DTH cos asked to pay ₹16,000 crore licence fee dues
MUMBAI: The ministry of Information and Broadcasting has issued demand notices totalling ₹16,000 crore to the country's four private direct to home (DTH) operators over outstanding licence fees, industry sources told ET, potentially compounding problems for an industry battling dwindling revenues and subscriber losses to OTT platforms and DD Free Dish.These demands cover both the principal amount and accrued interest on the dues, said the officials cited above. They said that the operators have communicated to the government that the notices cannot be enforced, as the matter is sub judice in various High Courts, the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), and the Supreme Court.
Dish TV
CEO Manoj Dobhal acknowledged the pressures facing the sector.
"The DTH industry is navigating a difficult phase, with factors such as subscriber churn driven by competition from OTT platforms and DD Free Dish, along with taxation and regulatory issues,' Dobhal said. 'Given these challenges, we would have hoped for a more supportive approach from the authorities."
To be sure, the licence fee demand is more than the combined revenue of the four private DTH operators, which stood at ₹10,230 crore in FY24, down 5% from ₹10,837 crore the previous year, as per regulatory filings.
In its correspondence, the ministry said the figures are subject to reconciliation based on the outcome of audits by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), as well as pending court decisions.
In its Q4 FY25 regulatory filing, Dish TV disclosed that it had received a communication from the ministry dated 22 April 2025, directing the company to pay ₹6,735 crore toward licence fees, including interest, covering the period from the grant of its DTH licence up to FY24. The company added that it has disputed the demand in its response.
As of FY24, Tata Play has received a consolidated demand of ₹3,628 crore, including ₹1,401.66 crore in interest. Sun Direct has received a demand of ₹1,051.84 crore (excluding interest) as of March 2024.
As of March 2025, Dish TV had made a provision of ₹4,612 crore towards licence fee dues. Tata Play had provisioned approximately ₹2,002 crore and recognised a further ₹2,280 crore as a contingent liability.
Bharti Airtel
had made provisions of about ₹3,426 crore as of 31 March 2024.
Bharti Telemedia, Tata Play and Sun Direct declined to comment on the matter.
A senior DTH executive added that the ministry has raised similar demands in the past even when legal disputes remain unresolved.
'DTH operators have repeatedly urged the ministry to exclude pass-through costs, such as content expenses, from the licence fee calculations and to address the issue of double taxation. However, these concerns are yet to be addressed,' the executive said.
The DTH industry lost 8 million subscribers between FY21 and FY24. The active pay DTH subscriber base stood at 58.22 million, as of December 2024.
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has, on two occasions, recommended phasing out the DTH licence fee by the end of FY27. Since 2020, TRAI has issued 17 recommendations aimed at reforming the broadcasting sector.
The ministry of information and broadcasting has historically calculated the licence fee as 10% of gross revenue, without deductions. However, in 2020, it amended the DTH guidelines to set the licence fee at 8% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Knowing when to sell a stock: Key signals investors shouldn't ignore (Part 2)
Among investment decisions, knowing when to sell a stock is often the most challenging. If you've read Part 1 of this story, you already know that selling isn't just about booking profits, rather, it's about protecting capital. We previously discussed what to do when a stock becomes too expensive, when business momentum slows, and when governance red flags begin to emerge. But sometimes, the risk lies outside the company. Sometimes, even the best-run businesses can become bad bets if their industry is in decline or if you hold on too long without re-evaluating. In this second part, we look beyond the balance sheet and ask: Is the company still playing a winnable game? And if not, is it time to let go? 1. When the industry changes: Don't let a good business turn into a bad investment Sometimes, the problem isn't with the company. The business might be well-run and the balance sheet clean, but if the entire industry is heading in the wrong direction, even great businesses can lose relevance. Think of this as the 'Blockbuster vs Netflix' problem. Only in our case, it's Kodak vs smartphones, or Hindustan Motors vs Maruti. Let's look at how this plays out in India. Dish TV and the Fall of DTH In the 2000s, Dish TV was a disruptor. Millions of Indians were moving from cable to satellite TV. The stock multiplied between 2007 and 2010, riding the wave of digital adoption. But by 2015, another wave was quietly building that was streaming. YouTube, Hotstar, Netflix, Amazon Prime; all started eating into traditional DTH. Dish TV didn't pivot. Revenues flattened, subscribers dropped, and the company turned loss-making by FY20. The stock fell from Rs 110 in 2010 to around Rs 15 by 2023. A long, painful fade, not a sudden crash. Another example is Hero MotoCorp. India's undisputed two-wheeler king: strong brand, rural reach, bulletproof finances. But while competitors like Ather, Ola Electric, and TVS moved aggressively into electric scooters, Hero remained slow and cautious. Hero's legacy ICE models (Splendor, Passion) still sell, but the long-term question remains: can Hero lead the EV transition? The market has noticed: Infrastructure and power companies in the post-2008 era Remember GVK Power, GMR Infra, or Lanco Infratech? They were