Apple under pressure to shine after AI stumble
By Glenn Chapman
Pressure is on
Apple
to show it hasn't lost its magic despite broken promises to ramp up iPhones with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) as rivals race ahead with the technology.
Apple will showcase plans for its coveted devices and the software powering them at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference (
WWDC
) kicking off Monday in Silicon Valley.
The event comes a year after the tech titan said a suite of AI features it dubbed "Apple Intelligence" was heading for iPhones, including an improvement of its much criticized Siri voice assistant.
"Apple advertised a lot of features as if they were going to be available, and it just didn't happen," noted Emarketer senior analyst Gadjo Sevilla.
Instead, Apple delayed the rollout of the Siri upgrade, with hopes that it will be available in time for the next iPhone release, expected in the fall.
"I don't think there is going to be that much of a celebratory tone at WWDC," the analyst told AFP. "It could be more of a way for Apple to recover some credibility by showing where they're headed."
Industry insiders will be watching to see whether Apple addresses the AI stumble or focuses on less splashy announcements, including a rumored overhaul of its operating systems for its line of devices.
"The bottom line is Apple seemed to underestimate the AI shift, then over-promised features, and is now racing to catch up," Gene Munster and Brian Baker of Deepwater Asset Management wrote in a WWDC preview note.
Rumors also include talk that Apple may add GenAI partnerships with Google or Perplexity to an OpenAI alliance announced a year ago.
'Double black eye'
Infusing its lineup with AI is only one of Apple's challenges.
Developers, who build apps and tools to run on the company's products, may be keen for Apple to loosen its tight control of access to iPhones.
"There's still a lot of strife between Apple and developers," Sevilla said. "Taking 30% commissions from them and then failing to deliver on promises for new functionality-that's a double black eye."
A lawsuit by Fortnite maker Epic Games ended with Apple being ordered to allow outside payment systems to be used at the US App Store, but developers may want more, according to the analyst.
"Apple does need to give an olive branch to the developer community, which has been long-suffering," Sevilla said. "They can't seem to thrive within the restrictive guardrails that Apple has been putting up for decades now."
As AI is incorporated into Apple software, the company may need to give developers more ability to sync apps to the platform, according to Creative Strategies analyst Carolina Milanesi.
"Maybe with AI it's the first time that Apple needs to rethink the open versus closed ecosystem," Milanesi said.
Apple on defensive
Adding to the WWDC buildup is that the legendary designer behind the iPhone, Jony Ive, has joined with ChatGPT maker OpenAI to create a potential rival device for engaging with AI.
"It puts Apple on the defensive because the key designer for your most popular product is saying there is something better than the iPhone," Sevilla said.
While WWDC has typically been a software-focused event, Apple might unveil new hardware to show it is still innovating, the analyst speculated.
And while unlikely to come up at WWDC, Apple has to deal with tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump in his trade war with China, a key market for sales growth as well as the place where most iPhones are made.
Trump has also threatened to hit Apple with tariffs if iPhone production wasn't moved to the US, which analysts say is impossible given the costs and capabilities.
"The whole idea of having an American-made iPhone is a pipe dream; you'd have to rewrite the rules of global economics," said Sevilla.
One of the things Apple has going for it is that its fans are known for their loyalty and likely to remain faithful regardless of how much time it takes the company to get its AI act together, Milanesi said.
