'Squid Game' Season 3 Review: A Short, Bitter Farewell To A Pop Culture Giant
Squid Game' Season 3 is a brief, emotional finale that closes the chapter on one of the biggest pop culture sensations of the decade.
At just six episodes, Season 3 is noticeably shorter than its predecessors—Season 1 ran nine episodes, and Season 2 spanned seven. Creator Hwang Dong-hyuk previously stated that these episodes were supposed to be one season, but were split into a 2nd and 3rd season due to the episode count (source). This is why season 3 really doesn't feel like season 3 – it takes place literally right after season 2. And because there's only 6 episodes, it feels like there was a lot that wasn't fleshed out, or moments that weren't given room to breathe.
Despite its narrative shortcomings, the cast once again delivers outstanding work. Lee Jung-jae returns as Gi-hun, bringing a raw, haunted intensity that makes his tragic arc land even when the writing stumbles. Newer players like Park Sung-hoon and Jo Yu-ri shine in morally gray roles, illustrating how quickly compassion erodes in the face of survival.
Well, you should have ended it at season 1. Just like Netflix's Queen's Gambit, season one of Squid Game was perfect and could have lived as a singular season. It told the story it needed to and it ended wonderfully – adding Gi-hun at the airport at the end was certainly not necessary, but even if that scene remained, you could have left the rest to the viewer's imagination. Season one forced viewers to reconsider the cost of economic disparity and the twisted games the system plays on ordinary people. Season 3 simply felt like the very greed and capitalism that season 1 criticized.
It shouldn't be understand how season three does dilute this brilliant masterpiece. Granted, season 2 was enjoyable and at that point, you needed more to really tie things up. In my season two review, I praised the second season for complimenting the intensity of season 1. It's something I stand by today. However, after looking at season 3 and how it ends, especially with what it promises; I'm left wishing it ended with season 1.
Gi-hun's arc concludes in a moment of grim self-sacrifice, destroying the game from within rather than surviving it one more time. It's a harrowing end that speaks to the show's inherent cynicism—a worldview that insists some systems are too corrupt to fix from the inside.
But Netflix is not quite done. As mentioned earlier, it looks like the show is going for the MCU effect in building up their world – something that it feels like their show is criticizing. It's been teased in the past that we're getting an American version, but I also didn't believe it until Cate Blanchett showed up. Do we really need this? Oh, Hollywood, how you never fail to absolutely squeeze every last drop you can out of a previously perfectly devised story.
This review has felt more negative than originally intended. In the end, Squid Game is a great show. Personally, I love this show, and we cannot deny the cultural significance that season one had. Gi-hun is the standout in season three and it should be applauded that the show really leans into darker themes this season, and in the end, is bold in where they took Gi-hun's story.
And while we don't know if the American version will hit the same way as the South Korean version (guarantee it won't), we'll still look upon the work the writers and actors did in bringing us Squid Game, and I don't think anyone will look at any of these beloved childhood games the same way again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Stranger Things 5's first trailer promises an epic showdown
It's been a long time coming, but we finally have a real look at the end of Stranger Things. Netflix just released the first teaser trailer for the show's fifth season, which will also be its last when it starts streaming later this year. As was alluded to in the finale of season 4, the new trailer — which, despite being called a teaser, clocks in at nearly three minutes long — is focused on the major showdown with Vecna that will presumably end the string of supernatural bad luck in Hawkins, Indiana for good. Here's the official setup for the finale, according to Netflix: The fall of 1987. Hawkins is scarred by the opening of the Rifts, and our heroes are united by a single goal: find and kill Vecna. But he has vanished — his whereabouts and plans unknown. Complicating their mission, the government has placed the town under military quarantine and intensified its hunt for Eleven, forcing her back into hiding. As the anniversary of Will's disappearance approaches, so does a heavy, familiar dread. The final battle is looming — and with it, a darkness more powerful and more deadly than anything they've faced before. To end this nightmare, they'll need everyone — the full party — standing together, one last time. The finale of Stranger Things is a big deal for Netflix, particularly after Squid Game wrapped up earlier in the year and as its other big genre franchise, The Witcher, also has an end date in sight. Because of this, the streamer is stretching out season 5 across three different releases. Volume 1 will start streaming on on November 26th, followed by a second volume on December 25th. Things then culminate in a finale on New Year's Eve. It's similar to the strategy for season 4, which was divided into two halves when it premiered back in 2022. Of course, while this is the end of the main series, Netflix isn't letting go of Stranger Things just yet. There are spinoffs in the works, including an animated series called Tales From '85, and series creators the Duffer brothers are working on other projects for Netflix as well.
