Opposition renews call for defence budget boost after NATO vote to spike spending
The opposition is renewing its call on Labor to boost the defence budget after NATO countries agreed to dramatically hike military spending.
All 32 NATO members agreed overnight to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP at a summit in the Netherlands.
The decision is a major win for Donald Trump, who has threatened to drop US military support for Europe if it did not splash more cash.
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles was at the summit representing Australia as a member of the Indo Pacific Four (IP4).
He told reporters in The Hague that 'obviously a very significant decision has been made here in relation to European defence spending', but noted it was 'fundamentally a matter for NATO'.
'We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape, assessing the threats that exist there, and the kind of defence force we need to build in order to meet those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and then to resource that,' he said.
'And what that has seen is the biggest peacetime increase in Australian defence spending that we have seen in our history.'
Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor took a different view.
He welcomed NATO's commitment, saying on Thursday 'we do need to see countries around the world upping their defence spend', including Australia.
'Authoritarian regimes are flexing their muscles,' Mr Taylor told Sky News.
'We're seeing it … with Iran, we've seen it with Russia, and of course, we're seeing it in the Indo Pacific as well.
'And all of that means that we do need to see democratic countries from the West making sure that they're spending what is necessary to make sure we can defend ourselves in these uncertain times.
'The Prime Minister himself has said, these are the most uncertain times since the Second World War, and I think that is absolutely right.
'But you've got to fund your plans. Labor hasn't been funding their plan.'
Pressed on what he thought Labor should be spending, Mr Taylor said 3 per cent of GDP would be sufficient.
'It's incredibly important that we fund the plan necessary for our sovereignty … but for us also to be a good ally of our allies around the world,' he said.
'We're not doing this because Trump is asking for it – in fact, our position was well ahead of that.
'We're doing it because it's the right thing to do in a highly uncertain world where authoritarian regimes are flexing their muscles.'
The Coalition's proposed 3 per cent increase is still well-short of what Washington has asked for.
During a meeting with Mr Marles earlier this month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called on the Albanese government to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
It ignited a major debate in Canberra and fuelled criticisms that Australia is ill-prepared to defend itself against an increasingly aggressive China.
While the Albanese government has committed record cash for the defence budget, much of it would not kick in until after 2029.
With the Australia itself predicting a major global conflict by 2034 and some analysts warning of a US-China conflict before 2030, critics have argued the money is not flowing fast enough and instead tied up in longer-term projects at the cost of combat-readiness.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
31 minutes ago
- The Age
Suburban Rail Loop will help only the few
Credit when it's due I am not a fan of President Trump, I have been known to make the comment 'America, land of opportunity where even a fool can be elected president'. He has obviously been misguided on the question of tariffs, but I believe he should be congratulated on recognising that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. The world is indebted to Trump and Israel for the action they have taken. The world is further indebted to Trump for now enabling the peace process to begin. No doubt, Trump exceeded his authority in not going to Congress to obtain approval for the B2 bombing raid on Iran's nuclear facilities, but I believe the venture would certainly have failed had he done so. I can't think of a previous president who would have been prepared to take this necessary action. We are now seeing politics in action by his opponents in belittling what he has achieved. Give him credit when it is due. On this occasion, he has been given expert advice and has followed through on it. Alan Davidson, Altona Feeling less safe Early last week, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed to have bombed Iran in order to make us 'all feel safer'. However, his actions made me, and no doubt many others, feel less safe. Now with Netanyahu having drawn Donald Trump into the 'military action', I feel significantly less safe than last week. Is it because Netanyahu's and Trump's actions were based upon 'intelligence' that is contrary to that of both the International Atomic Energy Agency's and the US State Department? Intelligence that came from the same Israeli people and agency that ignored the warnings of Israeli borders watchers of heightened activity leading up to incursion of Hamas on the October 7, 2023, resulting in the deaths of over 1200 Israelis and now perhaps 50,000 Palestinians in Gaza? Why was that intelligence ignored? Perhaps then US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger's words from the 1970s still ring true: 'There are only 90,000 people out there. Who gives a damn?' ('Deep Water', Good Weekend, 21/6). In the greater scheme of things, ordinary people don't matter to the powerful. We have long known that the first causality of war is truth, and Trump has his own concept of 'truth'. Combine this with having complete disregard for rights, agreements, rules or law, and a preparedness to exert what is basically coercive control on all in his orbit makes for a dangerous combination. At a time when we need greater global cooperation, not competition, I'd feel much safer if Trump insisted countries spent 5per cent of their budgets on addressing global warming and humanitarian aid rather than weapons of war. Trump could then show himself to be a real