logo
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul

Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul

Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said.
This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools.
The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday.
This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services.
The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on.
'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments.
'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.'
Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport.
'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed.
'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.'
Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'.
He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating.
'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground.
'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK Government's immigration plans could be ‘ticking time bomb' for Scottish construction
UK Government's immigration plans could be ‘ticking time bomb' for Scottish construction

Scotsman

time28 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

UK Government's immigration plans could be ‘ticking time bomb' for Scottish construction

Trade association warns that potential exodus of industry professionals to England will leave nation 'bereft of skills' and damage transition to net zero Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The UK Government's tough new immigration proposals are 'a ticking time bomb' for Scottish construction which could cause an exodus of skilled workers and leave the sector with a massive skills gap, Scotland's largest trade association has warned. SELECT says the proposals to raise the qualification standards for foreign workers is likely to see a significant number abandoning the UK and returning home, with Scottish construction workers flooding south to fill the resulting shortage south of the Border. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The electrotechnical body also echoed a shock new report issued this week by insisting that leaving the country 'bereft of skills' would also impact Scotland's transition to net zero, with fewer qualified professionals left to install and maintain renewable technology. Alan Wilson, Managing Director at SELECT SELECT Managing Director Alan Wilson raised the concerns with First Minister John Swinney during a meeting of Scottish business leaders last week, during which he relayed apprehensions from across the construction sector. Mr Wilsonsaid: 'Raising the thresholds for skilled workers may seem on the face of it to be a laudable aim, but it is likely to be detrimental to recruitment in the major UK population areas and that means workers will be sucked in from places like Scotland. 'In areas such as London, it's estimated that 50% of the workforce are from abroad, so if they leave, Scottish workers are likely to flood south to take up highly-paid jobs, leaving the domestic construction sector in crisis Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This could leave Scotland bereft of skills, with no opportunity to top up from abroad, and could lead to the worst of all possible worlds just as we need these skills to fulfil our transition to a net zero economy. 'This ticking time bomb could leave Scotland without enough skilled workers to build the country we need, which is why we had to bring it to the attention of government at the highest level.' The UK Government published its white paper policy document, Restoring control over the immigration system, on 12 May, proposing changes to make it harder to move to and settle in the UK, with a view to reducing immigration Under the proposals, Labour is proposing to raise the threshold for skilled workers from Regulated Qualifications Framework 3 (RQF3) – equivalent to Scottish Highers – to RQF6, which is degree level. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Wilson says many existing qualified tradespeople will be outwith the new threshold and insists the move will also be detrimental to recruitment, with firms less willing to recruit apprentices, creating a long-term impact on the sector. He said: 'We are facing a crisis in recruitment in almost all trades which will not be helped by the uncertainty caused by these proposals. 'The construction sector is a vital pillar of the Scottish economy, supporting infrastructure development, housing delivery and the green transition, yet it is experiencing a persistent and growing skills shortage already. 'According to the Construction Industry Training Board, an additional 26,100 workers will be needed across Scotland between 2024 and 2028 to meet demand, yet apprenticeship starts across construction have remained flat, with only around 6,500 new entrants per year.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Wilson's warning comes after a new report by Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce shows the UK is losing the skills and supply chain needed to deliver net zero, with a growing share of energy sector jobs, investment and innovation shifting abroad. The 41st Energy Transition Survey of more than 100 firms shows that two-thirds expect to increase their headcount overseas in the next five years, with almost half saying staff were already leaving the UK to work in other energy regions. Mr Wilson – who chairs the Construction Industry Collective Voice – also pointed out that architecture schools in Scotland, who often rely on fees from abroad, may have to shut down if students choose not to study there as a result of post-qualification uncertainty. He added: 'The uncertainty the proposals contain will be particularly acute for both graduate visa holders completing their training and employers, who may see no reward in investing in graduates from abroad qualifying in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Similarly, students may not choose to study architecture in Scotland because of the uncertainties post-qualification employment. This could have significant knock-on effects for architecture schools who rely on foreign students fees to make the courses viable.

