Texas House Republicans unveil new congressional map that looks to pick up five GOP seats
The new map targets Democratic members of Congress in the Austin, Dallas and Houston metro areas and in South Texas. The draft, unveiled by Corpus Christi Republican Rep. Todd Hunter, will likely change before the final map is approved by both chambers and signed by Gov. Greg Abbott. Democrats have said they might try to thwart the process by fleeing the state.
This unusual mid-decade redistricting comes after a pressure campaign waged by President Donald Trump's political team in the hopes of padding Republicans' narrow majority in the U.S. House.
Currently, Republicans hold 25 of Texas' 38 House seats. Trump carried 27 of those districts in 2024, including those won by Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar of Laredo and Vicente Gonzalez of McAllen.
Under the proposed new lines, 30 districts would have gone to Trump last year, each by at least 10 percentage points.
The districts represented by Cuellar and Gonzalez — both of which are overwhelmingly Hispanic and anchored in South Texas — would become slightly more favorable to Republicans. Trump received 53% and 52% in those districts, respectively, in 2024; under the new proposed lines, he would have gotten almost 55% in both districts.
Also targeted are Democratic Reps. Julie Johnson of Farmers Branch — whose Dallas-anchored district would be reshaped to favor Republicans — and Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, whose nearby district would remain solidly blue but drop all of Fort Worth — Veasey's hometown and political base. That seat — now solely in Dallas County — contains parts of Johnson's, Veasey's and Rep. Jasmine Crockett's current district, raising the prospect of a primary between Veasey and Johnson.
The map's newly proposed GOP seat in Central Texas also triggers the prospect of Austin Democratic Reps. Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett facing each other in a primary for the area's lone remaining blue district. To avoid that scenario, one of the two would have to step aside or run an uphill race for a new Central Texas district, based in San Antonio, that Trump would have won by 10 points.
In the Houston area, the proposed map would remake four Democratic districts. The biggest upheaval would be in the 9th Congressional District, a majority-minority seat represented by Rep. Al Green that currently covers the southern part of Harris County and its direct southern neighbors. It would shift to the eastern parts of Houston, where no current member of Congress lives. Instead of being a seat that Vice President Kamala Harris won by 44 percent under the current boundary, Trump would have won it by 15 percent.
Texas' Republican-dominated Legislature last drew these maps in 2021, with an eye toward protecting incumbents by making their seats as safe as possible. Trump won every Republican-held Texas district in 2024 by double-digit margins, as did every GOP incumbent who received a Democratic opponent. Edinburg Rep. Monica De La Cruz's 14-point victory was the closest of any winning Republican.
To pick up new seats, Republicans have proposed to pack more Democratic voters into districts in the state's blue urban centers, giving Democrats even bigger margins in districts they already control, such as those represented by Crockett, Rep. Joaquin Castro in San Antonio and Rep. Sylvia Garcia in Houston. And they're looking to disperse Republican voters from safely red districts into several districts currently represented by Democrats, such as the ones held by Johnson and Casar.
No Republican incumbents' districts were made significantly more competitive.
The map-drawers managed to move more Republican voters into Democratic districts around Dallas and Houston without imperiling the nearby seats of GOP Reps. Beth Van Duyne, R-Irving and Troy Nehls, R-Fort Bend. Both faced competitive races in 2020 before their districts were redrawn in 2021 to become solidly Republican, and neither was made to sacrifice those gains in the state House's initial map.
The changes would create two more districts in which white residents make up a majority of eligible voters, or citizens who are old enough to vote, hiking the number of such districts from 22 under the current map to 24. Hispanic residents — the state's largest demographic group, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates — currently form the majority of eligible voters in seven districts, a total that would rise to eight under the new plan.
Four of the five districts that Republicans have drawn with the intention of flipping are now majority-Hispanic — though the Hispanic populations in the new seats in Houston and Central Texas are almost exactly 50%.
The proposed map would also create two majority Black districts, where previously there were none. Among them is the Houston-centered 18th Congressional District, which has been represented by a decades-long run of renowned Black Democratic members, including Barbara Jordan, Mickey Leland, Sheila Jackson Lee and, most recently, Sylvester Turner, whose death in March left the seat vacant. The map proposes to pack even more Democratic voters into the solidly blue seat: Harris won the district with 69% in 2024 and would have carried it with 76% under the new boundaries.
Crockett's Dallas seat would also become majority Black.
The 18th District was among Texas' four majority-minority congressional seats flagged by the U.S. Department of Justice as unconstitutional racial gerrymanders, a charge Texas Republicans have interchangeably denied in court and cited as the basis for pursuing mid-decade redistricting.