leader. Rod Eldridge, Derrinallum Israel didn't start conflict Emma Shortis' claim (' Australia needs to find its courage ', 25/6) that Israel 'waged war on Iran' and breached international law is simply incorrect. Israel did not start a war with Iran—rather, Iran has long waged war on Israel through its proxies, including Hamas, whose October 7 attacks were funded, armed, and likely coordinated by Iran. Twice last year, Iran directly attacked Israel with missiles and drones. Israel responded in self-defence to prevent further escalation. Iran openly calls for Israel's destruction, funds groups dedicated to that goal, and even has a countdown clock in Tehran marking Israel's supposed demise. Is that not an act of war? In this context, Israel's actions were lawful self-defence. Likewise, the US acted to protect an ally and deter a regime that repeatedly calls for 'Death to America.' How is any of that illegal—or undesirable? Stephen Lazar, Elwood ABC charter needs attention As Karl Quinn writes, the ramifications of the Antoinette Lattouf case are 'potentially profound' (' Lattouf case has cost much more than just the money ', 26/6). The outcome of the case does little to resolve whether ABC broadcasters are free to express their political views. In deciding that the ABC breached the Fair Work Act by dismissing Lattouf for holding or expressing a particular political opinion, the Federal Court casts doubt over whether the ABC can continue to claim that its broadcasters are impartial, fair and balanced. It might be time to change the ABC Charter, abandon the pretence of impartiality, and allow ABC broadcasters to express their views openly. That would be a refreshing change from the current situation in which most ABC broadcasters play at impartiality while clearly holding progressive, left-leaning worldviews. Rod Wise, Surrey Hills Keep opinion to yourselves I'm amazed and disappointed that the Federal Court has said that journalist Antoinette Lattouf could post information on her social media site that showed a view on the Israel Gaza war. According to the journalists' union the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), journalists 'Do not allow personal interest, or any belief, commitment, payment, gift or benefit, to undermine your accuracy, fairness or independence'. The MEAA also informs that journalists 'Disclose conflicts of interest that affect, or could be seen to affect, the accuracy, fairness or independence of your journalism'. Journalists' views, such as on politics, should be private, and they should not interfere in any way in their reporting. Marguerite Marshall, Eltham $8 million in super. Really? I could hardly suppress my crocodile tears after reading the first question and answer in the latest 'Ask an expert' financial advice column (2 5/6). The questioners – a retired couple with a combined balance of $8 million in their SMSF – clearly consider the proposed new super tax to be a burden they want to avoid. Noel's answer, assuming the SMSF's earnings in 2025/26 to be $400,000, shows that the extra tax payable would amount to just over $7000. Given that the couple expect to draw from their fund a combined pension of $333,000 in the coming financial year, I suggest they won't struggle to pay this additional amount. And assuming a typical proportion of the funds are invested in shares, it's likely the extra tax would be more than offset by the tax refund associated with franking credits. Kevin Bailey, Croydon Tax helps The headline ' We have $8 million in SMSF. How do we avoid paying the new super tax? ' makes my blood boil. It encapsulates the way superannuation has been hijacked by selfish and greedy members of our society who have no concept of the greater good. If you have that much money in super, you should be appreciative of your good fortune and be happy that your tax is helping to fund services that benefit all. Ann Maginness, Beaumaris Eroding trust The exponential increase in misinformation and disinformation is not a new phenomenon, but, as mentioned in the article by Liam Mannix ″ Brett Sutton made it through a pandemic. Now he's fighting a new war ″, 25/6, has become more concerning with increasingly sophisticated AI technology. The problem has been enabled primarily through the ubiquitous electronic media, and in particular social media which propagates beliefs and opinions often expressed by those with hidden agendas or inexperienced and unqualified ″influencers″, that are often mistakenly confused with truth and verifiable facts. Consequently, trust in trained and experienced experts, including medical specialists, has been significantly eroded to the detriment of community health. Anything that can be done to reverse or mitigate this trend should be supported. I wish Brett Sutton every success in his endeavour to do this. Furthermore, education should from primary school on, emphasise the importance of deep, critical thinking and analysis, thereby empowering populations to differentiate between fact and fiction. Leslie Chester, Brighton 'Red notice' red flag I write as a concerned and angry consumer. I needed a plumber to address a toilet malfunction in my home. I selected a plumbing service from the internet that had thousands of five-star reviews. First hard learned mistake. I am an older woman at home by myself at the time of my call to them. I was quoted more than $30,000 to address the problem. I was absolutely floored by this, and told the attending plumber I would need to speak to my husband before any decision could be made. I was then transferred via phone to his supervisor and was told, effectively, that if I did not accept their quote without delay I would find myself with sewerage leaking everywhere and would be issued with a 'red notice' from the council that would order me to vacate my home. This man was so persistent that I felt bullied and threatened. I refused to succumb to his attempted coercion. I was advised by another plumber that no such work was necessary and the problem could be easily fixed and for far less an amount. I know my problem is not unique. I was stunned to learn that there is very little avenue for me to address this behaviour