
Trump's sugar economics for Coke amid the company's multi-billion tax case
Trump claims Coca-Cola will switch to real cane sugar in US-made sodas, a move framed as a health win, though Coca-Cola's confirmation is vague. This shift taps into nostalgia and anti-corporate sentiment, potentially impacting corn farmers and sugar producers. Meanwhile, Coca-Cola faces a massive IRS dispute over profit-shifting, adding financial pressure.
Ninety-four percent of the world's population recognises the red-and-white Coca-Cola logo, according to a ResearchGate study citing multiple reports. That's not a brand — it's a global reflex. And now, Donald Trump wants in.US President Donald Trump is gettinghimself involded into the recipe of the planet's most iconic soft drink. Coca-Cola, Trump claimed this week, has agreed to replace high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) with real cane sugar in its US-made sodas, a move he framed as a win for his "Make America Healthy Again" campaign.The announcement came via Trump's Truth Social platform, where he posted a mock-up of a Coke bottle reading 'Share a Coke with Trump' and declared, 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so… This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'Coca-Cola hasn't confirmed the change.But a vague statement hinted at something brewing: 'More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon,' the company said, while thanking the President for his 'enthusiasm.'
Coca-Cola is deeply embedded in American culture. By nudging its formula, Trump taps into nostalgia, anti-corporate sentiment, and populism. Cane sugar recalls a time when things supposedly tasted 'better,' like the Mexican Coke many Americans swear by.The message is simple: real over artificial, sugar over syrup, 'America First', even in your soda.It's also a nod to Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who's crusading against ultra-processed foods. Kennedy has blamed HFCS for fuelling obesity and diabetes, calling it 'just a formula for making you obese and diabetic.'HFCS, derived from corn starch, dominates US soda recipes because it's cheaper, partly due to corn subsidies and tariffs on imported sugar.HFCS became Coke's sweetener of choice in the 1980s. But many consumers prefer the cane sugar version sold abroad, which they say tastes cleaner. Trump's move channels that feeling, but swapping out HFCS isn't just cosmetic.HFCS accounts for about 3% of total US corn usage, 410 million bushels a year, according to the US Department of Agriculture. Removing that would ripple through corn prices and farm incomes.The Corn Refiners Association (CRA) estimates such a shift could cut farm receipts by $2.2 to $5.1 billion, with worst-case losses reaching $7.5 billion. Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska alone could lose nearly $2.35 billion in the short term.'Replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar — all with no nutritional benefit,' warned CRA President and CEO John Bode, as per CBS.Coca-Cola remains a giant.As of July 17, 2025, it had a market cap of $298.16 billion. It reported $47.06 billion in revenue for 2024, with Q1 2025 revenues at $11.13 billion (down 2% YoY due to currency swings and bottling changes), while organic revenue rose 6%.Net income in 2024 hit $10.63 billion; Q1 2025 net income rose 4.8% to $3.33 billion.Coca-Cola sells 500+ brands in over 200 countries, reaching 1.9 billion people daily. It led the global non-alcoholic beverage market with over 40% share in 2024, according to Investing.com.The $478.14 billion carbonated beverage market is projected to hit $707.76 billion by 2034, as per Precedence Research. The cola segment alone could more than double, from $144.6 billion to $317.5 billion, by then, as per Prophecy Market Insights.In the US, Coke held a 44.9% share of the 2024 carbonated soft drink market, which was valued at $303.11 billion and is forecast to grow to $467.18 billion by 2030, according to Grand View Research.Core brands like Coke (19.2%), Sprite (8.1%), and Diet Coke (7.8%) remain dominant.What's also worth noting is that nearly 40% of Coca-Cola's global revenue comes from the US market alone. In 2024, North America contributed 39% to total revenue, followed by Europe, the Middle East and Africa at 23%, Latin America and Bottling Investments at 13% each, and Asia Pacific at 12%, as per the report.While Trump touts Coca-Cola's supposed health kick, the company is fighting a far more consequential battle, with the IRS. And the outcome could reset global norms on how multinationals are taxed.It goes back to 1996, when Coke and the IRS agreed on a royalty formula for profits from foreign subsidiaries: the so-called 10-50-50 rule. Under it, subsidiaries kept 10% of sales and half the residual profit; the US parent got the rest. In return, the IRS said it wouldn't impose accuracy-related penalties, so long as Coke stuck to the formula.That truce held, until 2011. As reported the Forbes, without warning, the IRS scrapped the agreement for tax years 2007 to 2009 and imposed a new method: the Comparable Profits Method (CPM), which bases income allocations on profits earned by similar independent companies.The switch inflated Coca-Cola's taxable income by $9 billion and hit it with $3.4 billion in tax deficiencies for those three years alone.Coke challenged the IRS in court, but in 2020, the US Tax Court largely sided with the government. While the court allowed Coke some credit for dividends paid, it upheld the IRS's overall approach.The company now owes $2.7 billion in back taxes, $6 billion with interest.In September 2024, Coca-Cola wired the full $6 billion to the IRS, labelling it a 'tax litigation deposit.' The company is still appealing, but the money's already gone.Coke's argues that the IRS pulled a bait and switch. After encouraging use of the 10-50-50 formula for years, the agency retroactively changed the rules and punished the company for following its guidance. In its own words, the IRS 'handed Coca-Cola a $3 billion jaywalking ticket' after