
The bond market has worries but it isn't freaking out
U.S. government bond investors are nervous—it's easy to see why. The last top-notch rating on Treasuries has been taken away, and worries remain about foreign buyers abandoning the market.
Any paper gains from rising bond prices have vanished as yields have risen back to where they were in February. Bond prices have an inverse relationship to bond yields.
After years of overspending, fiscal worries are intensifying as a Republican Congress marches toward a new tax bill that could add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. That rattles bond investors who doubt the U.S.'s ability to pay its debt back despite its pristine record. Net effect? Yields could rise further as bond prices could decline more.
Yet, the mounting anxiety is overshadowing a truth—one that can balance out some of the negative narrative. Treasury yields have largely been locked in a tight range since reciprocal tariffs were reversed, hovering mostly between the 200-day moving-average of 4.23% and 4.5% mark at close.The spread between the two-year and 10-year yields paints a similar picture. The gap, which reflects the additional yield for locking up money for a decade instead of a short term, has been in a range of 0.449 percentage points to 0.584 percentage points at close since April 22.
With the gap now near 0.50 percentage points, 'it is difficult to argue that the market is on the precipice of a breakout in either direction," wrote Ian Lyngen, head of rates strategy at BMO Capital Markets.
The tight ranges suggest that Wall Street's capacity to absorb drama has been high. The worry about the U.S. Treasury market is valid but any panic may be overblown since yields on the 10-year aren't close to the near 5% level seen in October 2023. The two-year to 10-year spread was wider in April and from 2020 to 2022.
The 30-year yield looks more problematic; it closed at 4.967% on Tuesday, and has flirted with the 5% level since mid-May. That 5% level has long been considered an important psychological threshold. Its been the cap for the 30-year for about two decades.
But the obsession with the 5% level overlooks an obvious positive: It is an attractive level to buy. Bond yields have risen from 1.4% in 2020. The 30-year can also act as a good hedge against losses in stocks if a recession materializes and bond yields fall, pushing up bond prices.
'While we understand the discomfort around 5 percent 30-year Treasury yields, ultimately the benefits of a visible and relatively attractive long-term risk-free rate of return outweigh the costs," wrote Nicholas Colas, Co-founder of DataTrek Research. 'Capital should always reward investors adequately for the risks they take, even when the security in question is an obligation of the US government."
The bond market has some structural problems: Chinese officials in particular have taken a step back as a buyer and more price-sensitive buyers like mutual funds and hedge funds have grown. It's a cause of concern that deserves to be watched, but the market isn't freaking out about it yet.
Write to Karishma Vanjani at karishma.vanjani@dowjones.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
50% off J-35A fighter jets! China's half-price stealth deal to Pakistan ignites online backlash, user says 'we pay the price'
Social media lights up: 'It hasn't even paid for the J-10' Live Events A charity sale or strategic move? The bigger gamble: Selling unfinished products Trying to sell the J-10CE and the story that didn't fly India watches, Pakistan trains, China stays quiet (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Beijing's decision to fast-track the delivery of 30 J-35A stealth fighters to Pakistan has ignited a wave of backlash among Chinese citizens. The deal, reportedly offered at a 50% discount, is scheduled to begin in August 2025. If it proceeds, it would mark China's first-ever export of a fifth-generation jet , as reported by Business online, disbelief is running are asking why China would send an unproven, in-testing aircraft — one not even inducted into its own air force — to a foreign buyer that still depends on IMF funding for economic Chinese platforms, the tone has been blunt and biting. One X user, Yingyang Medical School (@Zhejiang), wrote, 'Pakistan has also made a lot of fake news. How can it afford to buy it? It hasn't even paid for the J-10.' That refers to Islamabad's overdue payments for earlier Chinese J-10C fighter jets Another user, CQL0530, expressed disbelief over Beijing's manufacturing priorities: 'China's own production of the J-35 has not yet been built up. How can it be given to them?'And some didn't bother with nuance. Angry Man 1957 (@Guangdong) wrote, simply, 'Bullshit!' while another, posting as Clouds rise and fall from Sichuan province, said 'I can't afford it all,' seemingly lamenting the financial burden on Chinese phrase '2 more powerful printers are coming', shared by user Cracked Rose (@Guangdong), sparked speculation about whether the government plans to ramp up jet production or metaphorically 'print money' to cover the timing of the announcement is what has drawn particular ire. It comes just days after the deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir. The optics are not lost on either side: India views the move as Beijing arming its ally against Indian forces, while Chinese users question if their government is effectively subsidising weapons for a client state with poor credit user summed up the sentiment: 'It is more in your interest to spend money on building and purchasing industrial equipment and infra.'To them, this isn't about