logo
The Battle for Sensible Sewage Management: Dr. Prem Agarwal's Stand

The Battle for Sensible Sewage Management: Dr. Prem Agarwal's Stand

In the bustling heart of New Delhi, where the chaos of urban life meets the sanctity of healthcare, a storm was brewing. Dr. Prem Agarwal, chairman of Sanjeevan Hospital and president of both the National Medical Forum and the Delhi Hospital Forum, stood at the forefront of a critical issue threatening the city's hospitals. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and local authorities were imposing what Dr. Agarwal called an 'unorganized and unnecessary' mandate: forcing hospitals to install and manage their own Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs). This directive, he argued, was not just redundant but posed risks to hospital management, doctors, and healthcare workers, while straining already stretched resources.
Dr. Prem Agarwal, Addressing Press Conference
The CPCB, established under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, is India's apex body for regulating pollution. It sets guidelines to ensure environmental compliance, including the treatment of sewage and biomedical waste from industries and institutions like hospitals. According to the CPCB's 2016 guidelines, centralized STP systems—large-scale facilities designed to treat sewage from multiple sources—are sufficient for managing hospital wastewater. These systems treat and recycle water, ensuring it meets environmental standards before being released or reused. Delhi, with its network of centralized STPs managed by the Delhi Jal Board, had been effectively handling hospital sewage under this framework.
Yet, in a perplexing turn of events, hospitals across the capital were now being coerced into installing individual STPs on their premises. Dr. Agarwal saw this as a bureaucratic overreach. 'The existing centralized STP systems are robust and efficient,' he declared at a recent press conference. 'Forcing hospitals to set up their own STPs is not only duplicative but also places an undue financial and technical burden on healthcare institutions.' He explained that the installation, maintenance, and operation of STPs require specialized expertise, costly equipment, and continuous monitoring—resources that small and medium-sized hospitals, in particular, could ill afford.
The implications were dire. Hospitals, already grappling with the demands of patient care, faced the risk of diverting funds from critical services like emergency care, diagnostic equipment, or staff training to comply with this mandate. Dr. Agarwal highlighted a chilling concern: the improper handling of STPs could compromise the safety of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare workers. Mishandled sewage systems could lead to contamination, biohazards, or even infections, undermining the very purpose of hospitals as sanctuaries of healing.
Dr. Agarwal's frustration was palpable as he recounted the case of a small hospital in East Delhi. With only 50 beds and a lean budget, the hospital was struggling to comply with the new STP directive. 'They're being forced to choose between upgrading their ICU or installing an STP they don't need,' he said, shaking his head. 'This is not just about money—it's about the quality of care we can provide to our patients.'
The doctor's crusade wasn't just about resisting an impractical policy; it was about protecting the healthcare ecosystem. He argued that the centralized STP system, if strengthened, could handle the city's needs more efficiently. These facilities, often equipped with advanced technologies like Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) or Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR), are designed to treat large volumes of sewage with consistent monitoring by trained professionals. In contrast, individual hospital STPs, especially in smaller setups, risked being under-maintained due to lack of expertise or funding, potentially leading to environmental violations—the very issue the CPCB aimed to prevent.
Dr. Agarwal's demands were clear and resolute. He called upon the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi to intervene urgently and address the crisis. His three-point agenda was a clarion call for reason:
Exempt hospitals connected to centralized STPs from the obligation to install individual systems, recognizing the efficiency of the existing infrastructure.
Strengthen Delhi's centralized STP network, investing in upgrades to ensure it could handle the city's growing healthcare demands without compromising environmental standards.
Relieve hospitals of unnecessary financial and technical burdens, allowing them to focus on their primary mission: saving lives.
As Dr. Agarwal stood before a room of reporters, his voice carried the weight of conviction. 'Hospitals are not factories. Our job is to heal, not to wrestle with redundant regulations,' he said. His words resonated with hospital administrators across Delhi, many of whom had privately voiced similar concerns but lacked the platform to challenge the status quo.
The issue sparked a broader debate. Environmentalists argued that hospitals, as significant generators of biomedical waste, must be held to strict standards. However, they also acknowledged that centralized systems, when well-maintained, were often more reliable than fragmented, hospital-specific solutions. The CPCB, for its part, remained silent on the controversy, leaving hospitals in limbo as they awaited clarity.
In the quiet corridors of Sanjeevan Hospital, Dr. Agarwal continued his work, tending to patients while preparing for the next phase of his advocacy. He knew the fight was far from over, but he was determined to ensure that reason prevailed. For him, this was more than a policy dispute—it was a matter of principle, a stand for the sanctity of healthcare in a city that desperately needed it.
As the sun set over Delhi, casting long shadows across the capital's hospitals, Dr. Agarwal's demands echoed in the minds of those who heard him. Would the authorities listen? Would the burden on hospitals be lifted? Only time would tell, but one thing was certain: Dr. Prem Agarwal would not back down.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Florida swim school urges teaching children water safety after 2 near drownings in Fort Lauderdale
South Florida swim school urges teaching children water safety after 2 near drownings in Fort Lauderdale

