Why National Dialogue cannot overlook Marikana Massacre
Image: The Presidency
ON AUGUST 16, 2012, 34 miners were gunned down by the bullets of the South African police while demanding nothing more than a living wage. Ten others had already been slain earlier that week under the same shadow, bringing the death toll to 44. History has since named this tragedy the Marikana Massacre, a wound reopened each year on its anniversary.
For the victims and their families, little has changed to transform their lives or the fate of the broader community. Despite the mineral wealth beneath their feet, poverty still greets visitors as they enter Marikana.
Residents speak of unchecked criminality, families struggle with basic needs such as healthcare, food, shelter, and a sense of neglect lingers. The town's economic lifeblood is mining, a sector that predominantly employs men, leaving many women without work and therefore more vulnerable to gender-based violence and other forms of abuse. Marikana's plight is a mirror held up to countless communities across the country.
The massacre's 44 lives, harrowing as they are, pale beside the relentless tide of violence that has since engulfed the nation. South Africa records an average of 75.5 murders every single day. This year's commemorations mark 4 748 days since that fateful day. At this daily rate, by the close of the day, the nation would have recorded approximately 358 475 murders.
This is a figure that rivals, almost number for number, the United Nations Human Rights Office's estimate of deaths in the Syrian civil war between 2011 and 2021. Comparable death tolls emerge from nations like South Sudan and Yemen, long ravaged by civil war and chronic instability, yet South Africa, during the same period, has remained under an ostensibly stable, democratic order.
It is a paradox of democracy, one that demands urgent and unflinching examination to scrutinise how a nation at peace harbours such sustained and silent carnage.
Murders should stand at the apex of the national dialogue, demanding innovative and decisive interventions, lest it scuppers every other effort towards development.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Meanwhile, the country is captivated by Shaka iLembe, a televised epic dramatising the blood-soaked rivalries of past generations, tribes warring for dominance, kinsmen killing kinsmen in the name of power.
African spiritual traditions teach that identity is inseparable from ancestry. Might today's generation, then, be unwilling vessels of ancestral bloodlust, reliving their forebears' battles through modern acts of violence? The question may be uncomfortable, but it is one worth placing before the spiritualists to explain the persistence of such unrestrained killing in a nation not at war.
South Africa is not alone in having endured tribal wars or grappled with severe underdevelopment. Many nations, particularly in Africa and Central Asia, share similar histories and economic burdens; however, their murder rates remain negligible by comparison. This makes our case an outlier, demanding a more searching analysis.
The First National Convention, which was in session from 15 to 17 August, should grasp this issue with both hands, probing beyond the surface to expose the root causes of this scourge.
This forum should go beyond cosmetic conversations and desist pacifying a growingly disenchanted society. While the country's chronic underdevelopment and the widening gulf between rich and poor will inevitably emerge as key factors, they are not the whole story. Indeed, such conditions have helped fertilise the growth of the 'hitman-for-hire' economy and the grim trade of ritual killings for material gain, temporarily, these being symptoms of a deep moral erosion within society.
The National Dialogue must therefore resist the temptation of single-thread explanations. It must commit the time, intellectual rigour, as well as political will to map the complex web of historical, economic, cultural, and spiritual forces feeding this relentless tide of violence. Only by confronting the multiplicity of causes can the nation hope to break the cycle and reclaim the sanctity of life.
At its essence, the National Dialogue should be embraced by all citizens as a platform to forge a shared vision of our future. Without such unity of purpose, disillusionment will deepen when the outcomes fail to meet expectations. Already, some believe their concerns will be addressed simply by virtue of the dialogue taking place. This may just be wishful thinking, as certain solutions may demand changes to legal frameworks before they can be realised. Whether there will be a political appetite to make such changes remains to be seen.
We may want to refer to the year 2018, when the National Assembly adopted a motion to review section 25 of the Constitution. Public hearings, akin to a national dialogue, were held, drawing more than 700 000 written submissions. The overwhelming sentiment was for a constitutional amendment to enable land expropriation without compensation. Although a majority of parliamentarians supported the proposed Bill, it fell short of the two-thirds majority required, and the effort collapsed. Years later, the issue remains unresolved, and the energy of that national conversation has dissipated into frustration.
