logo
Nayi Brahmin Community Protests High Court Ruling, Demands Protection of Traditional Livelihood and Identity

Nayi Brahmin Community Protests High Court Ruling, Demands Protection of Traditional Livelihood and Identity

Hans India7 days ago
Gadwal: In a passionate press meet held by the Nayi Brahmin Seva Sangham in Ayija town, representatives of the traditional barber community (Nayi Brahmins) expressed deep concern and emotional anguish over a recent High Court judgment that stated that any individual from any caste is allowed to take up the traditional occupation of barbering.
Key Concerns and Objections Raised by the Nayi Brahmin Community:
1. Historical and Generational Livelihood: The leaders emphasized that barbering has been the sole livelihood of Nayi Brahmins for generations, and their ancestors dedicated their lives to the service without diversifying into other professions. They questioned the intent behind the court's verdict, asking:
'How do we justify the sacrifices made by our forefathers who never abandoned this profession?'
2. Cultural and Ritual Importance: The community highlighted their indispensable role in both auspicious and inauspicious Hindu rituals—from birth ceremonies to funeral rites. They posed the question:
> 'Can any ritual from birth to death take place without the presence of a Nayi Brahmin?'
3. Religious Significance in Temples: Citing traditions, they pointed out that Nayi Brahmins are the first to awaken the deity in temples with Mangala Vaidyams (auspicious instruments like Nadaswaram and Melam). They questioned whether such sacred traditions could be altered.
4. Pioneers of Surgical Practices: The leaders took pride in their ancestral mastery of shaving with surgical blades, calling themselves 'descendants of Dhanvantari' (the deity of medicine), and questioned whether other communities could truly understand or replicate their skill with such reverence.
5. Economic and Cultural Threat: The community alleged a coordinated attempt to displace them by enabling people from other castes and even religions to open "modern salons" and importing workers from other states, which threatens the livelihood of local, impoverished Nayi Brahmin families.
6. Lack of Alternatives and Economic Backwardness: Many in the community, they said, lack access to quality education and healthcare due to insufficient income, and despite willingness, cannot switch professions. They described a grim reality of being stuck in a dying livelihood.
7. Neglect in Governance and Politics: They pointed out the lack of political representation and unfulfilled promises from previous governments—no permanent temple jobs, no minimum wages, no financial support—leaving the community both economically and politically powerless.
8. Warning to Authorities: In a stern message, the leaders warned that if others encroach upon their traditional occupation, the Nayi Brahmin community nationwide would unite to organize mass protests and demonstrations. They cautioned the authorities not to test their patience, hinting at a rise in community assertion and rights mobilization.
> 'So far, you've seen our patience. In the coming days, you'll witness our courage and unity,' said Seva Sangham President Shekhar Pandey, joined by District Publicity Secretary Somashekar.
The press meet reveals a deep sense of betrayal and cultural erosion felt by the Nayi Brahmin community. Their emotional appeals underscore a larger question that India is grappling with — how to balance tradition and social mobility.
While the High Court's ruling aims at breaking caste-based occupational boundaries and promoting equality, communities like the Nayi Brahmins feel excluded from development and abandoned economically after dedicating generations to a single caste-based profession.
This issue highlights:
The tensions between social justice and heritage preservation.
The urgent need for economic rehabilitation, skill development, and representation for backward communities if traditional occupations are opened up.
A rising sense of identity politics among small, often-overlooked caste groups.
Unless addressed with sensitivity and inclusive policymaking, such verdicts, even if constitutionally sound, may deepen social unrest.
The Nayi Brahmin Seva Sangham's message is loud and clear: they seek respect for their legacy, protection of their livelihood, and a dignified place in modern India. They are not just protesting a legal ruling—they are demanding recognition, rehabilitation, and representation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Savarkar case: UP govt accuses Rahul Gandhi of deliberately spreading hatred
Savarkar case: UP govt accuses Rahul Gandhi of deliberately spreading hatred

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Savarkar case: UP govt accuses Rahul Gandhi of deliberately spreading hatred

The Uttar Pradesh government has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court accusing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of deliberately spreading hatred by commenting against Hindutva Ideologue, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, during his 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. The Supreme Court was due to take up the matter on Friday. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) The affidavit dated July 23, filed in response to a notice on Gandhi's plea to quash a Lucknow court summons over the comments, argued against any relief ahead of the hearing in the matter on Friday. It pleaded for the dismissal of Gandhi's plea. The affidavit said that allegations of promoting enmity and public mischief under the Indian Penal Code's sections 153A and 505 are applicable against Gandhi. It cited the investigation in the case and added that it indicated deliberate spreading of hatred through pre-planned actions. In April, the court slammed Gandhi for calling Savarkar a 'servant' of the British while staying the proceedings against him. The court noted the statement was made in Maharashtra, where Savarkar is 'worshipped as a God'. 'Let him not make any statements on freedom fighters without knowing any history or geography about it,' the court said. The court reminded Gandhi that his grandmother, Indira Gandhi, wrote a letter praising Savarkar when she was the Prime Minister. It referred to Mahatma Gandhi, who communicated to the British Viceroy, addressing himself as a faithful 'servant'. Rahul Gandhi referred to the pension Savarkar received from the British while calling him a 'servant of the British'. The court said that one does not become a servant just like that. 'One day, you will say that Gandhiji was also a servant of the British,' the court said. 'This is not the way you treat freedom fighters.' Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, who appeared for Rahul Gandhi, assured the court that no further statement shall be made. The court warned that if any further statement is made, it will take it up suo motu (on its own). 'We will not allow anybody to make any statement against freedom fighters.' Gandhi moved the top court against the Allahabad high court's April 4 order rejecting his plea for quashing the complaint against him. Nripendra Pandey, a lawyer, filed the complaint against Gandhi, saying his remarks against Savarkar hurt Hindu sentiments. He argued Gandhi insulted a leader who fought for India's freedom. The trial court, in its summons, observed Gandhi spread hatred and ill-will in society through his speech against Savarkar. The complaint against Gandhi was initially dismissed in June 2023. It was revived on a revision petition. Gandhi argued in the high court that the allegations against him do not amount to the offences he has been accused of.

