Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools.
The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday.
This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services.
The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on.
'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments.
'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.'
Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport.
'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed.
'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.'
Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'.
He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating.
'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground.
'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Homeowners could be hit with new tax as Chancellor aims to fill ‘£41 billion shortfall'
A Treasury minister has not ruled out hitting owners of high-value houses with capital gains tax (CGT) when they sell their family home. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reported to be considering ending the current exemption from CGT for primary residences as she seeks ways to raise cash in the face of dire warnings about the state of the public finances. Such a move would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18 per cent levy. The Times reported that under the proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold. The threshold is still under consideration but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973, the newspaper reported. Treasury minister Torsten Bell declined to rule out hitting people selling their homes with CGT, insisting any potential changes were matters for the Chancellor and would be set out at a budget. Asked to rule out the move, the pensions minister told broadcasters: 'Working people and people's living standards is what this Government is all about. 'We've seen wages rise more in the first 10 months of this Government than the first 10 years of the last Conservative government. 'But of course, as you know, questions for tax are for the budget and they're for chancellors.' Ending primary residence relief could deter people from selling their homes, slowing the housing market and could have a particular impact for older people looking to downsize. The Labour government has ruled out increasing income tax, employees' national insurance contributions and VAT, restricting Ms Reeves' options when it comes to raising money. The scale of the challenge facing her in the autumn budget was illustrated by the NIESR economic think tank warning this month that Ms Reeves is set for a £41 billion shortfall on her self-imposed rule of balancing day-to-day spending with tax receipts in 2029-30. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hit out at the Chancellor's 'disastrous economic mismanagement' and said the Government was 'stuck in a doom loop of low growth and higher taxes'. She said: 'We should be cutting spending, cutting taxes, and backing the makers who keep our country going.' Any move to hit expensive properties would be likely to impact more heavily on London than other parts of the country. Analysis by Rightmove suggested 10.9 per cent of homes for sale in the capital would exceed a £1.5 million threshold, compared with 1.6 per cent outside London. Rightmove's Colleen Babcock said: 'In essence, this would predominantly be a tax on the most expensive areas of London and the South East. 'The London market is already feeling the effects of taxation more acutely than other parts of England, and this is likely to deter some moves at the upper end.'
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Educational inequalities have ‘grown wider' since the pandemic
A report by the Institute for Government warns that educational inequalities in England have 'grown wider and more pronounced' since the COVID-19 pandemic. Pupils in London are outperforming those in other regions, with the attainment gap between the capital and the rest of the country growing since 2019. The disparity in GCSE attainment between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged students has increased, with poor white children particularly affected. The Institute for Government criticised the government for lacking a clear vision or plan to address these growing inequalities, despite commitments to close the disadvantage gap. Experts and politicians are calling for urgent action, including addressing funding disparities and tackling high pupil absence rates, to reverse the decline in educational outcomes.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
England to sell eight times the council homes it built last year, report finds
England will sell off more than eight times as many council homes in 2025-26 as were constructed the previous year, research has found. Right to buy is depleting council housing stock more quickly than public housing can be replaced, forcing people to spend more money on private market rents and obtain less secure tenancies, finds a report from the thinktank Common Wealth. Its analysis of government data found that the most social homes constructed by the government was 38,170 in 2023-24, and 2,850 for council housing, which contrasts with sell-offs through right to buy which reached 13,966 homes in 2023-24 and 8,656 in 2024-25. The report concludes that if the government wants to increase the supply of social rental housing quickly, it must invest in buying back and restoring homes sold off under right to buy, alongside more council housebuilding. Adam Peggs, the report's author, said: 'We need to pull every effective lever we can find to expand public housing. Council housing gave people secure, low-cost homes in the past. With the right framework, it can give people high-quality, genuinely affordable homes, with real democratic voice in the future too. But we need to build the political will to make it happen. 'Every day of delay is another day families languish in squalid temporary accommodation. The government has the tools to turn this emergency around – and more quickly than they might admit – they just need to use them.' The report, which is published on Thursday, is also calling for expanded 'right of first refusal' powers, enabling local authorities to be the preferred buyer when ex-social homes and private rental homes enter the market. Since 1980, 2.4m council homes have been sold off under right to buy, at a discount that Common Wealth calculated was valued at £194bn, accounting for house price appreciation, with 41% now belonging to private landlords. As a result, council homes have collapsed from accommodating about 30% of households in the late 1970s to 6% today, a decline of about 80%. Common Wealth's report analysed council buy-ups of existing homes for public and social housing in seven countries, and determined that funding and incentivising a national right to buy back scheme would be a cost-effective policy in the UK. The Spanish government has granted powers for a right of first refusal to the country's new national public housing company after Barcelona acquired 1,500 homes – more than one fifth of new affordable homes in the city – through right of first refusal powers since 2016, often below their market value. The report also recommends a national rollout of a London scheme, in which the Greater London Authority bought 1,500 mostly ex-council homes in the first year of its right to buy back scheme. The New Economics Foundation (NEF) calculated that this would generate a net saving to the taxpayer within 16 years. A 2024 report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) concluded that buyouts would offer better value for public money, rather than paying housing benefit to private landlords or private temporary accommodation. Kwajo Tweneboa, a social housing campaigner and the author of Our Country in Crisis, said: 'Homes that were once publicly owned are now profit-generating assets for private landlords. That's the legacy of right to buy. Reversing that damage isn't just a nice idea. It's essential. 'Buying back ex-council homes and investing in a new generation of high-quality, genuinely affordable council homes must be the backbone of any serious plan to fix this crisis. That means central government stepping up with proper funding and power – not just warm words and weak targets.'
