MAGA-inspired outrage machine has a new target in this election
'Never make predictions, especially about the future,' New York Yankees manager Casey Stengel famously said. In the sport of politics we are in peak prediction mode this week – and Saturday night will reveal what surprises are in store.
I've been part of many elections where the polls have got it spectacularly wrong – most shockingly in Labor's 2019 loss and most painfully in Donald Trump's 2016 win.
Both were a result of the fact that while we obsess about the number of people who report a certain opinion at a given moment in time, we pay much less attention to the strength of that opinion. Large and unpredicted swings between polls and actual results are usually a reflection of the 'softness' of the opinions held by those being polled – the likeliness they will change their mind. Too often we report public opinion as if it is chiselled in stone.
We experienced this collectively as a nation in 2023. The prime minister, encouraged by polls that showed up to 75 per cent support for an Indigenous Voice to parliament, ploughed ahead with a referendum to enshrine it even after Peter Dutton's denial of bipartisanship.
As we found out, in the face of a barrage of unprecedented disinformation and a sophisticated MAGA-inspired outrage machine, that support turned out to be very soft. Over the course of the campaign it evaporated – on polling day the Yes vote garnered less than 40 per cent.
Similarly, we have in recent years taken the same levels of support for renewable energy as if they are chiselled in stone. More than 70 per cent of Australians support the transition to renewables, and more ambitious climate targets. Most pundits take broad social licence for a transition to clean energy – a fancy way of saying the community is on board – as a fait accompli.
Loading
But renewable energy is right now facing a barrage of unprecedented disinformation and a sophisticated MAGA-inspired outrage machine, akin to what we saw during the Voice. Its very purpose is to undermine the social licence under which renewable energy projects operate. Having lost the argument on the existence of climate change, as the world proceeded to burn before our eyes, opponents quickly pivoted instead to undermining support for renewables.
While the Voice had to withstand a torrent of misinformation-based attacks on social media, from 'say NO to save Australia Day' to 'farmers will need a permit to put up a fence', renewables face the same.
Social media is ripe with anti-renewables outrage. Hysteria over offshore wind farms killing whales (they don't). Hysteria over solar fields ruining pristine farmland (they don't). Hysteria over vehicle fuel-emissions standards banning utes (they don't) or ruining the weekend (they don't).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump has interrupted Anthony Albanese's election honeymoon, just as the pair were due to meet
He is arguably at his zenith, having not only defied history but making it on May 3 when, as leader of the Labor Party, Anthony Albanese defeated his opponents in a landslide. But less than six weeks into his second term as prime minister, the honeymoon has been interrupted, and Albanese is confronted with his first real test: Donald Trump. If all goes to plan (and with Trump, this is hard to predict) Albanese will hold his first face-to-face meeting with the US president on the sidelines of next week's Group of Seven summit in Canada. Nestled in Alberta's Rockies, Kananaskis' population of 130 is about to swell more than 10 times that size as world leaders descend on the verdant valley. It is here that Albanese will be warmly embraced by new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, a progressive ally, and hold his first formal meetings with the new leaders of Japan and South Korea. The Australian side is hoping Albanese will also get — at the very least — a "grip and grin" with Trump but on Thursday, an already challenged relationship showed further signs of strain. Albanese could find himself walking into an old-fashioned shake-down with a president determined to extract more from his closest friends and allies. The missive landed as most Australians were still asleep: "Pentagon launches review of AUKUS nuclear submarine deal," read the headline in the UK Financial Times. Signal chats from Canberra to Washington started lighting up as everyone from defence officials down tried to understand what it might mean for the $368 billion deal, aimed at countering China's rise in the region. They only needed to log in to Twitter. Pentagon official Eldridge Colby — who will lead the review — fired across the bow, posting a quote from US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: "Hegseth on Tuesday reiterated Trump's call for allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence burden-sharing". Posted, as they say, without comment but it came only minutes before the story broke in the Financial Times. According to the Pentagon, the aim of the review is to ensure AUKUS "is aligned with the president's America First agenda" which requires "allies step up fully to do their part for collective defense". Colby is an AUKUS-sceptic and doesn't believe Australia is spending enough to defend itself in this deteriorating strategic environment. Before he was even appointed to the role, he told Congress the main concern the US should raise with Australia was its spending on defence, which is currently on track to reach 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2033. "Australia is currently well below the 3 per cent level advocated for by NATO Secretary General [Mark] Rutte, and Canberra faces a far more powerful challenge in China," he said earlier this year. NATO, for what it's worth, is now advocating a target