
‘The worst day of all time': Afghans speak of safety fears after UK data leak
Speaking from Afghanistan, where he is in hiding, Abdullah fears he will be tortured and killed.
'The people I trusted for my safety have now created this risk for me,' said Abdullah, whose name has been changed for security reasons. He had applied to come to the UK with his wife and children under the Afghan relocations and assistance policy (Arap) after the Taliban swept to power in August 2021.
'This is the worst day in all time because I'm very scared. After hearing this news and receiving this email I haven't eaten, I haven't [had a] drink, and I'm just thinking about me and my family's security because I had sent to the UK government our photos, our home address, our everything and now I'm very scared for our safety.'
Adnan Malik, the head of data protection at Barings Law, which is representing about 1,000 of the victims, said some of those listed on the leaked database have had to go into hiding in Afghanistan, while others had been killed in targeted attacks. The law firm is now working with some of those affected to pursue potential legal action.
'We are aware of incidents where there are individuals who are named on the list that they have been killed. And based on our research and understanding … it was an attack towards an individual who the perpetrator knew assisted the UK armed forces,' Malik said.
That is Abdullah's greatest fear. 'I'm in Afghanistan currently and if this information is leaked, the current Afghanistan regime – they will find me and torture me and it's a risk for my life,' he said. 'I'm very concerned about myself and other people who are included in this data breach. I'm very sad. I thought the British government was very strong and now I'm in a very different situation.'
The correspondence Abdullah and others received from the UK government, sent in English, Pashto and Dari, warned that the recipient's email address had been used to make a resettlement application and that some personal data may have been compromised.
It advised the recipient to 'limit who can see your social media profiles and not accept friend/follow requests from individuals you do not know and trust'. It also urged the recipient not to take phone calls or respond to messages or emails from unknown contacts.
'As some applications included the personal data of others (including family and dependents) you should assume that their data may also be compromised, and they should exercise the same precautions,' it added.
Abdullah, who is being represented by the law firm Leigh Day, said his only hope is that the British government now speeds up his application.
Ahmed, a former soldier who conducted operations in Afghanistan with British troops, said he wept when he realised his details were included in the dataset.
He came to the UK with his wife and children under the Arap scheme after the fall of Kabul in August 2021, but many of his relatives are still in Afghanistan.
Shortly after his arrival in the UK, his two younger brothers – one of whom had been involved in military operations – tried to flee the Taliban after the family home was raided but the pair were shot dead at the Iranian border.
Ahmed, whose name has been changed for security reasons, said the leak included his Arap application number, which he had used to make a case for his wider family.
'I was very worried and I started crying,' he said, describing the moment he realised he was a victim. 'I thought everything is safe here. We did a lot of operations with British troops. I'm afraid. I'm worried about my brother and wife's family and my colleagues because lots are in Afghanistan still. These things happen. The Taliban killed a lot of my friends as well.'
He added: 'I have a request to the British government: please don't forget about our colleagues. A bad situation is going to happen in a couple of months if they don't bring them here.'
Prof Sara de Jong, a founding member of the Sulha Alliance, which helps ex-interpreters and others who worked for Britain, said it was 'incredibly concerning' that the Ministry of Defence routinely asked Afghans for the most sensitive of personal data but couldn't be trusted with data protection.
'It is a horrible irony that the UK government had to save Afghans from their own data blunder, instead of prioritising those who are the Taliban's prime target,' she said.
