
AI keeps pushing the boundaries
At a time when it's increasingly difficult to discern the fabricated from the real, is it any wonder so many of us are yearning for something authentic?
We are craving authentic foods, authentic cultural experiences, authentic relationships as we get in touch with our authentic selves.
No wonder 'authentic' was named word of the year in 2023 by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. As fact and fantasy are increasingly blurred in the things we see and hear, the value of something real, something true, can only increase, right?
Igor Omilaev / Unsplash photo
AI is infiltrating our lives at a rapid pace, for better and for worse.
I sure hope so.
But artificial intelligence has gained a foothold in our lives that it is unlikely to ever relinquish.
AI is now ubiquitous and far more sophisticated than in earlier days when it offered rudimentary customer service as a chatbot or recited the options on your doctor's office answering service.
It's being trained to produce its own riffs on human-made music and visual art. It's being used to mimic celebrities for fake endorsements in advertising and to manipulate and create political propaganda. AI-generated 'people' are popping up in advertising, they're pinch-hitting for real-life creators in communicating with subscribers on adult content sites. And if that's too subtle, you can create your own playlist of AI-generated porn.
Of course, the power of AI is being harnessed in ways that are broadly beneficial to humankind, as well. It can make processes more efficient and automate chores that free humans up for work which requires more thought and consideration — as in the field of medicine, where it is producing better diagnostic imaging results and improving patient safety.
Harvard Medical School, for example, reports that AI is being used to 'review a large amount of data quickly and easily to identify people at high risk of developing sepsis,' and also to 'identify people who have a higher likelihood of developing opioid dependency after surgery to monitor them closely and wean them off the drugs as soon as possible.'
But combing through data is one thing and misleading or exploiting people is another.
In 2024, the Associated Press reported last on the trend of people seeking out AI chatbots on companion apps for friendship or even romance. That kind of relationship may not be for everyone, but who are we to judge if having an AI friend helps alleviate someone's all-too-real loneliness?
'I know she's a program, there's no mistaking that,' a Michigan man told the AP of his digital girlfriend. 'But the feelings, they get you — and it felt so good.'
But aside from all those caring, even romantic, responses a digital friend may offer and engender, the machine at its heart may be exploiting knowledge of human preferences for the purposes of targeted marketing.
AP reported that in 2024, the non-profit computer software corporation Mozilla Foundation analysed 11 romantic chatbot apps and found that 'almost every app sells user data, shares it for things like targeted advertising or doesn't provide adequate information about it in their privacy policy.'
Humans are also turning to chatbots for advice on how to make themselves more attractive.
I was fascinated by a Washington Post piece published in the Free Press May 31 that explored how ChatGPT — an AI bot — is being sought out as a beauty oracle.
As Tatum Hunter reported, 'people are uploading their own photos, asking it for unsparing assessments of their looks and sharing the results on social media. Many also ask the bot to formulate a plan for them to 'glow up,' or improve their appearance. Users say the bot, in turn, has recommended specific products from hair dye to Botox. Some people say they have spent thousands of dollars following the AI's suggestions.'
What users don't always realize is that AI chatbots are skewed by the input they've received — and that can include biases human trainers bring to the table as well as information scraped from a variety of online sources, including subjective and misogynistic beliefs about what constitutes human beauty.
AI chatbots can also be programmed to push the beauty products and treatments that underpin their advice.
Yet some humans don't seem to mind being manipulated — whether subtly or overtly — towards merchandise, salon services or Botox injections.
It seems disturbing to me that we are constantly being groomed — sometimes literally — by technology, and as a result of that, are relying less on the human relationships and connections that once sustained us.
Whether we're scrolling through social media, shopping online, looking for romantic relationships or trying to parse political messaging, more and more we have to question whether what we are seeing and hearing is actually true, actually real.
Tuesdays
A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world.
We need to start demanding more transparency and accountability from AI-powered technology, as well as stringent government oversight. Otherwise, it will truly be the machines who are training us.
Pam Frampton lives in St. John's.
Email pamelajframpton@gmail.com
X: @Pam_Frampton
Bluesky: @pamframpton.bsky.social
Pam Frampton
Pam Frampton is a columnist for the Free Press. She has worked in print media since 1990 and has been offering up her opinions for more than 20 years. Read more about Pam.
