Las Vegas woman pleads guilty in prize scam involving millions
Barbara Trickle, 80, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, documents said.
In 2023, federal prosecutors accused Trickle and two others of mailing millions of phony prize notices from 2012 to 2018. The mailer indicated that the person would receive a large cash prize if they paid a fee between $20 and $50, documents said.
'[Trickle] was the owner and operator of a printing and mailing business that produced the fraudulent prize notice mailings for the scheme,' documents said. 'Trickle supervised the lasering, printing, and mailing of the fraudulent prize notices. She also directed her employees to analyze victim response data in furtherance of the scheme. Trickle was paid by her co-conspirators for these services.'
The loss to victims totaled about $15.5 million, prosecutors said, adding many were 'elderly and vulnerable.'
It was not immediately clear how much prison time, if any, Trickle would face at sentencing. The charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a minimum fine of $250,000, prosecutors said in 2023.
The government runs a National Elder Fraud Hotline at 1-833-FRAUD-11.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
How North Korea's IT army is hacking the global job market
Nearly every Fortune 500 company is hiding the same uncomfortable secret: they have hired a North Korean IT worker. Why it matters: Despite how widespread the issue is, few companies are willing to talk publicly about it. Experts say reputational risk, legal uncertainty, and embarrassment all contribute to the silence — which in turn makes the problem harder to solve. Dozens of resumes, LinkedIn profiles, and fraudulent identity documents shared with Axios lay bare the scale and sophisticated of the scams. The big picture: For North Korea, this is a precious revenue stream that evades American sanctions — capitalizing on the wealth of high-paying remote worker roles in the U.S. to route cash back to Pyongyang. In the past two years, companies and their security partners have begun to grasp the scale of the problem — and now, they're sounding the alarm about where it's headed next. "They've been stealing intellectual property and then working on the projects themselves," Michael "Barni" Barnhart, principal investigator at DTEX Systems, told Axios. "They're going to use AI to magnify exponentially what they're already doing — and what they're doing now is bad." Between the lines: It sounds easy to simply weed out North Korean job applicants. But some of the world's biggest firms have found it devilishly difficult. That's because the North Korean operation has become as complex as a multi-national corporation. It involves several North Korean government offices, dozens of China-based front companies and Americans willing to facilitate the fraud. And the undercover North Korean IT workers are often exceptional at their jobs — at least until they start stealing sensitive data or extorting companies that try to fire them. Google Threat Intelligence VP Sandra Joyce recalled the response of one employer when told they likely had a North Korean fraudster on staff: "You guys better be right, because that is my best guy." The groups running the show North Korea has invested years into building up its remote IT labor force, providing training not just for remote job fraud but also corporate espionage and IP theft. Workers are selected and trained at elite institutions such as Kim Chaek University of Technology and the University of Sciences in Pyongsong — some with specializations in software development, AI or cryptography. Research from DTEX shows that the most advanced worker scams are often coordinated with units like APT 45, a notorious government hacking group known for infiltrating companies, running scams and laundering money. Other participants in the scheme include the Lazarus Group, which typically leads the regime's cryptocurrency hacks and has positioned insiders within crypto companies, and Research Center 227, a new AI research unit inside North Korea's intelligence agency. The intrigue: Cybersecurity companies have been discovering and naming new groups running these hacks, with names like Jasper Sleet, Moonstone Sleet and Famous Chollima. The scale Driving the news: Nine security officials who spoke with Axios all said they've yet to meet a Fortune 500 company that hasn't inadvertently hired a North Korean IT worker. Google told reporters at the RSA Conference in May that it had seen North Koreans applying to its jobs. SentinelOne and others have said the same. KnowBe4, a cybersecurity training company, admitted last year that it hired a North Korean IT worker. A smaller cryptocurrency startup told the WSJ that they accidentally had North Korean workers on their payroll for almost two years. In one case, Sam Rubin, senior vice president of Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 consulting and threat intelligence team, told Axios that within 12 hours of a large client posting a new job, more than 90% of the applicants were suspected to be North Korean workers. "If you hire contract IT workers, this has probably happened to you," Rubin said. The intrigue: Even small-to-mid-sized companies that rely on remote IT talent or outsource their IT needs to a consulting firm have encountered this problem, Adam Meyers, senior vice president of counter adversary operations at CrowdStrike, said. CrowdStrike has investigated more than 320 incidents where North Korean operatives landed jobs as remote software developers, according to the company's annual threat hunting report published earlier this month. How it works Getting a job at a U.S. company — and going undetected — is a team effort that involves several North Korean IT workers, China-based companies and even a handful of Americans. Some of the North Korean workers are even stationed in China and other nearby countries to keep suspicions low. First, the workers identify potential identities they can assume. Those are often stolen from a real person, or even from a dead U.S. citizen. To pull off this deception, they create fake passwords, Social Security cards and utility bills. Many of them use the same recognizable tablecloth in the background of fake ID photos, Meyers said. For instance, in a December