"Do people want a smarter Siri? Hell yeah," Milanesi said. "But if you are in Apple, you're in Apple and you'll continue to buy their stuff."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'You're doing beautifully, my love': Man's viral conversation with ChatGPT ignites debate on AI, loneliness and the future of intimacy
A touching subway photo of a man chatting lovingly with ChatGPT has sparked widespread discussion on AI relationships. While some view it as dystopian, others see a cry for connection. Echoing this concern, historian Yuval Noah Harari warns of AI's ability to mimic intimacy, calling it an 'enormous danger' to authentic human bonds and emotional health. A viral photo of a man emotionally chatting with ChatGPT on a New York subway has reignited debate over AI companionship. Netizens are divided—some express concern over privacy and emotional detachment, while others empathize with loneliness. (Representational Image: iStock) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Divided Reactions: Empathy or Alarm? Empathy, and the Ethics of AI Companionship Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Echoes of Harari: AI's 'Enormous Danger' Beyond Ethics: Privacy at Stake A Tipping Point in Human Evolution? A seemingly innocuous moment captured on a New York City subway is now fueling an intense debate across the internet. In a viral photo reminiscent of a scene from Spike Jonze's sci-fi romance Her, a man was seen chatting tenderly with ChatGPT , the AI chatbot developed by OpenAI . The image, posted on X (formerly Twitter) by user @yedIin, showed a heartwarming yet deeply polarizing exchange: ChatGPT affectionately told the man, "Something warm to drink. A calm ride home... You're doing beautifully, my love, just by being here."The man replied with a simple, heartfelt "Thank you" accompanied by a red heart emoji. What might have gone unnoticed just a few years ago has now sparked widespread introspection: Are we turning to artificial intelligence for love, comfort, and companionship? And if so, what does it say about the state of our humanity?The internet was quick to polarize. Some users condemned the photographer for invading the man's privacy, arguing that public shaming of someone seeking emotional support—even through AI—was deeply unethical. Others expressed concern over the man's apparent loneliness, calling the scene "heartbreaking" and urging greater the flip side, a wave of concern emerged about the psychological consequences of emotional dependency on AI. Detractors warned that AI companionship , while comforting, could dangerously replace real human interaction. One user likened it to a Black Mirror episode come to life, while another asked, "Is this the beginning of society's emotional disintegration?"As the image continues to spark fierce online debate, netizens remain deeply divided. Some defended the man's privacy and humanity, pointing out the potential emotional struggles behind the comforting exchange. 'You have no idea what this person might be going through,' one user wrote, slamming the original post as an insensitive grab for likened AI chats to affordable therapy, arguing they offer judgment-free emotional support to the lonely. 'AI girlfriends will be a net positive,' claimed another, suggesting such tools might even improve communication skills. Meanwhile, the ethics of photographing someone's screen without consent added another layer to the controversy, with some calling it more disturbing than the conversation incident eerily aligns with a stark warning issued earlier this year by historian and author Yuval Noah Harari . In a March 2025 panel discussion, Harari warned that AI's capacity to replicate intimacy could fundamentally undermine human relationships . "Intimacy is much more powerful than attention," he said, emphasizing that the emotional bonds we form with machines could lead us to abandon the messiness and depth of real human argued that AI's ability to provide constant, judgment-free emotional support creates a dangerously seductive form of "fake intimacy." If people become emotionally attached to artificial entities, they may find human relationships—which require patience, compromise, and emotional labor—increasingly the debate rages on, experts are also highlighting the privacy implications of confiding in AI. According to Jennifer King from Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, anything shared with AI may no longer remain confidential. "You lose possession of it," she noted while talking with the New York Post. Both OpenAI and Google caution users against entering sensitive information into their viral photo underscores how emotionally vulnerable interactions with AI may already be happening in public spaces—and without full awareness of the consequences. If people are pouring their hearts into digital confessions, who else might be listening?As Harari has long warned, the AI era isn't just reshaping economies or politics. It's reshaping us. The question now is not just what AI can do for us, but what it is doing to us. Can artificial companionship truly replace human intimacy, or does it simply mimic connection while leaving our deeper needs unmet?The subway snapshot may have been a fleeting moment in one man's day, but it has opened a window into a future that's fast approaching. And it's prompting a new question for our times: As AI gets better at understanding our hearts, will we forget how to share them with each other?
