
Book examines Sherman's march and its massive emancipation
U.S. Army Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman's 1864 "March to the Sea" was not a "total war" campaign against the Confederacy as previously portrayed but a freedom movement that led to a great emancipation, a new book argues.
The big picture: " Somewhere Toward Freedom: Sherman's March and the Story of America's Largest Emancipation," released last month, revisits a crucial moment of the American Civil War and shows how it sparked an emancipation — then refugee tragedy — that is often forgotten today.
The book's release comes on the heels of the 160th anniversary of the march and is one of the latest historical analyses of the Civil War that challenges old narratives about the Lost Cause and white grievances.
Zoom in: Bennett Parten, a history professor at Georgia Southern University, tells Axios that as a native of Georgia he's always been interested in the "March to the Sea."
He grew up hearing the popular version of the march as told by white southerners: It was a total war campaign that brutalized the South and flattened Atlanta as the Confederacy was weakening.
That version has been popularized by false images seen in the 1939 film, "Gone with the Wind," as a heartless Union military operation that forced any Antebellum white southerners into poverty without any regard to the enslaved people who welcomed that downfall.
"We always assumed this was the case and it just never had a real good narrative of it."
Reality check: Sherman's "March to the Sea" was a strict military operation where soldiers were ordered not to burn homes randomly, only those connected to cotton plantations, Parten writes.
Soldiers couldn't enter the homes of private residents, and it wasn't a pillaging of innocent bystanders, yet the end of enslavement and its economy.
Allegedly "loyal" enslaved people didn't run for the invading U.S. Army like their white owners but thousands fled toward it, creating a massive refugee of 20,000 people.
The intrigue: Parten details that the refugee crisis of newly emancipated people grew as formerly enslaved people fled destroyed plantations and went searching for children, spouses and family members.
"We're looking at the largest emancipation event in American history," Parten said.
That alone counters the narrative that Sherman's campaign was heartless and brutal, but one offering hope, he said.
Parten offers documented cases of unification and also shows how difficult it was for formerly enslaved people to reconnect with others who could not read or write.
Yes, but: The massive number of refugees overwhelmed the city of Savannah, Georgia.
A Sherman subordinate ordered pontoon bridges pulled up near Savannah, preventing Black refugees from crossing over and leaving hundreds of men, women and children to drown or be reslaved.
Sherman would then issue Special Field Order No. 15, which set aside a vast strip of land for newly freed people.
Zoom out: Parten said he wanted to write a story that didn't sanitize the past nor romanticize it:
"I didn't necessarily expect that this would be the way the story would end, but the more you kind of start pulling the different threads, the more you ask the question of what happened to the refugees, this is where you know the story does end."
What's next: Visitors to Georgia can take a tour through The March to the Sea Heritage Trail and visit sites mentioned in Parten's book.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
34 minutes ago
- Axios
National Democrats target Rep. Andy Ogles' seat
The national Democratic Party will put money toward ousting U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles next year. Why it matters: It's an unprecedented move in recent Tennessee political history for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee to target a House Republican. The DCCC infuses financial resources and organizational help that Tennessee Democrats have sorely lacked since they lost control of the seat in 2022. State of play: Ogles has tacked far to the right in the gerrymandered district that includes about a third of Nashville clumped together with conservative suburbs and hyper-conservative rural areas. His time in Congress has been defined by loyalty to President Trump as well as campaign finance scandals. More recently, Ogles has hammered Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell over his response to federal immigration raids. Yes, but: The DCCC's decision to target the seat preceded Ogles decision to take on O'Connell. Between the lines: Due to the pre-existing scandal and the hope that 2026 will be a banner year for Democrats, the DCCC views Ogles as vulnerable. Flashback: Ogles defeated state Sen. Heidi Campbell in 2022 and he bested anti-gun activist Maryam Abolfazli last year. Ogles outperformed Trump in the district last year. Ogles won by 17.8 points, compared to Trump's 11.3-point margin. Details of an FBI investigation into Ogles' finances came out after last year's tough primary, meaning he hasn't faced a slate of negative ads on the issue. What she's saying: "Scandal after scandal, lie after lie, Andy Ogles continues to prove that he has no interest in actually working for the people of Tennessee's 5th Congressional District," DCCC spokesperson Madison Andrus tells Axios. "He's chasing self-enrichment and his constituents are tired of it." "Tennessee's voters deserve real representation and the DCCC is working to ensure we flip this seat blue next November and get a real fighter in Congress for TN-05," she says. The big picture: Democrats previously had a stranglehold on District 5 since the Civil War. For generations, the district was essentially Nashville's congressional seat, with a few neighboring counties included. U.S. Rep. Jim Cooper, a moderate Democrat, represented the district for two decades. Then, the Republican-led legislature redrew district lines to carve Nashville into three districts in which conservatives in neighboring counties outnumbered mostly liberal voters. Reality check: Ogles enters the race as a clear favorite. It's too soon to know if the nation is bracing for a blue wave in 2026, though it's fairly common for the minority party to do well in midterm elections.


USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Fearing a crackdown, protesters stick to plans to rally in DC before June 14 Army parade
Fearing a crackdown, protesters stick to plans to rally in DC before June 14 Army parade Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. As tanks, armored vehicles, and thousands of troops descend on Washington, D.C., for the massive June 14 Army parade and President Donald Trump has declared protesters could be "met with very big force," planned protests on the same day in the nation's capital are proceeding – with caution. "This parade sets a very dangerous and ominous mood," said Andy Zee, organizer of a "Refuse Fascism" march to the White House on the afternoon of June 14 before the Army's parade begins. Speaking in the Oval Office on June 10, Trump said, "If there's any protester wants to come out, they will be met with very big force." "This is people that hate our country," he added. Trump has deployed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to crack down on ongoing protests over his administration's widespread deportations. Zee and others preparing to rally against the June 14 military parade say the moment is ripe. "There is no precedent for a situation like this," Zee said, comparing the parade – which falls on both the Army's 250th anniversary and Trump's birthday – to "something that Germany did in the 1930's." "We should make no mistake that this is fascism." Some protest anywhere but Washington, others undeterred Law enforcement officials say they are already laying down 18.5 miles of anti-scale fencing and 17 miles of bike rack concrete barriers in preparation for the parade. They plan to screen everyone entering the National Mall with 175 magnetometers, according to Matt McCool, special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Washington field office. Drones will patrol from overhead. Many are opting to protest anywhere but the nation's capital as part of the "No Kings" protest, organized by Indivisible and other progressive groups. More than 1,700 demonstrations spanning multiple continents are in the works, according to organizers. But others will not be deterred from Washington. Four demonstrations, including "Refuse Fascism," have applied for a "First Amendment" permit for June 14 from the National Park Service as of early June, according to documents shared with USA TODAY. Another, the "National Protest Against Trump and the War Machine, plans to draw up to 20,000 demonstrators to Meridian Hill Park, around 1.5 miles north of the White House. "A military parade celebrating Trump and the Army is an outrageous insult to the American people," the group wrote in its permit application. The protest will take aim at both Trump for "eroding the people's democratic rights, our union rights, vilifying immigrants, gutting social services," as well as the Army – "the biggest cogs in the war machine." 'As many security checks as possible' Organizers of other planned permits – who say they will demonstrate peacefully – are taking extra security precautions. Marcus Anthony Hunter, who is leading the National Black Justice Collective's "ceremonial walk" around the Reflecting Pool next to the Lincoln Memorial hours before the parade begins, said organizers have thoroughly consulted with security to ensure they stay within the rules. "You can have as many security checks as possible and still run up against things you don't expect," he said. Organizers of the walk originally planned to meet at the Washington Monument, but were deterred when law enforcement released a new security map that made it "not feasible," Hunter said. The group's permit also originally included Freedom Plaza, an open area a block from the White House often used for protests, but chose to relinquish it because a large, staged event would be "a vulnerability," he said. Now, the walk's participants will pass through the security checkpoints mandated to enter the Army festival that will take place on the National Mall ahead of the parade. They've been told participants can bring in African drums and carry signs, but not with a wooden stick, and water, but not in an open cooler, he said. "We are doing it because it's the right thing to do," said Hunter, who is also a University of California, Los Angeles professor of sociology and African American studies, of the walk happening as protests against the Trump administration's deportations continue in his university's hometown. "This environment underscores it even more." More: How did the LA protests begin? A look at the immigration raids that sparked outrage Bree Taylor, founder and executive director of the Trans Unity Coalition, which will hold a rally the day after the parade at the Capitol building, said fear of a crackdown among the community has been "ongoing" since Trump took office and has "escalated a lot" in recent weeks. The Michigan-based group originally applied for a permit to rally on June 14, but later moved its event to the next morning – in part to avoid drawing attention to Trump's birthday. "This isn't about the President at all, actually, this is about our community," she said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Army veteran joins anti-ICE protest in Dallas and ‘calls on conscience' of fellow service members
A uniformed U.S. Army veteran has provoked anger among MAGA conservatives by joining a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, Texas, on Monday. In a viral video recorded at the event, the soldier does not hold back in her criticism of President Donald Trump for activating 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to help police the anti-ICE demonstrations that have raged in Los Angeles for five days and have since spread to other major American cities. 'We are not pawns for Donald Trump's agenda,' the woman, wearing a camouflage uniform bearing the name tag 'Colado,' says in the video shared by left-leaning X account BreakThrough News. 'Why now?' she continues. 'It's because the military was called upon against the protesters. In our oath to serve, we serve the people of the United States, the Constitution. These constitutional rights are being stripped and just denied. 'And the military will not be pawns to that. That's why I'm calling on the conscience of military members who served previously and now. We have a conscience, we have a mind and we have a duty, a moral obligation to say no and resist.' The Independent has contacted the Pentagon for its response to her comments. Online, conservatives wasted no time in calling for the woman, subsequently identified as Carmen Colado, a former U.S. Army intelligence analyst, to be dishonorably discharged or court-martialled for publicly criticizing the commander-in-chief's orders. Some argued that her actions constituted a violation of the U.S. military's Uniform Code of Military Justice and called for Article 15 to be invoked against her, which empowers a commanding officer to order nonjudicial punishments less severe than a court-martial. These might include restrictions on duty, extra duty, forfeiture of pay, and, in some cases, confinement; however, since Colado appears to have left the service, it is unlikely to apply. She describes herself on Instagram as the 'proud daughter of an illegal immigrant hero who saved my life' and posts photos of friends and family, poetry, pencil drawings, and even a short film she has directed. Her posts also include an inspirational quote from Texas Democratic Rep. Al Green, who was censured for interrupting President Trump's address to a joint session of Congress earlier this year, on the occasion of a Dallas protest march calling for immigration reform. 'To protect liberty and justice for all – to protect government of the people, by the people, for the people – to protect what this country has in its great and noble ideals, we have to do what is necessary,' Green's quote reads.