logo
Letters to the Editor: Salt Lake County mayor gives her take on why the Sundance is departing Utah for Colorado

Letters to the Editor: Salt Lake County mayor gives her take on why the Sundance is departing Utah for Colorado

Yahoo08-04-2025

To the editor: Los Angeles and the Hollywood community overall will soon feel the effects of the Sundance Film Festival's decision to move to Boulder, Colo. In the past few weeks, a number of storylines have emerged, placing blame anywhere from politics to finances, but it's way more nuanced ("Of course Sundance is fleeing. Utah has become a hateful place," April 4).
As one of the original founding staff members of the Sundance Film Festival, I know exactly where and how this story began. Sundance was born, not just as a film festival, but as a cultural force grounded in place. Robert Redford didn't choose Utah because it was easy or obvious. He chose it because it was different. Because the power of Sundance was never just about the films — it was about the space it created for independent voices to emerge in a setting that challenged, inspired and transformed.
The real story is this: Sundance is facing financial headwinds, brought on by a shifting independent film industry and revenue losses from the COVID-19 pandemic. The new leadership team, instead of working with Utah's public and private partners to rebuild a stronger future, chose to walk away.
As the current mayor of Salt Lake County, I proposed a summit — at the Sundance Resort itself — where we could meet as partners and determine how to evolve the festival, given the changing landscape. A gathering of local leaders, creative voices, and community partners, in a place built for dialogue and reflection. That offer was never accepted.
Additionally, financial offers from Salt Lake County and the state of Utah were also serious and substantial; proposed to increase funding, offer infrastructure and provided a clear path forward. It still wasn't enough.
Let's be honest about what happened here: The current Sundance leadership didn't want to solve problems. They wanted to move on from them. Instead of working within a community that stood by the festival through decades of growth, they opted for a clean break — and used politics as the convenient excuse.
But politics are not the real story. If they were, Redford would never have planted his vision in Utah to begin with. A progressive himself, Redford understood that impact happens when you speak truth in hard places — not when you run from them. He used his platform to protect public lands, elevate marginalized voices, and push for change. Sundance became powerful because it operated in a place where that power meant something.
As a Democratic mayor in a conservative state, I don't shy away from Utah's challenges. I face them every day. But I also know that the presence of Sundance here made a real difference. It opened doors for underrepresented communities. It gave audiences access to new ideas and new perspectives. It planted seeds for change where it was needed most.
This is a loss for Utah. But it's also a loss for Sundance. This exit leaves behind the environment that gave it its identity, but more importantly the people and the principles that gave it meaning. Sundance forgot its roots, the community that built it and the essence of what made it great in the first place; independent voices aren't just needed in comfortable places — they're needed in the places where they can actually make a difference.
Jenny Wilson, Salt Lake City
The writer is the mayor of Salt Lake County.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

Hamilton Spectator

time14 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

RFK Jr. Appointee To CDC Advisory Committee Was A Paid Expert In Merck's Gardasil Lawsuit
RFK Jr. Appointee To CDC Advisory Committee Was A Paid Expert In Merck's Gardasil Lawsuit

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. Appointee To CDC Advisory Committee Was A Paid Expert In Merck's Gardasil Lawsuit

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. named eight new members to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Wednesday, including several anti-vaccine proponents, after dismissing all 17 existing advisers. Kennedy justified the overhaul to 're-establish public confidence in vaccine science,' claiming, without providing specific evidence, that prior Biden-appointed members had conflicts of interest. The new eight-member committee represents the minimum allowed under ACIP's founding charter. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist, was among eight individuals selected by Kennedy to join the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Kulldorff has been an outspoken critic of COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccine mandates. His appointment has also raised questions due to his paid involvement in litigation against a major vaccine manufacturer, according to Reuters. Citing court records, Reuters notes that Kulldorff served as an expert witness in lawsuits against Merck & Co Inc (NYSE:MRK) over its Gardasil vaccine, which is used to prevent cancers caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). The plaintiff accused the pharmaceutical company of not properly disclosing the vaccine's risks. Gardasil was approved in the U.S. in 2006 after going through clinical trials to prove its safety and a deposition in October, Kulldorff acknowledged that he had been paid $400 an hour for his work on the case and had billed approximately $33,000 through September. He also received a $4,000 retainer in connection with the North Carolina lawsuit, which was part of a broader legal effort encompassing about 200 related cases. In March, a federal judge ruled in favor of Merck in that particular case. Kulldorff's paid role as a litigation consultant could conflict with ACIP's established rules. According to the committee's guidelines, members are prohibited from serving as paid expert witnesses or litigation consultants in cases involving vaccine manufacturers while actively serving on the panel. Gardasil/Gardasil 9 sales declined 41% to $1.33 billion in the first quarter of 2025, primarily due to lower demand in China, partially offset by higher demand in most international regions, particularly in Japan, and higher pricing and demand in the U.S. Excluding China, sales grew 14%, or 16%, excluding the impact of foreign exchange. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article RFK Jr. Appointee To CDC Advisory Committee Was A Paid Expert In Merck's Gardasil Lawsuit originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio

Gen Z-led group launches $3M in youth voter mobilization
Gen Z-led group launches $3M in youth voter mobilization

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gen Z-led group launches $3M in youth voter mobilization

A Generation Z-led group aligned with Democrats is launching a $3 million youth voter mobilization effort ahead of next year's midterms. The group Voters of Tomorrow said the effort, shared first with The Hill, will target 18 competitive House districts across the country. The push is aimed at providing 'training, stipends, and support to empower campus organizers to engage their peers directly in districts where young voters have the power to decide the outcome,' according to a press release from the group. Among the House districts being targeted are Colorado's 8th Congressional District; Nebraska's 2nd District; New York's 1st District; and California's 13th, 45th and 47th districts. Most of the districts are rated as a 'toss-up' by election forecasters at the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. The effort shows how some Democratic-aligned organizations are already making early investments to win back some of the young voters the party lost to President Trump in the November election. A report from the Democratic data firm Catalist found the Democratic Party last year saw a 6-point drop in support among voters ages 18 to 29 compared to 2020, decreasing from 61 percent to 55 percent. Among young men, the decline was 9 points. The House's slim majority offers Democrats their best chance at flipping one of the chambers, with the Senate map offering a more challenging terrain. 'To stop Trump's dangerous agenda, we need to take back the House. Student voters have the numbers to flip key races, yet too often we're overlooked by major funders,' Kaya Jones, programming director at Voters of Tomorrow, said in a statement. 'We're proud to be making this necessary investment in young people, and we urge others to follow our lead. The future is on the ballot and so are we.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store