strategy — it's about misplaced J-35A — also known as the FC-31 — is still undergoing testing and has yet to be formally inducted into the People's Liberation Army Air Force. Unlike America's F-35, which has seen over 900 units delivered globally, the Chinese stealth fighter is still China appears eager to use the Pakistani order to market the aircraft internationally. The J-35 is designed to rival Western platforms, but without combat experience or confirmed specs, it remains a say the stealth jet may one day feature advanced sensors and integrated battlefield communication systems. For now, however, it's a concept being sold as a finished product — and critics aren't has also claimed that during Operation Sindoor, its Chinese-supplied J-10CE jets — armed with long-range PL-15 missiles — downed multiple Indian Rafale fighters. Beijing has reportedly leaned on these claims to pitch the J-10CE as 'combat-tested' in marketing outside Pakistan, no one's attempts to sell the J-10CE to Egypt, Brazil, and Uzbekistan have all fallen through. One reason is technical: the jet still depends on Russian engines like the Klimov RD-93 and Saturn AL-31, which many countries consider outdated or risky due to supply chain pilots are already being trained in China to fly the J-35s, according to sources. Meanwhile, the Chinese government and state media have remained silent on the growing online criticism. There's been no confirmation, no denial — just quiet momentum behind the on the other hand, is likely to view the sale as part of a broader strategy to shift the regional power balance. A 50% discount on next-gen jets, timed after a cross-border terror attack, adds fuel to long-standing concerns about China using Pakistan as a military now, the deal is neither confirmed by China nor fully detailed. But the backlash has been clear. Citizens are asking tough questions. Why sell an untested weapon to a financially unstable country? Why offer it at a discount? And who, ultimately, is footing the bill?Beijing may see the move as a long-term strategic investment. But at home, many are calling it what they believe it is — a heavily subsidised, risky gamble, paid for by the Chinese taxpayer.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Chinese dumping concerns rise on PET resins; industry calls for action
Domestic players allege unfair trade by Chinese suppliers like Wankai, urging DGTR to tighten anti-dumping actions to protect India's petrochemical sector Chennai Listen to This Article The battle between the Indian PET resin industry—a key segment of the petrochemical sector—and Chinese suppliers has intensified. Domestic players have approached the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), seeking stringent anti-dumping measures, alleging that major importers like Wankai are engaging in 'unfair trade practices.' These practices, they claim, are causing revenue losses for the government and hurting the prospects of the domestic industry, said the Forum of PET Manufacturers (FoPM). This comes despite the imposition of an anti-dumping duty (ADD) in place since April 2021, and the government imposing an additional anti-absorption duty of $25 per tonne on Wankai


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Who Is Scott Bessent? Trump Trade Aide Who Traded Blows With Elon Musk Inside Oval Office
Last Updated: Scott worked in global finance for many years before making his debut in politics, holding senior positions in several well-known firms. A physical altercation broke out between Elon Musk and Scott Bessent in the White House, an incident that reportedly took place in mid-April. According to the Washington Post, a heated argument broke out between Elon Musk and Scott Bessent following a mid-April meeting with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office. After a disagreement between them over their preferred candidate for acting IRS commissioner, the argument escalated into a shouting match in the hallway outside the Oval Office, where the two men traded personal insults and engaged in a verbal brawl. After the meeting, Bessent reportedly accused Musk of being a 'total fraud," claiming he had failed to follow through on promised spending cuts. In response, Musk allegedly reacted physically—delivering a hard shoulder bump to Bessent's ribcage, described by witnesses as similar to a rugby tackle. The situation quickly escalated into a brief scuffle that had to be broken up by people nearby. Musk was reportedly escorted out of the West Wing following the incident. Who Is Scott Bessent? – Scott Bessent made history by becoming the first openly gay person to lead the US Treasury Department. – He is also the first openly LGBTQ+ Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate under a Republican president. – Scott completed his studies at Yale University, one of the top universities in the U.S. – He worked in global finance for many years before making his debut in politics, holding senior positions in several well-known firms. – He also aligns with Trump's economic policies, like reducing regulations, cutting taxes, and applying tariffs to key trade rivals. – He was nominated on November 22, with Trump praising him as someone who believes in the 'America First" approach. Elon Musk And Scott Bessent's Relationship Elon Musk, who was chosen to help reform the government, has criticised Bessent, saying he represents the old way of doing things. Musk also warned that continuing with traditional choices could harm the country's economy, and called for a different direction. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: June 08, 2025, 17:16 IST