US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Israel over Gaza
Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, destroyed much of the enclave and led to widespread hunger. A global hunger monitor has warned that a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding in the enclave.
The two resolutions were introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent aligned with Democrats. They failed by 73 to 24 and 70 to 27 in the 100-member chamber in voting late on Wednesday night.
Similar measures, also introduced by Sanders, failed by 82-15 and 83-15 in April.
A decades-long tradition of strong bipartisan support for Israel in the US Congress means resolutions to stop weapons sales are unlikely to pass, but backers hope raising the issue will encourage Israel's government and the US administration to do more to protect civilians.
All of the votes for the resolutions came from Democrats, with all of President Donald Trump's fellow Republicans opposed. Sanders said in a statement he was pleased that a majority of the Democratic caucus had backed the effort.
"The tide is turning. The American people do not want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza," Sanders said. "The Democrats are moving forward on this issue, and I look forward to Republican support in the near future."
Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of the Democrats who opposed the Sanders-backed resolutions in April but voted for them this time.
Shaheen said in a statement that Israel has a right to defend its citizens, but added: "it is clear that the Government of Israel has not conducted its military operations in Gaza with the necessary care required by international humanitarian law. It is also clear that the Government of Israel has failed to allow adequate humanitarian assistance into Gaza, resulting in unbelievable suffering."
The resolutions would have blocked the sale of $675 million in bombs and shipments of 20,000 assault rifles.
Senator Jim Risch of Idaho, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a speech opposing the resolutions that the Palestinian group Hamas was to blame for the situation in Gaza. "It is in the interest of America and the world to see this terrorist group destroyed," he said.
Israel has consistently said its actions in Gaza are justified as self-defence and accuses Hamas of using civilians as human shields, a charge Hamas denies.
The US Senate vote came as France and Canada have indicated they plan to recognize a Palestinian state amid growing international outrage over the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Britain has also said it would recognize the state at September's UN General Assembly meeting if the fighting in Gaza had not stopped by then.
The war began after Gaza's dominant the Palestinian group Hamas carried out a cross-border attack on southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages, according to Israeli authorities.
Israel's subsequent air and ground campaign has leveled entire neighbourhoods in Gaza and displaced most of the population of 2.3 million.
Israel says its operations are aimed at dismantling Hamas' military capabilities and securing the release of hostages.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Will a new UK left party back mass movements or bow to the establishment?
The pregnancy of the African elephant lasts nearly two years, but that is a blink of an eye compared with how long those in the UK wanting the birth of a new left party have had to wait. For many months, closed meetings involving survivors of former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn's leadership team and others have been formulating schemes, but no agreed plan has emerged. Now, at least, the objective of forming a new party has been announced by Corbyn and the Coventry MP Zarah Sultana, although no programme, policies, name or structure accompanied that declaration. Indeed, even the bare announcement of co-leadership was an agreement not easily reached. Fortunately, the level of rank-and-file enthusiasm for such a project has, for the moment, carried it forward and covered for the lack of agreement among its core promoters. And, again for the moment, there seems to be no difficulty the left can get itself into that Prime Minister Keir Starmer is not capable of helping it to overcome. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters His recent decision to remove the whip from four more dissident Labour MPs over their successful rebellion against welfare cuts reminded even the most jaundiced leftist of how necessary a new party has become. The removal of the whip (for a second time) from Diane Abbott shows that Starmer's hatred of the left is visceral to the point of self-harm. International vision Despite the difficulties attending its birth, the new party has been warmly welcomed by the wider world with over 600,000 signing up as supporters in a few days. There will, of course, be many challenges, both political and organisational, ahead. But one of the most pressing will be establishing an international policy that resonates with millions of voters. This might seem like one of the easier challenges. After all, four independent MPs and Corbyn himself were elected on a pro-Palestine ticket at the last election. Israel's ever-expanding war in the Middle East raises more issues than headline support for Palestinians They succeeded because there is already widespread pro-Palestinian sentiment in the population - a view that has virtually no other expression in electoral politics. But even so, Israel's ever-expanding war in the Middle East raises more issues than headline support for Palestinians. What of the attack on Iran - less popular to oppose than the Israeli offensive in Gaza? What stance will the new party take on the actions of the Houthis? Or of Hezbollah, a proscribed organisation under UK law? These questions may be resolved relatively easily because Israel has so degraded its own international standing that opposition to its war-mongering is quickly becoming widespread, at least among that section of the electorate likely to vote for a new left party. Beyond Gaza Still, beyond Gaza lie more difficult issues, and they are just as central to the politics of this country. A European-wide rearmament programme is now in full swing, intimately connected to a propaganda war against Russia and the actual war in Ukraine. There is no avoiding this. It is a defining feature of the Starmer government's political profile and a major justification for its austerity measures. A major "patriotic" propaganda campaign of "National Endeavour", spelt out in the latest Strategic Defence Review, is