Mini-fans among products fuelling ‘fast tech' waste crisis, campaigners warn
The campaign group also highlighted that Google Trend data shows demand for mini-fans increasing, with searches up 16% in May compared to the year before and overall yearly searches continuing to rise.
Demand for fast tech items, which covers cheap electronic items with short lifespans that are thrown away or left unused, continues to increase among UK consumers, Material Focus said.
These products include items like decorative LED lights, light-up toilet seats, rechargeable and chargeable batteries, electric toothbrushes, electric razors, earplugs and charging cables.
Research from Opinium showed that annual spend on fast tech has grown from £2.8 billion to £11.6bn between 2023 and 2025, and that 84% of people polled bought fast tech in the last year.
The findings also suggest £7.9 million light-up toilet seats, mini karaoke machines and LED balloons have been sold during the last 12 months.
But the equivalent of 55% of items bought each year are now binned or tucked away, forgotten in a drawer, the research indicates.
And nearly 22 million items of fast tech, containing valuable metals like lithium, copper and gold, are estimated to remain unused after just one month from being purchased.
Consumer expert Professor Cathrine Jansson-Boyd, from Anglia Ruskin University, warned that fast tech could be growing at a similar rate to fast fashion, with a 'similar negative impact' on the environment as it ends up in landfill.
'Like fast fashion, we can change things for the better though,' she said.
'That starts by making sure we don't see these items as disposable, being more conscious of what we buy in the first place, and at the very least, we recycle fast tech when we're finished with it.'
Scott Butler, executive director of Material Focus, warned that fast tech items are not disposable and should not be binned.
'When the novelty's worn off, just make sure you visit our recycling locator, where you'll find how quick and easy it is to make sure tech doesn't end up in bins,' he said.
Andrea Cheong, fashion sustainability advocate and creator of the Mindful Monday Method, who is working with Material Focus, said: 'Thanks to fast fashion, we've seen the quality of our clothes decline over the last few years.
'Similarly, the durability of our electricals has dropped too, thanks to fast tech.
'The unrealistic, low prices of fast tech encourages impulse purchases and makes them feel easy to dispose of. This all adds up.'
Prof Jansson-Boyd urged people to consider the impact before buying a fast tech item, check if it can be bought second hand, avoid being seduced by discounts and offers, use repair services such as that offered by Curry's and recycle items you are no longer using.
UK residents can find their nearest drop-off point thanks to Material Focus's Recycle Your Electricals locator, which maps more than 30,000 recycling points.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
3 days ago
- Times
Young couples are staying together for the rent — I should know, I did
You hear horror stories about it all the time. Married couples desperate to divorce but staying together 'for the kids'. They bicker every day, haven't had sex in ten years, but the cost of raising a family alone, or paying for a messy divorce, is an even more crippling fate. It's easy to assume such a dilemma might only fall on older generations yet new research has found that one in five young adults stay in an unhappy relationship to keep costs down. In a poll of 3,000 people aged 18-40 (by the agency Opinium for the Lifetime Isa firm OneFamily), researchers found that young single people were less likely to have cash reserves to fall back on and save significantly less each month. With 21 per cent agreeing that they have stayed with a partner because they can't manage living costs alone, the chief executive of OneFamily, Jim Islam, said the findings prove there's a 'tax on being single'. I have plenty of experience in the matter. Aged 28, with a job in the media and a salary of £29k, I moved in with my (now ex) boyfriend, let's call him Harry, after just one year together. At the time, I was spending 75 per cent of my income on rent and bills — to share a two-bedroom apartment with a friend in north London — and was only able to put £200 in savings each month. Harry and I had a great relationship; it was caring, fun and easy, but the knot in my stomach in the two months leading up to the move told me we weren't ready. If I'm honest, I silenced the growing fears by thinking of all the money I'd be able to save, plus the thrill of having disposable income for all the things I'd waved off as 'unjustifiable' for years: clothes, takeaways, weekends away. • Read more expert advice on sex, relationships, dating and love Within months, unfortunately, my nervous gut proved right — our relationship shifted. It was beyond the usual growing pains of living together. Harry became distant, prioritising two-day benders with friends over date nights. Soon, I found evidence he'd cheated — I was devastated. Our relationship had always been brutally honest; infidelity was the last thing I expected of him. When confronted, he denied it profusely, explaining away the evidence with little success. I knew I had to break up with him, but I also knew I couldn't. It wasn't because I believed him — as much as I wanted to — or because I thought he would change. It was less emotional than that. Amid the gut-wrenching turmoil of the rug being pulled firmly out from under me, my brain went to pure pragmatism — assessing the financial fallout of splitting. Could I move back in with my friend? No, she'd moved out of London. Could I afford to live alone? No, I wouldn't get approved to rent on my salary and my living costs would be extortionate. The alternative was to find a houseshare with