Trump's attempts at damage control on Epstein are just making things worse
The supine Republican Congress abruptly adjourned for the summer to flee the incessant demands for the release of files in the possession of the Department of Justice. But three Republicans broke to vote with Democrats on the House oversight committee to demand the Epstein files. The speaker, Mike Johnson, abandoning his assigned role as a Trump echo chamber, blurted, 'This is not a hoax,' directly contradicting Trump. Johnson's plain statement prompted widespread jaw dropping.
With every rattled excuse, Trump throws his administration into further chaos. His cabinet members are pitted against each other – the attorney general, Pam Bondi, versus the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, a pair of scorpions in a bottle.
Trump has succeeded in driving Bondi from her regular perch on Fox News, as his reliable apologist, into virtual seclusion. She has reportedly engaged in a screaming match with the deputy director of the FBI, Dan Bongino, a former far-right talkshow jock who made his bones parroting that the Epstein files held the secrets of a vast conspiracy to blackmail deep state actors. After she issued a statement that there was no such 'client list', he apparently sulked at home, declining to come into the office, upset that his reputation was being sullied with his former Maga listeners. Bondi accused him of leaking unfavorable stories to the media that blamed her for the Maga backlash against her announcement. The manosphere bigmouth, sensitive about his hurt feelings, was in a tizzy, oh dear.
'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing,' Trump said on 15 July about whether Bondi had told him his name was in the files. 'I would say that, you know, these files were made up by [the former FBI director James] Comey, they were made up by [Barack] Obama, they were made up by the Biden administration.' The next day he posted on Truth Social that 'Radical Left Democrats' and 'the Fake News' were behind 'the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax'.
A week later, on 23 July, the Wall Street Journal reported that Bondi had briefed Trump in May that his name appeared in the Epstein files. Which also raised the question: what did Elon Musk know and from whom did he know it when he tweeted in June that Trump's name was in the files, a tweet he quickly deleted after he had played arsonist? Did Bondi and the FBI director, Kash Patel, inform him about Trump's presence in the Epstein documents? Where else would he have gotten the idea?
Into the death valley of parched alibis stepped Tulsi Gabbard to win Trump's affection with a press conference orchestrated at the White House on the same day the Journal punctured Trump's lie about Bondi briefing him on the Epstein files. Gabbard was there to expose a 'treasonous conspiracy' of Obama administration officials who supposedly plotted to manufacture the 'Russiagate' scandal that Putin sought to help Trump in the 2016 election, which was a fact. Her presentation was a farrago of falsehoods. She conflated Russian interference with false claims that Obama fabricated information about Russian hacking of voting machines and other fairytales. Gabbard also triumphantly unveiled a report that Hillary Clinton was on a 'daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers', which was sheer propaganda concocted by Russian intelligence long debunked as 'objectively false' by the FBI.
Gabbard's performance unselfconsciously portrayed herself as a useful idiot for Russian spies. Trump was ecstatic. 'She's, like, hotter than everybody. She's the hottest one in the room right now,' he said. He posted that the Democrats 'are playing another Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax but, this time, under the guise of what we will call the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM'.
Bondi was reportedly frustrated with Gabbard. Bondi had been given little warning that Gabbard's work would be dumped in her lap 'for criminal referral', apparently in order to satisfy Trump's appetite for revenge. Bondi had been the catalyst of the 'client list' pseudo-scandal, claiming it was sitting on her desk. Always ready to gratify Trump's whims, she was not prepared to be sideswiped by Gabbard. In the pursuit of Trump's favor, one lackey lapped another.
Bondi finessed the situation by appointing a special 'strike force' to examine and undoubtedly dismiss yet again Trump's attempt to blot out the conclusive official reports, from the Mueller report to the report by the Senate intelligence committee, chaired by then senator Marco Rubio, that had documented his campaign's involvement with Russian agents in 2016. Bondi appeared to be seething in announcing the 'strike force', going out of her way to describe Gabbard as 'my friend'. The grueling Trump cabinet dance marathon goes round and round until they drop.