leading it into the crosswalk.Additionally, the IRS accuses Coca-Cola of shifting billions in profits to low-tax countries like Ireland, Brazil, and Eswatini. In court, Judge Albert Lauber called the company's global tax structure 'astronomical.'The fallout is already visible. Coca-Cola in May 2024 raised $4 billion in debt, partly to deal with the load. Financial Express reported that the case could curb acquisitions and buybacks. Al Jazeera pegged the company's total exposure at up to '$16 billion, almost two years' worth of profits.A shift to cane sugar would likely boost demand for domestic producers, particularly in Florida and Louisiana, where most of the US cane sugar industry is based. In 2024, the US sugar market stood at 48.1 million tons, as per IMARC, and the cane segment accounted for roughly 40–45% of total supply, USDA ERS, 2025.This shift would be welcomed by powerful industry groups like the American Sugar Alliance, which have long advocated for reduced reliance on HFCS.Despite being shielded by the US Sugar Program, which keeps domestic prices high through tariffs and quotas, cane sugar producers have struggled. They face rising input costs, margin pressures, and stiff competition from cheaper HFCS, widely adopted since the 1980s.The sector has also seen significant consolidation, with sugarcane farms declining by 31% between 1997 and 2022, as reported Southern Ag Today. For many growers, a move back to real sugar in sodas would be a rare opportunity to reclaim lost ground.But the cost implications are steep.Cane sugar costs between $0.40 and $0.50 per pound in the US, compared to $0.20–$0.30 for HFCS. That could mean $800–$900 million in added annual costs for Coca-Cola alone, Hindustan Times reported, based on its estimated use of 2.7 billion pounds of sweetener.Consumers could see price hikes of 10–15% on sweetened drinks, as per HT.Switching would also force 'massive supply chain overhauls,' from storage to equipment upgrades.The labour impact is mixed. Corn processors and HFCS refiners may face job cuts, thousands, according to the CRA. Meanwhile, sugar refining jobs could grow slightly, but direct employment in that sector is modest — 14,000 to 15,000 people, as per IBISWorld, 2025.Scientifically, switching to cane sugar may not mean much. The FDA has stated there's no evidence of a meaningful safety difference between HFCS and cane sugar. Harvard nutritionist Frank Hu summed it up: 'Sugar in general' is the problem, not which kind.But the war on ultra-processed food is as much cultural as medical, and Trump is using that momentum.This is more than a formula change, it's a potential $6 billion shake-up in the domestic sugar economy, which accounts for 30% of US sugar supply.Trump's announcement may be political theatre, but for Coca-Cola, it could be smart brand positioning. With tax agents closing in and consumers rethinking processed foods, appearing to respond to health concerns could be a reputational buffer.'Real sugar Coke' fits 2025's consumer trends: nostalgia, authenticity and clean-label marketing. But overhauling sugar sourcing, supply chains and formulas won't be easy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
Gaza, Ukraine and beyond: Is Trump's bid to be a global peacemaker falling apart?
The United States cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks this week plunges one of President Donald Trump's pushes to solve global conflicts into new uncertainty. read more The United States' decision to withdraw from Gaza ceasefire negotiations this week has cast fresh doubt over President Donald Trump's attempts to resolve some of the world's most intractable conflicts. The faltering of talks aimed at ending the 21-month war between Israel and Hamas marks another setback for Trump whose efforts to broker international peace agreements have stalled across multiple fronts. Though back in office for only six months, the Republican president has sought to position himself as a global peacemaker. Some of his aims, such as ending the Ukraine war before taking office, have yet to materialise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump has cited humanitarian motives for his diplomatic pursuits, he has also been vocal about his desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Several allies have nominated him for the honour. Ceasefire efforts in Gaza: No major progress Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, announced Thursday that the U.S. was recalling its negotiating team from Qatar. Talks there had failed to yield a breakthrough. Witkoff accused Hamas of not engaging in 'good faith', though he did not elaborate. Despite a visit to Washington earlier this month by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the negotiations have produced little progress. Witkoff said the U.S. would now 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home', but officials declined to provide further details. Asked about the issue on Friday, Trump told reporters that Hamas was uninterested in a deal and added, 'I think what's going to happen is they're going to be hunted down.' Ukraine war: Stalemate persists Trump previously vowed to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within 24 hours of assuming office, but the war continues with no sign of resolution. Despite increasing criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump has not supported a bipartisan U.S. sanctions bill. Instead, he gave Russia 50 days to accept a peace plan, delaying punitive measures. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This delay has allowed Moscow to intensify its military offensive. