Jailed by Trump's ICE, Children's Hospital Chaplain Was Thrown Into ‘Solitary'
None of that matters to the Trump administration, which is fighting to deport Soliman back to Egypt while branding him a terrorist sympathizer. Soliman's legal team say that such claims are a baseless smear that he has the evidence to rebut, and stresses that 'he faces death if forced to return to Egypt.'
Shortly after he arrived at the jail early last month, the imam told friends that was trying to work as a de facto chaplain of the jail and counseling others behind bars there. He told his friends that some of the jail's staff even said to him that if he's released and allowed to stay in Ohio, that Soliman should return as an actual chaplain with the jail.
But according to several of Soliman's associates, as well as a habeas corpus petition filed by his legal team this morning, something changed dramatically in recent weeks and the former children's hospital chaplain was thrown into isolation, which at times also included 'solitary confinement.' Friends say that these recent days of this detention have shredded the imam's mental health.
'It felt like I was looking into the face of somebody who had just been tortured,' says the Rev. Elizabeth Diop, who until recently also worked as a chaplain at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital. Diop was fired from the hospital for violating the company media policy by speaking out in support of her fellow chaplain.
Diop tells Rolling Stone that she visited Soliman and spoke to him, via video screen at the jail, this past Sunday and the Sunday before that. During that interim week, Soliman was put into isolation, and Diop says she could easily see the toll it took on him.
'He seemed disturbed. His eyes looked like he was in pain. He was talking really fast, and sounded despairing. I'd never seen him like that,' she says. 'He said he was imagining being deported and being killed. He said he couldn't sleep because his roommate was talking so much throughout the night. He said [the jail] wouldn't let anybody talk to him through the door. He said he couldn't order from the commissary, and the food was really hard for him to eat. He said he was contemplating doing a hunger strike, and I strongly discouraged that. I think he just was so hopeless he was just trying to think of anything he could do to try to fix things.'
Diop adds: 'He said to me, and I'm paraphrasing here, that it seemed like they were trying to torture him into leaving rather than fighting to stay.'
Today's public court filing (which you can read below in full) states that while 'detained at Butler County Jail, Petitioner has been placed into segregated detention by agents of DHS and officers of the Butler County Sheriff's Office,' and that this 'custody placement was a result of targeted harassment due to Petitioner's attempt to practice his religion.'
The document continues: 'This segregated detention resulted in solitary confinement, denial of access to visitation, and restricted access to legal calls with counsel, with calls being limited to the period of 12:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. daily. Petitioner was placed under this confinement from on or about August 2, 2025, until August 5, 2025.'
Soliman's advocates say that the document gives a conservative estimate of the length of the isolation period, which they say finally ended on Wednesday. Several on his team, including one of his attorneys Robert Ratliff, say Soliman was held in isolation at the jail for roughly 'six days.' Ratliff notes that his understanding is that the isolation was originally slated to last 20 days, but that Soliman was allowed to 'return to general population' early. The legal team is still searching for answers regarding the 'targeted harassment' and what Soliman and his lawyers are calling out as an unwarranted punishment.
'He was seeking to pray with some other detainees. They were trying to pray in a common area that is open to all inmates. He was told that was not acceptable. That was the basis of the segregation,' Ratliff says, relaying Soliman's account.
The Butler County Jail did not respond to a voicemail seeking comment on this story.
In the past week, different legal and political offices, including a U.S. congressman's, were looped into the behind-the-scenes efforts to get Soliman released from isolation early. Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) and his team were quietly involved in recent days: 'We made calls and glad it got resolved,' the congressman says. 'We're hopeful that it doesn't happen again.'
Adam Allen, another Cincinnati Children's chaplain who was fired after publicly supporting his arrested former colleague, says he spoke to Soliman prior to his release from isolation, and tells Rolling Stone that 'Ayman told me he filed a complaint every day since being put in isolation, and his complaint was escalated.' Allen recounts that when he spoke with his friend, 'Ayman is the kind of person who cares about other people before he cares about himself. He told me the last [several] days have been especially hard.… But then he asked me about me, and I tried to redirect it to him but then he just asked me how my son was doing, so I indulged him.'
Soon after, Allen says he asked Soliman how he could pray for him, to which the imam replied: 'Allah would help me through this test.'
