row before the run ended in June, the end of the fiscal year (July 1-June 30). But this year is different. A few interesting observations have emerged over the past weeks as leaders from Station Casinos, Caesars and MGM Resorts International have been peppered with questions about what's wrong with Las Vegas this year. Younger customers The declines in revenue and earnings aren't universal. 'Easily the best quarter in our company's history,' said Stephen Cootey, executive vice president, CFO, and treasurer at Red Rock Resorts (the publicly traded face of Station Casinos). Improvement projects at Green Valley Ranch, Durango Casino & Resort, and Sunset Station show the company's continued investment in the local market. Executives say local customers are happy, particularly at the oldest of those three properties. Frank Fertita III, CEO and chairman of the board, said renovations at Sunset Station are turning it into the Red Rock Resort of the East Valley, and he notes that it is accomplishing a long-term goal that is crucial to the company's future. 'We really have been able to lower the age group we've been able to attract to the property,' Fertitta said. For years, that has been a goal at casinos as the age of their core customer has continued to go up. Renovations at all the Station properties over the years have added something new: casino areas devoted to high rollers. High-limit slots and VIP gaming areas aren't just on the Strip now. Jackpots hit by players who bet a lot are happening at neighborhood casinos, too. That's one of the things being added at Durango, with 120 high-limit slots part of the plan as the casino adds 25,000 square feet on the gaming floor. That addition is expected to be complete in December. 'Durango continues to expand the locals market,' Cootey said. Since opening in late 2023, the casino has added 108,000 customers to its database. New players Several of the big companies have noticed an increase in uncarded players. They call them 'retail' players, and the numbers have increased over the past year. MGM, Caesars, Red Rock, and Boyd Gaming all mentioned them. Player databases are valuable to casinos. They track 'rated play' to keep track of their best customers. When you get a player's card, you're in the system. Who are these retail players that fly under the radar? Maybe they aren't interested in earning points toward comps, or they don't want the casino knowing their business. Whatever the motivation, casinos are noticing that they are opting out. It's kind of the opposite of casinos' efforts to create a 'digital wallet' that would be convenient — maybe too convenient for some gamblers. Timing of the downturn 'Vegas started leaking as a market, kind of end-of-May. That leak accelerated into June,' Reeg said. Caesars' revenue from Las Vegas dropped by 3.7% over the April-June second quarter. Net revenues of $1.054 billion were down from the $1.095 billion reported in the second quarter of 2024. Net income dropped from $268 million last year to $212 million this year. MGM saw a 4% drop in Las Vegas over the three months. But it wasn't just the big companies. Blake Sartini, chairman and CEO at Golden Entertainment, saw hotel occupancy at The STRAT Hotel, Casino & Tower plunge to 60% in June. That was far lower than the June average of 82% on the Strip. Last year, June occupancy was 88.3% on the Strip. The decline follows the drop in visitation (as compared to the same months in 2024) reported by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA): Down 7.8% in March, 5.1% in April, 6.5% in May, and 11.3% in June. So far this calendar year, visitation is 7.3% lower than last year. Early suggestions that the drop in travel from Canada was to blame only explain part of the decline this year. Overall, Canadian tourists make up only 3-4% of the customers at MGM and Caesars. Reeg acknowledged that it's an important segment, but he also noted the absence of two big-name entertainers this year: Adele and Garth Brooks. Another factor: People may not be traveling, but more and more of the U.S. population has access to gambling closer to home. In addition to local casinos, there's online gambling in some states. 'We think this is a temporary phenomenon in Vegas, but make no mistake, the summer is soft in Vegas,' Reeg said. He expects third-quarter results to be similar to the second quarter, but he has a positive outlook on the fourth quarter and 2026. Another interesting observation that Reeg spoke of: The ends of the Strip started to weaken in March and April. He didn't name the resorts. Tough 'comp,' but steady wins It's a familiar refrain on earnings calls: When records are set, sometimes it creates a comparison later that doesn't always look good. Super Bowl in 2024? February 2025 might not measure up. F1 in 2023? November 2024 will have a tough comp. But there wasn't a Super Bowl in Las Vegas in 2025, and the debut race for F1 won't ever be repeated. Those two events stacked in a four-month time period created momentum for tourism that carried through all of 2024. Las Vegas took full advantage. Clearly, tourism is down this year, and it is taking a toll. But last year was exceptional, and the comparison looks worse, partially because of the success in 2024. A comparison of the gaming win over the first six months of the two years show that after February, casinos have been consistent. In January, statewide 2025 numbers reflect the third-highest gaming win of all time. In February, the Strip's 2024 numbers are higher because of the Super Bowl. Las Vegas Strip casinos back in black, but June win not enough to reach state record 'The gaming win numbers month-over-month have been overall consistent,' Shelley Newell, senior economic analyst for the Nevada Gaming Control Board, said. 'We continue to monitor the data and find out what led to large wins or large losses for the licensees. In addition, we look to see what entertainment is offered throughout Nevada and good entertainment also drives the numbers,' Newell said. She pointed to the volatility of high-stakes baccarat and other casino games, but said results have remained consistent and stable despite lower visitor counts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

