On Covid resurgence, TN health official says no need to panic, surveillance mechanism in place
Covid resurgence
as a strict
surveillance mechanism
was in place in the state.
The present situation was not alarming and the pandemic like so many other thousands of viruses was under continuous monitoring, he said.
Allaying the apprehensions of the people on a possible outbreak of the pandemic, Selvavinayagam said in a video message that neither the World Health Organisation nor the central government has issued any advisory on Covid-19 outbreak.
"The Health department is closely monitoring all viruses including Covid through the Integrated Health Information Platform (IHIP) portal which allowed real-time reporting of data, modelling and analysis and this was integrated with other health programmes," he said.
Surveillance is being carried out daily on this portal through the involvement of 4,000 plus institutions.
In addition, along with MIST (a research programme to understand and prevent
airborne viral transmissions
), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and the National Institute of Edidemiology (NIE), the DPH has launched a sentinel surveillance to monitor all ILI (
Influenza-like Illness
) and SARI (
Severe Acute Respiratory Infection
) cases.
It also involved the participation of two rural and two urban PHCs, and medical colleges in four districts.
"So, all outbreaks are under continuous monitoring. Tamil Nadu's health infrastructure is vibrant and the state has the capacity to go on an expansion anytime," Selvavinayagam said in the nearly four-minute video.
"The public will be informed of outbreak if any. Under the present circumstances, there is no need to panic about Covid because the Tamil Nadu government has taken up a surveillance mechanism. If infection occurs, it will be informed to the public immediately," he added.
The official clarified that he had to explain the current situation due to reports in a section of the media on Covid-19 re-emergence.
Covid has not been totally eradicated. And like lakhs of viruses or bacteria when Covid made an appearance then it will be controlled and an equilibrium status will be maintained. The preventive measures were based on the virulence of the virus and its impact.
"Ten infections among one lakh people, ten infections in ten lakh people and ten infections among 7.8 crore population in Tamil Nadu can't be considered as same," the DPH stressed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Top 10 cleanest countries in the world 2024: Estonia, Luxembourg, and Norway score highest in cleanliness index
Top 10 cleanest countries in the world: Life expectancy is closely linked to cleanliness. Access to clean air and water, effective waste disposal, and proper sanitation can help people live longer, healthier lives. In countries where pollution levels are high, there are more deaths from non-communicable diseases. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), these diseases are responsible for 74 per cent of all deaths worldwide. Right now, it is important to reduce all types of pollution to improve people's quality of life. The information here comes from the 2024 Environmental Performance Index (EPI). Yale University, Columbia University, and the World Economic Forum collaborated to produce the EPI. It assesses the cleanliness and environmental friendliness of 180 nations. The index, which focuses on three primary objectives—preserving ecosystems, combating climate change, and improving environmental health—is based on 58 indicators in 11 categories. These include things like biodiversity, the preservation of natural habitats, sustainable practices, air quality, and water and sanitation. The world is still a long way from being entirely sustainable, but certain nations have made significant strides. From the cleanest to the most polluted, each nation is assigned a score, providing governments with a means of gauging the effectiveness of their environmental policies and monitoring their advancements towards a healthier, cleaner future. Source: Environmental Performance Index Estonia tops the list with outstanding results in air purity, ecosystem care, and climate initiatives. The country is well-known for promoting renewable energy, managing forests responsibly, and running carbon-neutral public transport. It combines modern digital advancements with a strong commitment to protecting nature. Small in size but big in environmental achievements, Luxembourg performs exceptionally in water quality (90.6) and sanitation (99.8). More than half of its land is under environmental protection, and it ranks high in biodiversity (84.8) thanks to strict EU environmental rules. Germany achieves full wastewater treatment coverage with a strong score of 89.1 and does well in biodiversity protection (82.4). The country proves that industrial power can coexist with green spaces and well-planned conservation programs. Finland earns perfect marks in sanitation, safe drinking water, and controlling heavy metal pollution. Its air remains clean, forests are well protected, and environmental care is deeply woven into everyday