North Korea tours mooted as South looks to mend ties
Koo Byung-sam, a spokesperson for South Korea's Unification Ministry, which handles inter-Korea affairs, refused to comment on a "particular issue".
But Koo said he understood individual tours were not in violation of international sanctions.
Tourism is one of a narrow range of cash sources for North Korea that are not targeted under United Nations sanctions over its nuclear and weapons programs.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has pledged to improve strained relations with Pyongyang that have reached their worst level in years.
In a bid to ease tensions, Lee suspended anti-North Korea loudspeaker broadcasts along the border and ordered a halt to leaflet campaigns criticising the North's leaders by anti-Pyongyang activists.
The president has said he will discuss further plans with top security officials to resume dialogue with North Korea, which is technically at war with the South.
North Korea recently opened a beach resort in the city of Wonsan, a flagship project driven by leader Kim Jong-un to promote tourism.
But the tourist area is temporarily not accepting foreign visitors, according to a July 16 note by DPR Korea Tour, a website operated by North Korea's National Tourism Administration.
North Korea first needs to open the area to the outside world, the Unification Ministry spokesperson said, when asked if South Koreans could travel to Wonsan.
South Korea once ran tours to North Korea's Mount Kumgang area, but suspended them in 2008, when a South Korean tourist was shot dead by a North Korean soldier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
UN urges Australia to halt deportation of man to Nauru while complaint investigated
The United Nations has urged Australia to halt plans to deport a man to Nauru while it investigates the human rights implications of his case. Australia is seeking to deport three people released under the NZYQ decision to the tiny Pacific nation in exchange for an undisclosed payment but their removal has been stalled since February due to court challenges. The men, one of whom has a prior murder conviction, were among a group of hundreds released into the community following the High Court's dramatic 2023 ruling that their indefinite detention was unlawful. The United Nations' Human Rights Committee wrote to the Australian government last week requesting the deportation of one of the trio be halted while they consider his complaint to the body, which was submitted days earlier. It cannot compel the government to follow its direction, which it issued as an interim measure while the matter is under investigation. "The principle is simple; if your visa is cancelled, you have to leave Australia," Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said in a statement. "That's a pretty consistent principle, applied in every functioning immigration system around the world." But the Human Rights Law Centre, which is representing the man, argues the government has an international legal responsibility not to deport people to places where they might be killed or suffer inhumane treatment. Their complaint to the United Nations on behalf of their client argued that sending him to Nauru breached this obligation because he would not be able to access adequate medical treatment, would be separated from his family, could face violence or discrimination and there is no guarantee the Nauruan government would not deport him back to Iraq, where he faces the risk of persecution. "This insidious plan affects more than just three people. It shows the Albanese government believes that some people in this country deserve fewer rights than others, and deserve repeated, lifelong punishment," associate legal director Josephine Langbien said. "These deportations would set a dangerous new baseline for how all migrants and refugees can be treated. We must demand better from our political leaders." In February, the government announced it had struck a deal with Nauru, which offered to grant visas to members of the NZYQ cohort in exchange for payment. The group — many of whom were convicted of violent offences but have served their sentences — were previously being kept indefinitely in Australian immigration detention because they had failed character tests but also had no reasonable prospects of deportation. That was until the high court's landmark decision in the case of one man, identified only as "NZYQ", triggered the cohort's release into the community. The judgement sent the government scrambling to find an alternative solution, which included attempts to monitor the cohort using ankle bracelets and curfews. But that too had to be reworked when the High Court ruled the cohort could not be treated punitively. Announcing the deal with Nauru, Mr Burke said he expected that more than the three men would eventually be deported after the initial legal challenges were cleared. It is the first test of the new laws that the government passed last year to strengthen its powers to send people without a visa to a third country for resettlement. In the interim, the government has promised the High Court that the man would not be removed from Australia until his case was resolved. Court documents show he was convicted of a crime and sentenced to a total of five years' jail before being released on parole and taken into immigration detention. His lawyers argue the ruling about his visa was not made lawfully. It is unclear when the High Court will make a judgement in the case. "The Albanese government claims to respect international law and urges other countries to do the same," Ms Langbien said. "It must demonstrate that respect by following this direction from the UN Human Rights Committee and halting these deportations."