darlings of the infrastructure boom from 2005 to 2009. But post-global financial crisis, the debt cycle turned vicious. Regulatory hurdles, stuck projects, and land acquisition delays choked growth. By the time promoters tried to pivot or restructure, it was too late. Today, many of these companies are either penny stocks or delisted. Investors who didn't exit early kept holding out in the hope and lost everything. So how do you identify a dying or disrupted sector? Low innovation and flat revenue across top players: If the entire sector isn't growing, there's no tide to lift any boats. New entrants grabbing market share with better tech or models: Think of fintechs eating into NBFCs, or startups challenging legacy media. Heavy government regulation or policy shocks: Sectors like telecom and infra are especially vulnerable. One spectrum pricing policy or land bill can derail years of planning. Global trends moving in a different direction: For example, the shift away from fossil fuels is affecting traditional oil refiners and coal-based utilities. The mindset shift? Markets evolve. Technology leapfrogs. Policies change. Consumer habits shift. If you're holding a stock in a sector that's going downhill, ask yourself: Is the company fighting the tide or riding it? 2. The 'hold forever' myth: Even great companies can lose their edge We've all heard it: 'Buy good companies and hold forever.' Sounds elegant. Feels wise. But here's the truth: in real-world investing, 'forever' is a dangerous word. Because businesses evolve. So do industries, leadership, regulations, and consumer behavior. And if you don't reassess your holdings regularly, time can erode even the strongest fundamentals. Let's go back a few decades. Hindustan Motors: From market leader to market exit At one point, Hindustan Motors was India's largest carmaker. The Ambassador was a symbol of power, comfort, and status used by government officials, bureaucrats, and taxi fleets. But then Maruti Suzuki entered the market. It brought Japanese reliability, fuel efficiency, and aggressive pricing. Hindustan Motors didn't adapt, and by 2014, it shut down its Uttarpara plant. From a position of dominance, it disappeared. Investors who bought in the 1990s and held out of nostalgia or blind belief watched their capital evaporate. Original Sensex members: Only 7 out of 30 survived When the BSE Sensex was launched in 1986, it had 30 companies. Today, only 7 of those 30 remain in the index. Companies like Ballarpur Industries, Premier Automobiles, Mukand Iron, and Scindia Steamships — all were once blue-chip. Now? Either defunct, delisted, or barely trading. If you had invested Rs 10,000 in the 'wrong half' of that original Sensex and held on blindly, you'd be left with scraps or nothing. Global example: IBM, Xerox, Kodak Zooming out, the same lesson applies globally: The problem wasn't incompetence. It was inertia and the inability to change fast enough. So, what should retail investors learn? Don't confuse a good company with a permanent investment. Even industry leaders lose steam if they don't innovate or adapt. Always watch for product stagnation, competitive pressure, or market shifts. Review your holdings at least once a year. Ask yourself: 'If I didn't already own this stock, would I buy it today?' If the answer is no, maybe it's time to sell. Cut emotional attachment. Just because a stock made you money in the past doesn't mean it owes you more in the future. Track management, strategy, and capital allocation. A change in leadership or reckless expansion can erode years of compounding in just a few quarters. The bottom line? Yes, long-term investing works. But blind holding doesn't. Holding forever only works for businesses that earn the right to be held year after year. Conclusion: The quiet skill that builds long-term wealth Selling is rarely as satisfying as buying. There's no celebration when you book profits. No praise for cutting a loss early. But the truth is that's where the real discipline lies. Because wealth isn't just built by riding winners. It's built by avoiding traps, exiting when the story changes, and not letting loyalty get in the way of logic. You don't need to get every stock right. But when you do see the signs, have the courage to exit. Because in investing, the ability to let go is just as powerful as the ability to hold on. Note: This article relies on data from the annual report and industry reports. We have used our assumptions for forecasting. Parth Parikh has over a decade of experience in finance and research and currently heads the growth and content vertical at Finsire. He holds an FRM Charter along with an MBA in Finance from Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies. Disclosure: The writer and his dependents do not hold the stocks discussed in this article. The website managers, its employee(s), and contributors/writers/authors of articles have or may have an outstanding buy or sell position or holding in the securities, options on securities or other related investments of issuers and/or companies discussed therein. The content of the articles and the interpretation of data are solely the personal views of the contributors/ writers/authors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific objectives, resources and only after consulting such independent advisors as may be necessary.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
30-05-2025
- Business Standard
DTH firms under pressure as govt demands Rs 16,000 cr as licence fees