living. With over 30 per cent of its oceans protected, the UK is unique in its efforts to conserve its maritime areas. While pursuing aggressive environmental and climatic goals, it has reduced greenhouse gas emissions by about a third over the last ten years. Renowned worldwide for clean energy use and low carbon emissions, Sweden excels in air purity, sanitation, and heavy metal pollution control. It also maintains healthy forests and works to reduce pollution from farming. With excellent anti-pollution measures, Norway receives a perfect score of 100 for managing heavy metals and 82.9 for air quality. It remains at the forefront of green energy leadership since nearly all of its electricity originates from renewable sources. Austria enforces tight controls on pesticides, fertilizers, and pollutants, earning a sanitation score of 96.0. With two-thirds of its land covered in forests and meadows, the country keeps its landscapes lush and well-preserved. In terms of cleanliness, heavy metal control, and clean drinking water, Switzerland achieves flawless outcomes. Known for its stunning landscapes, it also upholds stringent environmental regulations to safeguard its abundant wildlife. Denmark is a leader in reducing heavy metal pollution and makes significant investments in organic farming, renewable energy, and environmentally conscious travel. Even if it has recently slowed its rate of emission reduction, it is still a global sustainability model.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Booze too is injurious to health! Record number of Americans are rejecting alcohol drinking. New trend rising in USA?
Fewer Americans are reporting that they drink alcohol amid a growing belief that even moderate alcohol consumption is a health risk, according to a Gallup poll released Wednesday. A record high percentage of U.S. adults, 53 per cent, now say moderate drinking is bad for their health, up from 28 per cent in 2015. The uptick in doubt about alcohol's benefits is largely driven by young adults — the age group that is most likely to believe drinking 'one or two drinks a day' can cause health hazards — but older adults are also now increasingly likely to think moderate drinking carries risks, as per a report. As concerns about health impacts rise, fewer Americans are reporting that they drink. The survey finds that 54 per cent of U.S. adults say they drink alcoholic beverages such as liquor, wine or beer. That's lower than at any other point in the past three decades. The findings of the poll, which was conducted in July, indicate that after years of many believing that moderate drinking was harmless — or even beneficial — worries about alcohol consumption are taking hold. According to Gallup's data, even those who consume alcohol are drinking less, AP reported. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program The federal government is updating new dietary guidelines, including those around alcohol. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, government data showed U.S. alcohol consumption was trending up. But other government surveys have shown a decline in certain types of drinking, particularly among teenagers and young adults. This comes alongside a new drumbeat of information about alcohol's risks. While moderate drinking was once thought to have benefits for heart health, health professionals in recent years have pointed to overwhelming evidence that alcohol consumption leads to negative health outcomes and is a leading cause of cancer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Skepticism about Alcohol's Benefits Younger adults have been quicker than older Americans to accept that drinking is harmful, but older adults are coming around to the same view. About two-thirds of 18- to 34-year-olds believe moderate drinking is unhealthy, according to the poll, up from about 4 in 10 in 2015. Older adults are less likely to see alcohol as harmful — about half of Americans age 55 or older believe this — but that's a substantial increase, too. In 2015, only about 2 in 10 adults age 55 or older thought alcohol was bad for their health. Live Events In the past, moderate drinking was thought to have some benefits. That idea came from imperfect studies that largely didn't include younger people and couldn't prove cause and effect. Now the scientific consensus has shifted, and several countries recently lowered their alcohol consumption recommendations. Earlier this year, the outgoing U.S. surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, recommended a label on bottles of beer, wine and liquor that would clearly outline the link between alcohol consumption and cancer. The federal government's current dietary guidelines recommend Americans not drink or, if they do consume alcohol, men should limit themselves to two drinks a day or fewer while women should stick to one or fewer. Gallup's director of U.S. social research, Lydia Saad, said shifting health advice throughout older Americans' lives may be a reason they have been more gradual than young adults to recognize alcohol as harmful. The government is expected to release new guidelines later