Uttam urges Centre not to allow modifications to Polavaram
He alleged that the AP government's actions represent consistent violations of environmental clearances and tribunal allocations, calling them detrimental to riparian interests and legally untenable.
In his letter on Monday, Mr. Uttam stated that Andhra Pradesh has carried out massive deviations in both the Krishna and Godavari basins by enlarging the scope of several components of the PIP, in violation of the permissions accorded by the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal Award (GWDTA) and the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). He recalled that the Polavaram project originally received Environmental Clearance from MoEF under letter No. J-12011/74/2005-IA-1 dated October 25, 2005. However, the Andhra Pradesh government later implemented extensive changes without obtaining fresh clearance, prompting the Ministry to issue a 'Stop Work Order' on February 8, 2011.
Although the order was issued due to the unapproved changes in the project's scope, it was kept in abeyance and has been repeatedly extended, most recently until July 2, 2026. This allowed the works to continue despite objections raised not only by Telangana but also by Odisha and Chhattisgarh.
The Minister further pointed out that the Polavaram project, after being granted 'National Project' status by the government of India, continues to receive reimbursement of expenditures, but only for components that were approved under the original scope. 'Yet the AP government has proceeded with major infrastructural modifications,' he wrote.
Mr. Uttam Kumar Reddy referred to the Supreme Court's order dated September 6, 2022, which clearly observed that 'there are some technical reports available but more may be required depending on the expansion of the project. Similarly, the issue of the environmental clearances would also have to be addressed.' The Court had also suggested that the Minister of Jal Shakti and MoEF&CC play a pioneering role by convening a meeting of all stakeholders to resolve the contentious issues.
In his communication, the Minister warned that AP has gone far beyond the approved project parameters. 'The connectivity to draw water from the head sluice of the Polavaram Right Main Canal (PIPRMC) is now being designed for 40,000 cusecs, while the original design was for 20,000 cusecs. Twin tunnels, each with a discharge capacity of 20,000 cusecs, are under execution, and the infrastructure at the headworks has already been created accordingly,' he pointed out.
He added that the PIPRMC is being executed with a drawal capacity of 17,560 cusecs against the DPR-approved 11,654 cusecs. Similarly, the Polavaram Left Main Canal (PIPLMC) is being constructed with the same 17,560 cusecs capacity, though only 8,123 cusecs were originally approved.
He stressed that these changes in drawal capacities and the 'extensive alterations in the dimensional features of the project components' amount to a complete redesign of the project, undertaken without requisite clearances or approvals.
The Minister strongly urged the MoEF&CC not to undertake any appraisal of the Andhra Pradesh government's project proposal in the forthcoming meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC). 'In view of all the above, especially in the interest of justice, it is requested not to undertake any appraisal of this project proposal and outrightly reject the grant of ToR in the upcoming meeting of EAC,' he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Cannot ignore Pahalgam': SC on plea to restore Jammu and Kashmir statehood
The Supreme Court, while considering a plea for restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, on Thursday said that ground realities in the Union Territory, including incidents such as the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, cannot be ignored, Live Law reported. A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran was hearing an application seeking directions to the Union government to restore statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. The plea argued that the delay in restoring statehood was hurting the rights of citizens, Bar and Bench reported. The Bharatiya Janata Party-led Union government had abrogated Article 370, which gave special status to the erstwhile state, in August 2019. It also bifurcated the state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. In December 2023, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 2019 order abrogating Article 370 and ordered the Union government to restore statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. During the hearing on Thursday, the petitioners argued that the court, in its 2023 judgment, had relied on the Union government's assurance that statehood would be granted after the Assembly elections. The elections held in September and October 2024 were the first in Jammu and Kashmir in a decade and the first since the abrogation of Article 370. 'You can't ignore what happened in Pahalgam,' Live Law quoted the court as having told the petitioners. The terror attack at Baisaran near Pahalgam town in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22 left 26 persons dead and 16 injured. The terrorists targeted tourists after asking their names to ascertain their religion, the police said. All but three of those killed were Hindu. Meanwhile, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Union government, opposed the plea on Thursday. 'We assured statehood after elections,' Live Law quoted Mehta as saying. 'There is a peculiar position of this part of our country. I don't know why this issue is agitated now. This particular state is not the correct state to muddy the water.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
44 minutes ago
- First Post
Mandaviya namedrops Pakistan as National Sports Governance Bill puts restrictions on international participation: 'Safeguard for extraordinary circumstances'
