
Boston restaurant industry faces tariffs, immigrant workers and outsiders
Until recently, a restaurateur on a typical day might have to balance shipment schedules, employee shifts and maybe an exacting patron — and plenty else that goes beyond what's served on a menu.
The business has never been easy. But these days, the list of worries also includes tariffs, onerous costs and hurdles of operating in Boston, and protecting an immigrant workforce.
The Boston Business Journal brought together six prominent names in the local industry to talk about those topics and more at Saltie Girl on Newbury Street. The transcript has been edited for length and clarity.
On adjusting to tariffs
Kathy Sidell, Saltie Girl and Stephanie's on Newbury: Obviously, prices are going to go up. We source a lot from Canada, so that's going to be tricky and interesting. I think we're all going to be buying a lot more locally. And you can't just pass on these prices to the guests because there's a limit to what we can charge.
expand
Kathy Sidell of Stephanie's on Newbury and Saltie Girl at her newly remodeled Satie Girl restaurant.
Gary Higgins / Boston Business Journal
Demetri Tsolakis, Xenia Hospitality: I don't think any of us want to raise prices. My concepts are all Greek, so I import. I have all Greek wine. So it's scary for me. I don't know if I had a psychic ball or what happened but we had a lot of wine stored here locally, so I'm good through the rest of the year. Doing Greek and local is important to us. We don't have a tomato on our menu in January for that reason.
Allan Tidd, Blue Ribbon Restaurants: I think what we're going to see is prices elevated, even if it's justified or not, because that happened during Covid. People are charging what they think the market will bear. And I think prices are going to go up because they can, and not because their costs went up.
Don Donahue, Lenox Hotel: Forget just the cost of goods. We're going to have fewer guests coming here. That, in and to itself, is going to have a ripple effect.
Deirdre Auld, CODA Restaurant Group: One of the biggest challenges for us, beyond the costs and whether it gets passed on to customers, is that with the current administration, every other day is a different story. We're spending so much time as operators thinking about strategy or how we might pivot — that's wasted time in a lot of ways.
expand
Deirdre Auld is director of operations at The Coda Group.
Coutesy of Kevin Martin
Marc Sheehan, Northern Spy: There's a lot of disconnect between consumers and restaurants with why things cost what they cost. Beyond the tariffs, people don't get it. They just see what's on the news, and then they see what they walk into when they go out to dinner, and they make up their own mind about why the prices are what they are.
Immigration risks are worsening labor shortage
Auld: We're very upfront with our teams. We did really extensive ICE training with all of our management teams. We also did extensive training and overviews with our line level employees, because our team feeling safe at work has got to be the priority. We have an obligation to follow the law, and that's what we'll do, but we do not have obligations to do anything beyond that.
Tidd: When it's good — and I don't know when it was good last — it's your team that understands that you have their back and that you care. We've had staff afraid to take the subway.
Donahue: And drive now, too.
Auld: It's not just specific to folks that don't have documentation. Folks do have documentation, folks who are permanent residents lawfully, folks who have even become citizens, are dealing with the same fear, and that makes it that much more complicated for us.
Sidell: There's no one at this table who'd have a business if they go away.
Tsolakis: There'd be no hospitality.
High costs of operating in Boston
Sidell: I think it's getting increasingly more difficult to open in the city, and that's why you see people opening in other places.
expand
Demitri Tsolakis is founder of Xenia Hospitality.
Coutesy of Kevin Martin
Tsolakis: I went right over the line in Brookline. The process is much different. You get a free liquor license and you still get that Boston feel. So we can do great numbers over there. I think the problem here in Boston is that no department talks to each other.
Sheehan: When I opened Loyal Nine in 2015, it made sense to be in Cambridge. At the time, Cambridge was a place where if you were a young, independent operator, you could afford to open something that was a risk. For Northern Spy in Canton, we were actually approached by the town. They wanted to see if we wanted to come down and see where they were remaking the former Plymouth Rubber Co. site.
A lack of late-night, bar business
Tidd: There's just not enough late-night demand in Boston. We shortened our hours. There weren't enough people coming in to warrant carrying all that kitchen staff for those two extra hours.
Auld: Gen Z has straight-up said they're not going to stay up as late as previous generations. They have a different focus. It's just maybe not the next generation's scene. But that's where things like taking away happy hour kind of screws us over, right? Because we had the chance to potentially really double down on business during the times that people want to be out.
Sheehan: If you want to come out to the suburbs at 4 o'clock, I'll give you a cheap beer.