Any new map will inevitably be challenged in court. Courts have found that at least one of Texas' maps violated the Voting Rights Act every decade since it went into effect in the mid-60s. The current map is still being challenged in federal court in El Paso, with no verdict yet reached.
The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today!
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
People abuse Medicaid. That's why Trump's Big Beautiful Bill makes it stronger.
My Democratic colleagues in Congress have spread misinformation about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, claiming that it is a disaster for families. That's simply untrue. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump tasked Congress with developing a bill that enacts his domestic policy agenda and kickstarts the American economy. This piece of legislation, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, was signed into law by the president on July 4. It accomplished its goal of providing tax relief for Kentucky families, securing our border, investing in our military readiness, unleashing American energy and strengthening Medicaid for our most vulnerable Americans. In Congress, I am honored to serve as the chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. At the onset of the work on the One Big Beautiful Bill, we were tasked with finding $880 billion in savings from our committee's jurisdiction. The final version of the One Big Beautiful Bill includes over $1 trillion in savings from my committee's jurisdiction. To accomplish this, we worked to eliminate reckless Green New Deal environmental regulations, promote American energy dominance and eliminate waste, fraud and abuse within the Medicaid program. As you may have seen in the news over the past few weeks, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have spread misinformation about this bill, claiming that it is a disaster for Kentucky families. That's simply untrue. Let's take a moment to address a few of the false narratives that have been spread to scare the American people. Opinion: Trump isn't gutting Medicaid and food stamps. He's fixing our broken welfare system. Truth and lies about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and Medicaid Allegation: Single mothers, children, seniors and people with disabilities will lose access to health care. Truth: The Medicaid provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill ensure our most vulnerable Americans continue receiving the support they need. It strengthens the program by removing deceased recipients from the Medicaid rolls, requiring states to conduct more frequent eligibility checks for the expansion population, ensuring that individuals are not enrolled in multiple states and enacting commonsense work requirements for able-bodied Americans who choose not to work. Additionally, our bill expands access to home and community based services for low-income seniors and individuals living with a disability. Allegation: Work requirements are a 'ruse' to force people off Medicaid. Truth: According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, there are 4.8 million able-bodied adults currently on Medicaid who don't work. A survey showed this population spends roughly 184 hours a month watching television and socializing – that's 50% higher than employed beneficiaries. Your Turn: Medicaid handouts only create dependency. Able-bodied adults should work. | Opinion Forum Our bill enacts basic work requirements to require individuals to be employed, participate in job training, go to school or volunteer in their communities for just 20 hours per week to receive Medicaid. Notably, the One Big Beautiful Bill exempts people ages under 19 or over 65, pregnant women, tribal members, caregivers of children and seniors with disabilities and parents with dependents under 15. I believe most people would agree it's appropriate to expect able-bodied, unemployed adults on Medicaid to work or give back to their communities to receive fully subsidized health insurance. Kentuckians' support for these policies is strong, as this year, the Kentucky General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to overturn Gov. Andy Beshear's veto and institute a similar state-level work requirement. Allegation: Over 35 Kentucky hospitals are at risk of closing as a direct result of this bill. Truth: The allegation that 35 rural hospitals will close is a blatant mischaracterization at best. This number stems from a list of hospitals that generally receive high levels of Medicaid funding or experienced three consecutive years of negative total profit margin. This claim fails to mention the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program created by the bill to support rural health providers care for their patients. This will bolster funding for our most vulnerable hospitals and allow them to keep serving their communities. Trump's bill refocuses Medicaid to cover the most vulnerable Our legislation eliminates restrictive Biden-Harris era state requirements, forcing ineligible individuals to remain enrolled, and lifts Americans out of poverty by encouraging reentry into the workforce. By cutting top-down mandates, we refocus Medicaid dollars to cover the most vulnerable and give states' budgets the ability to further invest in hospitals. Spending in the Medicaid program continues to chart an unsustainable path, growing at twice the rate of inflation between 2018 and 2023. If not addressed, the program will no longer have the capacity to serve its intended purpose. In order to preserve this safety net for generations to come, Republicans have committed to policies that empower states to care for our most vulnerable Americans – pregnant women, children, individuals living with a disability and low-income seniors. The One Big Beautiful Bill is a commonsense win that strengthens Medicaid for Kentucky's most vulnerable, and I'm proud to have supported its passage. Congressman Brett Guthrie has served the people of Kentucky's Second District in Congress since 2009. He currently serves as chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. This column originally appeared in the Courier Journal.