indictment of 14 North Koreans, the workers were found using stolen identities to apply to dozens of jobs. Second, the workers find open jobs in software development, technical support and DevOps posted on Upwork, Fiverr, LinkedIn, and third-party staffing platforms. Much of this is streamlined through AI tools that help track and manage their job applications. Many of them will use AI tools to help generate passable resumes and LinkedIn profiles, according to Trevor Hilligoss, senior vice president at SpyCloud Labs. "There's a hierarchy: There's a group of people who are the interviewers, and they're the ones with the really good English specialties," Hilligoss told Axios. "When they get hired, that gets turned over to somebody that's a developer." Those developers will often juggle several jobs and multiple different personas. Zoom in: Job interviews would seem like the obvious time to catch a fraudulent application. But the "applicants" — whether they're using their real faces and voices or AI-enabled personas — are practiced interviewers with the skills necessary to complete technical coding assignments. In multiple cases, hiring managers only realized something was wrong weeks later when employees looked or behaved differently than during the interview, Barnhart said. After landing the job, the developers step in and request that their company laptop be shipped to a U.S. address — often citing a last-minute move or family emergency. That address often belongs to an American accomplice, who typically operates what's known as a "laptop farm." These facilitators are told to install specific remote desktop software onto the laptops so the North Korean worker can operate the laptop from abroad. In July, the FBI said it executed searchers of 21 premises across 14 states that were known or suspected laptop farms, seizing 137 laptops. Then there's the challenge of ensuring the salaries actually reach the North Korean regime. That often requires the facilitators forward the paychecks to front companies across China or funnel it through cryptocurrency exchanges. In a report published in May, researchers at Strider Technologies identified 35 China-based companies linked to helping North Korean operations. Challenges Hiring processes are so siloed that it's difficult for managers to see all the signs of fraud until the North Korean workers start their roles, Kern said. Even if a company suspects something is wrong, the forensic signals can be subtle and scattered. Security teams may detect unusual remote access tools or strange browser behavior. HR might notice recycled references or resumes that reuse the same phone number. But unless those insights are pooled together, it rarely raises alarms. "There's not one giant red flag to point to," said Sarah Kern, a leading North Korea analyst at Sophos' Counter Threat Unit. "It is multiple technical forensic aspects and then such a human aspect of small things to pick up on that aren't necessarily going to be in telemetry data from an endpoint detection standpoint." Yes, but: Even when these workers are detected, they're not easy to fire. Many of them are so talented that managers are reluctant to even believe they could actually be in North Korea, Alexandra Rose, director at Sophos' Counter Threat Unit, told Axios. If these workers are caught, employers then face a litany of problems: Some workers will download sensitive internal data and extort the companies for a hefty sum in a last-ditch effort to bleed the company of whatever money they can. Some workers have filed legal complaints, including workers' compensation claims, Barnhart said. In one case, Barnhart said he had a worker try to claim domestic violence protections as they were being fired just to buy time. "There is a lot of focus on companies that cybersecurity shouldn't just be for the CISO," Rose said. "You want a bit of that security feel throughout the company, and this is the kind of case that really demonstrates why that is." The bottom line: Some companies also hesitate to report these incidents, fearing they could be penalized for unknowingly violating U.S. sanctions — even though law enforcement officials have said they're more interested in cooperation than prosecution. What's next Right now, the operations are predominantly focused on making money for North Korea's regime. Threat level: But the hacking groups involved are evolving into something more sophisticated and dangerous — including by potentially building their own AI models and feeding in sensitive U.S. company data. That's a particular concern in the defense sector. Barnhart says his teams have seen North Korean IT workers increasingly studying information about AI technologies, drone manufacturing and other defense contract work. What to watch: As U.S. companies become more alert, North Korean IT workers are shifting their focus abroad as they seek employment at other companies and set up laptop farms throughout Europe — suggesting the operation is only just now ramping up, instead of slowing down.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bondi: 68 arrested overnight in DC
Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Sunday that authorities arrested 68 people overnight in Washington, D.C., amid a federal crackdown on crime in which President Trump has sent the National Guard to the nation's capital and federalized the police force. 'Over 300 arrests in D.C. — and counting: Just last night, our federal and DC law enforcement partners made 68 arrests and seized 15 illegal firearms,' Bondi said in a post on the social platform X. 'Homicide suspects, drug traffickers, and more are being charged. I'll continue to stand with you as we make DC safe again!' Trump last week said he would take federal control of D.C.'s police department and deploy the National Guard to the city. The president's moves have drawn heavy blowback from Democrats and D.C. residents. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who also recently compared the nation's capital to multiple foreign war zones, said in a post on X that 'graffiti is coming down in Washington, DC.' 'Graffiti left untouched to scar public spaces is the visual declaration of a society's surrender,' Miller said in his Sunday post. On Sunday, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) dismissed Trump's recent crackdown on the nation's capital as a 'stunt' and suggested, like other Democrats, that the effort is meant to distract from other events in the news. 