2 High-Flying Stocks to Consider Right Now and 1 We Question
2 High-Flying Stocks to Consider Right Now and 1 We Question

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

2 High-Flying Stocks to Consider Right Now and 1 We Question

"You get what you pay for" often applies to expensive stocks with best-in-class business models and execution. While their quality can sometimes justify the premium, they typically experience elevated volatility during market downturns when expectations change. Determining whether a company's quality justifies its price causes headaches for nearly all investors, which is why we started StockStory - to help you separate the real opportunities from the speculative ones. Keeping that in mind, here are two high-flying stocks with strong fundamentals and one climbing an uphill battle. One High-Flying Stock to Sell: Caesars Entertainment (CZR) Forward P/E Ratio: 29.5x Formerly Eldorado Resorts, Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) is a global gaming and hospitality company operating numerous casinos, hotels, and resort properties. Why Are We Hesitant About CZR? Flat sales over the last two years suggest it must innovate and find new ways to grow Performance over the past five years shows its incremental sales were much less profitable, as its earnings per share fell by 10% annually High net-debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 6× could force the company to raise capital at unfavorable terms if market conditions deteriorate Caesars Entertainment is trading at $24.13 per share, or 29.5x forward P/E. If you're considering CZR for your portfolio, see our FREE research report to learn more. Two High-Flying Stocks to Watch: Bloom Energy (BE) Forward P/E Ratio: 61.6x Working in stealth mode for eight years, Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) designs, manufactures, and markets solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation. Why Will BE Beat the Market? Impressive 15.8% annual revenue growth over the last five years indicates it's winning market share this cycle Free cash flow profile has moved into positive territory over the last five years, indicating the company has achieved financial self-sustainability Improving returns on capital suggest its past investments are beginning to deliver value At $36.55 per share, Bloom Energy trades at 61.6x forward P/E. Is now the time to initiate a position? See for yourself in our comprehensive research report, it's free. Leonardo DRS (DRS) Forward P/E Ratio: 36x Developing submarine detection systems for the U.S. Navy, Leonardo DRS (NASDAQ:DRS) is a provider of defense systems, electronics, and military support services. Why Do We Watch DRS? Market share has increased this cycle as its 13.6% annual revenue growth over the last two years was exceptional Demand is greater than supply as the company's 50.1% average backlog growth over the past two years shows it's securing new contracts and accumulating more orders than it can fulfill Incremental sales significantly boosted profitability as its annual earnings per share growth of 19.2% over the last two years outstripped its revenue performance Leonardo DRS's stock price of $41.43 implies a valuation ratio of 36x forward P/E. Is now the right time to buy? Find out in our full research report, it's free. Stocks We Like Even More When Trump unveiled his aggressive tariff plan in April 2025, markets tanked as investors feared a full-blown trade war. But those who panicked and sold missed the subsequent rebound that's already erased most losses. Don't let fear keep you from great opportunities and take a look at Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today for free. Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Find your next big winner with StockStory today StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store