'The vast amount of resource to cover up this error, could have been much better spent. For example, we see inexcusable delays in processing applications for family members at severe risk and many injured interpreters never received compensation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jeremy Corbyn more popular among younger voters than Keir Starmer, new poll shows
Jeremy Corbyn is far more popular among young voters than Sir Keir Starmer, new polling has indicated, suggesting that Labour's decision to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds could backfire. While both leaders remain deeply unpopular among the public, there is a surge in support for Sir Keir 's predecessor among those aged 18-24, a new poll has shown. The survey comes just days after Mr Corbyn launched his own political party alongside former left-wing Labour MP Zarah Sultana. While Sir Keir's approval ratings are poor across all age groups, new polling conducted by YouGov on the day Mr Corbyn announced his new party showed that the left-wing politician has a rating of plus 18 among 18-24 year-olds. By contrast, Sir Keir has an approval rating of minus 30 among the same group. But among voters overall, the two leaders have a near identical approval rating, with Sir Keir on minus 40 and Mr Corbyn on minus 39. Earlier this month, the government announced it will give the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds, expanding the electorate by 1.6m people at the next election. While there have been accusations from the right that the move was an attempt to shore up its own support, the YouGov polling for The Times suggests the move could serve to split the electorate even further if the results are reflected among 16 and 17 year olds. It comes amid growing concern over the direction of Sir Keir's government from voters on both the left and the right, with the prime minister's approval rating hitting an all time low earlier this month. Sir Keir's support among the public reached new depths of minus 43 after the £5bn welfare U-turn, according to new polling. The survey, first reported by The Sunday Times, also found that just a year after coming to power, seven in 10 voters think Sir Keir's government is at least as chaotic as the Tories' previous term. That includes one in three voters, who believe it is more so. Seeking to capitalise on the discontent with the Labour government, Mr Corbyn promised a 'new kind of political party' when he launched the as yet unnamed project with Ms Sultana on Thursday, claiming that more than 200,000 people have signed up. But dismissing the movement, technology secretary Peter Kyle said that the Islington North MP 'doesn't think about governing, he thinks about posturing'. Asked about the move, Mr Kyle reflected on what he called the 'chaos and instability' of Mr Corbyn's leadership. Speaking on Times Radio, Mr Kyle said: 'He's not a serious politician. He doesn't think about governing, he thinks about posturing. And we see that writ large at the moment, because all the posturing, of course, just puts him at odds with his own supporters, which is why you've got George Galloway saying he won't join it.' When Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana announced their new party, a Labour source said: "The electorate has twice given its verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn led party." The polling, conducted by YouGov for The Times, spoke to 2,013 adults between July 24 and 25.


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Teenager, 18, has ‘three-quarters of scalp ripped off' on funfair ride in Hampshire
An 18-year-old woman has been left with potentially life-changing injuries after her hair reportedly became caught in a funfair ride in Hampshire at the weekend. Emergency services were called to Netley Marsh Steam and Craft show shortly before 11pm on Saturday after the teenager's hair was said to have been trapped in the rollers of a swinging floor. Emma Perry, a nurse from Southampton General Hospital, told the Southern Daily Echo: 'Her friend came off the ride and said she was bleeding, so I offered my services as a first aider. 'When I got up there, I saw that three-quarters of the girl's scalp had been ripped off in what we call a degloving incident.' One woman told the BBC that she had helped provide first aid to the teenager, and that there had been 'shock and panic' at the scene. "One of the girl's friends came down and said how serious it was and some of us offered assistance,' she said. "It's very shocking it could happen on a fairground ride that young children go on. This must never happen again.' In a post on Facebook, the show's organisers said: 'The unfortunate incident that happened at the show last evening is being investigated by the relevant authorities. 'Netley Marsh Steam and Craft Show Ltd are cooperating with all parties involved. No further comment will be made until such time as appropriate and more information is available. 'Any comments made at present on social media are NOT the views of the show organisers and we will continue to support all parties involved. A Hampshire Police spokesperson said: 'We were called at 10.53pm on 26 July with reports that an 18-year-old woman had sustained potentially life-changing injuries to her head while on a ride at Netley Marsh Steam and Craft Show. 'She was taken to hospital for treatment. 'Police attended and have liaised with the Health and Safety Executive.'


BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Colchester driver who crashed car was not wearing glasses
A driver has been reported to the DVLA after failing to wear his glasses and crashing his Police said the motorist, who it described as elderly, was stopped in Colchester on Wednesday after his Vauxhall car clipped a kerb and a eyesight test conducted at the roadside revealed that instead of being able to see 20m ahead (66ft), he could only see two metres (seven feet)His car was seized under Section 165 of the Road Traffic Act and police said he was referred to the DVLA. Essex Police said: "Your eyes are your best driving tool, regular check-ups help keep you, and everyone else, safe on the road."If you are prescribed contact lenses or glasses to assist you when driving please remember to wear them." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.