logo
Pandemic aged our brains faster, whether or not we got COVID, study says

Pandemic aged our brains faster, whether or not we got COVID, study says

By almost any measure, living through a once-in-a-century pandemic emergency that killed 7 million people — including 1.1 million in the U.S. alone — was a harrowing experience.
Now, there's new evidence suggesting our brains bear the scars of that ordeal.
Living through the pandemic aged our brains faster — even among people who never became sick with COVID-19, according to a recent study.
'Our study suggests that the experience of living through the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with slightly faster brain aging, even in people who were never infected with the virus,' the study's lead author, Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad of the University of Nottingham in England, wrote in an email to The Times.
'This effect was subtle but measurable,' he added.
The study, published this month in the journal Nature Communications, wasn't designed to pinpoint the exact cause of the accelerated brain aging.
'But we believe the cumulative stressors of the pandemic — such as prolonged isolation, disrupted routines, reduced physical and cognitive activity, and economic uncertainty — likely contributed to the observed brain changes,' Mohammadi-Nejad said.
Those factors are all known to influence brain health over time. As the study notes, 'it remains unclear whether these brain aging effects may be at least partially reversible.'
Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, a UC San Francisco infectious-disease expert who wasn't affiliated with the study, said its findings demonstrate 'that even if you don't get infected, all the repercussions of the pandemic — like social isolation and stress — can have an impact on brain health.'
'We know that other things that we do have an impact on brain health, like exercise and diet and sleep,' Chin-Hong said. 'So it makes sense that something as global and as profound as a pandemic would have an impact on brain health.'
Those effects don't necessarily include immediate decreased cognitive function, however. Although researchers documented accelerated aging in generally all the brain scans they studied, only those who contracted COVID-19 showed 'small but measurable declines in cognitive performance — mainly in processing speed and mental flexibility,' according to Mohammadi-Nejad.
'This suggests that infection may introduce additional biological effects, such as inflammation or vascular issues, that are more directly linked to cognitive symptoms,' he said.
Past studies have noted cognitive effects after COVID-19 illness, especially in severe cases, he said. But what's new is that evidence of cognitive decline was found even in this study's population 'of generally healthy volunteers, most of whom had mild cases.'
'It shows that even mild infection can leave subtle traces in the brain, although the effect size is relatively small,' Mohammadi-Nejad said.
The effect was especially pronounced among older people, the study found, 'suggesting a complex model of cognitive decline due to more pronounced accelerated brain aging from infection-related factors in older people.'
The study was based on an analysis of brain scans from the UK Biobank, a large biomedical database in the United Kingdom that contains health information from volunteers taken both before and after the onset of the pandemic.
The study focused on a group of 996 participants and compared brain scans taken before and after the pandemic began. The group comprised primarily middle-aged and older people, ranging in age from 47 to 79. Only those who were generally healthy were included in the study, meaning they didn't have chronic illness such as heart disease, diabetes, dementia, kidney disease or major depression.
In this group, scientists found the accelerated brain aging was seen more strongly overall in older people and men. People who were socioeconomically disadvantaged — ranking lower on indicators such as income, education, employment and health access — also had more pronounced brain aging, Mohammadi-Nejad said, 'likely due to increased exposure to pandemic-related stress and fewer resources to buffer its effects.'
This isn't the first study to suggest brain health was altered by the experience of living through the pandemic.
A study published last year in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, by scientists at the University of Washington, suggested that COVID-19 lockdown measures 'resulted in unusually accelerated brain maturation in adolescents' and was greater in magnitude in females than males.
The authors of that study noted that 'females are at a higher risk for developing anxiety and mood disorders than males during typical adolescent development.'
But among adults, past research has suggested 'men may be more susceptible to certain forms of brain aging,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. Other research, the study noted, has found 'greater male susceptibility to cortical atrophy and neuroinflammation under stress, which aligns with our findings of heightened pandemic-related brain aging in males.'
There are a number of limitations to the study. The people participating in the study who had COVID-19 had mostly mild cases — and they were generally healthier than the population overall, since those with chronic illnesses were excluded.
Among study participants who contracted COVID-19, fewer than 4% required hospitalization. The vast majority had mild illness; and all participants tested negative for COVID-19 within two to three weeks.
Other factors also could contribute to the documented brain aging, including 'reduced physical activity, poorer diets and increased alcohol consumption' during the pandemic, the study said.
Many unanswered questions remain. If further studies do prove the pandemic-related factors caused accelerated brain aging, rather than simply being associated with it, how long will those effects last? And, 'once you have it, can you do anything to make it better?' Chin-Hong asked.
The study doesn't answer the question of whether the accelerated brain aging is reversible.
But it is well known that there are things that are good for general brain health, Mohammadi-Nejad said: physical activity, mental stimulation, social interaction, healthy sleep and good nutrition among them.
'Public policies that reduce social isolation and ensure continued access to physical, cognitive, and emotional well-being during major disruptions could help mitigate future effects on brain health,' he said.
For some, the study may raise the question of whether the pandemic-era response measures employed in Britain were worth the cost.
But answering that question today — years after COVID ceased to be a novel public health threat — is complicated.
'Our study wasn't designed to evaluate public health policies or determine what should or shouldn't have been done. What we show is that the pandemic experience, independent of infection, was associated with changes in brain health,' Mohammadi-Nejad said.
COVID-19 today is very different than the dark early period of the pandemic, when the disease devastated many families, prematurely killing grandparents and leaving children to grow up without their dad or mom. The death rate was much higher in the initial phase of the emergency, with hospitals in some areas overwhelmed with staggering numbers of critically ill people.
The risk of getting long COVID, and suffering debilitating symptoms such as brain fog or persistent fatigue, was also once much higher than it is today.
Early in the pandemic, 'it was a more serious time for COVID,' Chin-Hong said. 'It was a time when you didn't want to get infected at all.... Like, who would want to get Alpha or Delta, you know?' he added, referring to the variants that preceded Omicron.
Today's version of COVID is 'less invasive — even independent of the fact that we have more immunity,' Chin-Hong said. The latest subvariants of the coronavirus don't 'get inside the body as much as the earlier variants.'
Chin-Hong said he's glad there was a time early in the pandemic where 'we tried to avoid COVID as much as possible,' noting that infection itself has a chance of affecting the brain.
That said, it's also clear that health issues such loneliness have a clear effect on brain health. Dr. Vivek Murthy, the former U.S. surgeon general, issued an advisory on what he called a national epidemic of loneliness and isolation in 2023, and warned that loneliness is associated with a greater risk of dementia, depression, anxiety and premature death.
About half of U.S. adults experienced loneliness even before the pandemic, according to Murthy's report, which urged the public to fight loneliness and isolation by taking steps to strengthen their relationships. The British government in 2018 found loneliness to be such a public health concern that it created a new position: minister of loneliness.
The latest study underscores the idea that things such as exercise, sleep, diet, social connection and stress reduction are important for our brain health, according to Chin-Hong.
Resolving stress and a lack of social connection 'is probably as important as ... focusing on things like blood pressure and the things we traditionally think about,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China fights mosquito-borne chikungunya virus with drones, fines and nets
China fights mosquito-borne chikungunya virus with drones, fines and nets