CBS News

time2 days ago

  • CBS News

South Florida swim school urges teaching children water safety after 2 near drownings in Fort Lauderdale

A South Florida swim school is urging water safety after two small children nearly drowned in Fort Lauderdale this weekend. Both incidents involved kids under three, and both needed CPR. Parents and swimming instructors told CBS News Miami that getting children at ease in the water at an early age can be a big benefit. Daniela Egues wanted her daughter Emilia to learn the ways of the water as early as possible. "We started the moment that she was able to get into classes like this, so she's been in swimming classes since six months," Egues said. She wants her daughter to get comfortable in the water before she learns how to swim on her own. "Get her accustomed to the water and respect the water, understand her limits, [and] respect the boundaries," Egues said. Egues was at a Sunday swim lesson at OcaQuatics, where they are urging swimming safety after two children under three years old both had to be saved from pools on Saturday in Fort Lauderdale. The first incident involved a two-year-old saved from the pool at the Sheraton Hotel, and another incident involved a one-year-old found at a pool at the corner of Northeast 35th Court and Bay View Drive. Both children needed CPR and were taken to Broward Health. Officials haven't said if foul play or negligence played a role in the near drownings. Florida is often one of the nation's leaders in child drowning deaths. And the CDC found that drowning is the leading cause of death for children in the age range of one to four. OcaQuatics founder Miren Oca told CBS News Miami that children under three can still learn self-saving skills. "They know how to hold their breath if they were to fall in the water, they know how to return to the side of the pool," Oca said. "If they turn around and grab the wall instead of swimming out to the middle. And we also work on back floating as a skill. Children under three can totally do that." Oca said that it's still vital to have someone nearby to supervise toddlers or infants in the water. "Arms' length away is what we like to say because you never know what they're going to do," Oca said. "You never know when they're gonna choose to jump into the pool." Oca also teaches older children how to help save someone in the water from the side. As for the near drownings, officials haven't given any updates on the conditions of the two children saved from the pools.

Woman, 101, Who Still Competes in Shot Put, Discus and Long Jump Shares Her Simple Longevity Tips
Woman, 101, Who Still Competes in Shot Put, Discus and Long Jump Shares Her Simple Longevity Tips

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Woman, 101, Who Still Competes in Shot Put, Discus and Long Jump Shares Her Simple Longevity Tips

