&w=3840&q=100)
RCB, DNA Entertainment get interim relief from Karnataka High Court in Chinnaswamy stampede case: 'It's too premature'
Royal Challengers Bengaluru and DNA Entertainment had moved Karnataka High Court on Monday, four days after Bengaluru Police filed an FIR against them in connection with the stampede at the Chinnaswamy Stadium last week that had left 11 dead. read more
Royal Challengers Bengaluru's title celebration at Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium on Wednesday had to be cut short due to a stampede that had broken out outside the venue. AP
The Karnataka High Court on Monday provided interim relief to Royal Challengers Bengaluru as well as DNA Entertainment while hearing their petitions against a criminal case filed in connection with the recent stampede at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium .
RCB and DNA Entertainment had moved High Court on Monday seeking to quash a First Information Report that was filed by Bengaluru Police on Thursday, in which the Royal Challengers had been named as the first accused.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), which is headquartered at the Chinnaswamy Stadium and is in charge of the venue, was also named as an accused in the case.
And on Monday, both parties filed separate petitions before the Karnataka High Court ; while RCB claimed that they have been falsely implicated in the case, DNA Entertainment blamed the lack of police cover at the iconic venue as the primary factor that led to the stampede and the eventual loss of lives.
Later on the same day, the High Court adjourned the ongoing hearings concerning the two parties to Thursday, 12 June with Justice SR Krishna Kumar ordering police officials to not take any coercive action against anyone from either RCB or DNA until then.
'There is a gentleman's understanding – don't do anything till we take up the matter,' Justice Krishna Kumar told the Karnataka government, warning against unnecessary action.
'There's no independent case made out against RCB or DNA'
Monday's hearing also witnessed a sharp exchange between CV Nagesh and Advocate General (AG) Shashikiran Shetty. While Nagesh was representing RCB and DNA, Shetty was representing the State of Karnataka.
The former alleged that there was no prima facie case against his clients, and that the allegations were largely composite involving all three parties.
'Except for one sentence, the entire FIR makes composite allegations against all three. There's no independent case made out against RCB or DNA,' Nagesh said, while added that it was actually the Chief Minister of Karnataka Siddaramaiah who had invited everyone to RCB's felicitation event.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
AG Shetty, however, contended that it was RCB and DNA's social media posts that actually drew fans in large numbers at the Chinnaswamy, as well as the fact that they had done so without seeking prior permissions that led to the chaos.
'Thirteen crore people saw it,' the AG said, pointing the finger at Nagesh's clients on the parties responsible for spreading the word about the team's title celebrations.
'At 10.30 am, without informing the government, they tweeted that there would be a rally. Five lakh people came, and only 21 gates were there. If they had simply opened the gates, lives could have been saved,' he added.
'It's too premature': Karnataka HC Judge
Justice Krishna Kumar, however, said it was 'too premature' for the High Court to be arriving at a conclusion this early.
'Today, we are not in a position to say whether it was the tweet or the CM's invitation or something else that caused the incident. It's too premature. We're only dealing with a plea for protection from arrest.
'Except for that one sentence about free passes, everything else seems to be composite.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'At one point, the AG expressed concern that the petitioners could destroy evidence if granted protection.
'The investigation will reveal who among the three – RCB, DNA, KSCA – is responsible. If it turns out the tweet had no impact, what then?' Justice Krishna Kumar added.
The tragic incident at RCB's home ground had taken place on 4 June while Virat Kohli, captain Rajat Patidar and the rest of the squad was celebrating its historic victory over Punjab Kings in the IPL final in Ahmedabad on the previous night. The six-run victory over the Shreyas Iyer-led PBKS gave RCB their maiden IPL title after years of heart-breaks.
Besides the FIR against RCB, DNA and KSCA, Bengaluru Police had arrested Royal Challengers marketing and revenue head Nikhil Sosale at the Kempegowda International Airport.