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Nobel Prize Winners React to Idea of Trump Winning Economics Award
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Past winners of the Nobel Prize in economics have reacted to the suggestion that President Donald Trump's trade agenda has earned him a nomination for the prestigious award. During a Thursday appearance on Fox Business, Peter Navarro, White House trade adviser, said described the effects of the president's sweeping tariff policies as "a fundamental restructuring of the international trade environment." "A lot of people talk about Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize," Navarro added. "I'm thinking that, since he's basically taught the world trade economics, he might be up for the Nobel in economics." U.S. President Donald Trump walks across the South Lawn of the White House after returning on Marine One on July 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Donald Trump walks across the South Lawn of the White House after returning on Marine One on July 29, 2025 in Washington, Do Past Winners Make of the Idea? Newsweek spoke with winners of the prize—officially the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel—about the prospect of Trump receiving a nomination or winning the award. Newsweek has contacted the White House for a response to the opinions expressed by Nobel laureates in this article. Eric Maskin (2007) "I think it is unlikely that Donald Trump will be awarded a Nobel for economics," said Maskin, who was jointly awarded the prize in 2007 for contributions to mechanism design theory. "The prize is given for discoveries in economics, not for economic policies," he told Newsweek. "And even if it were awarded for a policy, it is far too early to know for sure what the impact of President Trump's tariffs will be." Maskin added that there exists "good reason" to assume that, should the high rates of tariffs imposed by Trump remain in effect, "the long-run effects on the U.S. and the world will be negative—but we will see." Roger Myerson (2007) "The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences is a science prize, and so it has been awarded for advances to general understanding in economics," said Roger Myerson, co-recipient of 2007 award alongside Maskin and Polish-American economist Leonid Hurwicz. He noted that the award is not given out for economic policy, noting that former Federal Reserve Chairman and 2022 winner Ben Bernanke was recognized for his scholarly work on the Great Depression, and not his actions during the 2008 financial crisis. 2007 Nobel Prize in Economics laureate Roger Myerson speaks at a symposium with co-winner Eric Maskin at the House of Sweden in Washington 26 November 2007. 2007 Nobel Prize in Economics laureate Roger Myerson speaks at a symposium with co-winner Eric Maskin at the House of Sweden in Washington 26 November 2007. Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images "As president of the United States, Donald Trump has made decisions that will also have great economic impact on millions of people's, for better or for worse," Myerson told Newsweek. "But if Peter Navarro wants to make the case for him as a candidate for a Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, it should be based on Donald Trump's contribution to our understanding of what is a good economic policy." Myerson said that many of Trump's recent policies had challenged conventional economic wisdom, but that to make a strong case for the award the president would need to "publish papers that engage with the economics literature and identify the different assumptions that have led him to choose his policies." "If President Trump truly has important insights to offer about economic policy-making, his publishing a thoughtful rigorous development of his ideas could be an important contribution to economic sciences," he added. "I should warn him, however, that the number of important contributions to economic sciences is greater than the number of prizes that the Nobel Committee is able to recognize." James Heckman (2000) "Let me put it this way: He is more deserving than Barack Obama," said Heckman, referring to the 2009 Peace Prize given to the former president only nine months into his first term. He said that a peace prize for Trump could be justified, "if he succeeds in bringing peace to the Middle East." However, Heckman, who was awarded the economics prize in 2000 for his work on econometrics, said he was "sure" Trump could never win this award "because of his abrasive commentary." "The bias against his politics is immense everywhere and he is not as polished as most laureates are," he told Newsweek. Heckman agreed with Navarro that Trump had attempted to restructure global trade, but said the "jury is out" on the impacts of this. "But who knows. The times they are a-changing and [Bob] Dylan won for literature." William Nordhaus (2018) Responding to Navarro, whom he called "an unreliable source of theory and commentary," Nordhaus told Newsweek he was skeptical that Trump's trade policies had achieved anything besides undermining America's global leverage. "The way I understand Trump's 'successes' is this: The United States has over the decades built up an enormous reservoir of soft and hard power as well as good will around most of the world—a vast amount of social capital," said Nordhaus, who won the award in 2018 "for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis." Yale Professor William Nordhaus speaks to attendees during a press conference after winning the 2018 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences at Yale University on October 8, 2018 in New Haven, Connecticut. Yale Professor William Nordhaus speaks to attendees during a press conference after winning the 2018 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences at Yale University on October 8, 2018 in New Haven, Connecticut."Trump has drawn upon that social capital and is using it like a spendthrift teenager to achieve virtually nothing of value and to destroy many critical parts of the global institutional infrastructure," Nordhaus said. He added that Trump could be a "leading contender" for the Ig Nobel Prize. Past winners of this satirical prize, awarded annually since 1991, include Russian President Vladimir Putin and Edward Teller, the Hungarian-American physicist known as the "the father of the hydrogen bomb," as well as Donald Trump himself, a co-winner of the 2020 award for Medical Education due to his perceived mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. What Others Are Saying White House trade adviser Peter Navarro told Fox Business on Thursday: "This is a fundamental restructuring of the international trade environment in a way where the biggest market in the world has said you're not going to cheat us anymore. We're going to have fair deals." "Everything he's doing has defied the critics," Navarro added. "The tariffs have been tax cuts rather than inflation, and it's working beautifully." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, during a recent press briefing, said: "President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize." Jeffrey Frankel, economist and professor at the Harvard Kennedy School, told Newsweek that the prospect of Trump receiving the economics prize is "beyond absurd" and that there is "no chance whatever that he would be seriously considered." "Regarding policies enacted, Trump's tariffs may go down in history because the effects will be so bad and, much as the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930 did, may teach a generation or two about the harms of tariffs and the value of listening to warnings from professional economists, when they are virtually unanimous," he said. "I must say, I put the probability of Trump winning the Nobel Prize as well below the probability of the U.S. invading Sweden," he added. What Happens Next? As well as the White House press secretary, Trump has been tapped to receive nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and, most recently, Cambodia. Prize announcements for all Nobel prizes typically occur in October, followed by award ceremonies held in December.


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump To Get New Nobel Peace Prize Nomination
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Cambodia will nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in securing a ceasefire with Thailand after days of skirmishes. Sun Chanthol, Cambodia's deputy prime minister, said his country would recommend Trump for the award as he praised him for a diplomatic breakthrough. It ended clashes between the neighbors that killed dozens and displaced hundreds of thousands. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment out of office hours. File photo: Donald Trump gives a salute as he boards Air Force One on August 1, 2025 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. File photo: Donald Trump gives a salute as he boards Air Force One on August 1, 2025 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Anna Moneymaker//Getty Images Why It Matters The Nobel Peace Prize recognizes an individual or organization who has managed to "advance fellowship between nations." The nomination of Trump follows recommendations for the award by Israel and Pakistan and the White House's calls for him to be recognized for his ability as a geopolitical dealmaker. What To Know Chanthol said that, without Trump's intervention, Cambodia and Thailand would likely not have struck a deal to end the fighting that killed at least 45 people on both sides of the disputed border. The Southeast Asian neighbors share a 500-mile land frontier—largely mapped by France when it ruled Cambodia. Last week, clashes erupted, displacing more than 300,000 people and prompting the U.S. State Department to step up its advisory risk. On Monday, the leaders agreed to a truce, which has mostly held to, and Chanthol lauded Trump's role in this happening. Reuters reported that, two days into the skirmishes, the U.S. president called Phumtham Wechayachai, Thailand's acting prime minister, after Bangkok had not responded to mediation offers from Malaysia and China. After his initial call, Trump said Thailand and Cambodia agreed to discuss a ceasefire and that Washington would not move ahead with tariff negotiations with both until the conflict had ended. Then, Bangkok demanded a meeting between the two prime ministers must take place at a neutral location, Reuters said. The peace deal was announced in Malaysia on Monday, with leaders of the countries pictured shaking hands. On Thursday, the Trump administration said Cambodia and Thailand would face 19 percent tariffs on imports to the U. S.—down from the 36 percent rate Thailand had faced previously and well below the 49 percent levy Trump announced for Cambodia in April. Announcing that his government would put the president's name forward with the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Chanthol said Trump should get the prize not only for his work on Cambodia, "but also elsewhere." In June, Pakistan said it would recommend Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve a conflict with India. In July, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also said he would nominate the U.S. leader, as he praised his "pivotal role" in negotiating diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab states in 2020. In touting his credentials for the prize, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that, during this presidency, Trump had ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia; Israel and Iran; Rwanda and Congo; India and Pakistan; Serbia and Kosovo; and Egypt and Ethiopia. What People Are Saying Sun Chanthol, Cambodia's deputy prime minister, said: "He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia, but also elsewhere." White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said on July 31: "The president has brokered on average about one peace deal or ceasefire per month … It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize." What Happens Next The nomination process for the Nobel Prize starts in September, and the announcements will take place between October 6 and 13. Trump has expressed his wish for the prestigious award, but he is still playing a key role in ongoing disputes in the Middle East and Ukraine.