'Trafficking mule' Brits stuck in hellish jails - why some do it and grim fates
Bella May Culley, 18, and Charlotte May Lee, 21, were arrested with a day of each other and face decades in foreign jails, but they are just two out of hundreds of British nationals languishing in foreign prisons on drugs offences
Two young British women face the terrifying prospect of decades behind bars in hellhole jails abroad after being caught smuggling drugs - but they are among hundreds of others currently locked up in prisons across the globe.
Bella May Culley, 18, from Billingham, County Durham, who was detained in Georgia on May 11 after 14kg of cannabis was found in her travel bag, faces life behind bars in the country's notorious Soviet-era women's jail.
A day later, Charlotte May Lee, 21, from Coulsdon, south London, was arrested at Colombo International Airport in Sri Lanka, with 45kg of synthetic cannabis, known as "kush," concealed in her luggage. The former TUIA air hostess could spend a year in the harsh Negombo prison before she is even sentenced.
Both women, whose cases are not believed to be connected, deny the charges they face.
According to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO), more than 850 British nationals are currently locked up in prisons across the globe for drug-related offences. Offences that may carry cautions in the UK are often penalised with long prison sentences when overseas, while in 33 countries or territories, some drug offences carry the death penalty.
Young Brits often find themselves detained for months without trial and facing distressing living conditions. Prisoners Abroad is currently supporting 80 Brits between the ages of 18 and 30 held in foreign countries for drug offences. Two-thirds of these are still awaiting trial, while others are serving sentences from a year to nearly 39 years.
Here are some of the other Brits locked up abroad…
Lindsay Sandiford - Bali
British drugs mule grandmother Lindsay Sandiford has been incarcerated in a cramped cell inside Bali's hellish Kerobokan prison since 2013, where she is on death row facing execution by firing squad.
The grandmother-of-two was sentenced to death for attempting to smuggle £ 1.6 million worth of cocaine into Indonesia's capital by stuffing it into the lining of her suitcase.
Sandiford, from Cheltenham, claimed she was coerced by a UK-based drug syndicate threatening her children. But despite cooperating with authorities and assisting in a sting operation that led to further arrests, judges imposed the maximum penalty, citing damage to Bali's image.
Her appeals have been unsuccessful, and the UK government has declined to fund her legal representation, adhering to its policy of not providing legal aid for nationals abroad.
Now grey-haired and suffering arthritis, she spends days at a time knitting in the cramped five metres-by-five metres cell prison she shares with four other women prisoners, most of them poorly-educated local women convicted of drug offences.
Sandiford has expressed feelings of hopelessness, especially after the execution of fellow inmates, stating, 'I just want to get it over with. I feel like just giving up.' A rare family visit in April 2025, including her grandchildren, provided a brief respite from her isolation. Legal experts suggest potential changes in Indonesian law could commute her sentence to life imprisonment, offering a glimmer of hope for eventual repatriation.
Thomas Parker - Bali
Electrician Thomas Parker was arrested in January after collecting a package from a taxi driver containing over a kilogram of MDMA, the main component in the party drug ecstasy, near Bali's Kuta Beach. Accused of trying to push Class A drugs, the 32-year-old looked bewildered as he was paraded in front of the world's media while wearing an orange jumpsuit following his arrest.
He was initially charged with drug trafficking, which carries the death penalty in Indonesia. The charge was later reduced to concealing information after investigators concluded the drugs were sent by a friend, not ordered by Parker himself.
Police said Parker was noticed 'acting suspiciously' by officers while he was collecting the package. When officers approached him, he allegedly discarded the package in a panic and fled. However, he was traced back to the villa where he was staying and arrested.
During his trial, Parker, from the village of Seaton near Workington, Cumbria, maintained that he did not order the package and had initially refused to collect it, doing so only after a friend assured him it was safe and would not endanger him.
Prosecutors have sought a one-year prison sentence, but under Indonesian law, judges could still revisit the trafficking charge. A verdict is expected on May 27, 2025. Parker has expressed deep remorse, stating, "I am very sorry and apologise, I know it was a mistake. I promise not to repeat it again, because I really didn't know that [the package] was drugs."
