
What will Germany's likely new government do about the 'Deutschlandticket'?
In an
initial policy paper
released at the start of March, the negotiating parties had good news for avid public transport users: Germany's
Deutschlandticket
was to be continued.
"We are discussing the continuation of the
Deutschlandticket
and the expansion and modernisation of local public transport," the exploratory paper read.
Unsurprisingly for a document that had been produced in a matter of days, however, the draft was thin on details. Fleshing them out was the task of a working group on transport, infrastructure and housing, which passed its recommendations onto senior party leaders on Monday.
According to DPA, which has seen the proposals, the
Deutschlandticket
could be continued at a price of €58 per month through 2025 and 2026. The cost would then be increased "gradually and in a socially responsible manner" from 2027.
READ ALSO:
Citizenship to Bürgergeld - What Germany's CDU and SPD have agreed so far
To resolve the endless debates over financing, the money stumped up by customers - as well as by states and federal governments - would be calculated according to a strict formula.
This could lead to significantly more costs for ticket users.
Uncertain future
Though the working group has put its recommendations forward, it's still unclear whether these proposals will be adopted in a future coalition pact.
Instead, a steering committee of party leaders will look at the plans and make a final call in the coming weeks. As part of their assessment, the negotiators will also look at budget constraints.
Despite the parties' pledge to keep the travel pass, the financing of the
Deutschlandticket
hangs in the balance after the end of the year.
Advertisement
Currently, states and the federal government have both pledged a €1.5 billion subsidy for transport companies until the end of the year, laid down in the Regionalisation Act. In order to continue the ticket past 2025, however, another amendment would have to be made.
At the start of the year, the price of the ticket was increased from its initial €49 per month to €58 per month in order to assuage funding concerns.
READ ALSO:
What happens next in Germany's rapid-fire coalition talks?
Commenting on the potential price increase, Greenpeace transport expert Lena Donat said signalling the next price rise after January's hike could "offend people" and jeopardise the popularity of the scheme.
"It's good that the CDU/CSU and SPD have realised what a treasure they have inherited with the Deutschlandticket and want to continue it," Donat explained. Instead of higher prices, Greenpeace would like to see an expansion of the scheme to include a social ticket for people on low incomes.
A regional Deutsche Bahn train stops on the platform in Braunschweig. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Swen Pförtner
Clashing perspectives
According to DPA, clashing perspectives on the ticket were fighting against each other in the transport and infrastructure working group last week.
The centre-left SPD - who helped introduce the ticket - have been passionate proponents of keeping the scheme, describing it as a "huge success". Negotiators from the party have apparently been pushing to maintain the offer at its current price.
However, politicians from centre-right CDU and CSU parties have generally been more sceptical.
Advertisement
Ulrich Lange, deputy leader of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group, has previously spoken out in favour in replacing the ticket with "something further or new" and said cars would remain the primary mode of transport in the countryside.
READ ALSO:
Will Germany's 'Deutschlandticket' survive after the elections?