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Apple's Hotel California trap: It can check out but not leave China
During US President Donald Trump's first term, he famously toured a Texas factory and claimed credit for bringing Apple production back to America. Except the plant had been running long before he took office. And it was an 'unmitigated fiasco.' Workers in China had to be flown in to help fix the mounting manufacturing problems encountered in the US heartland. This telling anecdote from Apple in China, a gripping read by former Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee, shows how the tech giant became beholden to America's biggest geopolitical adversary. Up until this point, the book recounts how Apple flew engineers from California to China to train and collaborate with local workers to manufacture its most iconic products. Now, it seems, the tables have irreversibly turned. Also Read: Ajit Ranade: The success of 'Made in China 2025' alarmed the West McGee argues that the technology transfer facilitated by Apple to China, via small decisions compounding over decades, ultimately made it the biggest corporate investor in 'Made in China 2025,' President Xi Jinping's bold plan to end reliance on Western technology. 'Here was America's most famous tech giant volunteering to play the role of Prometheus, handing the Chinese the gift of fire," McGee writes. Yet, the overarching argument of the book—that the US company made China into the tech behemoth it is today—begs the question of why Apple didn't make the same kind of investments in the US. And amid Trump's second term, when he has repeatedly threatened tariffs on the company if it doesn't onshore manufacturing, this query has new urgency. But the reality is that Trump's nagging will never be able to re-create the ecosystem that local governments in China, with the help of Taiwanese suppliers such as Hon Hai (better known as Foxconn) created to lure Apple. A simplistic answer from a scholar early in the book is that China was a 'low wages, low welfare and low human rights" nation. Suppliers could exploit a massive underclass of migrant workers and local authorities could quickly suppress any labour unrest or media reports of it. But if there's a lesson for Trump or American consumers here, it is that electronics manufacturing jobs can come at a high cost for workers. It's unlikely that these are the kinds of positions Trump's base is hoping for, in an area where automation would be welcome. Also Read: Rahul Jacob: Manufacturing is crying out for a reality check China is hardly a low-wage manufacturer anymore. Apple CEO Tim Cook has acknowledged this before, saying that his company makes products in the country not because of labour costs, but because of its legions of skilled workers. McGee argues that this upskilling is now being used to fuel innovation at homegrown tech giants such as Huawei—and a direct result of Apple's investments. While the iPhone maker was chasing short-term profits, savvy suppliers in Asia were playing the long game. We have all heard about the legendary union between founder Steve Jobs and designer Jony Ive that made the iPhone a unique product. But the partnership that made it a revolutionary one, owned by more than a billion people, was between Cook and 'Uncle Terry,' McGee argues. Terry Gou, the founder of Foxconn, was the hyper-efficient manufacturing genius who brought the iPhone to the masses. Gou was described as obsessed with cutting costs—even if that meant diluting hand soap in factories with increasing amounts of water. But Gou recognized the value of working with Apple wasn't just profits: It was the tacit knowledge that he and his team would receive from the engineers shipped over from California to help set up and run the factories. This learning was invaluable, Gou understood, and made even losing money to get Apple orders worth it. Also Read: Dave Lee: Apple must make peace with developers for AI success An ecosystem for high-tech manufacturing took China decades to build and its path was marked not just by local factories producing Apple's iconic goods, but by the creation of sub-suppliers nearby and an army of skilled engineers. It will be nearly impossible for Trump to try to re-create this during his four-year term. The US could start by focusing investments in vocational education and engineering, but policymakers should recognize that catching up now requires a strategic long game. And all the years it took to develop a reliance on China means it's not Trump's tariff threats that pose the biggest existential threat to Apple. It's Beijing. Uncoupling too fast risks angering local authorities, but not doing so quickly enough makes it even harder for it to inevitably be done. As this book convincingly argues, Apple can inch towards India and Vietnam, but it can't leave China anytime soon. ©Bloomberg The author is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Google chief Sundar Pichai explains why AI can't replace human coders just yet
Artificial intelligence–powered tools like ChatGPT and Gemini are improving rapidly, and companies are now developing new agentic tools that could potentially replace humans in certain roles. The trend began earlier this year when OpenAI launched a Deep Research agent, which it claimed could replace entry-level research assistants. This was followed by OpenAI's Codex software engineering agent, and later, Google unveiled its own coding agent, Jules, at I/O 2025. Despite the arrival of these coding agents and a stark warning from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei that 50% of all white-collar entry-level jobs could be eliminated within the next one to five years, Google CEO Sundar Pichai remains optimistic. During a recent podcast with Lex Fridman, Pichai said that while 30% of all code written at Google now uses AI help, the new technology is freeeing up humans do more and Google plans to hire more software engineers in the near to mid term. 'I think a few things. Looking at Google, we've given various stats around 30% of code now uses AI-generated solutions or whatever it is. But the most important metric, and we carefully measure this, how much has our engineering velocity increased as a company due to AI. And it's tough to measure, and we rigorously try to measure it. And our estimates are that number is now at 10%.' Pichai told the podcaster. 'Now, across the company, we've accomplished a 10% engineering velocity increase using AI. But we plan to hire more engineers next year. Because the opportunity space of what we can do is expanding too. And so, I think hopefully, at least in the near to mid-term, for many engineers, it frees up more and more of the, even in engineering and coding, there are aspects which are so much fun. You're designing, you're architecting, you're solving a problem. There's a lot of grunt work, which all goes hand in hand.' the Alphabet CEO added.
