
No to Iran's Regime, No to Israel's War
Sepideh Qolian, a 30-year-old Iranian labor activist, spent two years in Tehran's Evin Prison, where she wrote two books, one of them a celebrated prison memoir in the form of a baking cookbook. Just last week, Qolian was released—and three days later, Israeli missiles and drones began striking targets inside Iran.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has addressed the Iranian people, telling them that his war can help them free themselves from their oppressive government. 'This is your opportunity to stand up,' he said. Curious how Iranian opposition activists were responding to this message, I called Qolian.
'I know that war won't bring democracy,' she told me. She was active in the Women, Life, Freedom movement against compulsory veiling in 2022–23, and she told me that Netanyahu is no champion of the movement's values. 'The life that we wanted is the mirror opposite of the terrible events that are now happening,' she said. But the war hadn't endeared Iran's leadership to her, either—she blames its aggressive policies for the country's predicament.
That Iran has a substantial population opposed to its system of government is well known and has been oft-proved through cycles of protest and repression. The Women, Life, Freedom movement was one dramatic iteration. It followed economically motivated protests in 2017–19, the sweeping pro-democracy Green Movement in 2009–10, a student uprising in 1999, and an electorally based movement for reform covering nearly all the years since 1997. Iranians have been outspoken inside the country and across an ever-growing diaspora against the Islamic Republic's human-rights abuses, constriction of personal freedoms, economic mismanagement, and belligerent foreign policy.
For years, the debate outside Iran was theoretical: Would a military strike on the country help its people topple a hated regime, or would it cause even oppositionists to rally 'round the flag in their nation's defense? Now the answer to this question is being determined by the hour, and it is neither binary nor simple. Even ardent anti-regime activists I spoke with were hard-pressed to support Israeli attacks that have already killed almost 200 civilians, according to Iran's health ministry. Some had cheered the killings of certain repressive military figures in the early hours of the strikes, but the mood has since turned to terror, the priority simple survival.
Tehran is a dense city of 9.8 million. As Israel strikes targets across the Iranian capital as well as in other cities, it hits civil-society figures associated with the country's protest movement alongside officials and nuclear scientists. Parnia Abbasi, 23, a poet and an English teacher, was killed together with her parents and brother on the first day of the air campaign; the target of the strike that killed them was a regime official in a nearby building. Zahra Shams, 35, was a devout Muslim who wore the hijab by choice but vocally opposed its enforcement on others, even tweeting in support of the anti-hijab protests in 2022. She was killed in a strike intended for a regime official who lived in her apartment building.
Most of the activists I spoke with—about a dozen—blamed the war largely on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and evinced no political support for his regime. Nor were they supportive of Iran's attacks on Israel, which have already killed at least 23 Israeli civilians, injured hundreds more, and sent thousands of people to bomb shelters every night. But they in no way welcomed the Israeli strikes on their country. They worried about their own safety—and also about societal collapse and the destruction of Iran's infrastructure.
'I oppose the Islamic Republic and Khamenei with all my being,' a 24-year-old activist, who asked that I withhold her name out of concern for her safety, told me from Tehran. 'I took part in many demonstrations during the Women, Life, Freedom movement. But now I can't even think about the regime or overthrowing it. I am scared. I am worried. I fear for the life of myself and everyone around me.'
A 26-year-old activist who was arrested during the 2022–23 protests told me that she was emphatically opposed to the Israeli strikes. 'The war goes beyond the regime,' she said in a phone call. 'It has massive negative consequences for our country. It is destroying the economy. It can lead to hunger, shortage of medicine, cutting connections with abroad. It is a total disaster. It is killing innocent people in both Israel and Iran.'
One young activist was busy trying to escape the capital with her elderly and sick mother when I called. They were heading north, to the coast of Caspian Sea, an area thought to be safer from attacks. 'I can't think about activism under the sound of drones and missiles, can I?' she asked me rhetorically. 'I don't support the targeting of civilians anywhere, whether in Iran or Israel.'
Alireza Ghadimi, a sociology student and activist at the University of Tehran, was still in his dorm when I caught up with him. His campus has a long history as an epicenter of protest, both against the Shah during the revolution and against the Islamic Republic, which crushed student protests there in 1999. 'I carry this history with me,' Ghadimi said, 'and it now feels terrifyingly alive.' He described the sounds of explosions, the shaking of walls, frightened voices outside. 'I am one of many young Iranians who want change,' he said. 'But this war is not helping us. It is destroying us. It is silencing the very people it claims to save.'
Prominent figures in Iran's movement for democracy have also come out against both the war and the regime. From his prison cell in Evin, former Deputy Interior Minister Mostafa Tajzadeh condemned the Israeli attacks and called for an immediate cease-fire. But he also called for 'a peaceful transition to democracy' in Iran. The Nobel peace laureates Shirin Ebadi and Narges Mohammadi were joined by five other activists (including the director Jafar Panahi, who last month won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival) in issuing a call for an immediate end to the war and condemning the attacks on civilians by both Iran and Israel. They also called for an end to Iran's enrichment of uranium and for a democratic transition.