Tsolakis: I'd be against that. Knowing how much my rent is and how much my liquor license cost, to discount something that I rely on?
expand
Marc Sheehan is the chef at Northern Spy in Canton.
Coutesy of Kevin Martin
Sheehan: When I was 21, I worked at No. 9 Park. To get to work, I have to drive to a Red Line stop in Quincy to Park Street. I plated food until 12:30 to 1 in the morning, at which point I needed to already be partially changed so I could sprint out the door and try to catch the last train back to Quincy — and then drive home. How can you attract a line cook who's coming out of culinary school who thinks they want to come to the city to build their resume if they can't even get home late at night?
Waiting longer for an ROI
Auld: An ROI for us was two years, pre-covid. Now it's three.
Sidell: I think it's three to seven. I think most restaurants don't make money back until seven years.
Tidd: Say you put an investment group together to open a restaurant. What do they want? They're expecting to start making money on day one.
Sidell: It takes eight months to two years to know whether the restaurant is going to survive.
Shifting business
Tsolakis: We used to have a Monday-through-Friday, consistent lunch business. Then I lost Monday and Friday. But my catering is up because employers are trying to pull people back into the office and say 'hey, come to the office and we'll buy you food.'
Sheehan: We used to be open Tuesday through Sunday, for two services a day. Now, we serve only dinner on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. The demographic for our lunch business has changed dramatically.
Tsolakis: Is lunch a dying breed? Do people go out for lunch?
Sidell: I see it on Boylston. Everyone there is going to Sweetgreen.
expand
Daniel Donahue is president of Saunders Hotel Group, which operates Sweeneys and The Irving.
Coutesy of Kevin Martin
Donahue: Or Chick-fil-A.
Expanding our palates
Sidell: We aren't terribly sophisticated.
Tidd: I'm from here. I worked in New York for about a year while we're in construction, seeing what they do down there. For us, each location is completely different.
Sidell: You came into a city where, how many people really know Blue Ribbon? I think this is the question: Ci Siamo is coming to Boston but do people know and care? Are people going to Contessa because they know it's related to Carbone?
Donahue: You said it. Outsiders do not do well in Boston, by and large.
Tsolakis: Jean-Georges Vongerichten came in. He couldn't make it work. Our celebrity chefs and outsiders haven't worked.
Sidell: You have a legacy with Blue Ribbon. I just don't know how much that applies to Bostonians.
expand
Allan Tidd is the general manager at Blue Ribbon Restaurants.
Coutesy of Kevin Martin
Tidd: I love being from here, but opening a New York-based restaurant in the old Eastern Standard space was almost like suicide.
Auld: We've seen over the years that food has moved towards Italian or steakhouses, for comfort and stability. Rents are so expensive that taking a risk doesn't work. But if you look at what's done really well in Boston in the last couple of years, it's Greek food or Korean. There is an evolution happening. It's just so much tension for new operators. I think we're gatekeeping the next generation in Boston, because it's so expensive to open a restaurant here that folks who have highly focused skillsets or new cuisine ideas or new concepts are really challenged to be able to actually do it.
Tsolakis: People thought I was crazy for having Greek wine. Like, where's my sauvignon blanc?
Sidell: I can't believe how gutsy you were. The entire menu's in Greek. I went there and I thought, are you kidding me?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Not your parent's housing market: 4 ways things have changed
(NewsNation) — Homeownership has long been a cornerstone of the 'American dream,' but mounting affordability challenges have put that goal out of reach for many. These days, younger and older generations view the dream very differently. Nearly 70 percent of adults over 65 believe the 'American dream is still possible,' compared with just 39 percent of those under 30, according to a 2024 Pew survey. Housing costs appear to be a major driver of young adults' skepticism — a problem that has been years in the making. New construction plunged during the Great Recession, shrinking the nation's housing supply and worsening a shortfall that persists to this day. The inventory constraints came at a time when home prices had already been outpacing wages for years. Then the COVID-19 pandemic hit. Record-low mortgage rates and pent-up demand sparked bidding wars, sending home prices soaring. Investors piled in