To demonstrate Obama's supposed guilt, Trump posted an AI-generated video showing Obama forced to his knees and shackled in chains by federal agents before a seated and smiling Trump in the Oval Office to the soundtrack of the song YMCA. Trump apparently thinks that depicting himself as an enslaver, President Simon Legree, is a positive image that can deflect questions about his sexually predatory behavior and Epstein relationship.
'He's done criminal acts,' said Trump about Obama, and he mused, 'There's no question about it, but he has immunity. He owes me big.' Trump was referring to the supreme court's ruling granting him 'absolute' immunity for 'official acts' that wound up relieving him of prosecution for the January 6 insurrection. As Trump explained it, he was responsible for the decision, at least through justices he had appointed, and Obama was indebted to him over 'crimes' that Trump himself had made up to make the Epstein shadow disappear.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Then, after Trump tried the certain loser of a gambit of requesting the release of the Epstein grand jury material, which would almost certainly contain nothing new and was inevitably denied by the judge, he turned to another tactic. Suddenly, the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, who had been Trump's personal attorney in the Stormy Daniels hush-money trial, in which Trump was convicted of 34 felonies, was sent racing to Tallahassee to interview Epstein's imprisoned co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.
No mere professional prosecutor would do for this high-level mission. Instead, in an unprecedented move, the deputy attorney general would conduct the interrogation. The case, in fact, was closed after Maxwell's indictment for perjury, conviction for sex-trafficking minors and 20-year sentence. Yet Blanche stated, sloppily misspelling her first name in his haste, 'If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' He said that Maxwell can 'finally say what really happened', as if she would perhaps prove the existence of the fictional 'client list' or some version of it to incriminate the enemies it contained, or clear Trump as a gentleman beyond reproach.
Blanche's remark seemed to dangle a pardon or clemency. Asked about the possibility, Trump said, 'I'm allowed to do it.' Curiously, on 14 July, the solicitor general, D John Sauer, who was Trump's lawyer in the presidential immunity case before the US court of appeals, had filed a brief to the supreme court opposing relief that Maxwell had requested. 'From about 1994 to 2004, petitioner 'coordinated, facilitated, and contributed to' the multimillionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of numerous young women and underage girls,' Sauer wrote. She could not be exempt from her conviction on the basis of Epstein's first trial agreement as she claimed; she had been fairly tried, convicted and the matter was closed.
But the acceleration of the Epstein backlash apparently flipped the administration's position. Now, Blanche gave Maxwell a grant of limited immunity. Her attorney, David O Markus, was a good friend of Blanche's. In the Stormy Daniels hush-money case, he had offered Blanche the advice that he should impeach Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal attorney, as a witness against him, by characterizing him as 'GLOAT' –the 'Greatest Liar of All Time'. In 2024, Blanche appeared twice on Markus's little-watched podcast. 'I consider you a friend,' said Blanche.
Blanche asked Maxwell over two days about 100 people, according to Markus. Who those people might be, what she was asked and what she said remain unknown. One wonders, for example, if Blanche inquired about her knowledge of Trump's adventures in the dressing rooms of underaged models and beyond.
One prominent model agent, quoted in a 2023 story in Variety, 'Inside the Fashion World's Dark Underbelly of Sexual and Financial Exploitation: 'Modeling Agencies Are Like Pimps for Rich People,'' said that Trump was 'certainly' a 'fixture'. 'I would see Donald Trump backstage at [Fashion Week home] Bryant Park, and I'm like, 'Why is he standing there when there's a 13-year-old changing?' In 1992, Trump got George Houraney, a Florida businessman, to sponsor a 'calendar girl' competition with 28 young models who were flown to Mar-a-Lago. But there were reportedly only two guests. 'It was him and Epstein,' Houraney said to the New York Times. 'I said, 'Donald, this is supposed to be a party with VIPs. You're telling me it's you and Epstein?''
One of those models, Karen Mulder, who had appeared on the cover of Vogue the year before and was considered among the most elite supermodels, described her experience with Trump and Epstein as 'disgusting', according to the Miami Herald.