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya cited the example of Indian cricket teams not touring Pakistan since 2008, adding that the National Sports Governance Bill, which cleared both houses of the Parliament earlier this week, empowers the government to 'act decisively and lawfully in such situations'. Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya expects the National Sports Governance Bill to be implemented in the next six months. PTI The National Sports Governance Bill 2025 was passed in the Lok Sabha on Monday nearly three weeks after it was introduced in the Lower House of the Parliament, with Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya hailing the landmark moment as the 'single biggest reform in Indian sports since independence'. The National Anti-Doping Amendment Bill (2025) was also passed by the Lok Sabha at the same time, and the two Sports Bills cleared the Rajya Sabha, the upper house, on the following day. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The implementation of a National Sports Board and a National Sports Tribunal as well as the BCCI's exemption from the RTI Act are among the key takeaways from the Bill, which is set to replace the existing National Sports Development Code of India that was introduced in 2011. Another key provision in the Bill grants the government the ability to 'impose reasonable restrictions' under 'extraordinary circumstances' on the international participation of Indian teams and athletes. The provision appears to be aimed towards Pakistan, India's neighbour to the west that has largely shared hostile relations with New Delhi since the two nations gained independence in 1947. While the sporting relations between the two nations has had its share of ups and downs over the years, it has undergone sharp decline since the 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai in 2008. More recently, the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in April followed by a four-day military conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations has further hit Indo-Pak sporting ties. 'Act formalises the government's ability to act decisively and lawfully' Mandaviya, however, insists that the provision in the NSG Bill does not target 'any particular country', and that it's a 'standard safeguard' against situations that cover national security threats, diplomatic boycotts and other exceptional circumstances. 'The provision empowering the government to stop international participation is a standard safeguard seen in sports laws globally, intended for use in extraordinary circumstances. It covers situations such as national security threats, diplomatic boycotts, or global emergencies, and is not directed against any particular country,' Mandaviya told PTI in his first interview since the two bills cleared both houses of the Parliament. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In practice, decisions regarding sporting engagements with Pakistan have been shaped by broader government policy and security assessments, particularly after major incidents affecting bilateral relations,' he added. The BCCI had refused to send the Indian cricket team to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy earlier this year, forcing their games to be relocated to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. Reuters Mandaviya cited the example of Indian cricket teams refusing to tour Pakistan since the 26/11 attacks as a case in point. '…full senior men's cricket tours to Pakistan have not taken place since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and high-profile matches have often been moved to neutral venues. Such decisions are taken on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the Ministry of External Affairs and security agencies. 'The Act formalises the government's ability to act decisively and lawfully in such situations, while ensuring that any decision remains consistent with India's commitments under the Olympic Charter and the statutes of relevant international sporting bodies. 'This reflects the Modi government's clarity in protecting national interest while upholding global sporting obligations,' Mandaviya added. NSG Bill likely to be fully implemented in six months: Mandaviya Mandaviya, who also serves as the Minister of Labour and Employment, added that the Bill is likely to achieve full implementation in the next six months. 'This bill will be implemented as soon as possible. Within the next six months, all procedures will be completed to ensure 100 percent implementation,' Mandaviya continued. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Creation of posts and other administrative approvals will follow established procedures of the Department of Personnel and Training and the Department of Expenditure. 'The aim is to ensure that both institutions (NSB and NST) are fully functional at the earliest possible date consistent with statutory and procedural requirements,' he added, while reiterating that the bill is 'the single biggest reform in sports since independence,' he added.
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
India's merchandise trade deficit touches $27.35 billion in July
New Delhi: India's merchandise trade deficit touched $27.35 billion in July as exporters braced for Trump's trade offensive with additional duties set to kick in on 27 August. Merchandise exports were $37.24 billion in July, while imports reached $64.59 billion, provisional data from the commerce ministry showed on Thursday. Indian exporters could be among the hardest hit if US President Donald Trump's proposed additional 25% tariff hike on Indian goods take effect this month, unless a breakthrough is reached during the ongoing 21-day negotiation window. About half of India's exports to the US could be affected, especially from labour-intensive sectors like garments, leather, and gems and jewellery, according to Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda. Exports to the US account for about 2% of India's GDP. Trump announced a 25% reciprocal tariff on imported goods from India on 31 July. On 6 August, the US President signed an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff for India's 'direct or indirect' purchase of crude oil from Russia. 'It is estimated that around 55% of the total value of India's merchandise exports to the US is subject to this reciprocal tariff,' Union minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in the Lok Sabha.