'What's happening here in Washington, D.C., is just a stunt. Donald Trump didn't like the fact that the walls were closing in on him, that his own base was questioning why he wouldn't release the Epstein files, why he was protecting very powerful people,' Murphy told NBC News's Kristen Welker on 'Meet the Press.' 'He didn't want to talk anymore about the fact that our health care system is about to collapse because of the cuts that they have made, that premiums are going to go up by 75 percent on Americans,' the Connecticut senator added. But Republicans and the administration have argued the federal crackdown is a necessary step given high murder and crime rates in D.C., while suggesting that Democrats running cities have done a poor job handling the issue. A White House official told The Hill's sister network NewsNation Sunday that the Saturday night D.C. law enforcement operations involved 1,800 participants and that the National Guard was 'not making arrests at this time.' This story was updated at 4:57 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Court should reject HPE-Juniper merger: Former DOJ antitrust deputy
A Justice Department shake-up that led last month to the departure of the antitrust division's second in command arose over a DOJ decision to bend to lobbyists in the department's review of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's (HPE) acquisition of rival Juniper Networks ( according to Roger Alford, the fired official. The division's former antitrust deputy, Alford accused DOJ officials Chad Mizelle, chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Stanley Woodward, an associate attorney general nominee, of allowing lobbyists to prevail over the rule of law in the review that green-lighted the deal. Alford's critique came during an address on Monday at the Tech Policy Institute Aspen Forum. "It is my opinion that in the HPE/Juniper merger scandal, Chad Mizelle and Stanley Woodward perverted justice and acted inconsistent with the rule of law," Alford said. "I hope the court blocks the HPE/Juniper merger. If you knew what I knew, you would hope so too." The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Alford, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, was one of two of the Justice Department's most senior officials shown the door last month. He also served in the antitrust division during President Trump's first term. Before his departure from the second administration, he was principal deputy to President Trump's hand-picked antitrust chief, Gail Slater. The other official, William Rinner, a deputy assistant attorney general, headed up merger enforcement. Rinner also served in Trump's first administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that the two had been working on the department's challenge to the acquisition before a settlement was reached with HPE's politically connected lawyers, who lacked antitrust expertise. Alford said the HPE-Juniper review exemplified a broader, ongoing battle within the Republican Party over the future of the second Trump administration. "I am not talking about the well-known ideological battle between traditional conservatives and Trump supporters. I am talking about the battle between genuine MAGA reformers and MAGA-In-Name-Only lobbyists," Alford said. "It's a fight over whether Americans will have equal justice under law, or whether preferential access to our justice system is for sale to the wealthy and well-connected." The former deputy went on to question whether the US under the balance of President Trump's second term would be governed by the rule of law or the rule of lobbyists. He said the agency could correct course if it takes action to carry out the Trump administration's original mission to enforce the competition rules. "For the words 'equal justice under law' to be more than just a phrase etched in marble, it must be practiced by those privileged to enforce it," he said. "I am speaking out now because it is still early days in this Administration and I think correcting the problems at the DOJ is still possible, either by political will or judicial decree." Alford praised his former boss, Slater, and department colleagues, including Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who Alford said he believes remain true to President Trump's core message instructing that antitrust enforcement is not for sale and should deliver tangible "common sense populism"-oriented results for millions of Americans. During a panel discussion at George Washington Law School in May, Alford emphasized that the administration's focus was on mergers expected to drive up prices on goods and services that impact everyday Americans, like housing, education, healthcare, and everyday goods and services. Merger challenges like the one against HPE — filed roughly a week after Trump took office — appeared to signal the administration's plans to vigorously pursue competition concerns. Further underscoring its offensive approach, the administration pushed ahead with antitrust prosecutions targeting the biggest names in tech, including Google (GOOG), Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta (META). The Justice Department sued Hewlett-Packard in January, alleging that the $14 billion tie-up to combine the nation's second- and third-largest providers of enterprise wireless networking would substantially lessen market competition. Five months later, in June, the department announced it had settled with HPE and would allow the deal to go forward by requiring HPE to divest its global "Instant On" WLAN business to a DOJ-approved buyer, plus ensure it would license key software assets to rivals. Alford called on California Federal District Judge P. Casey Pitt to closely scrutinize the events that led to the merger settlement between the DOJ and HPE-Juniper court proceedings under the 1974 Tunney Act. The act requires companies seeking approval of merger settlements to disclose their settlement-related communications with the executive branch. Democratic lawmakers also asked Judge Pitt to hold a hearing to review the settlement. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