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated his willingness to hold direct talks with Putin, but Russia has rejected the offer. Lower-level negotiations held in Istanbul on Wednesday ended without progress. Russia continues to demand that Ukraine withdraw from four regions it annexed in 2022 and abandon its NATO ambitions, terms Kyiv and its Western backers have rejected. Iran conflict: Ceasefire but no nuclear deal The US and Israel recently carried out joint strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, leading to a fragile ceasefire. However, Washington has not yet reached any agreement with Tehran over its nuclear programme. An Iranian diplomat said this week that Tehran is open to talks with the US but only if steps are taken to rebuild trust. Meanwhile, Iran is also exploring a separate negotiation path with Britain, France and Germany—three parties to the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump withdrew from during his previous term. Foreign ministers from the four countries met Friday in Istanbul, warning that sanctions could be reinstated if there is no movement on a new deal by August. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Progress on some fronts Despite the setbacks, Trump has managed to broker certain regional agreements. In June, the US facilitated a peace accord between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, ending years of tension. The agreement includes commitments to cease hostilities, respect each other's sovereignty and grant US access to critical minerals. In May, the Trump administration claimed to de-escalate tensions between India and Pakistan following cross-border strikes. However, India denied any international interference. Earlier in July, US special envoy Tom Barrack announced a limited ceasefire between Israel and Syria following Israeli intervention in the latter's internal conflict. While the ceasefire was hailed as a success, the episode disrupted efforts to normalise relations between the two nations. With inputs from agencies


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Narrow escape for 150 after fire in GMC office basement
Ghaziabad: At least 150 people had a narrow escape while the basement of the GMC headquarters — board meetings are held there — was gutted after a major fire broke out at the building located in Navyug Market area on Friday. Over 150 employees — including women — were evacuated through the back door after the fire broke out at 5pm. Municipal commissioner Vikramaditya Singh Malik and mayor Sunita Dayal left the office when the fire started. Chief fire officer Rahul Pal said, "At 5.20pm, we received the information following which three fire tankers, along with the FSO, immediately departed from Kotwali fire station." The fire tenders brought the blaze under control after about 45 minutes. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida Pal said, "The fire started in the control unit/electric panel located in the basement meeting hall of the civic body office and reached the first floor via the electric duct. Fire service personnel extinguished the fire completely by pumping water from a motor fire engine. The fire incident resulted in damage to 10 to 12 chairs, an air conditioner and the false ceiling in the basement meeting hall." Mohan Sharma, a GMC employee, said, "We were in the office when we noticed smoke in our cabins. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo We rushed out only to see plumes of smoke billowing from the basement. An alert was sounded and employees were evacuated." "Since it was not advisable to use the lift and the stairs leading to GMC's four-storey building pass through the basement, employees were asked to use stairs on the opposite side," Sharma added. Vibha, a female employee, said, "We panicked when we heard that the basement was on fire and even though we managed to escape using the stairs, we had to cover our faces as the smoke had spread all around."


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Akali Dal fears ‘3rd false case' against Majithia
Chandigarh: The Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) on Friday accused vigilance bureau (VB) officials of creating false evidence against former minister Bikram Singh Majithia after failing to gather proof in the alleged false case of disproportionate assets against him. Addressing a press conference here, SAD chief spokesman Arshdeep Singh Kler and advocate Damanbir Singh Sobti said they apprehended that a "third false case" could be registered against Majithia. They also said they would move court to seek live streaming of the court proceedings of the assets case. Kler said, "The VB failed to buttress their claims that 29 mobiles were recovered from Majithia, including Rs 141 crore transactions, Rs 540 crore investment, and 1,000 acres of land in Himachal Pradesh." He also said that the VB "floated a new theory of a SIM card in the name of a person while Majithia has nothing to do with any such SIM as he uses a number which was issued in his own name". The two alleged the VB was picking up people illegally and torturing them to sign statements under Section 164 of the CrPC." Sobti claimed two people were picked up from Amritsar on July 21. "They were kept in a private hotel in Amritsar and compelled to sign their statements under Section 164, stating that investments done by his late brother Rupinder Singh were done with cash given by Bikram Singh Majithia." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Sobti said, "The family of these two people approached the Punjab and Haryana high court and a Habeas Corpus petition was filed. The high court appointed a warrant officer who raided the VB office at Mohali along with a team. When the govt came to know about this development, they were immediately taken to Amritsar and were forced by vigilance officials to give a statement to their family that they were coming in a bus, which they refused. " Sobti claimed that the statement of one individual was being recorded under which he was told to state that another person made an investment with cash received from Majithia. Sobti also alleged that a person "who introduces himself as a retired CBI official and adviser of Arvind Kejriwal in his legal cases, visited the vigilance office regularly and guided officials on how to proceed in the case." Sobti also named another person, who he claimed, "dictated Punjab officials in the case. " MSID:: 122905195 413 |