The Islamic Republic has decades of protest movements and crackdowns behind it, and with those, a globe-spanning diaspora of opposition exiles. Most of the people I spoke with were of a fairly like mind with their counterparts inside Iran. A young activist in Europe, who asked that I withhold her name because she frequently visits Iran, told me that she understood the glee that greeted the first killings of regime military figures. Still, she said, 'anybody who's seen what Israel has done in Gaza, Lebanon, and even Syria recently would know that Netanyahu is not seeking stability in the region. He is hitting Iran's refineries and power stations, so he is clearly not thinking about our people.'
For a more seasoned opinion, I spoke with one of my political heroes, the 80-year-old human-rights lawyer Mehrangiz Kar. She helped organize the fight against the mandatory hijab right at the Islamic Republic's inception in 1979 and has been a voice for democracy and the rule of law ever since. She was hounded out of Iran about 20 years ago and now lives in Washington, D.C.
'When I see the Israeli strikes on Iran today, I feel like I am seeing the burning of my very own house,' she told me. 'They are targeting my homeland. This isn't acceptable, no matter who is doing the attacks. No such attack is acceptable under international law.'
Kar told me she blames Khamenei for having made an enemy out of Israel for decades. But she made clear that Netanyahu is no friend to Iran's freedom fighters. 'Nobody I spoke to in Iran supports these attacks,' she said. 'People are angry, and they hate the Islamic Republic. But they now probably hate Mr. Netanyahu and his military policies even more.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
U.S. Tanker Aircraft Head to Middle East as Threat of Iran War Rises
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Air Force aerial refueling aircraft are heading for the Middle East amid an escalating war between Israel and Iran and the possibility that U.S. forces could also become involved, according to flight data tracking sources. Newsweek has reached out to the Pentagon for comment. Why It Matters The U.S. is redeploying military forces as the conflict between Israel and Iran stretched over the week, raising tensions between Washington and Tehran. The American repositioning could be a sign of an increased possibility that it gets involved in an attack on Iran although Washington has so far said that it is not joining Israel in striking Iran. U.S. President Donald Trump had previously not ruled out military action if Iran did not agree to curbs on its nuclear program. Iran has also blamed the United States for Israel's attacks though has not repeated earlier threats of attacking U.S. bases in the region. The USAF Thunderbirds mid-air refueling during the Atlantic City, NJ Air Show on August 24, 2022 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The USAF Thunderbirds mid-air refueling during the Atlantic City, NJ Air Show on August 24, 2022 in Atlantic City, New To Know KC-135R Stratotankers and KC-46A Pegasus tankers, commonly used during transatlantic deployments and support for combat aircraft appeared to be heading to the Middle East through Europe, data from Flightradar 24 showed. More than two dozen U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers took off from bases across the U.S. and headed east over the Atlantic, The War Zone reported earlier. The U.S. Navy's aircraft carrier USS Nimitz has also appeared to be heading toward the Middle East from Asia. "Over the weekend, I directed the deployment of additional capabilities to the United States Central Command Area of Responsibility," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on X on Monday. — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (@SecDef) June 16, 2025 Messaging from Trump has been fluctuating, with earlier remarks expressing hope for a "real end" to the conflict—and before that describing a nuclear deal with Tehran as achievable—to telling reporters aboard Air Force One he was not in "too much in the mood to negotiate" with Iran. Following Israeli strikes on Iranian territory last week, Iran retaliated with missile attacks targeting Israeli cities, resulting in civilian casualties on both sides. Tehran has held Washington responsible for Israel's offensive, after previously warning of a regional response that could include U.S. targets. Britain is deploying additional RAF Typhoon jets and refueling aircraft to the Middle East for "contingency support," Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced, according to the BBC. What People Are Saying U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Fox News: "Right now, we've got assets in the region and we're going to defend them. We're strong, we're prepared, we're defensive ... President Trump hopes there can be peace." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday: "This is what Israel is doing with the support, the clear support of the President of the United States, Donald Trump, and the American people and many others in the world. So, with God's help and with the goodwill and resolution of all free societies, we shall win." Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Sean Parnell wrote on X: "American Forces are maintaining their defensive posture & that has not changed. We will protect American troops & our interests." What Happens Next Trump, who made an early exit from the G7 summit on Monday against the backdrop of Israel-Iran escalation, is expected to convene with the National Security Council. This could give a clearer picture of whether the United States becomes involved in attacks on Iran. Any Iranian attack on U.S. forces could well also bring the United States into the war.


CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
‘A real end' better than a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Trump says
President Donald Trump said early Tuesday he's seeking 'a real end' to the conflict between Israel and Iran, arguing that outcome would be preferable to a ceasefire while also suggesting his patience for negotiations is wearing thin. The comments, made to reporters as he returned to Washington after abruptly cutting short his time at the Group of 7 summit in Canada, offered the latest window into Trump's thinking as he weighs options for US involvement in the ongoing conflict. Trump was due to meet later Tuesday with members of his national security team in the White House Situation Room. Israel has been pressing Trump to become more involved in its campaign to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, which top officials from the country have said would require American weapons and planes. The president offered little clarity on whether he would accede to that pressure, which has been countered by loud voices within his own party encouraging him to avoid getting dragged into another foreign conflict. Trump has offered somewhat mixed messages as the back-and-forth between Iran and Israel enters its fifth day. While he has encouraged Tehran to return to diplomatic talks meant to curb its nuclear ambitions, he is also warning Iranians to urgently evacuate their capital city and dismissing reports that he is reaching out to Iran for talks. 'I didn't say I was looking for a ceasefire,' he said aboard Air Force One. 'We're looking for better than a ceasefire.' He said his objective in Iran was 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire,' or 'giving up entirely.' Trump has said previously that Iran must abandon its nuclear program, and alleged Tuesday that Iran was 'very close' to developing a nuclear weapon, despite assessments from his own intelligence chiefs that such an outcome was not imminent. Asked if there's any guarantee that US bombs could actually reach underground Iranian nuclear bunkers and destroy them, Trump said, 'There's no guarantee in anything.' While officials told CNN on Monday that Trump had directed his team, including special envoy Steve Witkoff, to attempt meeting with Iranian negotiators as soon as this week, the president sounded non-committal on renewing talks. While Trump said he was considering dispatching Witkoff and Vice President JD Vance for negotiations, he said it would 'depend on what happens when I get back.' 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate,' he said later, adding he expects the next 48 hours will reveal more about whether Israel plans to slow down or accelerate its attacks on Iran. 'Nobody's slowed up so far,' Trump said. Asked about his Monday night social media post calling for everyone in the Iranian capital Tehran to evacuate, he said there was no specific threat to the city of roughly 10 million. 'I want people to be safe,' he said. 'That's always possible something could happen. I just want people to be safe.' And he issued a warning to Iran that targeting American troops in the region would lead to a dramatic escalation in the conflict. 'We'll come down so hard, it'd be gloves off,' he said in response. Upon arriving back to the White House Tuesday morning, Trump posted a message he'd received from his ambassador in Israel, Mike Huckabee, acknowledging the president had 'many voices speaking to you' but encouraging him to be open to divine intervention. 'I believe you will hear from heaven and that voice is far more important than mine or ANYONE else's,' Huckabee wrote.


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
O'Reilly: Trump believes Iran will surrender
Conservative political pundit Bill O'Reilly said President Trump wants to see a full surrender from Iran in its ongoing military conflict with Israel over Tehran's nuclear pursuits, adding that he believes that's how the latest skirmish will end. '(Trump) doesn't want to use American air power at this point – because that would cause some problems with China and (Russia),' O'Reilly said Monday evening on NewsNation's 'On Balance' with host Leland Vittert. 'He would rather have the Iranians surrender, which he believes they will.' 'What President Trump's strategy is, is to play this out a little longer because Israel is getting stronger while Iran is getting weaker,' he added. O'Reilly, author of the upcoming book 'Confronting Evil' about vicious historical figures, said he had been texting with Trump on Monday as Israel and Iran traded air strikes for almost five straight days. '(Trump) believes that the mullahs are through; they will have to sign a deal,' O'Reilly continued. 'The deal will be that the weapons inspectors go into all of the places that are working on the nuke, they identify what they have, and then the Iranians themselves, under supervision of the United Nations, would destroy a lot of their arsenal.' 'The mullahs don't want to do that, obviously, but President Trump believes that will happen,' the former Fox News host added. Trump departed the Group of Seven (G7) summit of world leaders in Canada late Monday — a day earlier than expected to return to Washington to monitor the ongoing conflict. O'Reilly's personal conversation with the president echos what Trump told reporters early Tuesday when he described what he was seeking as a 'complete give-up' by Iran. 'I'm not looking for a ceasefire; we're looking at better than a ceasefire,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One his return flight. 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon — it's very simple.' The Middle Eastern nations have exchanged attacks since Thursday, when the Israeli military carried out a surprise strike on Iranian nuclear facilities and killed multiple top military leaders and scientists. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump warned residents of Tehran to evacuate Monday, after the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) had taken out Iran's air defense systems, giving them clear airspace to continue strikes. Netanyahu has said he wouldn't rule out targeting Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but Trump reportedly tried to dissuade Israel's leader from moving forward with an assassination plot. The president has not ruled out the possibility of the U.S. military getting involved.