The Information and Broadcasting Ministry has issued notices demanding Rs 16,000 crore from four private direct-to-home (DTH) companies for unpaid licence fees — a move that is likely to hurt the struggling sector, The Economic Times reported on Friday. The notices demanded principal dues and accumulated interest from Bharti Telemedia (parent of Airtel Digital TV), Tata Play (formerly Tata Sky), Dish TV and Sun Direct. Industry representatives have told the Ministry the demand is not enforceable as the matter is before High Courts, the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal and the Supreme Court. Tax demand exceeds FY24 revenue The ministry's demand exceeds the four companies' combined FY24 revenue of Rs 10,230 crore, which is a 5 per cent decline from Rs 10,837 crore they earned in FY23. The sector lost eight million subscribers between FY21 and FY24. As of December 2024, the active pay DTH subscriber base was reported at 58.22 million. Final figures subject to changes, says MIB In its communications to the companies, the ministry said that the final figures are provisional and subject to reconciliation based on the outcomes of ongoing audits by the Comptroller and Auditor General and pending court verdicts. Dish TV, in its Q4 FY25 regulatory filing, said it had received a directive from the ministry on April 22 to pay Rs 6,735 crore in licence fees, including interest for the period from the issuance of its DTH licence through FY24. The company has formally disputed the demand. As of FY24, Tata Play has received a cumulative demand of Rs 3,628 crore, including Rs 1,401.66 crore in interest. Meanwhile, Sun Direct was issued a demand of Rs 1,051.84 crore, excluding interest, as of March 2024. SC upholds states' right to levy entertainment tax Compounding the industry's financial woes, the Supreme Court on May 23 upheld the constitutional validity of entertainment taxes imposed by state governments on cable and DTH television services. The court ruled that states have the legislative right to tax the entertainment aspect of these services, even if the broadcasting function is already covered under the Centre's service tax regime. Appeals by DTH operators rejected The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by leading DTH providers including Tata Sky, Dish TV, and Sun Direct, who had contested various state entertainment tax laws. The companies argued that the taxes were unconstitutional due to the Centre's existing service tax on broadcasting. The court, however, upheld the states' authority to impose such levies.
Time of India
30-05-2025
- Time of India
DTH cos asked to pay ₹16,000 crore licence fee dues
MUMBAI: The ministry of Information and Broadcasting has issued demand notices totalling ₹16,000 crore to the country's four private direct to home (DTH) operators over outstanding licence fees, industry sources told ET, potentially compounding problems for an industry battling dwindling revenues and subscriber losses to OTT platforms and DD Free demands cover both the principal amount and accrued interest on the dues, said the officials cited above. They said that the operators have communicated to the government that the notices cannot be enforced, as the matter is sub judice in various High Courts, the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), and the Supreme Court. Dish TV CEO Manoj Dobhal acknowledged the pressures facing the sector. "The DTH industry is navigating a difficult phase, with factors such as subscriber churn driven by competition from OTT platforms and DD Free Dish, along with taxation and regulatory issues,' Dobhal said. 'Given these challenges, we would have hoped for a more supportive approach from the authorities." To be sure, the licence fee demand is more than the combined revenue of the four private DTH operators, which stood at ₹10,230 crore in FY24, down 5% from ₹10,837 crore the previous year, as per regulatory filings. In its correspondence, the ministry said the figures are subject to reconciliation based on the outcome of audits by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), as well as pending court decisions. In its Q4 FY25 regulatory filing, Dish TV disclosed that it had received a communication from the ministry dated 22 April 2025, directing the company to pay ₹6,735 crore toward licence fees, including interest, covering the period from the grant of its DTH licence up to FY24. The company added that it has disputed the demand in its response. As of FY24, Tata Play has received a consolidated demand of ₹3,628 crore, including ₹1,401.66 crore in interest. Sun Direct has received a demand of ₹1,051.84 crore (excluding interest) as of March 2024. As of March 2025, Dish TV had made a provision of ₹4,612 crore towards licence fee dues. Tata Play had provisioned approximately ₹2,002 crore and recognised a further ₹2,280 crore as a contingent liability. Bharti Airtel had made provisions of about ₹3,426 crore as of 31 March 2024. Bharti Telemedia, Tata Play and Sun Direct declined to comment on the matter. A senior DTH executive added that the ministry has raised similar demands in the past even when legal disputes remain unresolved. 'DTH operators have repeatedly urged the ministry to exclude pass-through costs, such as content expenses, from the licence fee calculations and to address the issue of double taxation. However, these concerns are yet to be addressed,' the executive said. The DTH industry lost 8 million subscribers between FY21 and FY24. The active pay DTH subscriber base stood at 58.22 million, as of December 2024. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has, on two occasions, recommended phasing out the DTH licence fee by the end of FY27. Since 2020, TRAI has issued 17 recommendations aimed at reforming the broadcasting sector. The ministry of information and broadcasting has historically calculated the licence fee as 10% of gross revenue, without deductions. However, in 2020, it amended the DTH guidelines to set the licence fee at 8% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR).