strangers, something I hadn't done since a bad experience when I was 23. It would, undoubtedly, feel like I was going backwards. Could I really endure the untold obstacles that come with living with strangers? I cautiously — and secretly — viewed some lower-priced studios (in London, that means £1,300 a month) and found that any I could afford weren't worth living in. Most were so small you could shower, cook and remove mould from the ceiling all at the same time. • Divorced but still living together? It's hell That left one other option: stay and compartmentalise the emotional distress of remaining with a man I now couldn't trust, and our impending break-up, until our lease expired. All things considered, that seemed like the easiest choice — sure, my mental health might go awry, but at least I wouldn't have to uproot my life or ruin my financial future. Over the next seven months my emotions were like a British summer: sunny one second, thunder the next. We still behaved like a couple, eating dinner together every night, going on dates — we even spent my birthday in Dubai together. I was tortured by the shame of staying, yet somehow still in love, relishing the moments we were happy, knowing they would end soon. I had set myself a goal of doubling my salary — logic out of the window, along with my dignity — so that I would never be in this situation again. And actually, after some lucky openings at my company that led to two promotions in quick succession, I was almost there by the time our lease expired. We broke up a month prior to this, both in agreement that things weren't working. We'd long ignored the fact that some of our plans for the future didn't particularly align (he wanted kids, for example, I wasn't so sure) — and after that trust was fractured, our dynamic was never the same. I'd spent the past seven months checking out emotionally and it was clear to both of us that it was time to call it quits. I was free mentally, albeit now burdened by the cost of paying £1,600 rent alone (my salary might have risen, but my disposable income certainly didn't). I'd come to learn it was worth it, however. • Don't divorce, argue with your spouse better When I've shared this experience with friends, many have admitted that financial pressures have played into their decision to stay too. One knew her relationship wasn't working for a year before it ended, but had just started her own business and didn't have enough savings to feel comfortable managing bills alone. Another was made redundant and suddenly found herself reliant on her wealthy partner, living what she described as largely 'separate lives' for the rest of their relationship. Experts now worry that the mental toll of the single tax is long-lasting. 'The emotional exhaustion of staying is rarely spoken about, and the cost-of-living crisis has only heightened these fears,' says psychotherapist and divorce coach Eve Stanway. 'Living too long with tension, conflict or emotional disconnection can chip away at self-esteem, feed anxiety and leave people feeling hopeless or trapped.' After moving out of our shared flat, I spent six months in therapy — the emotional trauma I had compartmentalised finally caught up with me. I ended up with severe anxiety, my brain channelling the fear and stress I felt at being so out of control of my life into a phobia of being trapped (the irony isn't lost on me) in small spaces like the Tube, lifts or a plane. My sense of self took a hit too. I'd always prided myself on being strong enough to walk away from a bad relationship no matter the cost — evidently, just not the cost of rent in London. Therapy certainly helped, as did the fact I'm now in a better place financially. I've taken it as a lesson in resilience and I will never let the allure of living more comfortably speed up the pace of a relationship I'm not sure about. As the saying goes, you can't put a price on freedom. The writer has chosen to remain anonymous
The Independent
6 days ago
- The Independent
Families' back to school purchases ‘could end up in lost property within weeks'
Parents may be busy stocking up on 'back to school' items but for around two-fifths of families some purchases will soon be destined for the lost property cupboard, a survey indicates. Some 43% of parents surveyed said their child tends to lose an item within six weeks of a new school year, according to cashback and rewards website Rakuten. Tech items (average cost £47.68), school shoes (£43.44), and school blazers (£38.50) topped the list of items that parents said are the most costly to replace. Opinium"> PE kits, dresses, skirts, trousers, jumpers, shirts, shorts and ties were also among the list of items that parents said had vanished. Lunchboxes, pencil cases, stationary and water bottles were also among the items to disappear. On average, parents estimated they spend £131 per child on back-to-school shopping at the start of the academic year. Lost items are not the only reason for additional spending, as nearly two-thirds (63%) of parents have faced replacing ruined or damaged items. More than half (53%) of parents have replaced school shoes within the school year because their child outgrew them. More than a third (37%) of parents have even had to replace school shoes more than once within a single school year. Nearly two-fifths (39%) of parents said they have felt frustrated at replacing school items. Nearly half (48%) of parents label school essentials and the same percentage (48%) said they remind their child almost daily to look after their belongings. Rakuten commissioned Opinium to survey 2,000 people across the UK in July for the research. Bola Sol, a savings expert at Rakuten said: 'Back to school season can feel like deja vu for parents, buying new shoes, jumpers or water bottles only for them to vanish in the first few weeks of the new term. It adds up fast.'