Modou Adams - Peru
British male model Modou Adams flaunted his jet set lifestyle on TikTok, but in 2023 was jailed for nearly seven years in Peru after being caught trying to fly out of the country with £300,000 worth of cocaine.
The Londoner, 25, wowed his thousands of social media fans with his globetrotting under the self-styled moniker of 'boywholives', but was held at Lima's international airport as he tried to check in for a flight to London via Paris with almost three kilos of cocaine in his suitcase.
He was handed his sentence in a rapid trial 24 hours after his arrest by the same police force that held Michaella McCollum and Melissa Reid, the so-called Peru Two, in August 2013, and is still serving his sentence in one of Lima's notorious high-security prisons.
Modou, a former marketing and public relations intern described online as an 'experienced' model, had filmed himself posing as a tourist in Cuco, a favourite cocaine pick-up for drug mules and the city McCollum and Reid visited before their arrests, and posted selfies on the road to Andes Mountains Incan citadel Machu Picchu.
The dramatic moment he was taken into custody by two anti-drugs squad officers as he checked in for his flight was also filmed on cameras at Jorge Chavez International Airport. One of the officers used a knife to cut through the false bottom of the suitcase where the cocaine was found and held it up as Adams looked on, horrified.
Anti-drugs prosecutor Lincoln Fuentes said: 'It wasn't the first time this British national had come to Peru. The first time he had also taken drugs out of the country, most probably in the same way, with a specially-prepared suitcase.
'Each drug mule is paid £5,200 to £6,000 per drug run as well as getting all their expenses paid, including the tourist trips they enjoy to camouflage their real reason for coming here. The objective this man had for coming here was solely to transport drugs back to Britain.'
John Twell - Venezuela
John Twell is serving a 15-year sentence at the Simon Bolivar prison for foreigners in Caracas after he was caught trying to smuggle cocaine worth £ 4 million out of Venezuela in 2011. The 63-year-old from Spalding, Lincs, was stopped as he tried to board a flight to Madrid, when police found 31kg of the drug in two bags.
Cut off from the outside world and forced to do disciplinary drills praising the revolution of Hugo Chavez every day, the only time he was interviewed was when a Sky News team entered the jail in 2020.
Twell insisted he wasn't a career criminal but had made one stupid decision. "I wanted to start a business in England, I wanted to buy my own truck because years ago I was a truck driver, so I wanted to buy my own truck and start working for myself, and you need capital," he said.
He added, 'We have no telephone calls, and we have no communication. Before, when we first came here, we had a telephone call every week for five minutes or two minutes… but now we have no communication with anybody. The only way we know what's going on outside is if the gentlemen here (the guards) tell us."
Despite being estranged from his family and wanting to serve the rest of his sentence in the UK, Twell said he had come to accept his situation.
"When you've been in prison for eight and a half years, there's no point crying. Why would I cry? I'm sick as it is, it's no good me getting down and depressed as I'll get more sick."
Kim Hall - USA
Beautician Kim Hall was caught carrying 43 kilograms of cocaine packed into two suitcases through Chicago's O'Hare Airport in August 2024 after getting off a flight from Cancun in August last year.
She was about to board a connecting flight home to Manchester when she was apprehended, admitting to investigators that she'd been given the bags during a trip to Mexico to take back to the UK.
The volume of drugs seized means Hall, 28, from Middlesbrough, finds herself facing one of the harshest sentences, with Class X Felonies typically carrying up to 60 years in prison.
In November, while on house arrest as she awaited trial for the drug offences, Hall appeared on ITV's This Morning and claimed that two British men, whom she met while on holiday in Portugal, offered her a free trip to Mexico.
This week, Hall was sent back to prison after supposedly trying to leave the country ahead of her trial on May 27. She is said to have presented herself to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in an attempt to trick them into deporting her.
Judge Michael McHale wrote that Hall was 'almost successful in her attempt' to flee the United States and had a flight back to the UK booked before cops realised what was happening.