Politico

time6 minutes ago

  • Politico

China fights mosquito-borne chikungunya virus with drones, fines and nets

'What makes this event notable is that chikungunya has never been established in mainland China before,' Lopez-Camacho said in a statement. 'This suggests that most of the population had no preexisting immunity, making it easier for the virus to spread quickly.' Chinese state television has shown workers spraying insecticide around city streets, residential areas, construction sites and other areas where people may come into contact with mosquitoes. Workers sprayed some places before entering office buildings. Unusually heavy rains and high temperatures have worsened the crisis in China, and authorities are using drones to try to find standing water, where mosquitoes lay eggs. Authorities also have threatened to fine people who don't empty water from outdoor receptacles. Residents can be subject to fines of up to 10,000 yuan ($1,400) and have their electricity cut off. Because of the virus, the U.S. has issued a travel advisory suggesting that Americans take extra precautions when visiting China's Guangdong province, where Foshan is located, as well as Bolivia and some island nations in the Indian Ocean. Since the 2003 SARS outbreak, China has used strict measures to fight the spread of viruses, including hard-line tactics during the Covid-19 pandemic. This time, patients are being forced to stay in hospital in Foshan for at least one week and authorities briefly enforced a two-week home quarantine, which was dropped because the disease cannot be transmitted between people. Reports also have emerged of attempts to stop the spread of chikungunya with fish that eat mosquito larvae and even larger mosquitoes to eat the insects carrying the virus. Officials have held meetings and adopted protocols at the national level in a sign of China's determination to eliminate the outbreak and avoid public and international criticism.