A year later, in 1993, Epstein brought a Sport Illustrated swimsuit model, Stacey Williams, to Trump Tower. She had met the future president at a Christmas party in 1992. 'It became very clear then that he and Donald were really, really good friends and spent a lot of time together,' Williams told the Guardian. 'The second he was in front of me,' she recounted to CNN in 2024, 'he pulled me into him, and his hands were just on me and didn't come off. And then the hands started moving, and they were on the, you know, on the side of my breasts, on my hips, back down to my butt, back up, sort of then, you know – they were just on me the whole time. And I froze. I couldn't understand what was going on.' While Trump groped her, he kept talking to Epstein, and they were 'looking at each other and smiling'.
Markus said: 'We haven't spoken to the president or anybody about a pardon just yet.' Still, he added: 'The president this morning said he had the power to do so. We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way.'
The House oversight committee has subpoenaed Maxwell for a deposition on 11 August, but she has not decided yet whether to cooperate, her lawyer said.
While Blanche hurried back to Washington, Trump appeared to have depleted his armory of conspiracy theories, at least for the moment. He tried a novel tack, his most audacious projection yet. 'I'm not focused on conspiracy theories that you are,' he admonished the White House press corps. Then he made a remark that he had never made before, something contrary to his entire character, which underscored the depth of his anxiety. 'Don't,' he said, 'talk about Trump.'
But Trump quickly recovered from the tension of his momentary reticence, and on the evening of 26 July, from Scotland, where he was touring his golf courses, he posted that Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey and Al Sharpton should be prosecuted for their endorsement of Kamala Harris in exchange for payments of millions of dollars. 'They should all be prosecuted!' he demanded. Though a bogus accusation, it accurately reflected Trump's crudely transactional worldview. A few hours later, in the early morning of Sunday 27 July, he posted a Fox News clip of the rightwing talker Mark Levin, writing in capital letters: 'THIS IS A MASSIVE OBAMA SCANDAL!'
Sidney Blumenthal, a former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth. He is a Guardian US columnist and co-host of The Court of History podcast
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump introduces new wave of tariffs
The Trump administration announced a new trade policy and tariff plan, setting different rates based on a country's trade balance with the US. Goods from countries with a trade surplus will face a 10 per cent tariff, while those with a trade deficit will be subject to at least a 15 per cent tariff. More than a dozen nations with the highest trade deficits, including Syria (41 per cent) and Switzerland (39 per cent), will face tariffs exceeding 15 per cent. The tariff on Canadian goods increased from 25 per cent to 35 per cent, with the White House citing Canada's "continued inaction and retaliation." The new policy, initially set for 1 August, has been delayed until 7 August to allow US Customs and Border Protection time to implement the changes.
New Statesman
44 minutes ago
- New Statesman
What John Swinney gets right about Scottish independence
He came, he saw, he putted. Donald Trump's visit to Scotland was the expected whirlwind – a golfing trip during which he fitted in some diplomacy (if that's the right word with this president) with the leaders of the EU, the UK and Scotland. Trump clearly enjoyed himself, to the extent that he suggested he could become first minister once he's done with the US and the rest of the world. That joke raised quite the entertaining vision, as did his description of Scotland as a land of 'no crime, no muggings. You don't have people being hit over the head when they are not looking with a baseball bat, they're not pushed into a subway.' Not at the five-star Turnberry resort, anyway. John Swinney had two chances to beard Trump, at a dinner and then at a head-to-head, and spoke to him about whisky tariffs and the ongoing crisis in Gaza. For all Trump's unpopularity, meeting the leader of the free world is the kind of moment that elevates any first minister. The far left carps, as the far left does, but Swinney was right to take his opportunity. He behaved like a grown up. That, so far, has been the mark of Swinney's time in office. These things are relative, but he has been a moderating force, dragging his party back to the centre ground after the leftist administrations of Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Much of his attention is on fixing the NHS – he has a plan, and we will see whether it bears fruit (it had better). There is also a focus on growing the economy. To many, these are obvious priorities for government activity, but it has not always been like that in Scotland. There is a limit to how long any SNP leader can get away with talking about anything other than independence, of course, and the First Minister is as committed to his party's raison d'etre as the most passionate activist. It is his life's work, and even his moderation is merely a means of achieving that goal. Whatever an SNP government does, it is always based on what it thinks will best advance the cause of breaking up the UK. True to form, Swinney has now unveiled the latest strategy for getting to indy. There have been so many of these in recent years that voters are understandably confused about what the offer is. A de facto referendum, 60 per cent backing for separation in the polls over a sustained period, a majority of Scottish seats for the SNP at Westminster – each has been proposed as a route since the turn of the decade. None has lasted. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Swinney has, in effect, returned to 2011. That was when Alex Salmond won a surprise overall majority at Holyrood, providing the legitimacy and momentum that led David Cameron to accede to the 2014 referendum. The SNP is going back to the future. The First Minister said that, once again, securing a majority in Edinburgh is the way to a second referendum. There are 129 seats at Holyrood, meaning the party would have to win 65 of them. The alleged transformation of Scotland that would come with independence 'only happens if we have that referendum and we only get that referendum if a majority of SNP MSPs are elected next May,' Swinney said. He insists independence will be at the heart of his party's election campaign, but it's hard to see his strategy as anything other than kicking the can down the road. That's certainly how the hardliners are viewing it, lining up to criticize the FM's approach as weak and defeatist. Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary and a critic of the administration, said it was 'more about trying to save the SNP's bacon'. This is probably true, but that does not mean it lacks sense. Swinney has an election to win, which would take the Nats into their third consecutive decade of governance, and he will not do so with alarming promises of constitutional upheaval whatever the outcome. Sturgeon tried that, and it helped do for her. Voters – or most of them – are not looking at next May as a chance to refight the independence battles. They are worried about the cost of living, the state of the health service, jobs, transport and other policy areas that impact their day to day lives. They are nervous about the international climate, and are seeking security. They are fed up with politicians of all stripes. They are exhausted by the indy permawar, and would appreciate a break from all politics having to be squeezed through that funnel. Swinney's mature approach is to understand this, and to attempt to meet the electorate on its preferred terrain. A wise leader knows which fights to pick, and when. This is not the moment for William Wallace and saltire face-paint and screams of 'freedom'. It is not the time for 'one last push'. The SNP will not win 65 seats next May. It will be an unprecedentedly divided parliament, with Reform joining its ranks. There will be a minority administration, which will be formed by either the Nats or Labour. Swinney's independence plan is really an attempt to draw as much of the separatist support to the SNP, away from the Greens and Alba, so maximizing his party's performance. For the independence movement, if its members would only accept it, this is a time to regroup, rethink, and play a longer game. The First Minister, at least, seems to see this clearly. [See more: Maga zealots want to redraft the Civil Rights Act] Related
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's trade war returns America to the 1930s
Like many small American business owners, Beth Benike started the year with high hopes about America's improving economy. But in June, she stopped paying herself a salary, a sign of the dark turn the US economy has taken since Donald Trump launched his trade war. 'I'm going to have to cash out my retirement just to stay operational,' says the 48-year-old owner of Busy Baby, an infant products company. 'I am paying my mortgage with my savings.' A string of trade deals struck by Mr Trump in recent days have been hailed by his supporters as major wins for the US economy –and serious humiliations for America's trading partners, such as the European Union. But try telling that to ordinary Americans. The trade agreements, which include 15pc tariffs on the likes of the EU, Japan and South Korea, masks a brutal reality for many businesses. As these new deals come into effect on Friday, US charges on imported goods are about to hit their highest level since the 1930s. And the toll on any company that imports goods will be huge, with many already fighting for their lives. Like many US companies, Busy Baby had been booming before Trump's April 2 tariffs announcement. It was selling around 200,000 products a year and securing shelf space at retail giant like Target and Walmart. But the president's tariffs hammered companies like Busy Baby, which imports goods from China. Benike had two containers of stock that were just about to leave China, just before Trump hit the country with a 145pc tariff. Benike held her goods in China until the tariff rate fell to 30pc, when she finally took the hit. The tariffs on that shipment cost her $35,000 (£26,000). And she is not alone. Before Trump took office, America's effective tariff (the average rate charged across all goods imports) was 2.3pc, according to Capital Economics. As of Thursday, this figure had multiplied six times over to 14.6pc. On Friday, it will hit 16.3pc. This is roughly half the 31.6pc effective rate that was briefly in place under the 'liberation day' tariffs of April 2 that Trump quickly suspended, but it will still be the highest level on record since 1936. Tariffs on goods imports from China are still charged at 30pc under a temporary reprieve that is due to expire on Aug 12, with no sign yet of a new deal. Benike raised money through GoFundMe to cover the cost of her China shipment, but this did not make up for the fact that she had been out of stock for six weeks, which meant no cash flow. As things stand, her shipment for the Christmas season will incur a $52,000 tariff fee. 