Fay Bond has never been one for idleness. Now, despite her age, that hasn't changed much. For about 50 years, Bond taught water aerobics and stretch classes, and she was an avid gardener and member of a walking club. When the local health club opened in her hometown of Oriental, North Carolina, decades ago, Bond and her husband were the first to enroll. She shies away from calling herself athletic and instead says she's simply been in tune with her body for more than 100 years. 'I've always been aware of when I've needed to put off a little weight or put on a little weight, and be active,' she tells This month, at 101, Bond will compete in the 2025 National Senior Games in the discus, long jump and shot put events for the fourth time. More than 12,400 athletes between the ages of 50 and 105 compete in Des Moines throughout July and August for this year's games. Bond's daughter, Irma Bond, who's also competing, introduced her mother to the games when she was 90. Fay Bond has no idea how she'll fare, but she won't waste time wondering about it. She's ready to secure additional medals and add another record to her growing list. Or at least she'll try. 'If you see something and think, 'Well, I think I could do that,' get in, and do it,' she says. It's the advice she's always given her children and the mindset she's long maintained. Ahead are Fay Bond's best tips for living a long and active life. Invest in Your Health 'Mom has always been health-conscious,' Irma Bond tells Her mom regularly canned her own vegetables, and 'we never had cookies or soda pops,' she says. Fay Bond never smoked or drank either, and her go-to meals include oatmeal with fruit, chicken salad on a pita with tomatoes, and fish and chicken, often with sweet potato. She'll snack on yogurt and fruit and limits red meat. Irma Bond attributes her own athleticism to studying the way her mother cared for her own body. At 75, Irma Bond sprints every morning, and at this year's games, she'll be competing in the 100M event for her age division. Her brother is headed to California this year for the slalom water skiing national competition, which he won last year at 78. Build Community Fay Bond builds friendships doing the things she loves. She joined a walking club, she played bridge, she and her husband were members of a dance group, and she pickled watermelon rinds to share with the neighborhood. 'She's always been very social,' says Irma Bond. 'She's known as the sweetheart of Oriental.' On Aug. 10, after the games, Fay Bond will host her 55th annual watermelon cutting in the front yard, where the entire community can participate and eat. Say 'Yes' Fay Bond lived on her own until she was 99 years old. When she 'started getting confused about things,' Irma moved her mother in with her three years ago. Together, they're game for anything. 'We just enjoy living and enjoy life,' says Irma Bond. 'Mom has always been a very positive person. (She) enjoys being and doing. I try to entertain her as much as I can.' Last weekend, she took her mom canoeing, and they go swimming in the sound. If an activity piques their interest, the mother-daughter duo will make it happen. Be Positive 'Mom introduced me to Norman Vincent Peal, (author of) 'The Power of Positive Thinking,'' Irma Bond recalls. 'That probably did a lot for me growing up as much as anything ever has.' Life isn't long for everyone, the Bonds have learned. Fay Bond will turn 102 in September, and while her aunt lived until she was 103, and her sister until she was 96, other family members didn't live as long. Both mother and daughter are committed to seeing the good in every day. Have Something to Look Forward To Fay and Irma are grateful for the games because it gives them something to work toward. 'You need to always give yourself something to look forward to,' the Bonds believe. 'This actually gives us something to strive for and look forward to and stay in shape for, so you can't get any better than that.' This article was originally published on

A Regulated Trip: What New Mexico's Psilocybin Law Means For Work
A Regulated Trip: What New Mexico's Psilocybin Law Means For Work