Bella May Coley and Charlotte May Lee both deny committing drug trafficking offences.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Six members of Russian spy ring to have ‘too lenient' jail sentences reviewed
SIX members of a Russian spy ring are to have their jail sentences reviewed for being too lenient, we can reveal. The Bulgarians — who lived and worked in the UK — plotted sex stings, and targeted Russian dissidents and journalists critical of President Vladimir Putin 's war effort against Ukraine. 7 7 The ring included lab worker Katrin Ivanova, 33, and beauty shop owner Vanya Gaberova, 30 — dubbed 'killer sexy brunettes' by cell leaders. Ivanova got nine years and eight months and Gaberova eight years. They were both found guilty in March of breaching the Official Secrets Act by conspiring to provide information useful to an enemy between August 2020 and February 2023. Ivanova also got a concurrent sentence of 15 months for forged ID documents. All six got a total of more than 50 years last month. The Attorney General's Office has been asked to consider the sentences under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme. The ULS scheme allows anyone to ask for a Crown Court sentence to be assessed by the Attorney General's office if they think it is too lenient. Law officers have 28 days from sentencing to make a decision. 7 7 7 7 7
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sheku Bayoh: Hearing to decide whether chair should resign begins
A former judge who is chairing a £50m public inquiry into the death of a man in police custody will hear arguments on Thursday on whether he should step down or see the job Scottish Police Federation has accused Lord Bracadale of holding "secret" meetings with the family of Sheku Bayoh, who died after being restrained by police in Kirkcaldy in organisation which represents rank and file officers believes the five meetings could lead to "perceived bias" and has called for him to "recuse" Bracadale has been leading the inquiry since 2020 and ordered the hearing to allow core participants to make submissions on his conduct. If Lord Bracadale decides to stay in post, the federation has said it will seek a judicial departure and the search for a last minute replacement after five years of work would delay the inquiry's findings by many has already cost the public purse £24.8m, with an additional £24.3m spent by Police Scotland, including £17.3m of legal stage is now set for a robust exchange of legal arguments between senior lawyers. Roddy Dunlop KC, dean of the Faculty of Advocates, will represent the police federation and two of the officers involved in the incident which ended with Mr Bayoh's police federation has said that none of the other core participants were made aware that Lord Bracadale was meeting the family and the details of what was said have not been federation's general secretary David Kennedy has said it has lost confidence in the inquiry because not all core participants were being treated Bayoh family's solicitor Aamer Anwar has described the federation's actions as "a pathetic and desperate attempt to sabotage the inquiry" at the 11th claimed the hearing could cost taxpayers "in excess of a million pounds" in fees for "police lawyers." Competing arguments One of England's top barristers, Jason Beer KC, has been brought in as senior counsel for the inquiry is expected to argue that Lord Bracadale's actions were procedurally appropriate because of the importance of maintaining the family's prosecution service, the Crown Office, will state its position, along with Police Scotland, the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner and the Commission for Racial Equality and representing other police officers involved in the case will also have the opportunity to have their hearing is scheduled to last two days, with Lord Bracadale issuing his decision at a later inquiry has been examining what happened before and during the death of Sheku Bayou, who died in police custody. It has been looking at how the police dealt with the aftermath, the investigation into Mr Bayoh's death and whether race was a of the public called the police after Mr Bayoh was spotted carrying a knife and behaving erratically in the streets of Kirkcaldy on May 3, wasn't carrying the knife when officers arrived at the scene but a violent confrontation followed, with up to six officers restraining the 31-year-old on the father-of-two lost consciousness and later died in hospital.
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
High Court hears company linked to Baroness Michelle Mone must pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE
A company linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Government contract for 25 million surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic, the High Court has heard. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro for allegedly breaching a deal for the gowns, with lawyers for the Government telling the court they were 'faulty' because they were not sterile. The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded Government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Both have denied wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. 'It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were 'not part of this case', which was 'simply about compliance'. He said: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: 'Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. 'On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs.' In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject', after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not 'representative of the whole population', meaning 'no proper conclusions may be drawn'. He said the DHSC's claim was 'contrived and opportunistic' and PPE Medpro had been 'made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors' by the department. He said: 'It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. 'In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money.' He also said there was a 'delicious irony' that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had 'zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and Baroness Mone did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim. The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.