The Herald Scotland
10-08-2025
- The Herald Scotland
Trump voiced support for UK farmers - he needs to look at his own
'They love their way of life, and they love that dirt,' Trump said, in response to a question on the importance of farming. 'They don't know how to do anything else, but they don't want to do anything else.' While such sentiments may have drawn polite applause on British soil, they ring hollow when held up against the backdrop of a deepening farm crisis in the United States, a crisis that some say echoes the devastating rural collapse of the 1980s. Read More: According to the US Department of Agriculture, total farm sector debt in the United States is expected to rise to a record $561.8 billion in 2025, a 3.7% increase from last year. The Kansas City Federal Reserve attributes the surge to increased borrowing among small and mid-sized farms struggling to stay afloat. Perhaps most alarming is the recent spike in Chapter 12 bankruptcy filings, which are designed for farmers and family fishermen. Researchers at the University of Arkansas found 88 such filings in the first quarter of 2025 alone, nearly double the number from the previous year. 'Bankruptcies are on the rise, and you will see many more on the auction block in the coming months – especially this autumn,' warned John Boyd, founder of the National Black Farmers Association, who raises cattle and grows corn, soybeans and wheat in Virginia. Mr Boyd also revealed that 2025 marked the first time in his farming career that he was denied an operating loan, a critical source of funding to cover essential input costs. 'I was turned down by banks for the simple fact of low commodity prices due to the president's tariffs,' he told Newsweek. 'We cannot survive on low crop prices with input costs at an all-time high.' American farmers are still reeling from the impact of past trade disputes, particularly with China. Corn and soybean prices have been hit hard, with corn futures dropping by around 15% since the beginning of the year. As Caleb Ragland, president of the American Soybean Association, explained in Senate testimony: 'American soybean farmers stand at the edge of a cliff and will suffer if tariffs are not replaced with trade agreements that reduce them before our harvest this autumn.' At the same time, the US farm sector is facing what some are calling a labour crisis, with an estimated 400,000 agricultural jobs going unfilled in 2025. 'The shortage of these workers is perhaps the most significant challenge facing US agriculture,' said Michael Marsh, president of the National Council of Agricultural Employers. 'Technology will not fill that need.' Strict immigration enforcement under past and current administrations has exacerbated the problem, with raids by federal agents on farms and processing facilities reportedly leaving crops to rot in the fields due to a lack of available labour. 'Who's going to do the hard work that is required in 100-degree heat and enduring work conditions?' Mr Boyd asked. 'The president's immigration policies have hurt America's farmers.' The consequences of the crisis aren't confined to rural America. Experts warn of long-term impacts on food security and supply. 'When our farmers face persistent challenges, the broader consequences can include higher food prices, fewer choices at the grocery store, and reduced access to the variety and quality of food Americans have come to expect,' said Shannon Douglass, president of the California Farm Bureau. A recent support package dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', signed by Trump in July, allocates an estimated $66.4bn over 10 years in subsidies to support American agriculture. However, critics argue it does little to address structural issues, with much of the support expected to benefit large-scale farms in the southern states. The National Family Farm Coalition said the bill 'fails to offer any meaningful support for independent farmers – who face increasing challenges from low prices, trade wars and the climate crisis – and the communities they feed'. For British farmers, Trump's comments may sound flattering, but they come from a leader whose policies have been blamed for destabilising large swathes of the farming sector in the US. Many US farmers are keen to point out the dangers of short-term populism rather than long-term resilience and fairness. Nevertheless political sound bites continue to rule the airwaves. Glen Barclay is a member of The Scottish Farmer news team
