
PwC tracks UK office attendance with ‘traffic light' dashboard
Bosses use a dashboard to record attendance and check whether workers are adhering to the company policy that requires them to spend three days a week, or 60% of their time, with clients or in the office.
The panel shows staff as 'amber' if they fall below the 60% threshold, while workers show as 'red' if they drop below 40%.
The dashboard was first available for use by supervisors in April, while the office attendance data can reportedly be viewed by business unit leaders, as well as PwC's chief financial, administrative and people officers. Employees are also able to access their own data.
Employees' wifi connections from their laptop are traced by the system to check whether they are working from client sites on the days expected, according to the Financial Times, which first reported details of the system. This is then cross-referenced with information from staff time sheets and the company's HR platform.
The increased scrutiny of office attendance is causing unease among PwC's 23,000-strong UK workforce, and one senior staff member told the FT they had 'lost count' of the number of colleagues who had shared concerns about the monitoring. Another person reportedly said workers were seeking more transparency from their employer about the tracking.
Employees who breached the accountancy and consultancy firm's office attendance policy could face formal sanctions that could affect their bonus and performance rating, according to the report, which said those unable to meet the attendance rules because of sickness or for family reasons can request allowances.
PwC told UK employees last September that it was going to start tracking their working locations from January, to ensure that all workers spend 'a minimum of three days a week' in the office or at client sites amid a clampdown on remote working.
The company told staff in a memo it would track their locations in the same way it monitors how many chargeable hours they work, as the company looked to place 'more emphasis on in-person working'.
The rival firm EY began monitoring office attendance at the start of last year using staff turnstile data in an effort to crack down on breaches of its hybrid working policy.
PwC UK's chief people officer, Phillippa O'Connor, told the House of Lords home-based working committee in April that the company's monitoring was 'not clocking people in and out'.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
She added: 'This is not an old-school manufacturing world; it is about empowered flexibility – they have attended an office in our world. Where we do not have that data, we look at shared IP.'
PwC said there were 'clear benefits to in-person work for both our people and clients' and the approach was 'consistent with other businesses' and 'recognised and accepted by the vast majority of our people'.
A spokesperson said: 'We always listen to feedback and are committed to regular, clear and transparent communications about expectations … The dashboard ensures our people have easy access to their attendance data, so they can manage and plan their time in a way that works for them, our teams and our clients.'
PwC said the firm remains 'committed to flexibility' and allows employees to condense their usual working hours and finish early on Friday lunchtime for six weeks over the summer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Oral-B's Genius X toothbrush has never been cheaper, but how good is its AI?
Oral-B's Genius X was its first AI-powered electric toothbrush, and things have changed a lot in the years since. If you want so-called AI toothbrushing, you can now go for Oral-B's extensive iO range. However, this is quite a bit more expensive. Since it launched in 2019, the Genius X has plummeted in price from around £400 to just £64.99 (if you nab it with a discount). The Genius X claims to use AI to track where your brush moves in real time. It's designed to help you improve your brushing technique and coverage. Replacing the Genius 9000, the Genius X was developed as a way of coaching users. This is done via a connected app – real-time feedback is offered on the areas of the mouth which we might be neglecting. When I put this technology to the test, it didn't disappoint. In fact, it identified the exact same area of neglect that a dentist had pointed out to me weeks earlier. But what about its cleaning power? And how comfortable was my brushing experience? From the cleaning modes to how good the battery life is, keep reading for my in-depth review. How I tested Swapping my usual toothbrush with the Genius X, I assessed it on the following criteria: Ergonomics: I used the brush for my everyday cleans, when I assessed comfort in the hand, ease of use, and how intuitive it was to operate. User-experience: I paid close attention to the app, monitoring if it lagged, if it could accurately map my brushing, and ultimately, if it helped me brush my teeth. Cleaning power: I considered the efficiency of the motor and looked at the brush head. A good clean is powerful, but gentle, so I assessed how effectively and comfortably the brush cleaned hard-to-reach areas. Modes: I tested all the cleaning modes to examine if they were effective. Battery life: I charged the battery up to full and made a note of how long it took to run out, and I made sure to assess this when using more battery-draining modes, too. Why you can trust us John Axworthy has been a consumer writer for nearly three decades, and he has been writing for IndyBest since 2017. As someone who takes his dental routine seriously, electric toothbrushes are one of John's niches. He's reviewed top-of-the-range models from Philips, Oral-B and Spotlight, and, like all our reviews, his verdicts are always based on rigorous real-world testing.