Thailand-Cambodia Tension: Should Travellers Cancel Their Trip? Dos & Don'ts In The 2 Countries
Thailand-Cambodia Tension: Should Travellers Cancel Their Trip? Dos & Don'ts In The 2 Countries

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Thailand-Cambodia Tension: Should Travellers Cancel Their Trip? Dos & Don'ts In The 2 Countries

Last Updated: Thailand-Cambodia Tension: Clashes broke out between the two countries early on Thursday along a disputed area abutting an ancient temple Thailand-Cambodia Tension: Thailand and Cambodia are engaged in their worst fighting in over a decade, exchanging heavy artillery fire across their disputed border, with at least 16 people killed and tens of thousands displaced. Tensions began rising between the Southeast Asian neighbours in May, following the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief exchange of gunfire, and have steadily escalated since, triggering diplomatic spats and now, armed clashes. Thailand and Cambodia have for more than a century contested sovereignty at various undemarcated points along their 817 km (508 miles) land border, which was first mapped by France in 1907 when Cambodia was its colony. The map, which Thailand later contested, was based on an agreement that the border would be demarcated along the natural watershed line between the two countries. An 11th century Hindu temple called Preah Vihear, or Khao Phra Viharn in Thailand, has been at the heart of the dispute for decades, with both Bangkok and Phnom Penh claiming historical ownership. The International Court of Justice awarded the temple to Cambodia in 1962, but Thailand has continued to lay claim to the surrounding land. Tensions also rose in February when a group of Cambodians escorted by troops sang their national anthem at another ancient Hindu temple that both countries claim, Ta Moan Thom, before being stopped by Thai soldiers. Clashes broke out between the two countries early on Thursday along a disputed area abutting an ancient temple, rapidly spilling over to other areas along the contested frontier and heavy artillery exchanges continuing for a second straight day. Thailand recalled its ambassador to Phnom Penh on Wednesday and expelled Cambodia's envoy, in response to a second Thai soldier losing a limb to a landmine that Bangkok alleged had been laid recently by rival troops. Cambodia called that accusation baseless. Both sides accuse each other of firing the first shots that started the conflict on Thursday, which have so far claimed the lives of at least 15 civilians, most of them on the Thai side. Some 130,000 people have been evacuated from border areas in Thailand to safer locations, while some 12,000 families on the Cambodian side have been shifted away from the frontlines, according to local authorities, according to Reuters. Since Thursday's clashes, Cambodia has written to the United Nations Security Council, urging the body to convene a meeting to stop what it describes as 'unprovoked and premeditated military aggression" by Thailand. Thailand, on the other hand, wants to resolve the conflict through bilateral negotiations but says talks can only take place after Cambodia ceases violence. Thailand, Cambodia popular among tourists Thailand and Cambodia have emerged as tourist hotspots. A large number of people visit the two countries every year. Tourists are drawn to Thai cities like Bangkok and Chiang Mai, as well as islands such as Phuket and Koh Samui. Cambodia's Angkor Wat temple complex and its capital, Phnom Penh, are major tourist attractions. These tourist hubs are not located near the border clashes. Is it safe to travel to Thailand and Cambodia right now? The two countries have no issued any travel advisory. Popular destinations like Bangkok, Phuket, Chiang Mai, Siem Reap, and Phnom Penh are far from the disputed zones and continue to operate as usual. Locals have been advised against planning any overland travel between two countries until it stabilizes. Travellers can avoid isolated border regions near Preah Vihear or the Dangrek Mountains. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet in a statement on Facebook said: 'I appeal to all Cambodian citizens to maintain their morality and dignity, and to avoid discrimination or any actions that could affect the Royal Thai Embassy in Cambodia, Thai companies, and Thai citizens living in Cambodia. For Cambodian citizens who are living, working, or studying in Thailand and may be facing pressure from discrimination and wish to return to Cambodia, please come back to our country." Have travel advisories been issued for Thailand and Cambodia? Several countries have warned their nationals against travelling to the border areas between Thailand and Cambodia amid escalating tensions. United States: It has asked its nationals travelling or living near the Thailand border to 'follow direction from Thai security services and consult local government authorities for the latest information." United Kingdom: The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) advisory said: 'Take extra care and stay alert in border areas and follow the instructions of local authorities, especially at tourist destinations such as the Preah Vihear temple, the Ta Kwai temple and the Ta Muen Thom temple. There are also unexploded landmines in the border area. Stay on marked paths, especially around Ta Krabey." Thailand's embassy in Phnom Penh: The advisory said people should leave Cambodia as soon as possible. China: The embassy has urged its citizens in Cambodia to refrain from travelling to areas near the border and 'remain vigilant." Israel: Issued a travel advisory for its nationals, asking them to avoid the border between Thailand and Cambodia. top videos View all Hong Kong: Has issued an amber alert for Thailand and a warning for Cambodia. With Inputs from Reuters About the Author Manjiri Joshi At the news desk for 17 years, the story of her life has revolved around finding pun, facts while reporting, on radio, heading a daily newspaper desk, teaching mass media students to now editing special copies ...Read More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Cambodia thailand view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 25, 2025, 13:06 IST News world Thailand-Cambodia Tension: Should Travellers Cancel Their Trip? Dos & Don'ts In The 2 Countries Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Why A Cluster Of Hindu Temples Is At Heart Of Thailand-Cambodia Conflict
Why A Cluster Of Hindu Temples Is At Heart Of Thailand-Cambodia Conflict