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
For Nintendo, freedom means more than an open world
In past Donkey Kong games, like Tropical Freeze or DKC Returns, I would often find myself stuck against a particularly challenging platforming sequence. And there wasn't much I could do. If I wanted to progress, I had to nail those jumps or avoid those spikes to move on. Donkey Kong Bananza, on the other hand, offers a different tactic: smash some shit up. While the game is a 3D platformer, it also introduces destructive gameplay that lets you find new solutions or pathways just by smashing up the world around you. It perfectly suits the character, and also builds on a design trend Nintendo has steadily been pushing on for years now. In some way or another, all of its biggest franchises are opening up and becoming more exciting as a result. The most obvious example of this is Breath of the Wild. Before it, the Legend of Zelda adventures were comparatively linear, pushing players along a preordained path. But Breath of the Wild featured a true open world, letting you explore in any direction you chose. Its sequel, Tears of the Kingdom, took things a step further with underground areas and gameplay built around combining objects to build something new, which players took in all sorts of creative directions. Even Echoes of Wisdom, which was a return to the top-down structure of classic Zelda games, introduced a mechanic that turned everyday objects into useful tools, creating all kinds of opportunities for creative problem solving. A similar ethos was infused into many of the Switch's biggest games. But instead of simply adding an open world, Nintendo opened these games up in a way that makes sense for each franchise. Animal Crossing: New Horizons let players both craft their own items and customize the island landscape around them, making their spaces feel more personal; Super Mario Odyssey may not have been open-world, but it introduced levels that were both bigger and denser than its predecessors, offering more opportunities for exploration and discovery. Now we're seeing the same thing play out with the first few tentpole releases for the Switch 2, starting with Mario Kart World at launch. Instead of simply adding more tracks than Mario Kart 8, which was already massive, World introduced a new structure, putting all of the courses on a single landmass that can also be explored outside of racing. The idea was to create a sense of a cohesive whole, so that there was a progression as you made your way from one end of the continent to the other. There's even a 'free roam' mode where you can simply explore, either solo or online with friends, driving around in search of fun details or extra challenges to complete. These ideas expand on the idea of Mario Kart without getting in the way of what the series is about. Donkey Kong Bananza does something similar. Like Super Mario Odyssey before it, Bananza is not an open-world game (the similarities shouldn't be too surprising given the games were developed by largely the same teams). But it does feature large, dense areas to explore, which are big enough that there's a musical tool that points you in the right direction if you get lost. More importantly, the game changes things up by giving you a new way to interact with the world around you. For me at least, being able to smash things required a new way of thinking, as I often had to remember to explore three-dimensionally, using DK's brute force to open up hidden pathways above and below me. Sometimes this helped me find a way forward, or avoid challenging obstacles. Other times I discovered some kind of secret. Plus, in those moments when I do get frustrated or stuck, it's a great way to let off steam. Sometimes you just gotta break stuff. Both World and Bananza started life on the original Switch, but were able to fully explore their ideas — in one case an open world, in the other a destructible one — by utilizing the added horsepower of the Switch 2. As producer Kenta Motokura said in a recent interview, the shift in platform 'increased the amount of things players could destroy, which amplified the exhilaration of being able to demolish anything and everything.' Which means that we're likely to see this trend continue as Nintendo brings more of its franchises to the new console, including announced titles like Splatoon Raiders and Kirby Air Riders. They may be familiar favorites, but the exciting part is seeing which way Nintendo decides to expand them.
Geek Tyrant
2 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
SUPERMAN's Kiss Censored in India, Fans Slam 'Ridiculous' Move — GeekTyrant
James Gunn's Superman has run into unexpected turbulence in India, not for its explosive action, but for a kiss. India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) ordered cuts to two kissing scenes in the film, including the 33-second mid-air kiss between Superman and Lois Lane, citing them as 'overly sensual,' according to local reports. The edits were made to secure a UA (13+) rating ahead of its July 7 certification. As you might imagine, the decision has ignited backlash from fans and industry voices who see it as yet another example of India's inconsistent censorship practices. Actor Shreya Dhanwanthary ( Scam 1992, The Family Man ) didn't mince words, posting: 'If this is true, this is RIDICULOUS!!! Some ridiculous crap happens every day. Every. Damn. Day. Sure this is the least of our worries but is something done about anything else? There is some crap every day. Every. Damn. Day.' Film critic and digital creator Amol Jamwal echoed the frustration on X: 'You can have lewd double meaning jokes in Housefull 5. Beheadings & gory violence in Jaat But…. Superman kissing Lois Lane is where we draw the line.' Another user summed up the hypocrisy: 'CBFC would allow horrific scenes of violence and sexual assault in a U certified film that kids are freely allowed to watch, but won't allow consensual kissing in a U/A comic book movie that kids should watch under adult supervision.' This isn't an isolated case. Earlier this year, F1 had a middle-finger emoji swapped for a fist, and Thunderbolts* landed in India with muted expletives. These moves have reignited a long-running debate about censorship, morality, and the CBFC's sweeping powers under the Cinematograph Act. While the board's guidelines emphasize freedom of speech and expression, those rights are curtailed by 'reasonable restrictions' on grounds such as 'decency or morality.' The challenge for filmmakers is that these terms remain broad—and subjective. Adding to the frustration is the 2021 dissolution of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal, which once provided an industry-level appeals process. Today, studios have only one option: pursue costly, time-consuming legal battles in India's high courts, a daunting prospect for international releases on strict global timelines. The Superman controversy now joins a growing list of creative clashes with censorship, sparking the question… where do we draw the line between cultural sensitivity and stifling creative freedom? Source: Variety