Los Angeles wildfires may be linked to 440 deaths, new research estimates
Los Angeles wildfires may be linked to 440 deaths, new research estimates

CNN

time16 minutes ago

  • CNN

Los Angeles wildfires may be linked to 440 deaths, new research estimates

The wildfires that ravaged Los Angeles earlier this year — burning entire neighborhoods to the ground, straining firefighting resources and forcing tens of thousands of people to flee their homes — may have led to hundreds more deaths than were recorded, a new study suggests. While officials reported that the Palisades and Eaton fires directly killed at least 30 people when they incinerated parts of Los Angeles County, the blazes may be linked to 410 additional deaths from January 5 to February 1, according to research published Wednesday in the The Journal of the American Medical Association. That would make for a total of 440 wildfire-related deaths, according to the study. 'These additional deaths likely reflect a combination of factors, including increased exposure to poor air quality and health care delays and interruptions,' the study says. The wildfires' impact on his loved ones motivated Andrew Stokes, a mortality demographer and one of the authors of the study, to probe for excess deaths. 'Having had many family and friends who were directly affected made me feel compelled to look into this further, using my expertise as a demographer and a person who studies mortality statistics,' the Boston University associate professor told CNN. The new findings highlight the need to quantify just how deadly wildfires and other climate-related emergencies can be beyond direct fatalities. The emergencies can have long-term health effects that extend well beyond the disaster itself, experts say. Years ago, Stokes evaluated the excess deaths during the pandemic after many deaths went uncounted, he said. After developing models to understand the true toll of the virus, Stokes used that expertise to look at the true mortality burden of natural disasters such as the Los Angeles wildfires. Along with deaths directly related to the wildfire, the researchers counted deaths partially and indirectly attributed to the wildfires. That includes lung or heart conditions exacerbated by smoke or stress, disruptions to health systems and mental health impacts, according to the study. To conduct the study, the researchers compared recorded deaths in Los Angeles County from January to February with figures from previous years, excluding 2020 to 2023 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. That helped researchers estimate how many deaths would have been expected in that time period had no wildfires occurred, Stokes said. They then calculated excess deaths as the difference between observed and expected deaths, according to the study. 'In Los Angeles County, weekly deaths consistently exceeded expected deaths during the period from January 5 to February 1, 2025,' the study says. A total of 6,371 deaths were observed in the county, compared with 5,931 expected deaths, according to the study. This means that nearly 7% of the recorded deaths in Los Angeles County were excess deaths linked to the wildfires. Stokes said he was 'really surprised and alarmed' at the findings. 'The magnitude of the underreporting in the official data is just very severe,' he said. But he hopes that quantifying the excess deaths can spur authorities to provide more assistance to those still grappling with the devastation. The researchers note that the data is preliminary and the toll could grow. 'That 440 value that we estimate is clearly the lower bound, because we only look at the first weeks after the wildfire started,' Stokes said. 'These medium and long- term effects … could manifest over time as people develop wildfire related diseases.' Future studies should investigate the longer-term health impacts of the wildfires and the specific causes of excess wildfire deaths, the researchers said.

ACA premiums set to spike
ACA premiums set to spike

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

ACA premiums set to spike

The proposed rates are preliminary and could change before being finalized in late summer. The analysis includes proposed rate changes from 312 insurers in all 50 states and DC. It's the largest rate change insurers have requested since 2018, the last time that policy uncertainty contributed to sharp premium increases. On average, ACA marketplace insurers are raising premiums by about 20 percent in 2026, KFF found. Insurers said they wanted higher premiums to cover rising health care costs, like hospitalizations and physician care, as well as prescription drug costs. Tariffs on imported goods could play a role in rising medical costs, but insurers said there was a lot of uncertainty around implementation, and not many insurers were citing tariffs as a reason for higher rates. But they are adding in higher increases due to changes being made by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress. For instance, the majority of insurers said they are taking into account the potential expiration of enhanced premium tax credits. Those subsidies, put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs that Republicans are interested in tackling the issue at all. If Congress takes no action, premiums for subsidized enrollees are projected to increase by over 75 percent starting in January 2026, according to KFF. But some states are pushing back. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) on Wednesday called on the state's insurance commissioner to disapprove the proposed increases from Centene and Blue Cross Blue Shield. The companies filed increases of up to 54 percent and 25.5 percent, respectively, she said. 'Arkansas' Insurance Commissioner is required to disapprove of proposed rate increases if they are excessive or discriminatory, and these are both,' Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. 'I'm calling on my Commissioner to follow the law, reject these insane rate increases, and protect Arkansans.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store