'It is a huge chunk of money. That is not at all sustainable for us,' she says. Small businesses will bear the worst of the tariffs blow because they do not have the cash reserves or economies of scale to absorb the new charges, says Richard Trent, executive director of the Main Street Alliance, a small business industry group. 'They have to eat the losses, pass them onto consumers, or shutter altogether. The outlook is bleak on Main Street,' he says. Big business is hurting too. And for some of America's biggest companies, the tariff bills are not tens of thousands of dollars but multiple billions. Carmaker Ford made a $36m loss between April and June, compared with a $1.8bn profit during the same period a year earlier, because it had to pay $800m in tariff costs. It warned that it expected to pay at least $2bn on tariffs over the full year. Although Ford manufactures its cars within the US, it imports many of the parts and materials – many of which are subject to Trump's 50pc tariffs on steel and aluminium. General Motors, another major US carmaker, said last week that tariffs had knocked $1.1bn off its operating income in Q2. Household goods giant Procter & Gamble similarly warned this week of a $1bn hit to its profits from tariffs and said it will begin making price rises on a quarter of its products from next month. 'There isn't any getting away from the fact this is a huge, huge increase in the US tariff rate,' says Brian Coulton, the chief economist at Fitch Ratings. The real economic toll is still yet to come, says Coulton. Over the next six months, businesses will pass on much more of the cost of tariffs onto consumers, he says. This will drive up inflation, and dampen real wage growth. In turn, it will drag on consumer spending, the engine of the American economy. 'It's certainly a pretty sharp slowdown,' Coulton adds. The impact of the trade war is harder to detect. Big swings in trade because of Trump's tariffs have created wild swings in data on US economic growth. As businesses raced to stockpile before Trump's tariff announcements, imports soared. This was the main reason why US GDP fell by 0.5pc in the first three months of the year. When imports slumped after tariffs were introduced, the opposite happened and GDP rose by 3pc. Underneath these two figures sits a clearer picture of the state of the US economy. Growth across the first six months of the year averaged 1.2pc, less than half the 2.5pc recorded last year. As American consumers and companies count the cost of Trump's tariffs, countries around the world are also weighing up who won and who lost in the dash to make deals. According to David Henig, from the European Centre for International Political Economy, one of the surprise victors has been carmakers such as BMW, Volkswagen, Kia and Toyota. 'Everyone assumed that if Trump was going to go for anything, it would be cars. But the carmakers of the EU, Japan and Korea did far better than they were probably expecting,' he said. Trump initially levied a punishing 27.5pc tariff on the sector, and demanded to see more manufacturing brought to American shores. But in his deals with Japan, South Korea and the EU, the auto sector was included in the broad 15pc tariff. That could be a smaller hit than US carmakers such as Ford and General Motors are facing from Mr Trump's 50pc levy on imported steel and aluminium. Ben May, from Oxford Economics, says some countries with relatively punishing tariff rates could end up doing better than expected, if their exporters diversified away from the US into new and more profitable markets. And some countries with higher tariff rates, including India, relied less on exports to the US than others such as the EU and Vietnam – so they might take a smaller hit to their economies even with that higher rate. But nobody knows for sure, especially as the deals are largely just in-principle agreements, 'Because there are no legal obligations being drawn up, what's to stop Trump, for instance, from turning around and demanding something different in a few days or weeks or months?' May says. As for Benike, she spent months looking at whether she could manufacture her goods in the US but found it would be impossibly expensive. Instead, she is shifting to overseas sales in different markets. Next week, she will launch her products in South Korea and she is exploring selling in the EU, Canada, Mexico and Australia. 'There's babies all over the world,' she says. 'Hopefully we can sell enough products globally to stay in business.'