Forbes

time4 days ago

  • Forbes

A Regulated Trip: What New Mexico's Psilocybin Law Means For Work

Magic mushrooms are now medicine in New Mexico. And that shift could have ripple effects in the workplace. This spring, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham signed Senate Bill 219, the Medical Psilocybin Act, into law, making New Mexico the third state to legalize psilocybin for medical use. Unlike Oregon and Colorado, which adopted their psilocybin programs through ballot initiatives, New Mexico enacted its law through the legislative process. That distinction is more than procedural. It reflects an institutional shift toward integrating psychedelic therapy into the framework of state-managed healthcare. The law took effect on June 20, 2025, and requires full program implementation by December 31, 2027. With that, New Mexico becomes the first state to create a clinician-administered psilocybin program governed by medical oversight, not consumer access. As psilocybin therapy enters a regulated medical model, employers must now examine how psilocybin intersects with workplace safety, disability accommodation, and drug policy enforcement. Psilocybin's Reintroduction as Medicine Psilocybin is a naturally occurring psychedelic compound found in certain mushrooms. Once ingested, it metabolizes into psilocin, which affects cognition, mood, and perception. Although it remains a Schedule I substance under federal law, psilocybin has reemerged over the past decade as a potential breakthrough therapy for severe mental health conditions. Peer-reviewed research continues to highlight its therapeutic potential in treating major depression, PTSD, substance use disorders, and end-of-life distress. New Mexico's legislation embraces this emerging science by establishing a medical-use program in which licensed clinicians, not dispensaries, administer psilocybin in approved therapeutic settings. The Department of Health is responsible for creating treatment protocols, licensing standards, clinician training, and oversight mechanisms. The Act also establishes both a research fund and a treatment equity fund to expand access and support clinical study. Psychedelic wellness expert Cesar Marin sees the program as a reflection of how far public understanding has evolved. 'We're not talking about the free‑wheeling psychedelic trips of the 1960s anymore,' Marin says. 'We're seeing most states consider or enact some form of psychedelic policy reform, and that momentum helps people feel more comfortable with the intentional, therapeutic use of psilocybin.' Qualifying conditions are narrowly defined to include treatment-resistant depression, PTSD, substance use disorder, and terminal illness. All treatment must occur in controlled environments with preparatory and integration sessions surrounding the administration of psilocybin. Psilocybin and psilocin are removed from the state's list of Schedule I controlled substances when used in accordance with the law, and services provided under the Act are exempt from New Mexico's gross receipts tax. Legal Protections Without Workplace Requirements The Medical Psilocybin Act offers strong protections for individuals operating within its boundaries. Licensed clinicians, producers, and qualified patients cannot be prosecuted under state law, and individuals on probation or awaiting trial may participate in treatment without jeopardizing their legal status. However, the Act stops short of granting any employment-based rights. It does not require employers to accommodate psilocybin use, nor does it prevent adverse action based on lawful participation in the program. That omission is deliberate and significant. While patients may legally participate in psilocybin-assisted therapy under state law, the federal classification of psilocybin as a Schedule I substance remains unchanged. And unlike medical cannabis laws in some states, New Mexico's psilocybin law provides no employment protections, no retaliation standard, and no accommodation framework. Still, employers should not assume the workplace will remain untouched. A New Compliance Challenge for Employers 'New Mexico legalizing medical psilocybin is a huge step toward bringing these treatments out of the shadows and into mainstream medicine,' says Marin. 'When folks see local leaders endorsing these programs, it lowers the fear factor and makes it easier for someone who's curious to explore them.' That shift in perception could soon reach the workplace. Employers may begin receiving accommodation requests from individuals participating in medically supervised psilocybin therapy for conditions like PTSD, treatment-resistant depression, or substance use disorder. And while psilocybin remains a federally controlled substance, the conditions it treats are often considered disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). That means employers have a legal obligation to engage in the interactive process when an employee discloses a disability and requests accommodation, even if the employee's treatment involves a Schedule I substance like psilocybin. The ADA does not require employers to accommodate federally illegal drug use, but it does require them to consider accommodations related to the underlying condition. Employers are not obligated to tolerate on-the-job impairment or excuse safety violations. Still, if an employee reports off-duty participation in a licensed psilocybin program tied to a recognized condition, a flat denial without further inquiry could invite scrutiny under disability discrimination laws. Testing vs. Impairment: Where Policy Meets Practicality Psilocybin presents unique challenges when it comes to workplace drug testing. Unlike THC or opioids, psilocin, the active compound after ingestion, is not included in most standard employment drug panels. That means employers may be flying blind when it comes to detecting recent psilocybin use unless they specifically request an expanded panel. 'A person can be actively hallucinating due to psilocybin use and still pass a standard workplace drug test,' says Dr. Todd Simo, Chief Medical Officer at HireRight. 'Psilocin, the active compound, doesn't show up in most drug panels unless an employer specifically includes it. That's why training managers to recognize signs of impairment and providing a clear path to escalate reasonable suspicion are more effective strategies. For employers especially concerned, developing a reasonable suspicion panel that includes psilocybin and disclosing it to employees in advance can also help mitigate misuse.' Given that reality, employers may want to prioritize impairment-based enforcement strategies over reliance on traditional drug screening. While testing has its place, especially in post-accident investigations or in regulated industries, training supervisors to recognize signs of real-time impairment and respond consistently under internal policy is likely a more practical approach for most workplaces. Preparing for Disclosure and Dialogue Employers should take this opportunity to review and, where necessary, revise internal policies addressing drug and alcohol use, workplace impairment, and reasonable accommodations. Clarity around off-duty substance use and on-duty safety expectations will be essential. HR teams should also ensure that accommodation request procedures are equipped to handle emerging treatment disclosures, particularly where mental health conditions are involved. Equally important is creating an environment in which employees feel safe discussing mental health. Psilocybin's path to medical legitimacy mirrors, in many ways, the evolution of medical cannabis and broader mental health parity. For employers, staying ahead of these developments will require not only legal awareness but organizational empathy. The Bigger Picture New Mexico's Medical Psilocybin Act signals more than therapeutic access. It reflects a policy evolution, one where lawmakers, not just voters, are beginning to treat psychedelic medicine as a legitimate part of behavioral healthcare. The state's approach shifts the narrative from stigma to structure, putting psilocybin in the hands of trained clinicians operating under medical oversight. And while the law places no new obligations on employers, it surfaces a timely question: what does it mean to support mental health in a world where the frontier of treatment is changing? For employers, that shift invites action. It's time to revisit drug policies, reconsider testing strategies, and refine accommodation practices. As state-level momentum builds around psychedelics, employers don't need to endorse these therapies, but they do need to understand them. Because in the modern workplace, curiosity can be a better compliance strategy than surprise.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store