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
UN starts new bid to forge plastics treaty amid 'global crisis'
Nations must resolve the global plastics crisis, the head of UN talks told negotiators from 180 countries gathered in Geneva on Tuesday to forge a landmark treaty on eliminating the life-threatening waste. "We are facing a global crisis," Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso said at the start of 10 days of negotiations. "Plastic pollution is damaging ecosystems, polluting our oceans and rivers, threatening biodiversity, harming human health, and unfairly impacting the most vulnerable," he said. "The urgency is real, the evidence is clear, and the responsibility is on us." Three years of negotiations hit the wall in Busan, South Korea in December when oil-producing states blocked a consensus. Key figures steering the negotiations at this new attempt said they were not expecting an easy ride this time, but insisted a deal remained within reach. "There's been extensive diplomacy from Busan till now," UN Environment Programme executive director Inger Andersen told AFP. UNEP is hosting the talks, and Andersen said conversations between different regions and interest groups had generated momentum. "Most countries, actually, that I have spoken with have said: 'We're coming to Geneva to strike the deal'. "Will it be easy? No. Will it be straightforward? No. Is there a pathway for a deal? Absolutely." - Human bodies riddled - Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. In 2022, countries agreed they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024. However, the supposedly final negotiations on a legally-binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the seas, flopped in Busan. One group of countries sought an ambitious deal to limit production and phase out harmful chemicals. But a clutch of mostly oil-producing nations rejected production limits and wanted to focus on treating waste. Valdivieso insisted that an effective, fair and ambitious agreement was within reach. "Our paths and positions might differ; our destination is the same," he said Monday. "We are all here because we believe in a shared cause: a world free of plastic pollution." - 'Plastic-free future' - More than 600 non-governmental organisations are in Geneva. NGOs and civil society have access to the discussions tackling the thorniest points, such as banning certain chemicals and capping production. "To solve the plastic pollution crisis, we have to stop making so much plastic," Greenpeace delegation chief Graham Forbes told AFP. The group and its allies want a treaty "that cuts plastic production, eliminates toxic chemicals, and provides the financing that's going to be required to transition to a fossil fuel, plastic-free future", he said. "The fossil fuel industry is here in force," he noted, adding: "We cannot let a few countries determine humanity's future when it comes to plastic pollution." - Dumped, burned and trashed - More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items. While 15 percent of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only nine percent is actually recycled. Nearly half, 46 percent, ends up in landfills, while 17 percent is incinerated and 22 percent is mismanaged and becomes litter. A report in The Lancet medical journal warned Monday that plastic pollution was a "grave, growing and under-recognised danger" to health, costing the world at least $1.5 trillion a year in health-related economic losses. The new review of existing evidence, conducted by leading health researchers and doctors, compared plastic to air pollution and lead, saying its impact on health could be mitigated by laws and policies. To hammer home the message, a replica outside the UN of Auguste Rodin's famous sculpture "The Thinker" will be slowly submerged in mounting plastic rubbish during the talks. The artwork, entitled "The Thinker's Burden", is being constructed by the Canadian artist and activist Benjamin Von Wong. "If you want to protect health, then we need to think about the toxic chemicals that are entering our environment," he told AFP. But Matthew Kastner, spokesman for the American Chemistry Council, said the plastics industry and its products were "vital to public health", notably through medical devices, surgical masks, child safety seats, helmets and pipes delivering clean water.
The Age
10 hours ago
- The Age
Why people like me are taking to the streets
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. PROTESTS There have been questions raised about why people take part in peaceful mass demonstrations (Letters, 5/8). I believe I can give the prime reason. We live large distances away from many of the world's humanitarian problems, but we feel an emotional connection to the people who are suffering in those places. We can't personally express our feelings to them and their rulers, or undertake any meaningful action to help the victims, but we can join together and share our feelings with other concerned, like-minded people here. It is beneficial to us to know that we are not alone in our feelings, whether of anger or grief or anything else, and in so doing feel a sense of solidarity with the far-away victims. Many people will not or cannot write letters to, or phone, our politicians asking them to take action on our behalf, but large gatherings of people are a visible sign to them of how widespread our feelings are. I remember how uplifting an anti-Vietnam march was in helping me feel that there were many others who wanted the pointless killing and destruction to stop. It was a comfort to me. That's reason enough to encourage demonstrations rather than try and forbid them or meet them with police force. That's not what our police should be doing. Don Jordan, Mt Waverley Who will rescue the children? Who is to judge the so-called 'self-righteous anger of Melbourne keffiyeh-wearing performative protesters' (Letters, 4/8)? I was there at Sunday's protest, as I have been before. My feeling was not self-righteous anger, nor righteous anger. It was not anger at all, but sorrow. For the first time I wore a keffiyeh. It was not performance. It was an expression of sympathy with suffering Palestinians. As a Quaker and a pacifist, I would much prefer the protest was in silence for that would reflect the profound sorrow I feel for the lives being lost in Gaza due to starvation, and people being slaughtered as they desperately seek food. In 1939 British Quakers were instrumental in rescuing 10,000 German and Austrian Jewish children in the 'kindertransport' trains that took them to the UK. Who will rescue the Palestinian children now? Dorothy Scott, Macclesfield Symbol of a nation insulted After the burning of the Australian flag at a pro-Palestinian rally it is about time that protests that are disrespectful and disruptive to our citizens be required to meet standards – or else be stopped. Media condemnation is not adequate as a control and deterrent, it probably fuels their actions. This has nothing to do with the freedom to protest – this is about the fabric of and wellbeing of our society. There are laws that restrict what we can say and can do in a social context, added to these are a wide range of subjects that have established standards/norms of acceptable behaviour in Australia. For example, defamation is illegal and we are developing a stronger attitude and community response to domestic violence. Burning our national flag is an abhorrent action. Will they now burn the flag of our Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders? How do our war veterans and servicemen and women feel when the flag they fought for and stand for is desecrated? Ross Kroger, Barwon Heads Act of shame Unsurprisingly, the cowards burning the Australian flag on the King St Bridge wore masks to hide their identities. They should go live in maybe Iran, Iraq or Syria and see if they feel more comfortable with those countries' flags. Geoff Lipton, Caulfield North Widen support for action Noting the worldwide impetus to urgently end the Gaza war and to establish a Palestinian state, could the pro-Palestine demonstrators consider tweaking the chant from 'Free free Palestine' to maybe 'Two state solution now.' This may assist in increasing more widespread support. And help disarm opposition that now is not the time to recognise a Palestinian state. Carlo Ursida, Kensington THE FORUM Shift the spending Australia is currently looking at investing more than $368 billion into AUKUS to join forces with the US and UK against a prospective battle with China that we do not seek. At the same time we are facing an existential climate crisis, and yet the US has defunded much of its climate forecasting infrastructure (' Trump cuts cast a cloud over Australian forecasting ', 5/8). Surely now is the time for Australia to withdraw from AUKUS, and use the funds saved to provide ourselves (and the world) with detailed, reliable weather information that will identify and track our growing climate risks, and enable us to foresee and protect against the floods, cyclones and droughts which will inevitably intensify over coming years? Chris Young, Surrey Hills