too, tightening supply and helping drive inventory to historic lows. The dust has since settled, but affordability remains elusive. Mortgage rates are higher, and many owners who locked in rock-bottom rates aren't eager to sell. Prices, meanwhile, keep climbing. Today's renters put their chances of ever owning a home at just 1 in 3 — down from more than 50 percent before the pandemic, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. It's a striking shift in how Americans view their financial prospects, driven by fundamental changes that didn't exist decades ago. Here are four signs this isn't your parents' housing market. Homebuyers are older than ever Median age of homebuyers (National Association of Realtors 2024) 1981: 31 years old 2024: 56 years old (record high) In the 1980s, the typical homebuyer was in their early 30s. By 2024, that age had risen to 56 — a record high, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Baby boomers (ages 60 to 78) now represent the largest generational group of homebuyers, accounting for 42 percent of buyers between July 2023 and June 2024. Millennials (ages 26 to 44) are the nation's largest generation but made up just 29% of buyers, NAR found. They were also far more likely to be raising kids at home. Even more striking is the contrast in how each group paid. Roughly half of older boomers (ages 70 to 78) paid in cash, skipping financing altogether. On the other hand, 95 percent of millennials financed their purchase, and 40 percent relied on family and friends to help with the down payment. The stark generational contrast shows that today's homebuyers are trending older — but more importantly, it highlights who is competing for homes. These days, younger generations are going head-to-head with older, established homeowners for houses. Share of first-time buyers at all-time low Market share of first-time buyers (National Association of Realtors 2024) It's easier to buy a home when you already own one. Today's housing market increasingly pits homeowners with built-up equity against younger buyers trying to break in. Before 2008, first-time buyers typically made up 40 percent of the market. Last year, their share fell to 24 percent — the lowest since the NAR began tracking in 1981. The shift underscores how inaccessible the housing market has become for new buyers, jeopardizing the primary path to wealth for millions of Americans. A 2024 Redfin report found that empty-nest baby boomers own nearly 3 in 10 (28 percent) large U.S. homes, twice as many as millennials with kids. Elevated mortgage rates and a lack of affordable starter homes have contributed to the gap, incentivizing many older adults to stay in place. In theory, a so-called ' silver tsunami ' could free up larger homes as older Americans downsize. But that same shift could intensify competition for entry-level homes, pushing prices even higher. Wages haven't kept up with home prices Median sales price for new houses sold in the U.S. (Census Bureau) *not adjusted for inflation 1984: $79,900 2023: $428,600 Change: +436 percent Median household income (Census Bureau) — not adjusted for inflation 1984: $22,420 2023: $80,610 Change: +260 percent Mortgage rates may be lower today than in the 1980s, but wages haven't kept pace with soaring prices. In 1984, a new home cost 3.6 times the median household income; by 2023, it was 5.3 times — a gap that widened in recent years. Homebuyers now need an annual household income of $116,986 to afford the typical U.S. home, according to a recent Bankrate study. That's a nearly 50 percent jump from early 2020, when the income needed was $78,236. A separate Harvard study found that the price-to-income ratio in 2022 was the highest on record, dating back to the early 1970s. In some West Coast markets, including San Jose and San Francisco, typical homes sold for more than 11 times the median income. Homebuyers are competing with investors Share of investor buyers ( 2001 (Q4): 1.9 percent 2024 (Q4): 13.5 percent Today's homebuyers aren't just competing with other families — they're increasingly up against deep-pocketed investors. In 2024, investors purchased 13 percent of homes sold, up from just 2 percent in 2001, according to In total, that amounted to 610,000 homes last year. States like Missouri, Oklahoma and Kansas saw investors buy an even higher share — roughly 20 percent of homes last year. found that most investors (62 percent) paid all cash, nearly double the 33% rate of all homebuyers who did the same. 'Budget-conscious buyers often find themselves in direct competition with investors for the most affordable properties, a contest many are unable to win,' senior economic research analyst Hannah Jones said in a June report.


Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Mortgage Rates Today: August 21, 2025 - 30-Year and 15-Year Rates Rise
Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations. The current average mortgage rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage is 6.57%, according to the Mortgage Research Center. The average rate on a 15-year mortgage is 5.53%, while the average rate on a 30-year jumbo mortgage is 6.70%. Borrowers will pay more in interest this week as the average rate on a 30-year mortgage is 6.57% compared to a rate of 6.46% a week ago. The APR , which includes the interest and all of the lender fees, on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage is 6.6%. The APR was 6.49% last week. To borrow a $100,000 in a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage with the current rate of 6.57%, you will pay about $636 per month in principal and interest (taxes and fees not included), the Forbes Advisor mortgage calculator shows. You'd pay around $129,870 in total interest over the life of the loan. Today, the 15-year mortgage rate increased to 5.53%, higher than it was yesterday. Last week, it was 5.43%. On a 15-year fixed, the APR is 5.58%. Last week it was 5.48%. With an interest rate of 5.53%, you would pay $819 per month in principal and interest for every $100,000 borrowed. Over the life of the loan, you would pay $47,859 in total interest. On a 30-year jumbo mortgage (a mortgage above 2025's conforming loan limit of $806,500 in most areas), the average interest rate jumped up to 6.7%, higher than it was at this time last week. The average rate was 6.67% at this time last week. Borrowers with a 30-year fixed-rate jumbo mortgage with today's interest rate of 6.7% will pay $645 per month in principal and interest per $100,000. That means you'd pay roughly $132,682 in total interest over the life of the loan. After reaching highs in 2024, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate has remained in the mid-to-high 6% range since late January 2025. The 15-year fixed mortgage rate has hovered between the low-6% and high-5% range. While interest rates have fallen somewhat since mid-January 2025, experts don't expect them to drop significantly anytime soon. Mortgage rates are influenced by various economic factors, making it difficult to predict when they will drop . Mortgage rates follow U.S. Treasury bond yields. When bond yields decrease, mortgage rates generally follow suit. The Federal Reserve's decisions and global events also play a key role in shaping mortgage rates. If inflation rises or the economy slows, the Fed may lower its federal funds rate. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the Fed reduced rates, which drove interest rates to record lows. A significant drop in mortgage rates seems unlikely in the near future. However, they may decline if inflation eases or the economy weakens. Buying a house is a huge purchase and can put a big dent in your savings. Before you start looking, it's important to calculate how much house you can afford and you're willing to spend. Not only do you want to consider your income and debt, but you also want to factor in emergency savings and any long-term financial goals such as retirement or college. These are some basic financial factors that go into home affordability: Income Debt Debt-to-income ratio (DTI) Down payment Credit score Multiple factors affect the interest rate for a mortgage, including the economy's overall health, benchmark interest rates and borrower-specific factors. The Federal Reserve's rate decisions and inflation can influence rates to move higher or lower. Although the Fed raising rates doesn't directly cause mortgage rates to rise, an increase to its benchmark interest rate makes it more expensive for banks to lend money to consumers. Conversely, rates tend to decrease during periods of rate cuts and cooling inflation. Home buyers can make several moves to improve their finances and qualify for competitive rates. One is having a good or excellent credit score, which ranges from 670 to 850. Another is maintaining a debt-to-income (DTI) ratio below 43%, which implies less risk of being unable to afford the monthly mortgage payment. Further, making a minimum 20% down payment can help you avoid private mortgage insurance (PMI) on conventional home loans. If you can afford the larger monthly payment, 15-year home loans have lower rates than a 30-year term. Many home buyers are eligible for several mortgage loan types . Each program can have its own advantages: Conventional mortgage. A conventional home loan is ideal for borrowers with good or excellent credit to qualify for competitive rates. Additionally, making a minimum 20% down payment helps you waive private mortgage insurance premiums. A conventional home loan is ideal for borrowers with good or excellent credit to qualify for competitive rates. Additionally, making a minimum 20% down payment helps you waive private mortgage insurance premiums. FHA loan. An FHA home loan is best when applying with imperfect credit or a low down payment. You can put as little as 3.5% down with a credit score above 580. A minimum 10% down payment is necessary for credit scores ranging from 500 to 579. An is best when applying with imperfect credit or a low down payment. You can put as little as 3.5% down with a credit score above 580. A minimum 10% down payment is necessary for credit scores ranging from 500 to 579. VA loan. Borrowers with a qualifying military background may prefer a VA loan for its flexibility. A down payment may not be required. While you pay a one-time funding fee , there are no ongoing mortgage insurance premiums or service fees. Borrowers with a qualifying military background may prefer a for its flexibility. A down payment may not be required. While you pay a one-time , there are no ongoing mortgage insurance premiums or service fees. USDA loan. Applicants in eligible rural areas can buy or build a home with no down payment, although an upfront and annual guarantee fee applies. Additionally, income requirements apply and this program requires a moderate income or lower. Applicants in eligible rural areas can buy or build a home with no down payment, although an upfront and annual guarantee fee applies. Additionally, income requirements apply and this program requires a moderate income or lower. Jumbo loan. Homebuyers in a high-cost-of-living area will need to apply for a jumbo loan when the loan amount exceeds the Federal Housing Finance Agency's conforming loan limits. The limit in most municipalities is $806,500 in 2025. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) A competitive mortgage rate currently ranges from 6% to 8% for a 30-year fixed loan. Several factors impact mortgage rates, including the repayment term, loan type and borrower's credit score. Lenders adjust mortgage rates daily based on economic conditions, inflation, bond market movements and Federal Reserve actions. If you're shopping around for a mortgage, remember that you might be able to lock in a rate for 30 up to 120 days, depending on the lender. Note that some lenders charge a fee to lock your rate while others offer the service for free. A mortgage interest rate reflects what a lender is charging you on top of your loan amount in return for allowing you to borrow money. Annual percentage rate (APR) , on the other hand, is a calculation that includes both a loan's interest rate and finance charges, expressed as an annual cost over the life of the loan. In other words, it's the total cost of credit. APR accounts for interest, fees and time. Since APRs include both the interest rate and certain fees associated with a home loan, the APR can help you understand the total cost of a mortgage if you keep it for the entire term. The APR will usually be higher than the interest rate, but there are exceptions.


