logo
Military families ‘struggling' with their homes during VE Day celebrations

Military families ‘struggling' with their homes during VE Day celebrations

Liberal Democrat defence spokeswoman Helen Maguire described a 'scandal' in service family accommodation (SFA) and urged ministers to take 'concrete action to fix' homes.
The Government logged 442 urgent repair requests for SFA in the week which began on May 5, the early May bank holiday when Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer hosted a Downing Street party and the Red Arrows flew over London's Buckingham Palace to mark the 80th anniversary of VE (Victory in Europe) Day.
Responding to a written question which Ms Maguire tabled this month, the Ministry of Defence revealed 64,258 urgent repairs for SFA had been made between January 2024 and April this year.
Call-outs peaked in January 2024, with 5,921 urgent repairs for SFA, and 5,546 during the same month in 2025.
'For so many military families to be struggling over the 80th anniversary of VE Day – a week when they should have been able to celebrate and feel recognised by the nation for their service – is a scandal,' Ms Maguire told the PA news agency.
'This Government is more than happy to publicly celebrate our service personnel and veterans with a Downing Street party, but won't take concrete action to fix their homes.
'That's the ultimate hypocrisy.
'It's shocking that almost two-thirds of service personnel are still dissatisfied with the standard of maintenance for their housing.'
The Government has unveiled plans to extend a 'decent homes standard' – the 'minimum standard' which social housing should meet – into the private rented sector.
Lib Dem, Green Party and independent MPs and peers have called for the change to go further, to cover SFA.
Ms Maguire, a former Royal Military Police captain, said: 'We desperately need to bring military housing up to the decent homes standard.'
The Renters' Rights Bill faces further scrutiny in the House of Lords before it can become law.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence said: 'We're determined to deliver homes fit for our heroes and, for too long, military families have endured substandard housing. This Government is determined to fix that.
'Our deal to bring military homes back into public ownership is saving £600,000 of taxpayers' money each day, allowing us to start to fix deep-set problems in housing and support the development of high-quality new homes.
'Last month, the Defence Secretary announced a new consumer charter to drive up the standards of forces housing, and the forthcoming defence housing strategy will set out further plans to deliver a generational renewal of service family homes across the country.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer needs you: Britain readies for war
Keir Starmer needs you: Britain readies for war

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Keir Starmer needs you: Britain readies for war

On Monday, the prime minister, Keir Starmer, told Britain it was facing threats that were 'more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the cold war'. It was time, he said, to make Britain a 'battle-ready, armour-clad nation'. As the government publishes its strategic defence review, the former Guardian security editor Richard Norton-Taylor tells Helen Pidd there are still serious questions over whether Britain is ready for this new era. Is the government willing to spend enough to see Starmer's vision through? And even if it does, can we be sure the Ministry of Defence will concentrate its resources on the right things?

Healey announces £5 billion for military drones and lasers
Healey announces £5 billion for military drones and lasers

Belfast Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Healey announces £5 billion for military drones and lasers

The funding, announced by Defence Secretary John Healey, includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, and an extra £1 billion for lasers to protect British ships and soldiers. It follows the publication of the Strategic Defence Review on Monday that recommended a greater focus on new technology, including artificial intelligence and drones, as an 'immediate priority'. Mr Healey said the investment would provide 'the most significant advance in UK defence technology in decades' and 'ensure our armed forces have the cutting-edge capabilities they need to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing world'. He added: 'We are delivering the Strategic Defence Review's vision to put the UK at the leading edge of innovation in Nato, by backing British industry and fast-tracking the kit of the future into the hands of frontline troops.' Part of the investment will see the establishment of a new 'drone centre' to accelerate the deployment of the technology by all three branches of the armed forces. The focus on drones comes as the technology has proven increasingly lethal on the battlefield in Ukraine, where it now kills more people than traditional artillery. At a meeting of allied defence ministers in April, Mr Healey said the UK estimated drones were inflicting 70-80% of battlefield casualties, while on Sunday Ukraine launched a major attack on Russian airfields deep behind the front line using a fleet of small drones. In addition to investment in drones and AI, the Government has announced an additional £1 billion for the development of 'directed energy weapons' (DEWs) during the current parliament. This includes the DragonFire laser scheduled to be fitted to the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers from 2027, with a similar system provided for the Army by the end of the decade. DragonFire and other DEWs are intended to provide a lower-cost form of air defence against targets including drones, costing just £10 per shot compared with the thousands of pounds it costs to fire existing weapons.

Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul

South Wales Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul

Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said. This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools. The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday. This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on. 'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments. 'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.' Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport. 'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed. 'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.' Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'. He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating. 'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground. 'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store