of five per cent of GDP (a "quantum leap in our collective defence") to keep aggressors like Russia at bay. On the issue of defence spending, Colby has a powerful ally in Hegseth — the US Defense Secretary — who held face-to-face talks with Defence Minister Richard Marles a fortnight ago. At the Shangri-La dialogue in Singapore, Hegseth "conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible" according to a Pentagon read-out. Albanese has firmly pushed back on the US demands, bristling at the suggestion that Australia set an "arbitrary" spending target: "Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence," the prime minister said. If the government knew about the impending review "for weeks", as Marles asserted, it could well have been that Hegseth also used that meeting to inform him of the Trump administration's move. Although, you wouldn't have guessed it from his comments. Asked by a journalist about the state of the pact immediately following those talks, Marles said: "we walk forward with a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding." No hint of a review to be announced only a fortnight later — to the surprise of many. Publicly, the government is trying to appear unfazed, saying it is natural that the new administration would want to examine the agreement, and pointing out the UK had recently completed its own. It is adamant Australia's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers on Wednesday is not in any way connected. Privately, they speculate the review might be a Colby-led frolic but what they don't know is whether he is proceeding with the blessing of Trump (who has never spoken publicly about AUKUS) or if the future of the AUKUS deal is genuinely in peril without a sharp increase in spending. Under the three-nation, 30-year pact, Australia will acquire eight conventionally armed nuclear-powered submarines, and the first three will come directly from the United States before the allies create the new SSN AUKUS fleet. Australia has already made a down-payment — handing over more than $1 billion to the Americans — but there are real concerns about the ability of US shipyards to build enough subs to replace the ones it is selling. Working in Australia's favour is the fact that Hegseth himself is a big backer of AUKUS, the deal has strong bipartisan support in Congress, and between Washington, London and Canberra it enjoys "deep institutional buy-in", according to sources. But the deal has now been caught in a complex web of forces in the United States — both political and industrial — and at this early stage, it is not yet clear who will prevail. These are the questions Albanese will be seeking to answer if he scores a meeting with Trump because, when it comes to replacing our ageing fleet of submarines, Australia has no Plan B. During the election campaign, the prime minister successfully used anti-Trump rhetoric to his advantage, something he and Carney have in common. Having now been returned to power, he will need to build a connection with Trump as the list of disagreements, from defence spending and tariffs to Israel, grows longer. When Trump lands in Canada — a country he openly covets — he will likely cut a lonely figure on the world stage. His last appearance at a G7 summit in Canada ended in a blow-up over — you guessed it — tariffs, and produced the iconic image of Trump looking like a diminished figure in the shadow of then-German chancellor Angela Merkel. This time around, just months into his second term as president, Trump has managed to make himself even more isolated. As the New York Times has observed, next week's summit will be the first time since Trump was re-elected that he will be confronting such a large array of allies on the receiving end of hostile actions by his administration. And none are happy about it. Carney, who is presiding over the talks, is using Trump's retreat to his advantage, reportedly planning bilateral and smaller meetings on the sidelines — without the US president. "Canada is ready to lead," the Canadian prime minister said, adding: "The G7 must meet this moment with purpose and with force." As well as Albanese, Carney has invited the NATO secretary and UN secretary general to the talks, on top of multiple observers, including the leaders of Ukraine, India, the UAE, South Korea and South Africa. It is a show of unity among largely like-minded nations who, by-and-large, disagree with the notion that it is only biggest who should set the global rules. Trump is reshaping the world order but perhaps not in the way he had imagined.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
US dollar hits multi-year low as analysts warn of dangers of Trump policies
The US dollar is on the slide with seemingly no end in sight to the sell-off. Investors are shying away from the world's reserve currency as traders grow increasingly uncertain about United States' economic policy. From a geo-political perspective, two days of high-level talks in London between China and the US have yielded little fruit. The talks were to resolve conflicts that had emerged since a 90-day pause was placed on US-imposed trade tariffs. The two countries first met in Geneva, and the talks this week in London helped to wrap up those discussions. US President Donald Trump took to his social media platform Truth Social and said: "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval from President Xi and me." But officials from both sides said the London agreement would not alter the broad outlines of the May truce, which lowered — but did not eliminate — new tariffs announced by the two countries since Trump launched a new trade war earlier this year. Financial markets are becoming somewhat numb to the ongoing trade war dramas, with the exception of currency markets. The