Asked what he would say to Trump or others involved with Soliman's jailing, Allen responds: 'Ayman is a paragon of the kind of person we want in this community, and that this has happened to him demonstrates the kind of cruelty that has been unjustly dealt to every immigrant. And that should be a wakeup call to reform the system in a way that is just and fair.'
Soliman's advocates argue that the way he has been locked up and treated for the past month — including in the aggressive manner that the Trump administration, in and out of court, has wielded War on Terror-style propaganda against him — is yet another symptom of this government's ultra-draconian crackdowns on legal immigration. The human cost of the past six months is already incalculable. And if Trump's team gets its way on cases like Soliman's, there could be massive potential for expanding the administration's already staggering abuses and lawlessness.
'This is something that [the Department of Homeland Security] can do to anybody. I don't care if you're an asylee for 27 years or if you've become a U.S. citizen,' says Ratliff. 'In this case, solely DHS initiated termination proceedings. DHS decided solely on their own that their evidence was good enough. DHS decided solely on their own that Ayman's evidence wasn't good enough. And DHS decided solely on its own that immigration courts don't have jurisdiction because they're throwing out these unsupported allegations that he's a terrorist.… This means DHS can revoke anybody's asylum, and do this to anybody. This is something that has far reaching potential consequences, if Ayman's case is left to play out this way, and the courts don't intervene and stop DHS from deporting him.'
More from Rolling Stone
Will.i.am Calls Out ICE As He Returns to Conscious Roots With 'East L.A'
MAGA Superman Dean Cain Says He's Becoming an ICE Agent 'A.S.A.P'
A Puppy-Killing Kristi Noem and 'Dora the Explorer' Raids: 'South Park' Savages Trump Admin's ICE Policies
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone," Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Now we know just how useless Trump's Alaska summit really was ... to everyone but Vladimir Putin
Before President Trump's tête-à-tête with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, press secretary Karoline Leavitt was already downplaying the stakes. Wednesday morning, she described the summit as a 'listening exercise' — which is, frankly, a relief. After all, when you're a time-poor autocrat juggling a Monday invasion, a midweek labor camp opening, and a weekend of jailing political opponents, it's easy to feel unheard. Sure, Putin invaded Ukraine. And yes, countless people have suffered ... on both sides. But perhaps — and I think we can all agree this is the real tragedy here — no one has taken the time to validate his feelings. So it was heartening, then, to see Vlad and Donald touch down on Alaskan soil midday Friday and greet each other with warmth: a smattering of applause from Trump, a weirdly prolonged handshake, and then the two friends sliding into the same back seat — a notable break in protocol — for the drive to their meeting. Waiting for them on the tarmac was a stage emblazoned 'ALASKA 2025,' festival-style, primed for the photo-op. Meanwhile, at least seven civilians had just been killed in Ukraine by Russian missiles. When they emerged again for a post-meeting press conference, earlier than expected, it was clear a good time had been had by all. They had agreed on 'most points,' said Trump. He was going to 'call up NATO,' he added, saying, 'I will, of course, call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting." Very good of him. They should meet, Putin added, but 'next time in Moscow.' Trump laughed at that point, calling his suggestion 'an interesting one.' 'I'll get a little heat on that one,' the American president added, 'but I could see it possibly happening.' The two men leaned in toward each other and smiled, like they were sharing an inside joke. The bottom line: a nebulous amount of 'progress' made, some 'headway,' stuff to talk about, but 'there's no deal until there's a deal.' Ah well. Maybe Vlad just needs more time. I'm pretty sure, however, that he already got what he came for — and that the joke is on America. Contrast the kid-gloves treatment of everybody's favorite dictator with the treatment of Volodymyr Zelensky a few months ago, when he visited the White House. Indeed, it is hard to recall another Oval Office meeting where an allied head of state was treated quite like the Ukrainian president was in February. Lest we forget, Zelensky had arrived to discuss a minerals deal that might have bolstered his country's three-year fight for survival. He left having been publicly chided, mid-meeting, for 'disrespect' and insufficient gratitude. Trump accused him of 'gambling with World War III', while JD Vance, in full Wormtail mode, jumped in to ask: 'Have you even said thank-you once?' It was both difficult and embarrassing to watch. This is the asymmetry at the heart of Trump-era foreign policy: allies get the tongue-lashing, rivals get the literal red carpet. Zelensky's reward for resisting an