this year, under the directive of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has promised big changes. Kennedy has not hinted at how the alcohol recommendations may shift. Drinking Rates Fall to Decade Low Slightly more than half of Americans, 54 per cent, report that they drink alcohol — a low in Gallup's data that is especially pronounced among women and young adults. Young Americans' alcohol consumption has been trending downward for years, accelerating the overall decline in alcohol consumption. In sharp contrast with Gallup's findings two decades ago, when young adults were likeliest to report drinking, young adults' drinking rate is now slightly below middle-aged and older adults. Americans' reported drinking is among the lowest since the question was first asked in 1939. For most of the last few decades, at least 6 in 10 Americans have reported drinking alcoholic beverages, only dipping below that point a few times in the question's history. Americans are Consuming Less Even if concerns about health risks aren't causing some adults to give up alcohol entirely, these worries could be influencing how often they drink. The survey found that adults who think moderate drinking is bad for one's health are just as likely as people who don't share those concerns to report that they drink, but fewer of the people with health worries had consumed alcohol recently. About half of those who worry moderate drinking is unhealthy said they had a drink in the previous week, compared with about 7 in 10 who did not think drinking was bad for their health. Overall, only about one-quarter of Americans who drink said they had consumed alcohol in the prior 24 hours, a record low in the survey. Roughly 4 in 10 said that it had been more than a week since they had poured a drink. FAQs Q1. How much alcohol is considered safe to drink? A1. Moderate alcohol consumption is generally considered safe for most adults. According to health guidelines (like those from the CDC or WHO). Q2. What are the long-term effects of regular alcohol use? A2. Long-term or heavy alcohol use can lead to serious health issues, including: Liver damage (e.g., fatty liver, hepatitis, cirrhosis), Increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and high blood pressure, Increased risk of several cancers (e.g., mouth, liver, breast), Mental health problems like depression and anxiety, Dependence or alcohol use disorder (AUD).
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Six deliveries per thousand are stillbirths in India, highest rate in northern states: study
Over six in every one thousand deliveries in India in 2020 could have been a stillbirth, with higher rates among urban mothers compared to rural, according to an analysis of data from national surveys and the civil registration system. Researchers, including those from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, and the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, also identified that stillbirth hotspots are located primarily in northern and central India. Chandigarh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan in north India recorded the highest rates of stillbirth, the findings published inThe Lancet Regional Health Southeast Asia journal show. The team analysed data gathered from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) and the 2020 report of the civil registration system, which is managed by the Ministry of Home Affairs and records vital events, including births, deaths and stillbirths across India. "The nationwide stillbirth rate (SBR) in 2020 was 6.548 per 1,000 total births (female: 6.54; male: 6.63). Stillbirth rates were higher among urban mothers compared to rural mothers," the authors wrote. A higher rate of stillbirth was also found in districts where pregnant women were anaemic (deficient in iron) and underweight -- factors known to increase risk of adverse birth outcomes, including stillbirth. Hygienic menstrual practices and caesarean (C-section) deliveries -- in which a baby is delivered through a surgical procedure -- were associated with a lower rate of stillbirth, especially in Telangana, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. The results were in line with data from NFHS-5, according to which the prevalence of C-section deliveries was about 45 per cent in south India in 2019-2020, the authors said. Evidence from states including Assam, Meghalaya, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh and Chhattisgarh showed that receiving at least four pre-delivery check-ups and adhering to iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy can significantly reduce the risk of stillbirth, the team said. Overall, higher rates of stillbirths were found in regions where pregnant women were anaemic, more deliveries were occurring in public health facilities and a larger fraction of women were having a lower wealth status, they said. However, there were no disparities in sex-specific rates of stillbirth across the country's districts, even though a higher rate of stillbirths seen among male foetuses may point to a higher biological vulnerability, the researchers said.