with an appropriate governing tradesmen's body that would result in this particular plumbing service being sanctioned. Surely, it is wrong that such scams can occur so blatantly without consequence, and that the reputation of honest tradesmen is unfairly sullied by association. Christine Harris, Mordialloc AND ANOTHER THING Trump world Trump's desire for a Nobel Peace Prize by blitz bombing Iran is a classic case of the ends justify the means – which they don't. Greg Curtin, Nunawading How long until Trump launches his own awards system? Joan Segrave, Healesville Let's hope this time Donald Trump has said something true when he says Iran's nuclear capability has been destroyed. Tony O'Brien, South Melbourne NATO secretary general Mark Rutte has given the concept of ″brownie points″ a complete new meaning. Ruth Davis, Carrum Don't upset Donald! It is plaintive to watch the NATO leaders in The Hague to kowtowing to Donald Trump to keep the alliance together. For Trump the solipsist it was all that mattered - he was the centre of attention. Helena Kilingerova, Vermont Can the world's focus please be put back on the situation in Gaza? Israel is committing murder and mayhem. Rhonda Cox, Diamond Creek Re Megan Herbert's cartoon, 26/6: It was Hamas. It did house strategic targets. There never was a negotiating table. Sam Bando, Malvern Bezos' wedding Foam party? (' Protesting locals force Bezos to move Venice wedding spectacular ', 26/6). A foam party for 50 to 60-year-olds? And here's me thinking the US president was childish Pam Cupper, Dimboola Furthermore Twice this week the majority of the sport section has been devoted to the trials and tribulations of just one AFL football club. Enough! Apart from Carlton supporters – who cares! There are 17 other AFL clubs. Brian Kidd, Mt Waverley

Sky News AU
41 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘What a waste': Peta Credlin slams Albanese's NATO decision
Sky News host Peta Credlin slams the Albanese government's decision to send Richard Marles and his entourage to the NATO summit. 'What a waste of $100,000 or so it would have cost taxpayers to send Richard Marles and his entourage to the NATO summit this week,' Ms Credlin said. 'And for Marles then to miss out not just on a meeting with the US President, but also his own counterpart, the US Defence Secretary. 'And just in case Marles misread the snub, his place in the NATO family photograph made it all crystal clear. 'Not just to us in Australia but every other government in the world who knows how to read these sort of diplomatic displays.'

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
North Adelaide's LIV Golf redevelopment to go ahead after controversial laws pass SA parliament
Controversial laws that allow the South Australian government to push ahead with plans to redevelop the North Adelaide Golf Course, and move the LIV Golf tournament into the city, have passed parliament. The laws allow the government to take control of the golf course, overriding the Adelaide City Council, a move that Lord Mayor Jane Lomax-Smith said effectively takes 15 to 20 per cent of the city's parklands out of the council's care. The government said it made the move to provide "certainty" as it pushes to have the site ready to host LIV Golf in the city in 2028. While the opposition voted against the bill, the government secured the support of two key crossbench MPs — SA Best's Connie Bonaros and One Nation's Sarah Game. Ms Bonaros told parliament she was a strong supporter of LIV Golf. "I'm also a realist and I can see the clock ticking and the need for certainty," she said. The bill was introduced into parliament last week and passed the lower house the same day. Greens MP Robert Simms told parliament that, MPs and the general public should have been given time to consider the proposal. "There has been woefully inadequate consultation on this bill," he said. "Rather than indicating that the bill was a fait accompli and passing it through the lower house last week, the government should have released it for public consultation months ago." Independent MP Tammy Franks described the move as a "land grab". "It is deeply disappointing to see the Malinauskas government attempt yet another land grab at the behest, this time of a sporting tournament," she said. "Too often, when a new development is in need and around the CBD, state governments have looked at the parklands as supposed free land — and it is indeed free, but it is not their land." Premier Peter Malinauskas argued the government had to act quickly to make sure the course was ready for the 2028 LIV Golf tournament. "We're getting to the point where we're fast running out of time," Mr Malinauskas told ABC Local Radio. "We're not actually doing this, believe it or not, as a criticism of the council. I've spoken to Jane Lomax-Smith about this a lot, and Jane's been supportive of the project, as have a number of other councillors." But the premier said he was still concerned the project could be delayed. "The Adelaide City Council has had a propensity of getting in the way of a lot of these things, and that has been on occasion a source of frustration," he said. The LIV Golf tour began in 2022, with Greg Norman as CEO, and the Public Investment Fund — Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund — as its major financial backer. Tournaments have been held in Adelaide since 2023, and despite criticism of 'sportswashing' due to its links to Saudi Arabia, it has been hailed a success and awarded 'best golf event' at the World Golf Awards. With the plans to move from the Grange Golf Course to the city, Greg Norman Course Design has been given the contract to redesign the course, but no plans have yet been released. The government said it would be constructed on the existing golf course, as well as Park 27A, to the west of the course. It has not been revealed whether additional buildings will be part of the construction or how many trees will be removed to make way for it. The government said that for any tree that is cut down, at least three more will be planted. The government said the course would remain a public course after the redevelopment.