Cops had also detained three executives belonging to DNA Entertainment, the organisation that had successfully conducted an open-top bus parade for the Indian cricket team at Mumbai's Marine Drive following their victory in the T20 World Cup last year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sosale has since approached the Karnataka High Court following his arrest, terming it illegal and arbitrary.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Love triangle gets bloody, 1 murdered at Agrasen Square
Nagpur: A chilling murder shook Agrasen Chowk on Sunday night, when a ragpicker Anna alias Shailesh was stoned to death by Anurag alias Ghoda Sunil Borkar, 33, in a violent clash over a common love interest. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The gruesome incident, which unfolded around 9.45pm in front of Punjab Hardware and Sanitary Store, left the local community reeling and sparked concerns about safety in the area. Police said Shailesh and Borkar, both natives of Madhya Pradesh, had a history that began in Hosangabad jail, where they spent time together after being arrested for theft. After their release, the duo relocated to Nagpur six years ago. Their friendship soured over a romantic rivalry. Borkar, who lived on the footpath near Ambedkar Chowk, was enraged when his live-in partner grew close to Shailesh, even moving in with him. This love triangle culminated in a fatal confrontation on Sunday night. The First Information Report (FIR) reveals that Rakesh Sabal, a 45-year-old manager at a lodge, was alerted to the attack by Vicky alias Kalya, a 22-year-old ragpicker. Vicky reported that Borkar struck Shailesh on the head and chest with a stone, leaving him in a pool of blood. Sabal promptly informed Tehsil police, who rushed Shailesh to Mayo Hospital, where he was declared dead on arrival. The Tehsil police have registered a murder case against Borkar under Section 103 of the BNS and are actively searching for the accused, who remains at large. Preliminary investigations point to the romantic dispute as the motive, though further inquiries are underway to confirm the details. The incident has heightened fears among Agrasen Chowk residents, who are now demanding stronger security measures. This tragic event underscores the urgent need for community vigilance to prevent such violent crimes in Nagpur, as authorities work to bring the perpetrator to justice.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru stampede: IPS officer challenges suspension order
Bengaluru: Suspended IPS officer Vikash Kumar Vikash Monday moved the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), challenging the govt's order suspending him for dereliction of duty. Vikash is one of the five officers suspended. The suspension order, citing Rule 3(1)(a) of the All India Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1969, alleged that Vikash, along with other officers, failed to take adequate crowd-control and safety measures despite prior knowledge of the celebrations. However, it doesn't specify the exact role, negligence or wilful misconduct attributable to him. The order highlighted the fact there wasn't enough time to prepare for such a huge event, but was silent on how the tragedy could be attributed to Vikash and the other officers. The applicant stated in his application that he has been made a scapegoat. Retired officers' plea to CM Meanwhile, nearly 30 retired IPS officers have written to chief minister Siddaramaiah, urging him to revoke the suspension of senior police personnel over the June 4 stampede at M Chinnaswamy Stadium. In their open letter, they stressed that punitive action should follow judicial inquiry, not precede it. The officers said the RCB management first announced the victory celebrations on social media, drawing lakhs of fans to the stadium within hours of the IPL final. The hasty celebrations were arranged due to travel plans of RCB's foreign and local players, the letter said. They noted that police had warned the organisers in writing about the risks of holding such a large event on short notice. Calling the suspension of police officers unjust, the letter stated they were made scapegoats while the real accountability lay with RCB, KSCA and the organisers.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
CoP appears in high court; asked to give details of pending FIRs
Chennai: Madras high court has directed Chennai city commissioner of police, A Arun, who appeared before it in person on Monday, to file a comprehensive report by July 8 on the total number of FIRs pending investigation across police stations in the city as of June 2024. The report must also include number of cases in which chargesheets were filed and the number of cases where investigations are still ongoing, Justice P Velmurugan said. The issue pertains to a plea moved by Vanamamalai of Nanguneri belonging to Scheduled Caste community. He had lodged a complaint alleging financial misappropriation in the welfare fund of a residential complex in Nolambur, Chennai. He further claimed that another resident posted caste-based derogatory comments about him in a WhatsApp group. Aggrieved, he filed a complaint with the Nolambur police. As they failed to take any action, he moved high court. Appearing before the court, the commissioner submitted that appropriate action would have been taken if the complaint was formally submitted. Recording the submission, the court pointed out discrepancies between the number of pending cases recorded in court and the figures reported by police department. The court added that in many instances, investigation reports were not being submitted to the courts even after the investigations were concluded. The court then directed the commissioner to file a detailed report outlining the number of FIRs pending as of June 2024 and how many of these cases progressed to the chargesheet stage.