Chicago Tribune
33 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Forrest Claypool: Chicago leaders show no signs of changing their fiscal behavior
For years, city and state officials have marched Chicago toward a cliff. This budget season will determine if they have the will to finally pull back from the abyss. Leaders of three prominent Chicago civic organizations recently outlined principles in the Tribune that they hope will guide those officials as they tackle billions in budget deficits at the city, public schools and the CTA. Although sound, their admonitions seem almost quaint, reflecting a bygone era when elected officials exercised a modicum of responsibility for their constituents' futures. Some history, juxtaposed with paraphrasing of the civic leaders' recommendations, is illustrative:For decades, city mayors have used one-time revenues to present the illusion of balanced budgets. Both Mayor Richard M. Daley and his successor Rahm Emanuel used 'scoop and toss,' refinancing bonds with new 30-year debt and spending it to close annual deficits. A Tribune investigation called this practice, along with Daley's use of bonds to cover legal settlements, back pay and sundry expenses, 'equivalent to taking out a 30-year mortgage to buy a car and making your children — or grandchildren — pay it off, with interest.' Mayors Lori Lightfoot and Brandon Johnson used one-time COVID-19 relief dollars, among other short-term revenues, to balance budgets. Stealthy deficit spending has been the choice of mayors and city councils since at least the late decades of economic growth under Daley and Emanuel, financed in part by tax increment financing districts, Lightfoot and Johnson have raided these funds to balance budgets, shrinking job creation and future revenues. Further dampening growth, Lightfoot instituted automatic annual property tax increases and raised the gas tax. Johnson pushed through new taxes falling largely on businesses, making the city less competitive. He is seeking a new tax on each private sector job in the late! With Johnson's passive acquiescence, Gov. JB Pritzker imposed new pension sweeteners on the city Aug. 1, adding $60 million to 2027's pension tab and a whopping $750 million a year by 2055. It increases pension debt in the police and firefighters' funds by $11 billion, reducing funding levels to pay retirees from 25% to 18%, the worst ratio in the nation. As Yogi Berra would say, the governor's action was deja vu all over again. Pritzker signed similar pension sweeteners in 2021 and 2023, contributing to Chicago budget deficits. In contrast to Johnson, Lightfoot fought hard to block the unfunded mandate, but Pritzker and legislators beholden to powerful government unions ignored receives ideas for government cost efficiencies in the same way a vampire reacts to a gift of garlic. His only answer to budget challenges is a supplicating plea for more money from Chicago and Illinois taxpayers. Unlike the crushing pension debts imposed on Chicago by Springfield, this civic recommendation is within the control of local leaders. The CTA, for example, can match its bus and rail service to actual rider demand rather than running pre-pandemic schedules, pretending that despite the rise of remote work, 2019 ridership will return any minute. Chicago Public Schools, hemorrhaging students for years, can right-size its system by closing near-empty schools, giving students better opportunities and sending more dollars to classrooms. When combined with strategic neighborhood investments, guided by community leaders, these changes can both improve educational outcomes and help spur local renewal. Improving services also means putting customer needs first. The Chicago Park District, for example, should reconsider its obtuse plan to close 57 swimming pools by mid-August, the peak of the heat season amid a near-record heat wave. Chicago's civic leaders are right, but state and local officials show no signs of turning over a new leaf. Unless and until they do, expect more of the same — high unemployment, sky-high taxes, endemic violent crime and a declining quality of life. As the Tribune wrote nearly a half century ago, at a time of a similar existential crisis in 1981 Chicago, 'cities stricken in this way become irrelevant. Business moves away. So do the best young people. The population ages. The city becomes a backwater.' Chicago rose like a phoenix from that historic nadir because strong and effective leaders made difficult decisions. It's long past time for today's leaders to start doing the same. Forrest Claypool is author of 'The Daley Show: Inside the Transformative Reign of Chicago's Richard M. Daley.' He served twice as Daley's chief of staff and was CEO of Chicago Public Schools from 2015 to 2017.