Auto Express
5 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Sad news! There won't be a new Lamborghini Miura
A new-age take on the iconic Lamborghini Miura will not be built, the brand's head of design has told Auto Express. Instead, the company is looking to the future to inspire its new supercars. We asked Lamborghini's Chief of Design, Mitja Borkert, whether a new Miura was on the cards and he told us : 'The demand will be there, but we will not do it. Lamborghini is a brand where the mirrors are small, but the windshield is big. We are not looking backwards, we are looking into the future. And I think it has to be like this.' While you won't be able to buy a new Miura, our Buy a Car service has plenty of used Lamborghinis for sale. You can own a used Lamborghini Urus for around £140,000 or used Lamborghini Huracan Spyder for around £190,000. Advertisement - Article continues below In response to the sad Miura news, we mentioned the brand's Miura concept from 2006, suggesting this isn't a new idea, plus the more recent reboot of the Countach. Mitja replied: 'The Countach… It was a futuristic interpretation. I personally found it interesting to do the translation into the year '21 or '22. The last Countach was in 1990, and I wanted to imagine the new Countach as a continuation.' However, that doesn't mean that the design legacy of Lamborghini's past models will be lost. On the contrary, it will still have an important role to play in elements on the firm's new models. Borkert continued: 'I have seen a Miura next to [the new Fenomeno], and there is some influence, like the two air outlets in the front. We also have this S duct air outlet, characterised by the Y shape.' This seemingly accidental connection refers to the two air vents mounted in the new Fenomeno's bonnet. This is a feature that can also be seen on the Miura, along with others including the curved rear haunches and rear ducktail spoiler. So although it seems unlikely that the Miura will be directly reimagined, the new Fenomeno does integrate design elements that many could associate with the iconic Marcello Gandini-designed original. However, they will be executed in a more subtle and less controversial manner than the reborn Countach in 2021. Now you can buy a car through our network of top dealers around the UK. Search for the latest deals…


The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut after blow from Starmer's trade deal with Trump
The UK's largest bioethanol plant is to close after being dealt a body blow by Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump. The owner of the Vivergo plant in Hull, owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is to close with the loss of 160 jobs, just hours after the government said it would not fund an industry rescue package. The first redundancies will be made on Tuesday. The government's decision creates uncertainty over a further 4,000 jobs in the industry's supply chain including farmers and hauliers. Bioethanol is a petrol substitute produced from agricultural products. Vivergo opened a redundancy programme in June. At that point the government appointed talks with the company, more than a month after ABF warned that the US trade deal was an 'existential threat' allowing US producers, for the first time, to compete litre-by-litre under a new duty free agreement for American ethanol. ABF and Ensus, the owner of the other major bioethanol plant in the UK, said the US deal would have a huge knock on effect in farming for wheat farmers who supplied their plants, as well as the UK's lead in clean fuels. A spokesperson for ABF said on Friday: 'It is deeply regrettable that the government has chosen not to support a key national asset. We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. We initiated and led talks with government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the government's own green industrial strategy.' ABF had warned the US trade deal, hailed as a triumph for Starmer, was a killer blow because it scrapped tariffs on a quota of 1.4bn litres of imports from the US, the exact size of the UK production, as part of the agreement with Trump in May. The US trade deal was a victory for the car industry which had tariffs slashed from 27.5% to 10%. The steel industry is still facing 25% tariffs but the UK government is hoping these will be scrapped through ongoing negotiation. Government sources said they had to prioritise the 320,000 jobs in auto, steel and aerospace and added that the ethanol plants had faced financial problems before the US deal. Sources in the National Farmers' Union believe that Trump's negotiators had said that in exchange for slashing tariffs on cars and steel it wanted US farmers to have access to either the British pork or ethanol industries. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion A spokesperson for the department for business and trade said it had taken 'the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces'. ABF said the decision was 'deeply regrettable' accusing the government of having 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber' and the opportunity to 'lead the world' on clean fuels. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'This is a shortsighted decision that totally disregards the benefits the domestic bioethanol sector will bring to jobs and energy security.'