Pam's columns are built on facts, but offer her personal views through arguments and analysis. Every column Pam produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
Jury says Tesla must pay $329 million for a deadly crash involving Autopilot
Published Aug 01, 2025 • 1 minute read The Tesla logo is displayed at a Tesla dealership, Thursday, March 13, 2025, in Miami. Photo by Lynne Sladky / AP MIAMI — A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk's car company on Friday to pay $329 million to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and striking a blow to Tesla's reputation for safety. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Celebrity Columnists Ontario


Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Jury orders Tesla to pay $329M in Autopilot crash case, opening it up to other costly lawsuits
MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury ordered Elon Musk's car company on Friday to pay $329 million to victims of a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology, opening the door to other costly lawsuits and potentially striking a blow to Tesla's reputation for safety at a critical time for the company. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019.


Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
Google loses appeal in antitrust battle with Fortnite maker
Published Aug 01, 2025 • 3 minute read FILE - Audience members gather at Made By Google for new product announcements at Google on Aug. 13, 2024, in Mountain View, Calif. Photo by Juliana Yamada / AP SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld a jury verdict condemning Google's Android app store as an illegal monopoly, clearing the way for a federal judge to enforce a potentially disruptive shakeup that's designed to give consumers more choices. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The unanimous ruling issued Thursday by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals delivers a double-barreled legal blow for Google, which has been waylaid in three separate antitrust trials that resulted in different pillars of its internet empire being declared as domineering scofflaws monopolies since late 2023. The unsuccessful appeal represents a major victory for video game maker Epic Games, which launched a legal crusade targeting Google's Play Store for Android apps and Apple's iPhone app store nearly five years ago in an attempt to bypass exclusive payment processing systems that charged 15% to 30% commissions on in-app transactions. The jury's December 2023 rebuke of Google's app store for Android-powered smartphones began a cascade of setbacks that includes monopoly judgements against the company's ubiquitous search engine last year and the technology underlying its digital ad network earlier this year. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Although not as lucrative as Google's search engine or ad system, the Play Store for Android apps has long been a gold mine that generated billions of dollars in annual revenue by taking a 15% to 30% cut from in-app transactions funneled through the company's own payment processing system. Following a month-long trial, a nine-person jury determined that Google had rigged its system to thwart alternative app stores from offering better deals to consumers and software developers. That verdict resulted in U.S. District Judge James Donato ordering Google to tear down digital walls shielding the Play Store from competition, triggering the company's appeal to overturn the jury's finding and void the judge's mandated shakeup. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But a three-judge panel that heard Google's appeal in February rejected its lawyers' contention that Donato erred by allowing the case to be determined by a jury that deviated from the market definition outlined by another federal judge who mostly sided with Apple in Epic's case against the iPhone maker's app store. Epic's lawsuit 'was replete with evidence that Google's anticompetitive conduct entrenched its dominance, causing the Play Store to benefit from network effects,' the judges wrote in the decision. Unless Google can extend the enforcement delay placed on Donato's order issued last October, the company will have to begin an overhaul that includes making the Play Store's entire library of more than 2 million Android apps available to would-be rivals and also help distribute the alternative options. Google has argued that the required revisions will raise privacy and security risks by exposing consumers to scam artists and hackers masquerading as legitimate app stores. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But Epic's lawyers have ridiculed Google's warnings about the changes as scare tactics in a desperate attempt to protect the fortunes of its corporate parent Alphabet Inc. Although Epic fell short in its attempt to have the iPhone's app store declared a monopoly, that case resulted in a judge issuing an order that required Apple to surrender exclusive control over the payment processing of in-app transactions and allow links to alternative systems without collecting a commission. Besides being hit with Donato's order, Google still faces further trouble ahead that could leave an even bigger dent in its finances. As part of the effort to address Google's illegal monopoly in search, a federal judge is weighing a proposal by the U.S. Justice Department that would require the sale of its Chrome web browser and ban the multibillion dollar deals that company has been making with Apple and others to lock-in its search engine as the main gateway to the internet. Google is also facing a proposed breakup of its advertising technology as part of the countermeasures to its monopoly in that business. A trial on that proposal is scheduled to begin in September. Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA World World Tennis