aimed - in Starmer's words - at putting the country in a condition of "war-fighting readiness". Some military figures go further, insisting that "we" will be fighting a war with Russia within "five years". Starmer's 'all guns, no butter' policy will cost him dearly Read More » Opposing this war drive will mean flying directly in the face of the interests of the military-industrial complex, an entrenched media consensus, and the agreed tripartisan positions of Labour, the Conservatives and Reform. Corbyn has been through this fire before. Few will forget his live TV grilling over nuclear weapons during the election campaign when he was Labour leader. When he resisted that pressure, he drew on a lifetime of organised relationships with the anti-war movement, especially the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and the Stop the War Coalition. Sultana does not yet have those links to the same degree. It would be advantageous if they were strengthened. This would help re-establish connections broken when Starmer forced MPs to sever links with Stop the War over a statement opposing the Ukraine war. Few of Corbyn's advisers had a direct practical engagement with the anti-war movement, and that showed when they, not Corbyn himself, collapsed over the IHRA definition of antisemitism when it was adopted by the Labour NEC, then dominated by leftists. It was the single most disastrous decision of the Corbyn leadership, with the most long-lasting consequences. Servants or bosses? Such episodes are not minor or incidental - they go to the heart of how any new party views its relationship with extra-parliamentary mobilisation. There are two broad models: one is the traditional model, which claims to combine parliamentary and extra-parliamentary struggle - a formulation much used by the late Tony Benn. The other puts extra-parliamentary struggle at the centre, viewing electoral politics as a tool to support, rather than lead, mass movements. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of Israel's war on Gaza The traditional model, however, is an algebraic equation in which much rests on the values one attributes to its terms. Even for Benn, the balance shifted from the time he held cabinet office to his later, much closer, identification with extra-parliamentary struggle. In that, he was virtually unique. So the questions remain: is extra-parliamentary struggle simply a supporting chorus for electoral activity? Do would-be elected representatives view it as a means to an end, or the main motor of social change? Is the local council chamber and the chamber of the House of Commons "where the real power lies"? Or does decisive change come from the streets and workplaces? Are elected representatives the servants of the social movements or their bosses? These are not merely theoretical concerns. A new left party in the UK will hardly be the first attempt to create an alternative to mainstream social democracy. Syriza in Greece, Rifondazione in Italy, Podemos in Spain, and Die Linke in Germany have all preceded it - and failed, often splitting over just these issues. This should be a radical and robust socialist project, with the strengthening of extra-parliamentary struggle as its primary goal Reinventing left social democracy, which then becomes right social democracy, only to disappoint and fail, is not an attractive option. From the outset, this should be a more radical and robust socialist project, with the amplification and strengthening of extra-parliamentary struggle as its primary goal. In any case, the depth of the current social and political crisis necessitates the most radical measures to effect even the most marginal improvements in working people's lives. International relations are not marginal to voters' concerns. In the UK, the greatest mass movements of the last generation have been over international questions: the Iraq War and Palestine. The upcoming political crisis will centre on rearmament, in all its global and domestic aspects. A new left party will be judged on whether it helps or hinders mass mobilisations for peace. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
UAE conducts 62nd airdrop as part of ‘Birds of Goodness' operation, delivers 40 food trucks into Gaza
4 Aug 2025 19:45 ABU DHABI (WAM) The United Arab Emirates is continuing its humanitarian mission in support of the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip, carrying out the 62nd airdrop of aid under the 'Birds of Goodness' initiative, part of Operation Chivalrous Knight operation is conducted in collaboration with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, with the participation of France, Germany, Belgium, and operations aim to deliver urgent humanitarian aid to areas inaccessible by land due to the prevailing security situation. The airdrop included a range of essential food items and emergency relief supplies. With Monday's mission, the total volume of aid delivered by air has now surpassed 3,829 tonnes, directed towards supporting the most affected and vulnerable communities in Gaza. In parallel, the UAE has delivered 40 trucks loaded with food aid into the Gaza Strip, as part of its ongoing efforts to strengthen humanitarian support and meet the essential needs of the population. These initiatives reaffirm the UAE's steadfast commitment to humanitarian principles and its enduring approach of standing with fraternal nations in times of crisis and emergency.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
US could require up to $15,000 bonds for some tourist visas under new pilot programme
The US could require up to $15,000 bonds for some tourist and business visas under a new pilot programme launching in two weeks, a US government notice said on Monday, an effort that aims to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The program gives US consular officers the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, according to a Federal Register notice. The bonds also could be applied to people coming from countries where screening and vetting information is deemed insufficient, the notice said. US President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a central focus of his presidency, surging resources to secure the border and arresting people in the US. The Republican president issued a travel ban in June that blocks citizens of 12 nations from entering the US on national security grounds. The new visa programme, effective August 20, will last for approximately a year, the government notice said. The US government launched a similar pilot program in November 2020 during the last months of Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the notice said.