Introduced in May 2023, the
Deutschlandticket
offers unlimited travel around the country for a fixed monthly price. With it, subscribers can travel on local and regional public transport anywhere in Germany, but not on intercity trains.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local Germany
a day ago
- Local Germany
Firework bans and deportations: The new laws German ministers could put forward
The spring conference of Germany's interior ministers - of both federal and state governments - is set to open on Wednesday evening in Bremerhaven. According to reporting by the German Press Agency (DPA), discussions on electronic ankle bracelets for violent offenders, the fight against sexual violence against children and how to deal with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) are on the agenda. Other topics include strengthening civil protection and civil defence, betting in amateur sports and dealing with New Year's Eve fireworks. The conference, which was founded in 1954 and usually happens twice a year, is intended to promote political cooperation between Germany's state and federal governments. The conference can pass resolutions that inform initiatives to be carried out in the coming months. Recently appointed Federal Minister of the Interior, Alexander Dobrindt (CSU), is expected to announce when the next deportation flight to Afghanistan is scheduled following the conference. Free rides for police officers According to DPA, there is broad agreement on nationwide measures to improve safety on trains. Among them is a recommendation to allow federal police officers to use trains free of charge even when not in uniform. How the officers should identify themselves during ticket inspection was a recent the subject of discussions. Continued border checks and deportations Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann told the Augsburger Allgemeine that they would also "talk intensively about the current refugee situation..." "We must continue the migration turnaround," he added. This includes the implementation of further border controls, which has recently become a point of contention between judicial and executive authorities. READ ALSO: How long can Germany keep its tighter border controls in place? Advertisement Saxony-Anhalt's interior minister Tamara Zieschang (CDU) praises the tightened border controls, but adds that, "It is clear that further measures must follow." Namely she wants to see more deportations of "dangerous persons" and criminals, including to Afghanistan and Syria. Since the Islamist Taliban seized power in Kabul in 2021, Germany had ceased deportations to Afghanistan - with one exception in August last year when 28 offenders were flown to Kabul. Stricter limits for fireworks The states would like to see more options for firework prohibition zones. This year's chairman of the conference, Bremen's interior minister, Ulrich Mäurer (SPD), told the Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland : "I would prefer to ban private New Year's Eve fireworks." Together with Berlin Mäurer has proposed that cities should have the power to ban fireworks where they cause problems. How to deal with the AfD Notably, a discussion of an AfD party ban is not on the agenda. Advertisement On Tuesday, ahead of the conference, federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said he opposes a ban on the far-right party despite the BfV domestic intelligence service labelling it an "extremist" group. Such a ban could be applied for by the federal government, the Bundestag or the Bundesrat. In the end, the Federal Constitutional Court would have to decide. However, Dobrindt and several CDU interior ministers want to end the ban debate, suggesting that a ban could fuel support for the party and that it must instead be defeated politically. With reporting by DPA.


DW
2 days ago
- DW
Greenpeace in court: Romania takes aim at environmental NGOs – DW – 06/10/2025
Greenpeace Romania faces legal action from the state gas firm Romgaz, which wants the environmental group shut down. Critics warn this is the latest in a string of attacks on civil society groups. The Romanian government is on the offensive against critical voices from civil society. In an unprecedented move, the state-owned energy company Romgaz has filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace Romania, arguing that the nongovernmental organization be disbanded. Romgaz is 70% owned by the Romanian state and the lawsuit is supported by the Energy Ministry. The lawsuit is part of a growing trend, said Romanian political scientist Cristian Pirvulescu. "Several environmental and human rights NGOs have come under increased scrutiny — be it through unforeseen inspections, extensive reporting obligations or public questioning of their legitimacy. Taken together, this is systematic pressure that can discourage robust civic engagement," he said. Natural gas in the Black Sea This escalation is the latest chapter in a debate that has been going on for some time. Observers say it has its roots in the huge natural gas deposits in the Black Sea off the coast of Romania. Romgaz, along with the Austrian company OMV, want to extract this natural gas, which amounts to around 100 billion cubic meters (3.5 trillion cubic feet), enough to make Romania the largest natural gas producer in the EU. The government is hoping for energy independence and earnings in the billions. Production is due to start in 2027 and while investors have rejoiced, environmentalists are horrified. Critics, in particular Greenpeace, have said the venture will torpedo the European Union's climate targets. The Romanian branch of the NGO is organizing protests and taking legal action against the project. Several lawsuits have been filed in court. In January, Greenpeace lost a case and was ordered to pay court costs of around €30,000 ($34,200) each to OMV and Romgaz. In May, Greenpeace lost another case and now has to pay around €16,000 in court costs to the companies. However, the NGO never received a demand for payment from the energy firms, said Greenpeace. Instead, Romgaz commissioned a bailiff, who stated that Greenpeace was insolvent. How does natural gas harm the environment? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "It's absurd. Of course we can pay the costs," said Mihnea Matache, spokesperson for Greenpeace Romania. The accusation is closely linked to a discovery that Romgaz claims to have made, namely that there are two different organizations with the name Greenpeace, with two different tax numbers. Romgaz has accused Greenpeace of using these different organizations as a cover to sidestep fines. In the light of this complaint, Romgaz is seeking to have Greenpeace dissolved. A 'classic intimidation lawsuit' Greenpeace has called the accusations laughable. Yes, Greenpeace has two tax numbers, said Matache, one for national and one for international affairs. "That's quite normal," he added. He doesn't believe the lawsuit will be successful. "They just want to unsettle our supporters, exhaust our resources, tire us out and intimidate us." Political scientist Pirvulescu agrees. "The lawsuit seems more like retaliation against their activism and public communication than a legitimate legal claim," he told DW. In his view, it's a classic intimidation lawsuit. This type of lawsuit is known by the abbreviation SLAPP, which stands for "strategic lawsuit against public participation." The goal is to dissuade civil organizations from seeking legal recourse or operating in the public sphere altogether, by using steep compensation claims and lengthy court proceedings to place them under immense financial and emotional strain. Greenpeace faces large fine for US pipeline protests To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Energy minister accuses Greenpeace of 'fraudulent business practices' The natural gas extraction project off the coast of Romania goes by the name Neptun Deep, and is considered one of the country's most important projects by Energy Minister Sebastian Burduja. When asked by DW, the Energy Ministry said it had nothing to do with Romgaz's lawsuit against Greenpeace, but emphasized how crucial Neptun Deep is for the Romanian economy. On Facebook, Burduja has congratulated Romgaz on the lawsuit and accused Greenpeace of "fraudulent business practices." Burduja recently piled pressure on environmental NGOs. Back in March, he called on company CEOs to sue environmental NGOs that filed lawsuits, and stated this constituted an act of "energy patriotism." In response, over 100 environmental organizations wrote an open letter demanding Burduja's resignation. The ministry, for its part, has said it is defending the country's economic interests, rejecting accusations of trying to silence civil society. "We believe that [NGOs] do play and should play an important role in the social and public life of a country," it stated. "If the NGOs concerned have not acted abusively or unlawfully, they have nothing to fear." Energy Minister Sebastian Burduja has backed Romgaz on social media for its legal action against Greenpeace Image: Zoltan Balogh/MTI/AP Photo/picture alliance In 2021, three environmental NGOs were summoned to a parliamentary inquiry. A commission was tasked with investigating whether energy prices had risen so sharply because the environmental organizations had prevented the construction of lignite and hydroelectric power plants. The NGOs criticized this move, saying it soured their public reputation and turned them into scapegoats. The UN's special rapporteur on environmental defenders, Michel Forst, intervened in 2024 and expressed serious concern to the Romanian state about a "campaign of harassment and intimidation." Hefty legal costs and alleged ties to Russia "They want to intimidate us — and they are succeeding. We are now thinking twice about suing Romgaz," said Vlad Catuna, Greenpeace's campaign manager for the Neptun Deep issue. In part, they are worried about the hefty legal costs facing NGOs if they lose. In the previous lawsuit, Romgaz and OMV had originally demanded a total compensation of €250,000, making the five-figure final settlement appear paltry by comparison. And it's not just in court that the Energy Ministry is challenging environmental NGOs. The minister and state-affiliated media have repeatedly suggested that Greenpeace and other environmental organizations have links to Russia. They claim the Russian state wants to prevent Romania from extracting gas in a bid to make the nation more dependent on Russian gas. Matache and Catuna reject these accusations. Greenpeace has been banned in Russia as an "undesirable organization" since 2023. But accusations such as these still leave a bitter aftertaste and dent the organization's standing with the public. This article was originally written in German.


DW
2 days ago
- DW
German police say AfD membership incompatible with service – DW – 06/10/2025
Skip next section German court to hear case on right-wing extremist magazine ban 06/10/2025 June 10, 2025 German court to hear case on right-wing extremist magazine ban The Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig is set to hear a case regarding the ban on the right-wing extremist magazine Compact. In August, the Federal Administrative Court temporarily lifted the ban on the magazine, which was issued by Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD). The court expressed particular doubts about the ban's proportionality. This allowed the magazine, which was based in Brandenburg at the time, to resume publication under certain conditions. The Interior Ministry first banned Compact in mid-July, describing the publication as a "central mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene." In response, Compact filed a lawsuit and an urgent motion against the immediate enforcement of the ban. The final decision is now pending in the main proceedings.