CodeSignal's AI-Assisted Tests Redefine How Tech Skills Are Evaluated

Forbes

28-05-2025

The ability to effectively use artificial intelligence tools increasingly separates typical employees from highly productive '10x" employees. In technical and engineering roles, where the effective use of AI tools is becoming an essential skill, traditional methods of assessing talent are rapidly becoming outdated. It is no longer sufficient to know what technical skills an employee possesses; one must also understand their ability to collaborate effectively with multiple intelligent tools simultaneously. CodeSignal's recent announcement of its AI-Assisted Coding Assessments marks a significant milestone in acknowledging this important shift in skill evaluation and development.
Historically, evaluating technical proficiency has involved assessing direct, tangible skills. Candidates were evaluated based on their individual capacity to write and debug code, solve mathematical problems, or showcase theoretical knowledge. By way of analogy, technical assessments traditionally focused on individuals as virtuoso musicians, with the evaluation determining how well they could play various instruments. The rise of powerful AI-driven tools has fundamentally transformed this landscape.
Tigran Sloyan, CEO of CodeSignal, highlights this evolution. 'Working with AI in many ways is similar to management. It is like telling somebody other than yourself what to do. Clear communication, the ability to break things down into clear parts, and put them back together are essential. It is not merely about understanding tools; it's about effectively managing multiple intelligent systems simultaneously.' Rather than being a virtuoso musician, the role has become more akin to that of a conductor. The conductor doesn't play every instrument but directs multiple musicians to create harmonious outcomes. Similarly, the modern technical professional must seamlessly orchestrate various AI tools, each capable of intelligent outputs.
Recognizing this shift, CodeSignal has introduced a suite of coding assessments designed to evaluate candidates' abilities to leverage AI-powered coding assistants effectively. Rather than ignoring the reality that individuals will inevitably use these intelligent tools to complete their work, CodeSignal has embraced this fact. Their new assessments directly test a candidate's proficiency in collaborating with AI to quickly understand complex problems, devise strategic solutions, and execute them efficiently.
Traditional pre-employment assessments often simplify tasks to fit within a short evaluation window, typically lasting one to two hours. 'You can't just take existing pre-hire assessments and add AI to them, because the old questions were oversimplifications of reality. Simplifications are too simple for AI, so the AI would solve the problems instantly, demonstrating no skill from the candidate,' says Tigran. As a result, CodeSignal's new approach introduces real-world scenarios with greater complexity, ensuring the AI assistant enhances rather than replaces candidate skills. Candidates must be able to ask strategic questions, rapidly assimilate AI-driven insights, and effectively integrate outputs to address sophisticated challenges.
For example, a candidate might encounter a complex codebase in a typical software engineering scenario. Rather than manually sifting through thousands of lines of code to grasp its functionality, candidates who collaborate with AI can quickly summarize, interpret, and identify core focus areas using AI-powered tools. Those who haven't mastered this collaboration will soon fall behind, overwhelmed by the complexity. Therefore, success in these assessments is less about the ability to code itself and more about effectively managing intelligent resources to get the job done.
This shift in assessment philosophy underscores a broader transformation across the tech industry and beyond. AI tools like ChatGPT, Xai's Grok, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini have become routine companions in many workplaces, leading to a radical shift in job expectations. Companies no longer seek individuals proficient in existing technical frameworks or languages; they require professionals capable of continual learning, adapting, and effectively leveraging evolving AI tools.
Historically, university engineering and technology programs' curricula have evolved slowly, and they often struggle to keep up with rapidly changing industry demands. With AI reshaping skill requirements, this issue has become even more pressing. Unless universities can adapt quickly and provide the higher-order skills employers need, they risk graduating students who are ill-prepared for the modern workforce.
Tigran notes, 'There's a massive disconnect between what companies and industries want, and what university curricula teach. Universities want to know what skills they should be teaching students right now. The universities whose students perform well on our assessments do two things: first, they understand what companies are hiring for, and second, they provide students with plenty of opportunities to practice those skills.'
Educational institutions must incorporate explicit instruction in AI collaboration skills into their curricula. Students should be trained in traditional coding and effectively manage and orchestrate multiple intelligent tools. Universities aiming to produce students who excel in these new types of technical assessments must develop exercises that reflect authentic workplace complexities, requiring students to strategically engage with and leverage AI technologies to solve sophisticated real-world problems.
Beyond the explicit teaching of AI collaboration skills, educational institutions must navigate an ever-evolving distinction between core and emerging competencies. At the core will be the skills and knowledge that every professional should possess, regardless of the changing tools. In contrast, emerging competencies are rapidly evolving skills closely linked to specific technologies or methods that may quickly become obsolete but are crucial for immediate productivity. These competencies are most likely to be assessed during a technical interview, and providing this level of education will enable university programs to have the most significant impact on their graduates.
This distinction also demands new strategies. Institutions must focus not only on current technological skills but also on cultivating students' abilities for rapid learning and adaptability. Critical capability becomes less about thoroughly knowing any tool and more about quickly mastering and integrating whatever tools become relevant next. The capacity to rapidly assess a situation and deploy the appropriate complex set of tools to address a problem is precisely what students will need to demonstrate to succeed in an interview.
In light of these implications, CodeSignal's AI-Assisted Coding Assessments represent more than just a new testing method—they reflect a significant philosophical shift. By explicitly assessing the skill of orchestrating AI systems, CodeSignal sends a clear message to educators and employers alike: success in AI relies on adaptability, strategic collaboration, and rapid response learning.
The future workplace is here now. It is defined by intelligent collaboration rather than just individual technical execution. Those who master orchestrating multiple intelligent tools will find themselves invaluable. As AI integrates rapidly into nearly every industry, developing these management skills will become essential to being a 10x engineer. These skills will not only enhance individual careers but also transform them. CodeSignal's AI-Assisted Coding Assessments illuminate this path, urging employers and educational institutions to prepare individuals for yesterday's challenges but for the evolving demands of tomorrow.