Which Powys projects get £11million in Levelling Up funds
Which Powys projects get £11million in Levelling Up funds

Powys County Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Which Powys projects get £11million in Levelling Up funds

Resurfacing works, active travel routes and a new footbridge are among the projects in Powys set to benefit from £11million of Government cash. Powys Council has revealed which projects in Mid Wales will be backed with the latest cash from the UK Government's Levelling Up Fund for the 2025/26 financial year. The council says there is a focus on delivering projects that aim to boost recreational tourism and contribute to local economic growth, specifically ones aimed at transport investment. Among these projects is a resurfacing scheme to improve access to tourist hotspots and support the National Cycle Network. Another is active travel projects in Llandrindod Lake, Brecon promenade, the next phase of the Llandrindod Wells to Howey route and a section of the Crickhowell to Llangattock route, designed to improve access between towns and surrounding tourist destinations, which the council hopes will make it easier for visitors to explore Powys using active modes and improve accessibility for key locations. Replacing the Pont y Milgy footbridge in Ystradgynlais will be the first project in a wider scheme to improve visitors' accessibility to Powys' Rights of Way network. Cllr Jake Berriman, Leader of Powys County Council, said: 'This latest contribution of Levelling Up Funding from UK Government will allow us to begin making the improvements needed to the county's transport infrastructure. 'Through this timely investment, we aim to improve accessibility to key services, encourage active travel and support recreational activities, providing better journeys for everyone and improve connectivity to tourist hotspots. 'We are hopeful to receive confirmation of additional Levelling Up Funding to enable us to complete further projects in the future.' The Levelling Up funding aims to address regional disparities across the UK by investing in vital local infrastructure projects to increase pride in place and bring people closer to opportunity. Cllr Berriman added: 'This latest contribution of Levelling Up Funding from UK Government will allow us to begin making the improvements needed to the county's transport infrastructure. 'Through this timely investment, we aim to improve accessibility to key services, encourage active travel and support recreational activities, providing better journeys for everyone and improve connectivity to tourist hotspots.'

Labour and Tories vote down Hamilton community funding
Labour and Tories vote down Hamilton community funding

The National

time41 minutes ago

  • The National

Labour and Tories vote down Hamilton community funding

At South Lanarkshire Council's Hamilton area committee on Wednesday, SNP councillors proposed giving more than £5000 to 11 community groups in Hamilton, Larkhall and Bothwell, highlighting there had been tens of thousands of pounds in underspend in the community grants budget in previous years. However, Labour councillors Allan Falconer and Mo Razzaq proposed a much smaller amount, with their plan receiving backing from Tory councillors – including Tory by-election candidate Richard Nelson. One group that was eligible for more than £1900 only received £300. It comes a day before voters in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse hit the polls to elect a new MSP following the death of Christina McKelvie. READ MORE: New poll shows Scots overwhelmingly back independence over direct rule Hamilton councillor John Ross said Labour and the Tories teaming up to deny community groups funding was "egregious". He said: "South Lanarkshire SNP are disappointed to see Labour and the Tories team-up once again to deny local community groups in the Hamilton area the funding that they need and deserve. "This is particularly egregious given there is money sitting unused in the Community Grants budget specifically for this purpose. "We call on the Labour party and their coalition partners to end their austerity agenda and invest in the people and places of South Lanarkshire." South Lanarkshire Council had been run by a minority SNP administration before the local elections in 2022, and the party was returned as the largest that year. However, the SNP's 27 seats were not enough to take a majority on the 64-seat council and instead Labour won the support of the Tory group and LibDems which allowed them to form an administration. The SNP will be aiming to hold onto the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Scottish Parliament seat they have held since 2011 when the seat was created. READ MORE: Labour minister in 'jaw-dropping' U-turn on drug consumption rooms Clacking at the heels of SNP candidate and South Lanarkshire councillor Katy Loudon will be Reform UK's Ross Lambie and Scottish Labour's Davy Russell, with the contest widely expected to be a three-horse race between the parties. McKelvie won the seat three times on the trot with a majority of more than 4500 over Labour in 2021. Professor John Curtice has predicted whichever party wins they will likely do so on less than a third of the vote. He told The National he would be surprised if Reform won the by-election, predicting they will come "a good third". Curtice no party "is going to do terribly well" in a fragmented political environment, but he considers the SNP to be slight favourites in the race.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store