NDTV

time3 hours ago

  • NDTV

Why A Cluster Of Hindu Temples Is At Heart Of Thailand-Cambodia Conflict

New Delhi: The 900-year-old Preah Vihear temple, a Hindu shrine dedicated to Lord Shiva, is perched on a 525 metre cliff in Cambodia's Dangrek mountains. Built under the Khmer Empire, it is a religious site for not just Cambodians, but also their Thai neighbours. Roughly 95 km to the west lies the Ta Muen Thom temple, a 12th-century Shiva shrine. Although largely overshadowed by the popularity of Angkor Wat, this cluster of temples has been at the centre of a conflict between the two nations for more than half a century. Clashes erupted again on Thursday between Thailand and Cambodia along their border, marking the most violent escalation in over a decade. The clashes left 12 dead, dozens wounded, and forced mass evacuations. The latest round of fighting began in the early hours of Thursday near the Ta Muen Thom temple in Thailand's Surin Province. The Thai version of the events claims that the confrontation began when Cambodian troops deployed drones for aerial reconnaissance near Thai military positions. Attempts by Thai soldiers to de-escalate failed, and by 08:20 local time, heavy exchanges of fire had commenced. Thailand claims its forces acted in self-defence after provocations by Cambodian units equipped with RPGs. Cambodia, on the other hand, alleges Thailand violated its sovereignty. Thailand escalated threat levels to "Level 4," triggering a full closure of all border checkpoints along the shared frontier. Around 40,000 Thai civilians from 86 villages have been evacuated. Ancient Temples And Claims The border dispute revolves around the controversy surrounding the demarcation between Cambodia and Thailand, much of which stems from colonial-era borders. In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled in favour of Cambodia and ordered Thailand to withdraw troops and return any artefacts removed after 1954. The ruling rested on a 1907 French-drawn map that placed the temple within the French protectorate of Cambodia. Thailand, then Siam, had accepted this map at the time but later argued it had done so under the mistaken belief that the border followed a natural watershed line. The ICJ disagreed, concluding that Thailand had accepted the map and was bound by it. In 2013, after renewed clashes between troops at the site in 2011, the ICJ clarified its original judgment, granting Cambodia sovereignty not only over the temple but also the surrounding area, and instructed Thailand to remove its forces. Ta Muen Thom The current hostilities have focused on the Ta Muen Thom temple. Situated along the rugged forested border in the Dangrek Mountains, this lesser-known Khmer Hindu complex includes three main temples - Ta Muen Thom, Ta Muen, and Ta Muen Tot. Ta Muen Thom's architecture features a sanctuary faced southward, an anomaly among Khmer temples, which traditionally face east. A naturally formed Shivling remains enshrined in its sanctum. Its location has made it a recurring flashpoint. In February, Cambodian soldiers reportedly sang their national anthem at the temple, provoking a confrontation with Thai troops. A video of the exchange went viral on social media. Politics And Colonial Borders Following the establishment of French protection over Cambodia in 1863, several treaties between France and Siam were signed from 1904 to 1907 to define territorial boundaries. French surveyors created maps based on watershed lines but made exceptions near culturally important sites such as Preah Vihear. Southeast Asian historians have long noted that boundaries, particularly those drawn by Western powers, were alien to regional politics. The French-made maps based on European cartography gave Cambodia a distinct "geo-body," with Preah Vihear located just inside its borders. Thailand has consistently disputed these lines, especially as more modern geographic technologies exposed inconsistencies. In 2008, Cambodia succeeded in having Preah Vihear listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site, a move that again triggered Thai opposition. Thailand's then Foreign Minister Noppadon Pattama, who had supported the bid, was forced to resign following domestic backlash. That same year, clashes broke out near the temple, killing soldiers on both sides.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store