existential threat was a televised scolding. Putin's reward for creating it has been years of deference and flattery. Recall the Helsinki summit, where Trump sided with the Russian leader over his own intelligence agencies, or the warm praise for Putin's 'genius'. Too self-satisfied to realize he's been manipulated, The Donald simply keeps walking into the same trap, over and over again. Trump himself seems to have realized how poor his own negotiating skills are in the past few weeks. Putin's not a blowhard like his American counterpart; he just does what he feels like, and everyone else be damned. Indeed, it was Donald himself who put it best in a press conference earlier in July where he described his ongoing efforts to help broker an end to the war in Ukraine thus: 'I get home, I say to the First Lady, 'I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir. I think we are finished,'' to which Melania will apparently respond in kind: 'That's funny, because they just bombed a nursing home.' Therein lies the entire issue. Trump is brittle and easily manipulated; Putin talks him round again and again. Trump leaves those conversations utterly convinced of both Putin's integrity and his own genius. Then Putin goes on dropping bombs and killing people. It's a familiar story that's played out not just in Russia, and that we can expect to play out anywhere where there's a strongman leader with a penchant for basic flattery. And really, where better to stage this utterly redundant spectacle than Alaska — the state Trump accidentally referred to as Russia earlier this week, and which, of course, once belonged to the Russian Empire. After all, isn't the whole point to start returning old territories to their former owners? Alaska, a place that is currently arranging citizen evacuations because of an uncontrolled glacier flood due to the effects of climate change, where water is thundering toward a dam called Suicide Basin. (Anchorage is on the other end of the state to where all that is happening in Juneau, meaning that Trump was able to fly right over Suicide Basin and shutter his Qatari-gifted Air Force One windows to the sight of climate catastrophe before he landed at a military base to meet with the man who started a war to talk about ending it.) Alaska, the perfect place to propose — as leaks have suggested — that Russia has a 'West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine,' since all available geopolitical sources suggest that solution has already played out so well for everyone involved. And so the dance goes on, and tangible progress is not made but cameras and microphones and spotlights are perpetually trained on two geriatric egomaniacs. This kind of time-wasting theater always works in Russia's favor. The war will rumble on in Ukraine. The deal will never be made. Trump will get a few nice words, Putin will get his headlines. And the rest of us are left with just the images of Donald and his little band of spray-tanned comrades marching about in the Alaskan summer, isolated together in a cold state in the middle of nowhere, with only a friendly dictator to keep them warm.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UFC heavyweight suspended for doping violation
UFC heavyweight suspended for doping violation originally appeared on The Sporting News The UFC career of Alvin Hines is in serious jeopardy. The heavyweight, who lost his Octagon debut at UFC 317 earlier this year, has been suspended for a year after a failed drug test. Hines, who took a bout with Jhonata Diniz on short notice in June, tested positive for the anabolic steroid Drostanolone, the promotion announced. The test results were released by Combat Sports Anti-Doping (CSAD). MORE: Dana White still has trust with Conor McGregor to make big fights A native of Minnesota, Hines was also found to have 3a-Hydroxy-2a-methyl-5a-androstan-17-one and testosterone metabolites, as well as a metabolite of Tamoxifen, 3-Hydroxy-4-methooxytamoxifen, a hormone and metabolic modulator in his system. The tests were take from samples collected both in-competition and out-of-competition. In the release, the UFC noted that the cases reflected that Hines consumed the substances that are banned before he was signed to the UFC, but that he also failed to disclose taking them when his onboarding into the UFC Anti-Doping Program was completed just days before his bout. "Under the UFC ADP, CSAD evaluates each case and can reduce periods of ineligibility based on the athlete's degree of fault and their level of cooperation," the UFC said in a statement. " While Hines failed to disclose his prior use of these substances during onboarding, the estimated concentrations of these substances in Hines' samples were reflective that they were near the tail end of excretion and supported his explanation of their use prior to being signed to the UFC and entering the UFC registered testing pool." The suspension started on July 11, 2025 and runs for one year. MORE COMBAT SPORTS NEWS: PFL sets pair of championship matches for upcoming event How to watch UFC in 2026 on Paramount+ Alexander Volkanovski previews UFC 319 co-main event Complete MMA schedule for 2025