drawn-out trade discussions, and the lack of any binding trade deal with the US's major trading partners, have led to an exodus out of the US dollar "The US dollar is under renewed pressure, probing multi-year lows," InTouch senior FX analyst Sean Callow told the ABC. "[The US dollar] started 2025 with strong momentum as investors priced in a 'Trump trade' of dollar gains, backed by loose fiscal policy supporting growth and making the Fed reluctant to cut rates. "Things started to unravel in March as Trump's tariff campaign proved more aggressive than expected and administration officials said they were willing to tolerate a weaker economy in the short term. "Recession fears surged on the April 2 tariff announcement, hurting the dollar's yield support." This dynamic also led to an enormous US Treasury bond sell-off as global investors began to question the durability of the United States' fiscal position. This pushed investors, Mr Callow said, into the euro. "Moreover, the sell-off in long-term Treasuries raised fears of a 'Sell America' trade, largely benefiting the euro," he said. "USD weakness has helped the Aussie [dollar] push above 65 cents, reaching highs since November." The US Dollar Index (DXY) tracks the value of the US dollar against a basket of countries. It hit its lowest level since January 2022 on Thursday at 97.8 at 9pm AEST. While the US dollar's slide is supporting the Australian dollar, it's not created as much of an updraft for the local currency as expected. "It is clear that the Aussie [dollar] is not investors' preferred alternative to the US dollar," Mr Callow said. Further US dollar weakness and Australian dollar strength may depend on how currency traders view the credibility of the Trump administration's policies. University of Michigan professor Justin Wolfers says Donald Trump's recent intervention in the Los Angeles riots is another sign for the financial markets that his policies are unpredictable and unorthodox. "That this is a White House, not given to respecting the usual guardrails of civil society, [which] was clear on January 6th," he said. Professor Wolfers told the ABC there was a sense in the US that Trump was leading the US down a dangerous policy path. "The sense of things fraying is, I think, very dangerous," he said. "There's a deep fear among a lot of people over here. "How far does [Trump's interventions in state affairs] go? "You can't rule out anything. "There are hushed conversations in the hallways everywhere with people saying how far does this go? "Or maybe he does what emerging autocrats always do, which is just skate close enough, where you're not quite sure where the law is meant to be." The direction of US interest rates, as determined by the US Federal Reserve, will also hold sway in terms of the direction of both the US and Australian dollars. As for the tariff war, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he expected the US would extend the existing 90-day pause on some of its most aggressive tariffs to allow trade talks with other countries to continue. The Australian dollar continues to trade around 65 US cents, up 4.5 per cent since the start of the year.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Trump warns of 'chance of massive conflict' as Iran-Israel tensions rise
US President Donald Trump says the Middle East is facing the "chance of massive conflict" after Iran revealed it had received a warning that Israel was planning to attack it. Regional tensions are rising after a new UN watchdog finding that Iran was not complying with commitments designed to prevent it from building a nuclear weapon. Iran responded angrily and announced it would activate a new nuclear enrichment facility, which would be the country's third. "The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution," the Iranian Foreign Ministry and Atomic Energy Organization said in a joint statement. Separately, an Iranian official said a "friendly country" had warned Tehran that Israel was planning to strike its nuclear facilities. The US on Wednesday, local time, said it was ordering some American personnel to move out of Iraq. There are fears US facilities could be the target of Iranian retaliation to any attack. On Thursday, Mr Trump said: "Look, there's a chance of massive conflict. "We have a lot of American people in this area. And I said, we gotta tell them to get out because something could happen. Soon. "And I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible." Asked how imminent an Israeli strike on Iran was, he said: "I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like something that could very well happen." The US has been attempting to negotiate a nuclear agreement with Iran, something which Mr Trump says is "fairly close". "As long as there is an agreement, I don't want them [Israel] going in [to Iran] because I think it would blow it," Mr Trump said. "Might help it, actually, but it also could blow it." In 2018, the first Trump administration pulled the US out of an existing deal with Iran, and Iran has rapidly advanced its uranium enrichment program in the years since. But the UN watchdog's declaration that Iran is not complying with its non-proliferation obligations is the first finding of its kind in almost 20 years. The watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), warned that Iran had amassed more near-weapons-grade uranium and was now "the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material". It could mean Iran is referred to the UN Security Council and penalised with further sanctions. Mr Trump has previously warned that either Israel or the US could strike Iran's nuclear facilities if Iran does not agree to a nuclear deal. A sixth round of talks between Iran and the US is scheduled to start on Sunday in Oman.