This is the danger before us now. After investing money, time, and raising hopes, if the structural impediments that brought the country to this moment remain untouched, citizens will lose hope beyond measure. The result could be more poverty, more murders, more gender-based violence, and deeper moral decay, eroding the fragile chances of national rehabilitation and leaving Marikana as merely a footnote in the chronicle of the country's decline.
Citizens must understand that the envisaged outcome of this dialogue is a social pact. If attained, the true test will lie in its implementation, where, as always, the snare waits in the details.
May God bless all endeavours in pursuit of a civilised common purpose and lead the nation into enduring prosperity.
Professor Ncube is the Head of the Department of Social Work at the University of the Free State
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
10 minutes ago
- IOL News
Thabo Mbeki Foundation weighs options after EPG's olive branch
Leading foundations withdrew from the National Dialogue Convention, citing concerns over rushed planning, loss of citizen leadership, and lack of transparency in the process. Image: file The Thabo Mbeki Foundation (TMF) is reportedly mulling over a return to the National Dialogue process, following an olive branch extended by the Eminent Persons Group (EPG). This comes after several legacy foundations, including the TMF, withdrew from the First National Convention due to concerns over preparation and process two weeks ago. The foundation's withdrawal raised questions about the legitimacy of the National Dialogue process. Controversy surrounded the National Dialogue held at Unisa last Friday and Saturday, particularly concerning its alleged R700 million budget. Several political parties, including the uMkhonto weSizwe Party, the EFF, and the DA, have also refused to participate. Yesterday, TMF spokesperson Bongani Kupe confirmed that all of the legacy foundations had received the letter and were considering it. 'We have always said that we are open to further discussions. In the letter that we wrote to the EPG, we mentioned that we just had a few concerns, including rushing the process,' Kupe said. Other foundations refused to comment on the matter for now. In a bid to restore trust, the EPG, a group of 32 independent volunteers appointed by President Cyril Ramaphosa to support and guide the National Dialogue, formally requested a meeting with the legacy foundations in a letter addressed to the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group. The letter acknowledges the concerns raised by the foundations and expresses a desire to work together to ensure a successful and inclusive National Dialogue. 'We acknowledge the depth and seriousness of the concerns raised by the foundations,' it read. These concerns included the preservation of citizen leadership, the need for a genuinely meaningful engagement platform, transparent financial and governance arrangements, and the importance of adequate preparation over rigid timelines. The EPG stressed that these were not 'peripheral matters' but 'central to the credibility and success of the National Dialogue'. The Presidency, in statements earlier this month, had recognised the historic role of these foundations in initiating and shaping the National Dialogue, noting their continued commitment to its vision and principles. The EPG echoed this sentiment, stating that the process would benefit from their 'leadership, commitment and knowledge'. The EPG reaffirmed its commitment to a 'radically inclusive, transparent, and accountable' National Dialogue and expressed a desire for the foundations' continued engagement. A delegation from the EPG has proposed a meeting at the earliest convenience to reaffirm shared principles for the Dialogue, consider joint strategies to safeguard its citizen-led nature, identify practical avenues for re-engagement, and explore governance and operational mechanisms to build confidence and transparency. The TMF's Chairperson, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, reiterated on Monday that the foundation's initial withdrawal was due to a perceived lack of preparation for the National Convention. She said the foundation believes that the precursor event needed a more solid basis for civil society interaction and engagement, with discussion documents drafted beforehand to provide a foundation for debate. Fraser-Moleketi also noted that 11 reports on various topics were still being prepared when the convention date was set by a group outside the preparatory task team. Fraser-Moleketi further emphasised that their withdrawal from the convention did not signify a complete boycott of the Dialogue process. 'It's never too late. Being the progenitors, we had not withdrawn from the National Dialogue. What we withdrew from was the National Convention, which we said should be given a bit more time.' Meanwhile, former president Kgalema Motlanthe has refuted allegations that his foundation pulled out of the convention, labelling such reports as misleading and incorrect. The Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation (KMF) clarified in a statement that it was not part of the preparatory committee for the convention.


The Citizen
10 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Government cites police data to refute racial bias in SA's farm killings
The Department of International Relations and Co-operation (Dirco) has announced its commitment to revising its initial statement on the 2024 US Human Rights Report, specifically regarding safety conditions in rural and farming communities in South Africa. 'The South African government wishes to set the record straight on this matter and to clarify what we believe is an inaccurate and distorted account of the facts,' the statement that was issued yesterday, reads. This follows the report published by the United States Department of State last week, which claimed that South Africa's human rights situation has significantly worsened over the past year. It noted concerns regarding the signing of the Expropriation Bill, which was described as a troubling step toward land expropriation affecting white Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country. In January, President Cyril Ramaphosa promulgated the Expropriation Act 13 of 2024, which states that property may not be expropriated arbitrarily or for a purpose other than a public purpose or in the public interest, and is subject to just and equitable compensation. The report criticised the South African government for its alleged mistreatment of Afrikaner farmers, highlighting significant human rights issues. It claimed there were credible reports of arbitrary or unlawful killings, arbitrary arrests or detentions, and the repression of racial minorities. However, Dirco said the nation's foreign policy is guided by a commitment to a rules-based international system based on international law and a respect for human rights, as enshrined in the Constitution. 'It is within this framework that we address all forms of crime, which remain a significant challenge for all of our citizens, regardless of race or location. The suggestion that these crimes represent a concerted practice of racially motivated attacks, as insinuated by the US report, is not borne out by the facts.' The department cited SAPS' official statistics on rural safety for the fourth quarter of the 2024/25 financial year, from January 1 to March 31, which it believes demonstrate this reality. According to the figures, a total of six murder cases were reported in farming communities. The department stated that the breakdown of the victims reveals that these crimes are not targeted against a single racial group, which included three employees, two farmers and one farm dweller. 'These figures underscore that violent crime in rural areas affects everyone who lives and works on farms and related rural areas. While the loss of any life is a tragedy, these statistics do not reveal a pattern of action driven by inflammatory racial rhetoric against a specific community.' National Rural Safety Strategy The government said it continues to implement a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary approach to rural safety. 'Our National Rural Safety Strategy is a priority and is implemented in police station areas that serve rural and farming communities.' By the end of the fourth quarter of 2024/25, the department said the country reported that 893 out of 900 identified rural police stations (99%) had fully implemented the strategy. This initiative focuses on enhancing police capacity and fostering community involvement with key stakeholders, including traditional leaders. In addition, the programme involves commercial farmers' associations, including the African Farmers Association of South Africa, the National African Farmers' Union, Agri-SA and its provincial structures, and the Transvaal Agricultural Union. They also involve labour unions like the Food and Allied Workers Union and organisations advocating for the rights of farmworkers, as well as interest groups like AfriForum, the South African Agricultural Research Institute and Stop Attacks and Farm Murders. Government said it is also strengthening public-private partnerships through initiatives like the Eyes and Ears programme, co-ordinated with Business Against Crime South Africa. According to the department, this initiative leverages the private security industry's technological and logistical capabilities to enhance the situational awareness of the SAPS and improve responses to rural crime. 'South Africa remains committed to a transparent and collaborative approach to addressing crime. 'We stand ready to engage with any nation on matters of mutual interest through established diplomatic channels, and we will continue to provide accurate, data-driven information to counter any misrepresentations of our domestic situation. There is a focus on the safety and security of all South Africans.' – Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on


Eyewitness News
10 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Some Soweto residents accuse govt of only addressing longstanding issues for G20 Summit
JOHANNESBURG - Some Soweto residents attending the G20 Summit awareness programme on Thursday have accused government of only addressing longstanding issues for the upcoming summit and not for the benefit of South Africans. The Gauteng government is holding an engagement session in Diepkloof, Soweto, about the summit, which will host dignitaries from different countries. Officials said progress had been made to ensure that delegates find a pristine version of South Africa in November. Community members gathered at the Diepkloof community hall said they were ready to fully engage with government. Many have shared some of their frustrations over what they described as a lack of essential services. Some have even accused the government of caring about fixing the province to present a false image of what Gauteng truly looks like. Regional chairperson of the South African teachers' union Thulani Ncobo said: "How is it that we are always cleaning our house when we're getting visitors? And when no one is visiting us, the government doesn't care. "It's business as usual. So, you are actually wanting to paint a false picture to the world that you care about your citizens when you don't." Community members have also called on government to include communities in the G20 Summit to empower them economically.